Search

Aims The Hunter-8 and the ACT-FAST are stroke scales used in Australia for the pre-hospital identification of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke but have not previously been compared. Moreover, their use in identifying distal arterial occlusions has not previously been assessed. We therefore aimed to describe the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of the Hunter-8 versus the ACT-FAST for the detection of classic LVO. Methods Both scales were performed on consecutive patients presenting with stroke-like symptoms within 24 hours of symptom onset presenting to the emergency department at a tertiary referral hospital between June 2018 and January 2019. The AUC of the Hunter-8 and the ACT-FAST was calculated for the detection of LVO using different definitions [classic LVO (proximal segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA-M1), terminal internal carotid artery (T-ICA), or tandem occlusions) and extended LVO (classic LVO plus proximal MCA-M2 and basilar occlusions)]. Results Of 126 suspected stroke patients, there were 24 classic LVO and 34 extended LVO. For detection of classic LVO, the Hunter-8 had an AUC of 0.79 and the ACT-FAST had an AUC of 0.77. For extended LVO, the AUC was 0.71 and 0.70 respectively. Conclusion Both scales represent a significant opportunity to identify patients with proven potential benefit from thrombectomy (classic LVO), however M2 and basilar occlusions may be more challenging to identify with these scales.

Introduction: The very elderly (⩾80 years) are under-represented in randomised endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) clinical trials for acute ischaemic stroke. Rates of independent outcome in this group are generally lower than the less-old patients but the comparisons may be biased by an imbalance of non-age related baseline characteristics, treatment related metrics and medical risk factors. Patients and methods: We compared outcomes between very elderly (⩾80) and the less-old (Results: We included 600 patients (300 in each age cohort) after propensity score matching from an initial group of 1270 patients. The median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 16 (11–21), with 455 (75.8%) having symptom free pre-stroke independent function, and 268 (44.7%) receiving intravenous thrombolysis. Good functional outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale 0–2) was achieved in 282 (46.8%), with very elderly patients having less proportion of good outcome compared to the less-old (118 (39.3%) vs 163 (54.3%), p Conclusion: Endovascular thrombectomy can be successfully and safely performed in the very elderly. Despite an increase in all-cause 90-day mortality, selected very elderly patients are as likely as younger patients with similar baseline characteristics to return to baseline function following EVT.

Rationale: Alteplase is the only approved thrombolytic agent for acute stroke. An alternative plasminogen activator, tenecteplase, has been previously shown to increase early biological effectiveness (reperfusion) resulting in early clinical recovery in acute stroke patients with target mismatch on perfusion imaging; however, phase III data are lacking. Aim and hypothesis: In this study, we assess the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase compared to alteplase in acute stroke patients with target mismatch on perfusion imaging. Methods and Design: Tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) versus alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) for Stroke Thrombolysis Evaluation (TASTE) is a multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE), controlled phase III non-inferiority trial (2 arms with 1:1 randomization) with an adaptive sample size re-estimation in patients with acute ischemic stroke meeting target mismatch criteria on perfusion imaging. Sample size estimates: Recruiting 728 patients (1:1 tenecteplase vs alteplase) would yield 90% power (two-sided alpha 0.05) to detect a treatment effect of 8% (26% modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0–1 in alteplase arm and 34% mRS 0–1 in tenecteplase arm), with an absolute non-inferiority margin of 3%. Following the pre-planned “promising zone” adaptive sample size re-estimation, the final sample size was set at 832 patients. Study outcomes: The primary outcome measure is the proportion of patients with an mRS score of 0–1 at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include the categorical shift in mRS at 3 months; the proportion of patients with: mRS 0–2, 5–6, and 6; reduction of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) by 8 or more points or reaching 0–1 at 24 h; symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 36 h; and death. Discussion: This pivotal trial will provide important data on the role of tenecteplase in acute ischemic stroke, and the use of imaging-based treatment decision-making for stroke thrombolysis. Clinical trial protocol: Trial Registration: ACTRN12613000243718, EudraCT 2015-002657-36

Rationale Rapid response by health-care systems for transient ischemic attack and minor stroke (TIA/mS) is recommended to maximize the impact of secondary prevention strategies. The applicability of this evidence to Australian non-hospital-based TIA/mS management is uncertain. Aims Within an Australian community setting we seek to document processes of care, establish determinants of access to care, establish attack rates and determinants of recurrent vascular events and other clinical outcomes, establish the performance of ABC2-risk stratification, and compare the processes of care and outcomes to those in the UK and New Zealand for TIA/mS. Sample size estimates Recruiting practices containing approximately 51 full-time-equivalent general practitioners to recruit 100 TIA/mS per year over a four-year study period will provide sufficient power for each of our outcomes. Methods and design An inception cohort study of patients with possible TIA/mS recruited from 16 general practices in the Newcastle-Hunter Valley-Manning Valley region of Australia. Potential TIA/mS will be ascertained by multiple overlapping methods at general practices, after-hours collaborative, and hospital in-patient and outpatient services. Participants’ index and subsequent clinical events will be adjudicated as TIA/mS or mimics by an expert panel. Study outcomes Process outcomes—whether the patient was referred for secondary care; time from event to first patient presentation to a health professional; time from event to specialist acute-access clinic appointment; time from event to brain and vascular imaging and relevant prescriptions. Clinical outcomes—recurrent stroke and major vascular events; and health-related quality of life. Discussion Community management of TIA/mS will be informed by this study.