Search

Background Despite previous attempts to classify atopic dermatitis (AD) into subtypes (e.g. extrinsic vs. intrinsic), there is a need to better understand specific phenotypes in adulthood. Objectives To identify, using machine learning (ML), adult AD phenotypes. Methods We used unsupervised cluster analysis to identify AD phenotypes by analysing different responses to predetermined variables (age of disease onset, severity, itch and skin pain intensity, flare frequency, anatomical location, presence and/or severity of current comorbidities) in adults with AD from the Danish Skin Cohort. Results The unsupervised cluster analysis resulted in five clusters where AD severity most clearly differed. We classified them as 'mild', 'mild-to-moderate', 'moderate', 'severe' and 'very severe'. The severity of multiple predetermined patient-reported outcomes was positively associated with AD, including an increased number of flare-ups and increased flare-up duration and disease severity. However, an increased severity of rhinitis and mental health burden was also found for the mild-to-moderate phenotype. Conclusions ML confirmed the use of disease severity for the categorization of phenotypes, and our cluster analysis provided novel detailed information about how flare patterns and duration are associated with AD disease severity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article presents a Danish nationwide cohort study on the long-term drug survival of biologics in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), a chronic inflammatory skin disease. The study analyzed data from 452 patients who were treated with various biologics between 2005 and 2021. The results showed that the median drug survival time for adalimumab was approximately 8 months, with bio-naïve patients having a significantly longer drug survival time compared to non-naïve patients. The study also reported real-life drug survival data on secukinumab in HS. The findings suggest the need for further research into more effective biologics for HS. [Extracted from the article]

Background Early prediction of therapeutic response can optimize treatment strategies in atopic dermatitis (AD). Baricitinib is approved for moderate-to-severe AD in Europe, Japan and other countries. Objectives To identify early clinical improvements that can reliably predict a later clinical response to baricitinib in adults with moderate-to-severe AD. Methods Using data from one topical corticosteroid combination study [BREEZE-AD7 (NCT03733301)] and data pooled from two monotherapy studies [(BREEZE-AD1 (NCT03334396) and BREEZE-AD2 (NCT03334422)], we calculated the sensitivity and specificity, along with the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), of predefined changes in single and combined clinical scores at weeks 2, 4 and 8, to predict clinical response at week 16. Clinical response was defined as ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75), ≥ 4-point improvement in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (Itch NRS ≥ 4), or a combination of both. Results Composite predictors had higher predictive accuracy for week 16 response outcomes than did single parameters. This was evident as early as week 4 for the combination of EASI 50 or Itch NRS ≥ 3 and of validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) score ≤ 2 or Itch NRS ≥ 3 (sensitivity 87–100%; NPV 68–100%). The predictive accuracy of these composite clinical predictors for week 16 response outcomes was highest at week 8 (sensitivity 92–100%; NPV 80–100%). At both weeks 4 and 8, EASI 50 or Itch NRS ≥ 3 had higher sensitivity and NPV than did vIGA-AD score ≤ 2 or Itch NRS ≥ 3. Conclusions Improvement in signs and symptoms early during treatment with baricitinib 4 mg once daily predicts clinical response at week 16, providing a tool for dermatologists when choosing treatment strategies for patients with moderate-to-severe AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction/Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory disease that can affect multiple regions of the body, but can be particularly burdensome on exposed areas of skin, such as the head and neck (H&N).Tralokinumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that specifically neutralizes interleukin-13, is approved in multiple countries for adults with moderate-to-severe AD. Phase 3 trials showed tralokinumab provided significant improvements in AD severity and was well-tolerated up to 52 weeks of treatment. The ongoing open-label, 5-year extension trial, ECZTEND (NCT03587805), assesses the safety and efficacy of tralokinumab after the completion of parent trials (PT). Objective To assess tralokinumab efficacy in the H&N region. Methods This post hoc analysis included adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD initially randomized to tralokinumab 300mg Q2W in the phase 3 PTs ECZTRA 1 (NCT03131648) or ECZTRA 2 (NCT03160885). Patients on active tralokinumab treatment were followed for up to 52 weeks in PTs and for up to 152 weeks in ECZTEND as of data cutoff April 30, 2022. Patients re-randomized to placebo at Week (Wk) 16 were not included beyond that timepoint. For this analysis, overall EASI and H&N regional EASI (H&N EASI) were evaluated. H&N EASI (0-7.2) was calculated based on the severity of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, lichenification and area of involvement. All data were analyzed and presented as observed. Results At baseline, 87.8% (1047/1192) of patients had H&N involvement (H&N EASI>1), and 49.9% (591/1192) of patients exhibited severe AD (IGA 4). Baseline median H&N EASI for the pooled PTs was 3.0 (IQR 1.8; 4.5). In the pooled PTs, 48.2% (542/1125) and 71.2% (558/784) of patients achieved H&N EASI≤1, at Wk16 and Wk52, respectively. After 3 years additional treatment (Wk152 in ECZTEND), the proportion of patients with H&N EASI≤1 was 87.2% (232/266) and the median H&N EASI was 0.2 (IQR 0.0; 0.5). In the subgroup of patients (n=301) with severe AD (IGA 4) and high H&N involvement (H&N EASI≥4), median H&N EASI improved from 5.4 at baseline to 2.4 and 0.8 at Wk16 and Wk52, respectively, and 0.4 at Wk152. Improvements in H&N region were comparable to overall EASI improvement. Conclusions Tralokinumab provided sustained improvements in the H&N regions in patients with moderate-to-severe AD for up to 4 years. Sustained improvements were also seen in patients with severe disease and substantial H&N involvement at baseline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A study published in the British Journal of Dermatology provides insight into the prevalence of ichthyoses in Denmark. Ichthyosis is a group of genetic skin disorders characterized by dry and scaly skin. The study found that the prevalence of ichthyoses in Denmark is 1.6 per 10,000 people, with ichthyosis vulgaris being the most common type. The prevalence varied by age and sex, with higher rates in younger age groups and a higher prevalence in women over 50 years old. However, the study may underestimate the true prevalence and further research is needed. [Extracted from the article]

Background Although chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a highly prevalent and disabling skin disease, it is currently unknown if CHE is associated with systemic inflammation. Objectives To characterize the plasma inflammatory signature of CHE. Methods Using Proximity Extension Assay technology, we assessed 266 inflammatory and cardiovascular disease risk proteins in the plasma of 40 healthy controls, 57 patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) with active lesions, 11 with CHE and a history of AD (CHEPREVIOUS_AD), and 40 with CHE and no history of AD (CHENO_AD). Filaggrin gene mutation status was also assessed. Protein expression was compared between groups and according to disease severity. Correlation analyses for biomarkers, and clinical- and self-reported variables, were performed. Results Very severe CHENO_AD was associated with systemic inflammation when compared with controls. Levels of T helper (Th)2- and Th1-, general inflammation and eosinophil activation markers increased with severity of CHENO_AD, primarily being significantly increased in very severe disease. Significant, positive correlations were found between markers from these pathways and severity of CHENO_AD. Moderate-to-severe but not mild AD displayed systemic inflammation. The Th2 markers C-C motif chemokine (CCL)17 and CCL13 (also known as monocyte chemotactic protein 4) were the top differentially expressed proteins in both very severe CHENO_AD and moderate-to-severe AD, showing a higher fold change and significance in AD. CCL17 and CCL13 levels further correlated positively with disease severity in both CHENO_AD and AD. Conclusions Systemic Th2-driven inflammation is shared between very severe CHE with no history of AD, and moderate-to-severe AD, suggesting that Th2 cell targeting could be effective in several CHE subtypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Lebrikizumab is a novel, high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to interleukin (IL)-13. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab monotherapy in adolescent and adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) over 52 weeks of treatment in ADvocate1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate2 (NCT04178967). Methods Patients who responded to lebrikizumab 250 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) at the end of the 16-week induction period were re-randomized 2 : 2 : 1 to receive lebrikizumab Q2W, lebrikizumab 250 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or placebo Q2W (lebrikizumab withdrawal) for 36 additional weeks. Response at week 16 was defined as achieving a 75% reduction in Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI 75) or an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1, with a ≥ 2-point improvement and no rescue medication use. Multiple imputation was used to handle missing data. Intermittent use of topical therapy was permitted during the maintenance period. Results After 52 weeks, an IGA of 0 or 1 with a ≥ 2 point improvement was maintained by 71.2% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q2W, 76.9% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q4W and 47.9% of patients in the lebrikizumab withdrawal arm. EASI 75 was maintained by 78.4% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q2W, 81.7% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q4W and 66.4% of patients in the lebrikizumab withdrawal arm at week 52. Across treatment arms, proportions of patients using any rescue therapy were 14.0% (ADvocate1) and 16.4% (ADvocate2). During the combined induction and maintenance periods of ADvocate1 and ADvocate2, 63.0% of lebrikizumab-treated patients reported any treatment emergent adverse event, with most events (93.1%) being mild or moderate in severity. Conclusions After a 16-week induction period with lebrikizumab Q2W, lebrikizumab Q2W and Q4W maintained similar improvement of the signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe AD, with a safety profile consistent with previously published data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Research has linked homelessness with an increased risk of skin conditions. However, representative studies of diagnosis-specific information on skin conditions in people experiencing homelessness are lacking. Objectives To examine the association between homelessness and diagnosed skin conditions, prescribed medication and type of -consultation. Methods This cohort study included data from the Danish nationwide health, social and administrative registers from 1 January 1999 to 31 December 2018. All people of Danish origin living in Denmark and aged at least 15 years at some point during the study period were included. Homelessness, measured by homeless shelter contacts, was the exposure. The outcome was any diagnosis of a skin disorder and specific skin disorders recorded in the Danish National Patient Register. Information on diagnostic consultation type (i.e. dermatological, nondermatological and emergency room) and dermatological prescriptions was studied. We estimated adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) (adjusted for sex, age and calendar year) and cumulative incidence. Results In total, 5 054 238 individuals (50.6% female) were included in the study population, accounting for 73 477 258 person-years at risk, with a start mean (SD) age of 39.4 (21.1) years. Of the total number of individuals, 759 991 (15.0%) received a skin diagnosis and 38 071 (0.7%) experienced homelessness. A 2.31-times [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.25–2.36] higher IRR of any diagnosed skin condition was associated with homelessness, higher for nondermatological and emergency room consultations. Homelessness was associated with a reduced IRR of a skin neoplasm diagnosis (aIRR 0.76, 95% CI 0.71–8.82) compared with no homelessness. By the end of follow-up, 2.8% (95% CI 2.5–3.0) of individuals experiencing homelessness had a skin neoplasm diagnosis vs. 5.1% (95% CI 4.9–5.3) of individuals not experiencing homelessness. Five or more shelter contacts during the first year from first contact was associated with the highest aIRR of any diagnosed skin condition (7.33, 95% CI 5.57–9.65) compared with no contacts. Conclusions Individuals experiencing homelessness have high rates of most diagnosed skin conditions, but a lower occurrence of skin cancer diagnosis. Diagnostic and medical patterns for skin disorders differed clearly between people experiencing homelessness and individuals without these experiences. The time after first homeless shelter contact is an important window of opportunity for mitigating and preventing skin disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The epidemiology of atopic dermatitis (AD) in Greenland has been sparsely investigated. Aim To examine the point and overall prevalence, cumulative incidence at different ages, and associated risk factors for AD among children in Greenland. Methods Between 2019 and 2020, three towns in Greenland, representing 48% of the total population, were visited. A cross-sectional study was conducted, including children aged 0–7 years attending daycare centres. Parents completed a questionnaire with questions on AD and related risk factors. A diagnosis of AD was based on the UK Working Party's criteria along with a clinical examination. Results In total, 839 children aged 0–7 years were included. The overall prevalence of AD was 35% according to physician's diagnosis and assessment. The point prevalence was 28% and peaked among 1-year-old children (36%) and declined with age. The cumulative incidence at ages 1–6 years varied between 29% and 41% and was highest in 1-year-old children and showed a slight decline with increasing age. In the fully adjusted multivariate model, AD was associated with being of Inuit descent [odds ratio (OR) 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1–2.8]; food allergy in the child (OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.3–5.6); ear infection in the child (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0–1.9); having a mother with a high educational level (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0–2.3); maternal atopy (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1–2.0); and paternal atopy (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.5–2.8). No environmental risk factors were identified. Conclusion The overall prevalence of AD in children in Greenland is high and has likely increased over the past 20 years. The point prevalence was highest in the youngest children indicating early onset of disease. Inuit descent, family atopy predisposition and having a higher socioeconomic status (based on parental educational level and housing) increased the risk of AD. Insight into possible Inuit-specific genetic predisposition is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Sufficient data on access to systemic treatment for patients with psoriasis living in Latin America (LA) including Brazil and Chile are lacking. Understanding the availability and limiting factors of access to treatments can help to improve patient care and decrease long-term healthcare costs. Objectives In association with the Global Psoriasis Atlas, this cross-sectional survey study analysed the availability and insurance reimbursement of systemic treatments for adult patients with psoriasis in Brazil and Chile. Methods A multicentre, cross-sectional Global Healthcare Study on Psoriasis was performed in Brazil and Chile in 2020. For each eligible adult patient with psoriasis, doctors and nurses completed a 48-item questionnaire about clinical aspects of psoriasis including the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), body surface area (BSA) score and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), as well as the availability of systemic treatments and insurance reimbursement status. Between-country differences were compared with Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables, and a χ2-test or Fisher's exact test, where appropriate, for categorical variables. The median and interquartile range (IQR) was calculated for non-normal distributed data. Results A total of 1424 patients with psoriasis from 43 centres [27 centres in Brazil (n = 826) and 16 in Chile (n = 598)], were included with a mean (SD) age of 49.1 (16.3) and 49.2 (15.1) years, respectively. Unstratified analyses revealed that patients with psoriasis in Chile had more severe disease than those in Brazil [PASI 11.6 vs. 8.4 (P < 0.001) and BSA 14.7 vs. 12.0 (P = 0.003), respectively]. For patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, defined as PASI and/or BSA ≥ 10, systemic nonbiologic drugs were available (81.2% in Brazil and 65.3% in Chile, P ≤ 0.001), but only 37.0% of patients in Brazil and 27.3% in Chile received biologics (P = 0.01). Lack of availability and/or lack of insurance reimbursement for biologic drugs for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis was reported for 22.2% (50 of 225) in Brazil and 67.9% (148 of 218) in Chile (P < 0.001). Patients with no access to biologic therapies due to lack of availability/insurance reimbursement had a median PASI of 9.15 (IQR 3.00–14.25) in Brazil and 12.0 (IQR 5.00–19.00) in Chile (P = 0.007), as well as a median BSA of 7.0 (IQR 3.00–15.00) and 12.0 (IQR 5.00–22.50) (P = 0.002), and median DLQI of 11.0 (6.00–15.00) and 21.0 (6.50–25.00) (P = 0.007), respectively. Conclusions Chilean patients had significantly more severe psoriasis compared with Brazilian patients in our study. While nonbiologic treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis were available in both LA countries, there is a high need for improvement in access to more effective psoriasis treatments including biologics. Our results highlight a significant gap between treatment recommendations in international psoriasis guidelines and real-world situations in Brazil and Chile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) may have disturbed sleep, affected self-esteem and decreased quality of life, likely interfering with performance in school. Objectives To examine the association between hospital-managed paediatric AD, school performance and cognitive function. Methods In this cross-sectional study we linked data from the Danish national registers and identified three populations between 2001 and 2019. Population 1 comprised children with graduation grades registered from lower secondary school, population 2 comprised adolescents with registration of an upper secondary graduation mean, and population 3 comprised male conscripts with registration of an IQ test score. AD was defined as a hospital diagnostic code (inpatient or outpatient) prior to the exam or conscription date, and was stratified according to severity, activity and atopic comorbidity. Outcomes included graduation mean from lower and upper secondary school, special educational assistance in primary and lower secondary school, and IQ at conscription. Results In total, 770 611 (12 137 with AD), 394 193 (6261 with AD) and 366 182 (4539 with AD) children and adolescents were included in populations 1 (lower secondary graduation), 2 (upper secondary graduation) and 3 (conscription), respectively. In lower secondary school, children with severe AD had significantly lower overall, written and oral graduation grade means compared with children with mild AD: respectively, difference −0.29 [95% confidence interval (CI) −0.45 to −0.13, P < 0.001], difference −0.26 (95% CI −0.42 to −0.10, P = 0.0016) and difference −0.30 (95% CI −0.49 to −0.11, P = 0.0018). In upper secondary school, adolescents with AD performed similarly to their peers without AD. Young men with AD scored significantly lower IQ test means at conscription examination than male conscripts without AD: difference −0.60 (95% CI −0.87 to −0.32, P < 0.001). Conclusions AD, in particular when severe, is associated with lower school performance in childhood and IQ in young men, which can interfere with academic achievements in life. Optimization of treatment of children with AD and specific educational support to children with severe AD could be needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with several important medical comorbidities. There are scant data available on the comorbidities of patients with psoriasis in South America. Aim: To examine the comorbidity profile of adult patients with psoriasis in Chile and its association with severity of psoriasis. Methods: This was a multicentre, cross‐sectional study involving 16 hospitals and clinics in Chile, which used a 48‐item questionnaire to study clinician‐ and patient‐reported outcomes and comorbidities. Inferential analyses were performed by psoriasis severity, using Fisher exact test, Student t‐test and multivariable logistic regression. Results: In total, 598 adult patients with psoriasis were included (51.1% male; mean age 49.2 ± 15.1 years); 48.5% mild and 51.4% moderate to severe; Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 11.6 ± 11.5; body surface area 14.7 ± 18.2%. Plaque psoriasis was the most common phenotype (90.2%), followed by guttate (13.4%). Psoriatic arthritis occurred in 27.3% of patients. Comorbidities were reported in 60.2% of all patients with psoriasis. Frequent concomitant diseases were obesity (25.3%), hypertension (24.3%), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (18.7%), dyslipidaemia (17.4%), metabolic syndrome (16.7%) and depression (14.4%). After adjustment, significant associations were found between moderate to severe psoriasis and obesity, T2DM and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) compared with mild psoriasis. Conclusions: We report a large study of comorbidities, including depression, dyslipidaemia, T2DM and NAFLD, in people with psoriasis in Chile. The prevalence of comorbidities with psoriasis in Chile appears similar to that found in Western countries, and emphasizes the importance of assessing patients with psoriasis for risk factors for and presence of, comorbid disease in a multidisciplinary setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Tralokinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that neutralizes the activity of interleukin‐13, a key pathogenic driver of atopic dermatitis (AD). Clinical trials including adults with moderate‐to‐severe AD, of up to 52 weeks' duration, showed tralokinumab was efficacious and well tolerated. Objectives: To characterize the safety profile of tralokinumab for the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe AD. Methods: Safety and laboratory measures were assessed in pooled analyses of phase II and III placebo‐controlled clinical trials of tralokinumab in moderate‐to‐severe AD (NCT02347176, NCT03562377, NCT03131648, NCT03160885, NCT03363854). Results: In total, 2285 patients were randomized in the initial treatment periods up to 16 weeks (1605 tralokinumab, 680 placebo). The frequencies of any adverse event (AE) were 65·7% for tralokinumab and 67·2% for placebo. The respective rates were 640 and 678 events per 100 patient‐years of exposure (ep100PYE); rate ratio 1·0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·9–1·1. Serious AEs occurred in 2·1% of patients with tralokinumab and 2·8% with placebo (7·4 and 11·9 ep100PYE; rate ratio 0·7, 95% CI 0·4–1·2). The most common AEs occurring at a higher frequency and rate with tralokinumab vs. placebo were: viral upper respiratory tract infection (15·7% vs. 12·2%; 65·1 vs. 53·5 ep100PYE); upper respiratory tract infection (5·6% vs. 4·8%; 20·8 vs. 18·5 ep100PYE); conjunctivitis (5·4% vs. 1·9%; 21·0 vs. 6·9 ep100PYE); and injection‐site reaction (3·5% vs. 0·3%; 22·9 vs. 4·0 ep100PYE). Some events in safety areas of interest occurred at a lower frequency and rate with tralokinumab vs. placebo: skin infections requiring systemic treatment (2·6% vs. 5·5%; 9·7 vs. 22·8 ep100PYE), eczema herpeticum (0·3% vs. 1·5%; 1·2 vs. 5·2 ep100PYE), opportunistic infections (3·4% vs. 4·9%; 13·0 vs. 21·3 ep100PYE) and serious infections (0·4% vs. 1·1%; 1·3 vs. 3·7 ep100PYE). AEs did not increase with continued maintenance and open‐label treatment, including rates of common or serious AEs and AEs leading to study drug discontinuation. No clinically meaningful changes in mean laboratory measures were observed with treatment up to 1 year. Conclusions: Across the AD population pool from five clinical trials, tralokinumab was well tolerated, with consistent safety findings during treatment of patients with moderate‐to‐severe AD. The safety profile during prolonged tralokinumab treatment was consistent with that during the initial treatment period; the frequency of events did not increase over time. What is already known about this topic?Tralokinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that specifically neutralizes interleukin‐13, a key cytokine driving skin inflammation and epidermal barrier dysfunction in atopic dermatitis (AD).In clinical trials in moderate‐to‐severe AD, tralokinumab provided significant and early improvements in the extent and severity of AD and was well tolerated, with an overall safety profile comparable with placebo over 52 weeks. What does this study add?We report the frequency and rate of adverse events (AEs) from pooled observations of over 2000 patients from five phase II and phase III placebo‐controlled clinical trials of tralokinumab in moderate‐to‐severe AD.During initial treatment up to 16 weeks, the frequencies of any AE and of serious AEs were similar for tralokinumab and placebo. AE rates did not increase with continued treatment up to 52 weeks.Common AEs occurring more frequently with tralokinumab vs. placebo were viral and upper respiratory tract infection, conjunctivitis and injection‐site reaction. Some events occurred at a lower frequency and rate with tralokinumab vs. placebo, such as skin infections requiring systemic treatment, eczema herpeticum and opportunistic and serious infections.No clinically meaningful changes in mean laboratory measures were observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease characterized by intense itch and eczematous skin lesions that can impact individuals at any age across any area of the body. There is a need for safe treatments for AD that provide rapid itch relief and skin clearance and that are suitable for long-term use. Upadacitinib is a selective, reversible oral Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor, which is approved in multiple countries for the treatment of adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD. The current analysis assessed the long-term safety for up to 4 years of upadacitinib 15 and 30 mg in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD, using integrated data from three ongoing global pivotal phase 3 studies. The Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up studies are ongoing pivotal phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg and upadacitinib 30 mg in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to receive oral upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg or placebo once daily alone (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2) or with concomitant topical corticosteroids (AD Up). At Week 16, patients receiving upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg during the double-blinded period continued their assigned treatment in the blinded extension (BE) period, whereas patients receiving placebo were re-randomized 1 : 1 to receive either upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg in the BE period (upadacitinib treatment for up to 260 weeks). A total of 2693 adults and adolescents (upadacitinib 15 mg, 1340; upadacitinib 30 mg, 1353) who received at least one dose of upadacitinib were included in the integrated analysis. Treatment-emergent adverse events of special interest (AESI) were analysed as exposure-adjusted rates per 100 patient-years (PY) for the entire treatment period to adjust for potentially different durations of follow-up. Upadacitinib was well tolerated by both adults and adolescents. For all patients, rates of AESIs were similar at the 1-year analysis and up to 4-year analysis for upadacitinib (15 mg/30 mg) for: serious infections, 2.3 and 2.2/2.8 and 2.8; opportunistic infections, 1.6 and 1.8/1.9 and 2.4; active tuberculosis, <0.1/<0.1 at both time points; herpes zoster, 3.5 and 3.1/5.2 and 5.8; nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), 0.3 and 0.4/0.4 and 0.3; malignancy excluding NMSC, 0.1 and 0.4/0.5 and 0.3; and adverse events leading to death, 0 and 0/<0.1 and <0.1. Rates of adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were 0.1 and <0.1/<0.1 and <0.1, and for venous thromboembolic events (VTE) were <0.1 for both doses at the 1-year analysis and up to 4-year analysis. Rates of gastrointestinal perforations were 0 for both doses at both timepoint analyses. Rates of serious infections remain low (<3.0 E/100 PY). Based on the integrated analysis of long-term safety data for up to 4 years, rates of AESIs remained low throughout a longer duration of treatment with upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg among adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD. No new safety risks were observed. Findings of the current safety analysis continue to support a favorable benefit-risk profile of upadacitinib in the treatment of adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD for up to 4 years of treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

SUMMARY: Background: Prolonged systemic antibiotic treatment is often a part of management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Although biologic therapies are now available, the patient's treatment journey leading to biologic therapy is unclear. Objectives: To examine treatment patterns and duration of systemic treatment use in patients with HS preceding biologic therapy. Methods: We identified all patients with HS receiving treatment with biologics in the Danish National Patient Registry from 2010 to 2018 and extracted their entire prescription history of specific systemic treatments from the Danish National Prescription Registry since its inception in 1995. The patients' treatment journeys are graphically displayed through Sankey diagrams and box plots generated to show temporal distributions. Descriptive patient characteristics were presented as frequencies with percentages for categorical variables and as means with SDs or medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) for continuous variables. Results: A total of 225 patients with HS were included. Patients had most frequently been treated with penicillin (n = 214; 95·1%), dicloxacillin (n = 194; 86·2%), tetracycline (n = 145; 64·4%) and rifampicin/clindamycin (n = 111; 49·3%), as well as the retinoids isotretinoin and acitretin, and dapsone. Prior to biologic therapy, patients received a mean of 4·0 (SD 1·3) different systemic therapies, across a mean of 16·9 (SD 11·3) different treatment series. The mean time from first systemic therapy until biologic therapy was initiated was 15·3 (SD 5·1) years [8·2 (SD 5·9) years when excluding penicillin and dicloxacillin]. Conclusions: Patients with HS who receive biologic therapy have long preceding treatment histories with multiple drug classes and treatment series, many of which are supported by relatively weak evidence in HS. Delay in the initiation of biologic therapy may represent a missed opportunity to prevent disease progression. What is already known about this topic?The treatment journey leading to biologic therapy in patients with HS has not previously been investigated. What does this study add?Our data from 225 patients with HS illustrate that patients who receive biologic therapy have long preceding treatment histories with multiple drug classes and treatment series, many of which are supported by relatively weak evidence in HS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA‐AD™) is a standardized severity assessment for use in clinical trials and registries for atopic dermatitis (AD). Objectives: To investigate the reliability, validity, responsiveness and within‐patient meaningful change of the vIGA‐AD. Methods: Data were analysed from adult patients with moderate‐to‐severe AD in the BREEZE‐AD1 (N = 624 patients; NCT03334396), BREEZE‐AD2 (N = 615; NCT03334422) and BREEZE‐AD5 (N = 440; NCT03435081) phase III baricitinib clinical studies. Results: Across studies, test–retest reliability for stable patients showed moderate‐to‐good agreement [range of Kappa values for Patient Global Impression of Severity–Atopic Dermatitis (PGI‐S‐AD), 0·516–0·639; for Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), 0·658–0·778]. Moderate‐to‐large correlations between vIGA‐AD and EASI or body surface area (range at baseline, 0·497–0·736; Week 16, 0·716–0·893) supported convergent validity. Known‐groups validity was demonstrated vs. EASI and PGI‐S‐AD (vIGA‐AD for severe vs. moderate EASI categories at baseline, P < 0·001). Responsiveness was demonstrated vs. EASI (P < 0·001 for much improved vs. improved and improved vs. stable). Anchor‐ and distribution‐based methods supported a vIGA‐AD change of –1·0 as clinically meaningful. These findings are limited to populations defined by the studies' inclusion and exclusion criteria. Conclusions: The vIGA‐AD demonstrated sufficient reliability, validity, responsiveness and interpretation standards for use in clinical trials. What is already known about this topic?A description of the development of the validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA‐AD™) has been published previously. What does this study add?The current study validates the vIGA‐AD by demonstrating appropriate test–retest reliability, convergent validity, known‐groups validity and responsiveness across three baricitinib clinical studies.In addition, a 1‐point change was identified as a clinically meaningful patient‐perceived change minimal clinically important difference in the vIGA‐AD. What are the clinical implications of the work?The vIGA‐AD is a measure for investigator assessment of atopic dermatitis suitable for use in clinical research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory disease that can affect multiple regions of the body, but can be particularly burdensome on exposed areas of skin, such as the head and neck (H&N). Tralokinumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that specifically neutralizes interleukin-13, is approved in multiple countries for adults with moderate-to-severe AD. Phase 3 trials showed tralokinumab provided significant improvements in AD severity and was well-tolerated up to 52 weeks of treatment. The ongoing open-label, 5-year extension trial, ECZTEND (NCT03587805), assesses the safety and efficacy of tralokinumab after the completion of parent trials (PT). Objective To assess tralokinumab efficacy in the head and neck region. Methods: This post hoc analysis included adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD initially randomized to tralokinumab 300mg Q2W in the phase 3 PTs ECZTRA 1 (NCT03131648) or ECZTRA 2 (NCT03160885). Patients on active tralokinumab treatment were followed for up to 52 weeks in PTs and for up to 152 weeks in ECZTEND as of data cutoff April 30, 2022. Patients re-randomized to placebo at Week (Wk) 16 were not included beyond that timepoint. For this analysis, overall EASI and H&N regional EASI (H&N EASI) were evaluated. H&N EASI (0-7.2) was calculated based on the severity of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, lichenification and area of involvement. All data were analyzed and presented as observed. Results: At baseline, 87.8% (1047/1192) of patients had H&N involvement (H&N EASI>1), and 49.9% (591/1192) of patients exhibited severe AD (IGA 4). Baseline median H&N EASI for the pooled PTs was 3.0 (IQR 1.8; 4.5). In the pooled PTs, 48.2% (542/1125) and 71.2% (558/784) of patients achieved H&N EASI=1, at Wk16 and Wk52, respectively. After 3 years additional treatment (Wk152 in ECZTEND), the proportion of patients with H&N EASI=1 was 87.2% (232/266) and the median H&N EASI was 0.2 (IQR 0.0; 0.5). In the subgroup of patients (n=301) with severe AD (IGA 4) and high H&N involvement (H&N EASI=4), median H&N EASI improved from 5.4 at baseline to 2.4 and 0.8 at Wk16 and Wk52, respectively, and 0.4 at Wk152. Improvements in H&N region were comparable to overall EASI improvement. Conclusions: Tralokinumab provided sustained improvements in the H&N regions in patients with moderate-to-severe AD for up to 4 years. Sustained improvements were also seen in patients with severe disease and substantial H&N involvement at baseline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction/Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin disease associated with atopic comorbidities, including asthma, food allergy, hay fever, and allergic conjunctivitis. Tralokinumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that specifically targets IL-13, is indicated for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. Objectives: To assess the impact of atopic comorbidities on the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab vs. placebo for moderateto-severe AD in patients age ≥12 years. Methods: This post-hoc analysis presents data from the adult trials ECZTRA 1 and 2 (NCT03131648 and NCT03160885 pooled; 300 mg tralokinumab every 2 weeks [Q2W] vs. placebo) and ECZTRA 3 (NCT03363854; 300 mg tralokinumab Q2W vs. placebo, both plus TCS as needed), and the ECZTRA 6 adolescent trial (NCT03526861; pooled 150 mg and 300 mg tralokinumab Q2W vs. placebo). Tralokinumab-treated patients received a loading dose. Proportion of patients achieving IGA 0/1 and EASI-75 at Week 16 according to patient-reported current or past atopic comorbidity are presented as observed regardless of rescue medication use; missing data were imputed as non-responders. Results: In total 2,223 patients were included across four trials. Among patients in ECZTRA 1 and 2, 50.5% reported history of asthma, 38.5% food allergy, 53.8% hay fever, and 33.5% allergic conjunctivitis, while 19.8% reported no atopic comorbidities and 79.3% reported ≥1 atopic comorbidity. Proportions of patients in ECZTRA 3 and 6 reporting history of atopic comorbidities were largely similar, although more adolescent patients reported food allergy. In all subgroups at Week 16, higher proportions of patients receiving tralokinumab vs. placebo achieved EASI-75. In ECZTRA 1 and 2, response rates among patients in each subgroup were asthma: 35.3% vs. 12.8%, food allergy: 33.2% vs. 14.7%, hay fever: 36.8% vs. 16.5%, allergic conjunctivitis: 34.8% vs. 12.7%, none: 34.6% vs. 20.5%; and ≥1 atopic comorbidity: 35.5% vs. 15.2% (P<0.05 for all). A similar pattern of response was observed in ECZTRA 3 and 6, and for IGA 0/1 across trials. EASI-75 response rates for tralokinumab-treated patients were consistent across patients with different numbers of atopic comorbidities. Safety across subgroups was consistent with the safety profile of tralokinumab observed overall in adults and adolescents. Conclusions: 16 weeks of tralokinumab treatment improved AD signs and symptoms in adult and adolescent patients with and without atopic comorbidities, regardless of type or number of atopic comorbidities. The safety profile of tralokinumab was consistent between patients with and without atopic comorbidities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a burdensome disease, and new well‐documented, safe and efficacious treatments are warranted. In a recent CHE phase IIa trial, the pan‐Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor delgocitinib in an ointment formulation was found to be efficacious and well tolerated. Objectives: This trial assessed the dose response, efficacy and safety of delgocitinib cream in CHE. Methods: In this double‐blind, phase IIb dose‐ranging trial, adults with CHE and a recent history of inadequate response or contraindication to topical corticosteroids were randomized to delgocitinib cream 1, 3, 8, 20 mg g–1 or vehicle treatment twice daily for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was the Investigator's Global Assessment for CHE (IGA‐CHE) treatment success [0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with a ≥ two‐point improvement from baseline to week 16]. Secondary endpoints were the time to IGA‐CHE treatment success and changes in Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI); other endpoints were itch and pain numerical rating scale (NRS) scores, and Patient's Global Assessment (PaGA) at week 16. Results: Patients (n = 258) were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 to delgocitinib cream 1, 3, 8, 20 mg g–1 or vehicle. A significant dose–response relationship was established for IGA‐CHE (P < 0.025). IGA‐CHE treatment success at week 16 was achieved in 21.2% (1 mg g–1), 7.8% (3 mg g–1), 36.5% (8 mg g–1), 37.7% (20 mg g–1) and 8.0% (vehicle) of patients. Delgocitinib 8 and 20 mg g–1 showed a treatment effect against vehicle (P < 0.001). Similarly, there were improvements in HECSI, itch and pain NRS scores, and PaGA. Delgocitinib cream was well tolerated with the majority of adverse events being mild or moderate and considered unrelated to treatment. The most frequently reported adverse events were nasopharyngitis (17.3–29.4% in delgocitinib groups vs. 40% in vehicle group), eczema (5.8–11.3% in delgocitinib groups vs. 16.0% in vehicle group) and headache (3.8–11.5% in delgocitinib groups vs. 4.0% in vehicle group). Conclusions: In this trial, delgocitinib cream showed a dose–response relationship in terms of efficacy and was well tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We examined the incidence and risk of cancer in all patients treated with omalizumab in Denmark for CU and asthma. The study cohort comprised a total of 1444 participants treated with omalizumab (998 women, 446 men) with a mean (SD) age of 40-6 years (± 16-1) of which 1009 (69-9%) had CU, 370 (25-6%) had asthma, and 65 (4-5%) had CU and asthma. The unexposed age- and sex-matched control group consisted of 14 397 participants (9961 women, 4436 men) with a mean age of 40-5 years (± 16-0) of which 2891 (20-1%) had CU, 11 430 (79-4%) had asthma, and 76 (0-5%) had CU and asthma. [Extracted from the article]

Background and Aims Epidemiological studies have established an association between psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], i.e. ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's disease [CD], but results are inconsistent. The aim of this study was therefore to quantify the prevalences and association between IBD and psoriasis. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched from database inception through April 2018 for studies reporting data on psoriasis among patients with IBD and vice versa. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate, respectively, the prevalences and association between IBD and psoriasis. Data extraction was according to the PRISMA guideline, and quality assessment was made using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The main outcomes were the proportion of psoriasis patients with IBD and vice versa, as well as the association (odds ratio [OR]) of IBD in psoriasis and psoriasis in IBD, respectively. Results Based on quantitative analysis of 93 studies, the prevalence of psoriasis in CD and in UC was 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1%–4.6%) and 2.8% [95% CI 2.0%–3.8%] respectively. The prevalence of CD and UC was 0.7% [95% CI 0.2%–1.3%] and 0.5% [95% CI 0.3%–0.8%], respectively, among patients with psoriasis. Presence of CD or UC was significantly associated with psoriasis, with OR 2.0 [95% CI 1.4–2.9] and OR 1.5 [95% CI 1.2–2.0], respectively. Presence of psoriasis was significantly associated with CD: OR 2.2 [95% CI 1.6–3.1] and with UC: OR 1.6 [95% CI 1.3–2.0]. Conclusions We found significant bidirectional associations between psoriasis and IBD, warranting increased awareness among clinicians in the diagnostic process, especially in children and adolescents with IBD. Last, this study showed an increased frequency of paradoxical psoriasis in patients treated with biologics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Skin pain is a common and bothersome symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD) that is associated with a substantial burden. To assess the efficacy of abrocitinib vs. dupilumab on skin pain in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Data from patients aged ≥18 years who received oral abrocitinib 200 mg once daily (QD) or subcutaneous dupilumab 300 mg once every 2 weeks in combination with topical therapy in the phase 3 trials JADE COMPARE (NCT03720470) and JADE DARE (NCT04345367) were analysed. Data from patients who received abrocitinib 100 mg QD or placebo in the JADE COMPARE trial were also included in this analysis. Patients rated their skin pain using the Skin Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) item of the Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) instrument ['How painful was your skin over the past 24 h?' on a scale from 0 (not painful) to 10 (extremely painful) ] in JADE COMPARE or the Skin Pain Numerical Rating Scale [SP-NRS, which queried patients for the severity of their 'worst skin pain' in the past 24 h on a scale from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (worst skin pain imaginable)] in JADE DARE. Least squares mean (LSM) changes from baseline and proportions of patients who achieved a ≥4-point improvement from baseline in PSAAD skin pain score or SP-NRS were assessed through Week 16 (JADE COMPARE) or Week 26 (JADE DARE). The JADE COMPARE analysis (Skin Pain NRS item of the PSAAD) was performed post hoc, whereas the JADE DARE analysis (SP-NRS) was prespecified. At Week 2 of JADE COMPARE, LSM change from baseline in PSAAD skin pain score was greater with abrocitinib 200 mg [−2.8 (95% CI, −3.1, −2.5)] than with abrocitinib 100 mg [−2.1 (−2.3, −1.8)], dupilumab [−2.0 (−2.3, −1.8)], or placebo [−1.3 (−1.6, −0,9)]; improvements were sustained through Week 16 of treatment with abrocitinib 200 mg [−4.1 (−4.4, −3.8)], abrocitinib 100 mg [−3.3 (−3.6, −3.0)] and dupilumab [−4.0 (−4.2, −3.7)] compared with placebo [−1.8 (−2.2, −1.4)]. In JADE DARE, LSM change from baseline in SP-NRS was significantly greater with abrocitinib 200 mg vs. dupilumab at Week 2 [−3.7 (−3.9, −3.4) vs. −2.6 (−2.8, −2.3); P < 0.0001] and week 12 [−4.5 (−4.7, −4.2) vs. −4.0 (−4.3, −3.8); P = 0.0116]; no significant differences were observed between the treatment arms at Week 16 [−4.4 (−4.7, −4.2) vs. −4.2 (−4.4, −4.0); P = 0.16], Week 20 [−4.8 (−5.0, −4.5) vs. −4.5 (−4.7 vs. −4.2); P = 0.06] or Week 26 [−4.5 (−4.8, −4.3)] vs. −4.3 (−4.6, −4.1); P = 0.27]. The proportions of patients who achieved a ≥4-point improvement in PSAAD skin pain score at week 2 of JADE COMPARE were greater with abrocitinib 200 mg (43%) than with abrocitinib 100 mg (23%), dupilumab (24%) or placebo (14%). At Week 16, these proportions increased to 76% (abrocitinib 200 mg), 57% (abrocitinib 100 mg) and 70% (dupilumab) compared with placebo (29%). In JADE DARE, the proportions of patients who achieved a ≥4-point improvement in SP-NRS were significantly greater with abrocitinib 200 mg vs. dupilumab at Week 2 (58% vs. 36%; P < 0.0001) and Week 12 (71% vs. 61%; P = 0.0098) but not at subsequent timepoints. Similar to previous findings on the effect of abrocitinib on itch, these results suggest that abrocitinib 200 mg provides greater early skin pain relief in patients with moderate-to-severe AD compared with dupilumab, but the difference between the treatments diminishes with time. At earlier time points, skin pain improvement with abrocitinib 100 mg was similar to that with dupilumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory disease characterized by sensitive and dry skin, eczematous lesions and intense pruritus. Patients with moderate-to-severe AD often require systemic treatments if their symptoms are insufficiently controlled with topical treatments or phototherapy. While numerous systemic therapies are currently available for moderate-to-severe AD, more data evaluating patient satisfaction with various characteristics of these treatments are needed to help guide physicians and their patients with joint treatment decision-making. This study aims to investigate patient satisfaction with AD treatments according to the degree and speed of itch improvement and the degree of skin clearance. A cross-sectional, web-based survey was used to evaluate patient preferences for characteristics associated with systemic AD therapies. Respondents were required to have a physician-confirmed diagnosis of AD (currently moderate or severe), to be aged ≥18 years, to be a US resident, and to read and understand English. Assessments included worst itch experienced in the past 24 h (using a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 defined as no itch and 10 defined as the worst imaginable itch), time to noticeable itch reduction following initiation of their current treatment (1–6 days, 7–13 days or ≥14 days) and the amount of body surface area still affected by AD (≤2%, 3–10% or >10%; patient-assessed). Patient satisfaction with itch improvement, speed of itch improvement and skin clearance with their current treatment was also assessed and classified into three categories: satisfied, dissatisfied or neither. P values were determined by Chi-square tests (or Fisher's exact test where appropriate). Of the 213 individuals recruited by physicians to participate in the survey, 200 respondents fulfilled the eligibility criteria, consented to participate and completed surveys. A total of 186 respondents indicated that they were currently receiving treatment for their AD; treatments included over-the-counter creams, ointments or medicines (26.9%, n = 50), prescription creams (72.0%, n = 134), oral corticosteroids (16.7%, n = 31) or dupilumab (11.3%, n = 21). Treatment satisfaction differed based on the patient's itch level within the past 24 h (P < 0.001): 85.2% (n = 23) of the 27 patients reporting the lowest levels of itch (0–1) indicated they were satisfied with their current treatment, whereas only 7.1% (n = 1) of the 14 patients reporting the worst levels of itch (8–10) were satisfied with their current treatment. Among the 73 respondents who experienced the fastest itch reduction (within 1–6 days), 65.8% (n = 48) were satisfied with their treatment. For the 36 respondents experiencing itch reduction ≥14 days post treatment, 13.9% (n = 5) were satisfied with their treatment (P < 0.001). Of the 75 respondents with the highest degree of skin clearance (≤2% of body surface area still affected), 65.3% (n = 49) were satisfied with their treatment. Among the 21 respondents with the lowest degree of skin clearance (>10% of body surface area still affected), 14.3% (n = 3) were satisfied with their treatment (P < 0.001). Safety was not evaluated, which may limit the findings in this analysis. In patients with moderate-to-severe AD, the majority of respondents experiencing the lowest levels of itch, the fastest onset of itch improvement and the highest degree of skin clearance also reported satisfaction with their current treatment. These findings underscore the stringent thresholds for both the degree and speed of symptom improvement required to achieve patient satisfaction. This highlights patients' desire for treatments offering both rapid and extensive itch reduction and skin clearance and may help broaden physicians' understanding of patient preferences and inform treatment decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous analyses based on short-term, phase 2 studies reported that baseline biomarkers do not correlate with clinical outcomes following dupilumab treatment in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). This new analysis based on 16-week, phase 3 studies reports whether pretreatment levels of common serum biomarkers can predict treatment response to dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe AD. LIBERTY AD SOLO 1 and 2 (NCT02277743 and NCT02277769), two randomized, double-blind studies, included patients ≥18 years-old with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks or placebo for 16 weeks. Correlation between change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and log of baseline IgE, CC chemokine ligand 17 [CCL17; previously referred to as thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC)] and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at baseline was assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient (ρ). At Week 16, change in EASI showed little correlation with baseline total IgE [Spearman's correlation coefficient (ρ) = –0.14, n = 370 for dupilumab; ρ = –0.03, n = 202 for placebo], baseline CCL17 (ρ = –0.28, n = 369 for dupilumab; ρ = –0.05, n = 201 for placebo) or baseline LDH (ρ = –0.30, n = 370 for dupilumab; ρ = –0.08, n = 202 for placebo). Overall safety was consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile. Baseline levels of total IgE, CCL17 and LDH do not predict treatment response to dupilumab, as measured by EASI, in adults with moderate-to-severe AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by eczematous morphology and intense pruritus. Previous clinical trials have demonstrated that upadacitinib (UPA) was superior to placebo (PBO) in the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. Here, we analyse the efficacy and safety of UPA across 52 weeks in adolescent and adult subgroups from three phase 3 studies. Patients were randomized to UPA 15 mg (UPA15), UPA 30 mg (UPA30) or PBO orally once daily, either alone or with concomitant topical corticosteroids. After 16 weeks, patients in the PBO group were randomized to the UPA15 or UPA30 groups. For both adolescent and adult subgroups at 52 weeks, the proportion of responders in the UPA15 and UPA30 groups was: ≥70% and 83% for EASI75, ≥31% and 47% for vIGA-AD 0/1 and ≥37% and 61% for Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale improvement ≥4. Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) 0/1 was achieved by ≥15% (UPA15) and ≥28% (UPA30) of adolescents aged 12 to <16 years; DLQI 0/1 was achieved by ≥18% (UPA15) and ≥38% (UPA30) of adolescents aged 16 to <18 years and ≥30% (UPA15) and ≥45% (UPA30) of adults. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A and HADS-D) <8 was achieved in ≥28% of adolescents and ≥45% of adults for both treatment groups. Rates of serious adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs leading to discontinuation at week 52 were similar for both adolescents and adults. UPA15 and UPA30 responses in moderate-to-severe AD across 52 weeks were similar between adolescents and adults, with acceptable safety outcomes in both populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lebrikizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity and slow off-rate to interleukin (IL)-13, thereby blocking the downstream effects of IL-13 with high potency. ADvocate1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate2 (NCT04178967) are identically designed phase 3, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials evaluating lebrikizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). At Week 16 of both studies, lebrikizumab 250 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) showed statistically significant improvements in measures of skin clearance and patient reported outcomes. Patients treated with lebrikizumab achieved clinically meaningful improvements in the signs and symptoms of AD with fewer AD flares across multiple definitions than patients treated with placebo. In patients who met the protocol-defined criteria for response to lebrikizumab at Week 16, most patients treated with lebrikizumab Q2W and lebrikizumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) maintained an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1 response (71% and 77%, respectively) and a 75% improvement in the Eczema and Severity Index from baseline (EASI 75; 78% and 82%, respectively) up to Week 52. The objective of this analysis is to determine the proportion and the individual efficacy trajectory of lebrikizumab-treated patients who exhibited a stable response with no or minimal fluctuations of efficacy from Week 16 to Week 52 in Week 16 responders. Patients who responded to lebrikizumab at the end of the 16-week induction period were rerandomized 2 : 2 : 1 to receive lebrikizumab Q2W, lebrikizumab Q4W or placebo Q2W (withdrawal) for 36 additional weeks. Week 16 responders were defined as those achieving an EASI 75 or IGA 0/1 with a ≥2-point improvement and without rescue medication use. We defined no or minimal fluctuations as maintaining EASI 75 for at least 80% of the 10 study visits from Week 16 to Week 52. Separately, we analysed EASI 90 with the same criteria. We also analysed the proportion of patients who achieved each endpoint at all 10 maintenance period study visits. ADvocate2 analyses were performed on a modified population, excluding 17 patients who entered the maintenance period (from a single study site) and whose eligibility could not be confirmed. Therefore, analyses were performed on the modified pooled population of ADvocate1 and ADvocate2 patients. All analyses were performed post hoc. If patients used rescue medication, discontinued treatment or transferred to the escape arm, data collected at or after the event was imputed as nonresponse. In ADvocate1 and ADvocate2, 291 patients met the criteria for response at Week 16 (EASI 75 or IGA 0/1 with a ≥2-point improvement and without rescue medication use) and were rerandomized to receive lebrikizumab Q2W (n = 113), lebrikizumab Q4W, (n = 118) or withdrawal (n = 60) from Week 16 to Week 52. The proportions of patients who maintained EASI 75 for at least 80% of the maintenance period were 71% (lebrikizumab Q2W), 71% (lebrikizumab Q4W) and 60% (withdrawal). The proportions of patients who maintained EASI 75 at all study visits were 53% (lebrikizumab Q2W), 55% (lebrikizumab Q4W) and 38% (withdrawal). The proportions of patients to achieve and maintain the more stringent response of EASI 90 for at least 80% of study visits were 45% (lebrikizumab Q2W), 51% (lebrikizumab Q4W) and 35% (withdrawal). In ADvocate1 and ADvocate2, approximately 7 out of 10 of patients who continued treatment with lebrikizumab maintained at least an EASI 75 response with no or minimal fluctuations. These individual patient data show that most patients treated with monotherapy lebrikizumab Q2W and Q4W maintain a stable response with no or minimal fluctuations of efficacy up to Week 52. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Missing data occur in clinical trials and have the potential to lead to biased results. Subsequently, the analytical methods for handling the missing data are important to evaluate. In atopic dermatitis (AD) trials, missing data are not handled consistently across studies. Lebrikizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity and slow off-rate to interleukin (IL)-13, thereby blocking the downstream effects of IL-13 with high potency. In ADvocate1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate2 (NCT04178967), two randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab monotherapy in adolescent and adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD, a combined nonresponder/multiple imputation (NRI/MI) approach, was applied on the primary and key secondary endpoints. This study aims to illustrate the NRI/MI method using individual patient examples and to present Week 16 study results from ADvocate1 and ADvocate2 with NRI/MI and single imputation methods, NRI and last-observation carried forward (LOCF). In the combined NRI/MI method, data from patients after initiating rescue medication or discontinuing treatment due to lack of efficacy were imputed with NRI, and missing data for other reasons were imputed with MI, which uses a statistical model based on all available patient data to impute missing values. The MI method considers each patient's trajectory and leverages information from other patients within the same treatment arm to impute the missing data. With NRI alone, the cause leading to the missing data is not considered and missing data for any reason are imputed as nonresponse. With LOCF, missing data are replaced with the last available measurement; LOCF assumes that the patient response would be stable over time and does not consider the reason for missing data. We determined the amount of missing data in ADvocate1 and ADvocate2, and we assessed patient-level imputed IGA scores to illustrate NRI/MI, NRI and LOCF. With these missing data handling methods, we evaluated the percentage of patients achieving the co-primary endpoints of ADvocate1 and ADvocate2: an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 [IGA (0,1); clear or almost clear] with ≥2-point improvement from baseline or 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) at Week 16. With the NRI/MI method, most missing data at Week 16 were imputed with NRI (ADvocate1: 73%, ADvocate2: 82%) compared with MI (ADvocate1: 27%, ADvocate2: 18%). Example imputed IGA scores based on patient-level data will be presented to demonstrate the missing data handling methods. For NRI/MI, NRI and LOCF, respectively, the percentage of patients achieving IGA 0,1 were 12.7%, 11.3% and 12.8% for placebo in ADvocate1 and 10.8%, 9.6% and 11.0% for placebo in ADvocate2; 43.1%, 41.0% and 42.4% for lebrikizumab in ADvocate1 and 33.2%, 31.3% and 33.5% for lebrikizumab in ADvocate2. The percentage of patients achieving EASI 75 were 16.2%, 14.2% and 16.3% for placebo in ADvocate1 and 18.1%, 17.1% and 19.2% for placebo in ADvocate2; 58.8%, 56.5% and 60.1% for lebrikizumab in ADvocate1 and 52.1%, 50.2% and 55.5% for lebrikizumab in ADvocate2. When using the NRI/MI method, we determined most missing data in ADvocate1 and ADvocate2 were handled with NRI. This analysis suggests that the NRI/MI method may provide a realistic estimation of response rate in ADvocate1 and ADvocate2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The landscape of targeted systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) continues to expand. With limited head-to-head randomized controlled trials conducted in AD, a network meta-analysis (NMA) helps inform treatment decisions by providing indirect comparisons across therapies. This study aims to update an NMA presented in Silverberg et al. (2022), assessing the comparative efficacy of targeted systemic treatments without concomitant topical corticosteroids in moderate-to-severe AD by including the latest Phase 3 monotherapy data for lebrikizumab. Data from the two most recently published Phase 3 monotherapy trials for lebrikizumab in moderate-to-severe AD [ADvocate1 (NCT04146363); ADvocate2 (NCT04178967)] were included in the analyses along with other eligible Phase 3 or 4 randomized placebo-controlled trials for abrocitinib, baricitinib, dupilumab, tralokinumab and upadacitinib identified through a systemic literature review in Silverberg et al. (2022). Prespecified efficacy outcomes included ≥90% and ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 90, EASI 75) from baseline, ≥4-point improvement in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale from baseline (ΔNRS ≥4) and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) with a ≥2-point reduction from baseline (IGA 0/1), at the primary endpoint timepoint for each study (Week 12 for abrocitinib, Week 16 for all other therapies). Bayesian NMA was performed with fixed-effect, random-effect and baseline risk-adjusted models; fit statistics and diagnostics were assessed. The odds ratio (OR), number needed to treat (NNT), placebo-unadjusted absolute response rate (ARR) and Surface Under the Cumulative RAnking curve (SUCRA) scores were estimated. Statistical significance was assessed by OR 95% credible intervals excluding 1. The updated NMA analysed 13 unique placebo-controlled trials involving 7105 patients in 32 arms across six targeted therapies. Fit statistics and diagnostics supported fixed-effect models for all outcomes analysed. All targeted therapies had significantly greater response rates compared with placebo across all outcomes. For EASI 90, upadacitinib 30 mg had the most favorable response estimates (ARR = 58.3%, OR = 23.1, NNT = 1.9, SUCRA = 98.5%), followed by abrocitinib 200 mg (ARR = 45.2%, OR = 13.5, NNT = 2.5, SUCRA = 84.3%), upadacitinib 15 mg (ARR = 43.7%, OR = 12.8, NNT = 2.6, SUCRA = 82.0%), dupilumab 300 mg (ARR = 27.3%, OR = 6.2, NNT = 4.7, SUCRA = 52.8%), abrocitinib 100 mg (ARR = 26.8%, OR = 6.0, NNT = 4.8, SUCRA = 48.4%), baricitinib 4 mg (ARR = 25.0%, OR = 5.5, NNT = 5.2, SUCRA = 45.5%) and lebrikizumab 250 mg (ARR = 23.6%, OR = 5.1, NNT = 5.6, SUCRA = 40.0%). A similar rank order was observed for EASI 75 [upadacitinib 30 mg (ARR = 72.3%, OR = 19.1, NNT = 1.7, SUCRA = 98.5%), abrocitinib 200 mg (ARR = 64.6%, OR = 13.3, NNT = 1.9, SUCRA = 87.3%), upadacitinib 15 mg (ARR = 59.8%, OR = 10.9, NNT = 2.1, SUCRA = 80.2%), dupilumab 300 mg (ARR = 45.3%, OR = 6.0, NNT = 3.0, SUCRA = 55.4%), abrocitinib 100 mg (ARR = 44.9%, OR = 5.9, NNT = 3.1, SUCRA = 53.5%) and lebrikizumab 250 mg (ARR = 44.7%, OR = 5.9, NNT = 3.1, SUCRA = 53.9%)]. For ΔNRS ≥4, upadacitinib 30 mg also had the most favorable response (ARR = 56.1%, OR = 12.9, NNT = 2.1, SUCRA = 99.0%), followed by abrocitinib 200 mg (ARR = 45.4%, OR = 8.3, NNT = 2.8, SUCRA = 83.6%), upadacitinib 15 mg (ARR = 42.9%, OR = 7.6, NNT = 3.0, SUCRA = 79.2%), dupilumab 300 mg (ARR = 33.9%, OR = 5.2, NNT = 4.0, SUCRA = 54.2%), lebrikizumab 250 mg (ARR = 33.9%, OR = 5.1, NNT = 4.1, SUCRA = 54.1%) and abrocitinib 100 mg (ARR = 31.5%, OR = 4.6, NNT = 4.5, SUCRA = 46.1%). For IGA 0/1, upadacitinib 30 mg (ARR = 61.8%, OR = 19.4, NNT = 1.9, SUCRA = 99.9%) and upadacitinib 15 mg (ARR = 48.1%, OR = 11.1, NNT = 2.5, SUCRA = 86.9%) had the most favorable estimates, followed by abrocitinib 200 mg (ARR = 39.3%, OR = 7.7, NNT = 3.2, SUCRA = 75.5%), dupilumab 300 mg (ARR = 32.4%, OR = 5.7, NNT = 4.1, SUCRA = 62.1%) and lebrikizumab 250 mg (ARR = 28.0%, OR = 4.7, NNT = 5.0, SUCRA = 49.1%). Baricitinib 2 mg and tralokinumab 300 mg were generally ranked lower across outcomes. Among targeted treatments for moderate-to-severe AD used without concomitant topical corticosteroids for 12–16 weeks, upadacitinib 30 mg remains the most efficacious therapy in this NMA, generally followed by abrocitinib 200 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, dupilumab 300 mg and lebrikizumab 250 mg or abrocitinib 100 mg. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lebrikizumab (LEB) is a monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to interleukin (IL)-13, thereby blocking the downstream effects of IL-13 with high potency. To report integrated safety information in adult and adolescent patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis treated with LEB, from an integrated safety analysis of eight clinical Phase 2 and 3 trials. These data include adult and adolescent patients who received at least one dose of study drug from a total of eight atopic dermatitis clinical trials: ADvocate1, ADvocate2, ADhere, ADore, ADjoin (ongoing), ARBAN, TREBLE and a Phase 2b study. Treatment duration ranged from a single dose to 100 weeks. This analysis includes all placebo-controlled Week 0- to 16-safety data in patients treated with LEB 250 mg every 2 weeks (LEBQ2W, n = 783) compared with placebo (n = 404) known as ALL PC Weeks 0–16, and all patients who received at least one dose of LEB (n = 1720) known as ALL LEB. Conjunctivitis cluster is defined by MedDRA-preferred terms of conjunctivitis, allergic conjunctivitis, bacterial conjunctivitis, viral conjunctivitis and giant papillary conjunctivitis. Exposure adjusted incidence rates (IR) are provided as per 100 patient-years. In ALL PC Weeks 0–16 analysis, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) was 49.2% in LEBQ2W (n = 384) compared with 53.1% in placebo (n = 215). The majority of TEAEs reported were mild or moderate in severity with 2.3% (n = 18) reported as severe in LEBQ2W and 4.4% (n = 18) in placebo. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported by 1.3% (n = 10) in LEBQ2W and 1.9% (n = 8) in placebo. No deaths reported in LEBQ2W and one death in placebo. The most frequently reported TEAE in LEBQ2W was conjunctivitis and in placebo was atopic dermatitis. Conjunctivitis cluster was reported by 8.5% (n = 67) in LEBQ2W and 2.5% (n = 10) in placebo. All conjunctivitis cluster events were mild or moderate. Injection site reactions (ISRs) were reported by 2.6% (n = 20) in LEBQ2W and 1.5% (n = 6) in placebo. Adverse events leading to discontinuation were reported by 2.3% (n = 18) in LEBQ2W and 1.4% (n = 6) in placebo. In ALL LEB, the frequency of TEAEs was 64.3% (n = 1106, IR: 137.9), with the majority being mild or moderate in severity. Severe TEAEs were reported by 5.3% (n = 91). The incidence rates of TEAE did not increase with duration of treatment exposure. The SAEs were reported by 3.3% (n = 56, IR: 3.5). Three (0.2%) deaths occurred in ALL LEB. Conjunctivitis cluster was reported by 10.6% (n = 183, IR:12.2) with the majority being mild or moderate in severity and 0.3% (n = 6) being reported as severe. The ISRs were reported by 3.1% (n = 53, IR: 3.3). Adverse events leading to discontinuation were reported by 4.2% (n = 73, IR: 4.5). The overall safety profile for lebrikizumab consisted of AEs that were mostly nonserious, mild or moderate in severity, and did not lead to treatment discontinuation. Safety profile was similar in both adults and adolescents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lebrikizumab (LEB) is a novel, high-affinity monoclonal anti - body that selectively binds to interleukin (IL)-13. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LEB monotherapy in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in two identical phase 3 trials ADvocate1 (ADv1) and ADvocate2 (ADv2). Patients who responded to LEB 250 mg every 2 weeks (LEB Q2W) at the end of the 16-week induction period were re-randomized in a 2 : 2 :1 ratio to receive LEB Q2W, LEB 250 mg every 4 weeks (LEB Q4W) or placebo (LEB withdrawal) for an additional 36 weeks. Response, at week 16, was defined as achieving an IGA (0, 1) with a ≥2-point improvement or EASI75 and no use of rescue medication. Efficacy outcomes reported at week 52 included IGA (0, 1), EASI 75, ≥4-point reduction in Pruritis Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), EASI 90 and DLQI ≥4-point. Safety analysis was conducted on all patients who received ≥1 dose of LEB. Patients maintained IGA (0, 1) in LEB Q2W (ADv1, 75.8%; ADv2, 64.6%), LEB Q4W (ADv1, 74.2%; ADv2, 80.6%) and LEB withdrawal (ADv1, 46.5%; ADv2, 49.8%). Maintenance of EASI75 was, in LEB Q2W (ADv1, 79.2%; ADv2, 77.4%), LEB Q4W (ADv1, 79.2%; ADv2, 84.7%) and LEB withdrawal (ADv1, 61.3%; ADv2, 72.0%). For Pruritus NRS ≥4-point improvement from baseline, patients-maintained improvement in the LEB Q2W (ADv1, 81.2%; ADv2, 90.3%), LEB Q4W (ADv1, 80.4%; ADv2, 88.1%) and LEB withdrawal (ADv1, 65.4%; ADv2, 67.6%). Maintenance of EASI90 was, in LEB Q2W (ADv1, 66.1%; ADv2, 61.5%), LEB Q4W (ADv1, 66.6%; ADv2, 67.4%) and LEB withdrawal (ADv1, 45.5%; ADv2, 36.9%). DLQI ≥4-point improvement from baseline was LEB Q2W (ADv1, 64.0%; ADv2, 59.0%), LEB Q4W (ADv1, 62.7%; ADv2, 73.0%) and LEB withdrawal (ADv1, 57.7%; ADv2, 45.5%). TEAEs were reported by 58.1% (ADv1) and 67.8% (ADv2) LEB-treated patients at week 52. Serious adverse events were reported by 3.3% of ADv1 patients and 2.7% of ADv2 patients. In ADv1 and ADv2, 2.3% and 3.9% of patients reported an adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation, respectively. Both LEB Q2W and LEB Q4W maintained improvement in all reported outcomes for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD through 52 weeks. The safety profile was consistent with previously published data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abrocitinib, an oral, once-daily Janus kinase 1-selective inhibitor, had a superior efficacy vs. dupilumab in head-to-head randomized trials in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Data on patients who switched from dupilumab to abrocitinib have been limited. To evaluate abrocitinib response in patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were responders or nonresponders to dupilumab. Dupilumab-treated patients from the JADE DARE trial (NCT04345367), which was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of 26-week abrocitinib (200 mg daily) vs. dupilumab (300 mg bi-weekly) in patients receiving topical medicated therapy, had the option to switch to abrocitinib 200 mg by enrolling to an open-label JADE EXTEND trial (NCT03422822). In this analysis, we evaluated the response to abrocitinib 200 mg at week 12 of JADE EXTEND of responders and nonresponders to dupilumab at week 26 of JADE DARE. Response and nonresponse were defined as patients’ achievement and nonachievement, respectively, of ≥50%, ≥ 75% or ≥90% improvement from the JADE DARE baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-50, EASI-75 or EASI-90), ≥ 4-point improvement from JADE DARE baseline in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4), and PP-NRS score of 0 or 1 (PP-NRS 0/1) at week 26 of JADE DARE. In addition, changes in individ - ual EASI and PP-NRS scores were evaluated in dupilumab-treated patients with significant skin lesions (EASI ≥16) or itch burden (PP-NRS ≥7) at week 26 of JADE DARE. Patients who withdrew from JADE EXTEND were considered nonresponders after withdrawal. Additionally, adverse events (AEs) of dupilumab-treated patients from JADE DARE occurring during JADE EXTEND were assessed. Out of 365 dupilumab-treated patients in JADE DARE, 312 received treatment in JADE EXTEND. After 12 weeks of switching to abrocitinib, EASI-50 response was maintained in 98% of patients (277/282) who had attained EASI-50 after 26 weeks of dupilumab. Those values were 95% (232/245) for EASI-75, 88% (143/162) for EASI-90, 91% (192/210) for PP-NRS4 and 79% (86/109) for PP-NRS 0/1. Conversely, among patients who did not attain EASI-50 after 26 weeks of dupilumab, switching to abrocitinib for 12 weeks resulted in 75% (12/16) of patients attaining this level of response. Those values were 77% (41/53) for EASI-75, 62% (85/136) for EASI-90, 51% (46/90) for PP-NRS4 and 45% (86/192) for PP-NRS 0/1. Among dupilumab-treated patients with EASI ≥16 at week 26 of JADE DARE, 91% (10/11) experienced improvements (i.e. EASI <16), after switching to abrocitinib for 12 weeks; in two such patients, score changes were consistent with ≥97% improvement in EASI from JADE DARE week 26 to JADE EXTEND week 12 (from 45.5 to 0 and from 42.3 to 1.4). Among patients with PP-NRS ≥7 at JADE DARE week 26, 75% (12/16) showed an improvement (i.e. PP-NRS score <7), 12 weeks after switching to abrocitinib; three such patients achieved a PP-NRS score of 0 or 1. During JADE EXTEND, 57% (178/312) of patients who previously received dupilumab experienced AEs and 3% (9/312) experienced serious AEs. Most patients with moderate-to-severe AD who switched from dupilumab to abrocitinib after 26 weeks maintained their response, while a great proportion of the nonresponders achieved clinically relevant efficacy outcomes 12 weeks after the switch. The safety profile of abrocitinib after switching from dupilumab was consistent with that of previous safety analyses; serious AEs were relatively rare. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a debilitating chronic inflammatory skin disease with fluctuating disease severity that requires long-term control. Patients report that complete or almost complete skin clearance is highly important as a treatment goal. Upadacitinib is a selective oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor with greater inhibitory potency for JAK1 vs. JAK2, JAK3, and tyrosine kinase 2. In this post-hoc analysis of the upadacitinib phase 3/3b studies, we analysed the time patients spent in skin clearance response states over 16 weeks with upadacitinib 15 mg (UPA 15) and 30 mg (UPA 30) compared to placebo and dupilumab. Data were from phase 3/3b multicenter, randomized, double-blinded studies comparing the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib to either placebo (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2) or dupilumab (Heads Up) in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. In the Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 studies, adults and adolescents were randomized to receive UPA 15, UPA 30 or a placebo once daily for 16 weeks. In the Heads Up study, adults were randomized to receive UPA 30 once daily or dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks beginning at week 2 following an initial loading dose of 600 mg. The days patients spent in skin clearance response states based on Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI) improvements ≥75%/90%/100% (EASI 75/90/100) from baseline were assessed. Missing data at study visits were imputed using non-responder imputation. Response states between study visits were interpolated using the last observation carried forward. Integrated data from Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 included 1683 adults and adolescents randomized to UPA 15 (N=557), UPA 30 (N=567), or placebo (N=559); 44.0% were female, and 48.8% had previously received systemic therapy. In the Heads Up study, 692 adults were randomized to UPA 30 (N=348) or dupilumab (N=344); 45.5% were female, and 51.0% had previously received systemic therapy. Patients in Measure Up 1 and 2 taking UPA 15 or UPA 30 cumulatively spent a greater proportion of days in EASI 75 (UPA 15: 54.2%, UPA 30: 64.6%, Placebo: 10.2%), EASI 90 (UPA 15: 32.0%, UPA 30: 44.0%, Placebo: 3.2%), and EASI 100 (UPA 15: 7.5%, UPA 30: 13.5%, Placebo: 0.6%) response states compared to placebo over 16 weeks. In the Heads Up study, patients taking UPA 30 vs. dupilumab cumulatively spent a greater proportion of days in EASI 75 (58.9% vs. 36.9%), EASI 90 (42.1% vs. 19.1%), and EASI 100 (11.8% vs. 3.3%) response states over 16 weeks. Treatment of moderate-to-severe AD with UPA 15 or UPA 30 resulted in a greater proportion of days spent with higher levels of skin clearance (EASI 75/90/100) compared to placebo over 16 weeks, mirroring findings from the Heads Up study comparing UPA 30 to dupilumab. Increases in time spent with high levels of skin clearance with upadacitinib treatment may reflect improved long-term disease control and translate into more time spent experiencing a better quality of life that is less burdened by AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with itch, eczematous lesions and impaired quality of life (QoL). Although the frequency of skin pain in AD is often underestimated, it is associated with a substantial health burden, similar to itch and is known to contribute to sleep disruption and mood disturbance. Abrocitinib is an oral, once-daily, selective Janus kinase-1 inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. In phase 3 clinical trials JADE MONO-1 (NCT03349060) and JADE MONO-2 (NCT03575871), abrocitinib demonstrated rapid relief from itch and skin pain, as well as meaningful improvements in QoL compared with placebo. The interrelationships between abrocitinib treatment and improvements in itch, skin pain and QoL have not yet been investigated. This mediation analysis aimed to characterize the effect of abrocitinib treatment via itch and skin pain on dermatology-specific QoL in patients with AD. Data from JADE MONO-1 and JADE MONO-2 were pooled in this analysis. Adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD received abrocitinib (200 or 100 mg) as monotherapy or placebo for 12 weeks. Three separate models were evaluated whereby QoL was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score, and itch and skin pain were assessed via the Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) items #1 (How itchy was your skin over the past 24 h?) and #2 (How painful was your skin over the past 24 h?), respectively. The cross-sectional mediation model (CSMM) was run separately at weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 using all available data at each timepoint. The longitudinal mediation model (LMM), which does not assume independence among measurements of itch, skin pain and DLQI at each timepoint, estimated relationships using all available data from all weeks simultaneously. Based on the results of the CSMM and LMM, a pseudosteady-state model, in which the relationship among variables was assumed to be the same across timepoints, was applied. Effects with P<0.05 were considered statistically significant. In the CSMM, the indirect effect of abrocitinib on DLQI mediated via itch was considered approximately stable (24–30%) for the first 8 weeks before increasing at week 12 (42%), while the indirect effect mediated via skin pain was considered approximately stable from week 2 to week 12 (33–41%). In the LMM, the indirect effect of abrocitinib treatment on DLQI mediated via both itch and skin pain was considered approximately stable from week 2 to week 12 (17–26% and 42–48%, respectively). The cross-sectional and longitudinal models were generally consistent and indicated a pseudo-steady-state period between weeks 2 and 12. Using the pseudo-steady-state model, the direct effect of abrocitinib on DLQI was estimated to be 34.8% (P<0.0001), and the indirect effects mediated via itch and skin pain were estimated to be 19.5% and 45.8%, respectively (P≤0.0001 for both). Improvements in dermatology-specific QoL with abrocitinib are mostly mediated indirectly via a reduction in skin pain and less so by relief of itch. These findings warrant further research to examine to what extent patients consider itch and skin pain as separate concepts in terms of their impact on dermatology-specific QoL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder characterized by intense itch, skin pain and impaired quality of life. Skin pain is a common and bothersome symptom of AD and increases in prevalence and intensity with worsening disease severity. Abrocitinib is an oral, once-daily, selective Janus kinase-1 inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. Abrocitinib treatment resulted in improvements in skin clearance as well as rapid itch reduction in patients with moderate-to-severe AD across multiple phase 3 studies. Work productivity loss and activity impairment were assessed in the phase 3 JADE MONO-2 (NCT03575871) trial, with greater improvements being associated with abrocitinib treatment compared with placebo. The mechanism(s) through which abrocitinib reduces work productivity loss and activity impairment are unclear. To describe the interrelationships among abrocitinib treatment, itch, skin pain, and work productivity and activity impairment using a mediation modelling analysis in patients with AD. Data from adult patients treated with abrocitinib monotherapy (200 or 100 mg) or placebo in JADE MONO-2 were included in this analysis. As separate outcomes, work productivity loss and activity impairment (outcome variables) were measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Atopic Dermatitis version 2.0 (WPAI-AD 2.0). Itch and skin pain (mediator variables) were evaluated using the Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) item #1 (How itchy was your skin over the past 24 h?) and item #2 (How painful was your skin over the past 24 h?), respectively. Mediation modelling was conducted independently for work productivity loss and activity impairment. All available data at week 12 were used in the modelling. Effects with P<0.05 were considered statistically significant. The direct effects of abrocitinib were estimated to be 7.3% (P=0.779) and 17.5% (P=0.258) on work productivity loss and activity impairment, respectively. The indirect effects of abrocitinib treatment on work productivity loss and, separately, on activity impairment mediated via itch were estimated to be 50.6% (P=0.017) and 20.9% (P=0.062), respectively, and via skin, pain were estimated to be 42.1% and 61.5%, respectively, (P<0.05 for both). The indirect effect of abrocitinib treatment on work productivity loss is mediated approximately equally through the reduction in itch severity and skin pain. The effect of abrocitinib treatment on activity impairment is mostly mediated indirectly through the reduction of skin pain, along with a smaller indirect contribution from the reduction in itch. These findings support further research into the extent that patients consider itch and skin pain as separate concepts in terms of their impact on work productivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lebrikizumab is an injectable, IgG4 monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to interleukin-13 with high affinity. Injection-site reactions (ISRs) are localized adverse events in the immediate site of administration of a drug and are common with injectable therapies. This analysis reports ISRs in patients from eight lebrikizumab (LEB) clinical trials in atopic dermatitis. To report ISRs in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis treated with LEB, from an integrated safety analysis of phase 2 and 3 LEB clinical trials. These data sets include adolescents and adult patients who received at least one dose of LEB from a total of eight atopic dermatitis clinical trials, including four 16-week placebo-controlled clinical trials. Eight trials consist of: ADvocate1, ADvocate2, ADhere, ADore, ADjoin (ongoing), ARBAN, TREBLE and Phase 2b study. Treatment duration ranged from a single dose to 100 weeks. ISRs were defined using the preferred terms from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities high-level term, injection site reactions, excluding terms related to joints. This analysis includes ISRs frequencies in patients treated with LEB compared to placebo (ALL PC week 0–16), and all patients who received any dose of LEB (ALL LEB), and reports ISRs type, exposure adjusted incidence rates (EAIR) per 100 patient-years, the timing of ISRs occurrence, and ISRs leading to discontinuation. In the ALL PC week 0–16 analysis, 2.6% (n=20/783, EAIR 9.0) of patients in the LEB group reported ISRs vs. 1.5% (n = 6/404 EAIR 5.4) in the placebo group. Injection site pain (n = 7, 0.9%) and injection site erythema (n = 7, 0.9%) were the most frequent reactions reported in the LEB group. Most ISRs were mild or moderate, with only 1 (0.1%) severe event. In the ALL LEB analysis, 3.1% of patients reported ISRs (n = 53/1720, EAIR 3.3). Injection site pain (n = 16, 0.9%) and injection site erythema (n =12, 0.7%) were the most frequent reactions. Almost all reports were mild or moderate, with 3 (0.2%) severe. The incidence of ISRs did not increase with a longer duration of LEB expo - sure. The majority of ISRs were reported between weeks 0 and 16 ( n = 38, 2.2%). The frequency of ISRs from week 16 to 32 was 1.0% (n = 15), from week 32 to 48 was 0.4% ( n = 4) and from week 48 to 64 was 0.2% (n =2). Treatment discontinuation due to ISRs occurred in a few patients (n =5, 0.3%). Overall, a low proportion of patients reported ISRs (<3%) with a numerically higher frequency of LEB-treated patients who reported ISRs compared to placebo (1.5%). Most events were mild or moderate in severity, did not lead to treatment discontinuation, occurred within the first 16 weeks of treatment, and ISRs incidence did not increase with a longer duration of exposure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lebrikizumab demonstrated robust efficacy during the first 16 weeks of treatment in ADvocate1 and ADvocate2. This study aims to describe the 52-week results of lebrikizumab-treated patients who did not meet the protocol-defined criteria for response at 16 weeks of treatment. During the induction period, patients were randomized 2 : 1 to lebrikizumab 250 mg or placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 16 weeks. Protocol-defined criteria for response were characterized as achieving a 75% Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) or an Investigator's Global Assessment of 0 or 1 (IGA 0,1) with a ≥2-point improvement and without rescue medication use. At Week 16, patients from the lebrikizumab treatment arm, who did not reach the criteria for response, were assigned to the Escape arm (n = 215). These patients continued to receive lebrikizumab 250 mg Q2W for an additional 36 weeks. Endpoints and measurements included at week 52 were EASI75, EASI90, IGA (0,1) and pruritus. Pruritus was assessed using an 11-point Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Data are presented as observed results with no imputation for missing data. Pooled results for patients who did not respond to lebrikizumab and entered the escape arm show 36.1% achieved IGA (0,1) with 2-point improvement at Week 52. In the same population, 75.5% achieved EASI75, 44.2% achieved EASI90 and 66.4% reported 4-point improvement in Pruritus NRS. These results suggest that patients, who do not achieve protocol-defined response at 16 weeks of treatment, can be slow responders and derive benefit from continuing long-term therapy with lebrikizumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lebrikizumab (LEB) is a novel, high affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to interleukin (IL)-13. Lebrikizumab has been shown to provide robust improvements in signs and symptoms in adolescent and adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD across three phase 3 clinical trials (ADvocate1, ADvocate2 and ADhere). However, little is known about the efficacy of LEB in difficult to treat regions such as the face and hands. This study aims to report efficacy of LEB in improving facial and hand dermatitis. ADvocate1 and ADvocate2 assessed LEB 250 mg every 2 weeks (LEBQ2W) vs. placebo for 16 weeks in monotherapy. ADhere compared low-to-mid potency topical corticosteroids (TCS) in addition to LEB Q2W vs. TCS and placebo for 16 weeks. In all trials, clinicians assessed for the presence or absence of facial and hand dermatitis. If present at baseline, at Week 16, clinicians assessed the change from baseline on a scale of cleared, improved, no change or worsened. Patients with improved or cleared dermatitis are described. In ADvocate1 at baseline, facial dermatitis was identified in 71.4% (202/283) of LEBQ2W patients and 80.9% (114/141) of placebo. At Week 16, 61.9% (125/202; P < 0.001) of LEBQ2W were improved or cleared vs. 31.6% (36/114) of placebo. At baseline, hand dermatitis was identified in 72.1% (204/283) of LEBQ2W patients vs. 73.0% (103/141) of placebo. At Week 16, 67.2% (137/204; P < 0.001) of LEBQ2W were improved or cleared vs. 29.1% (30/103) of placebo. In ADvocate2 at baseline, facial dermatitis was identified in 73.7% (207/281) of LEBQ2W patients and 78.8% (115/146) of placebo. At Week 16, 57.5% (119/207; P < 0.001) of LEBQ2W were improved or cleared vs. 21.7% (25/115) of placebo. At baseline, hand dermatitis was identified in 73.3% (206/281) of LEBQ2W patients and 72.6% (106/146) of placebo. At Week 16, 61.7% (127/206; P < 0.001) of LEBQ2W were improved or cleared vs. 18.9% (20/106) of placebo. In ADhere at baseline, facial dermatitis was identified in 72.4% (105/145) of LEBQ2W patients and 59.1% (39/66) of placebo. At Week 16, 68.6% (72/105; P = 0.02) of LEBQ2W were improved or cleared vs. 46.2% (18/39) of placebo. At baseline, hand dermatitis was identified in 71.0% (103/145) of LEBQ2W patients and 66.7% (44/66) of placebo. At Week 16, 72.8% (75/103; P = 0.001) of LEBQ2W were improved or cleared vs. 43.2% (19/44) of placebo. Lebrikizumab treatment is efficacious in improving and clearing hand and face dermatitis in most patients at Week 16. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Having genital psoriasis is often embarrassing to patients, negatively having an impact on their sexual health throughout their lives.5 Although speculative, such embarrassment may have deterred some patients from consulting their GP because of their psoriasis. Dear Editor, Undiagnosed psoriasis can lead to impaired quality of life and development of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, poor mental health and certain types of cancers.1-3 Identifying potential predictors of a diagnostic delay in patients with psoriasis is therefore important and more data on this topic are warranted. Having a longer diagnostic delay was significantly associated with higher DLQI, which could suggest that patients who remain untreated or undiagnosed for a longer time may be more affected by the disease later in life. [Extracted from the article]

Adalimumab is currently the only biologic approved for moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).1 Although the treatment may initially reduce the number of flares, patients with HS may often discontinue the treatment due to insufficient disease control. HT