1. Reappraising Choice in Addiction: Novel Conceptualizations and Treatments for Tobacco Use Disorder
- Author
-
Matthew J. Carpenter, Amanda M Palmer, Eric C. Donny, Alana M. Rojewski, Tracy T. Smith, Johannes Thrul, Mehmet Sofuoglu, Dorothy K. Hatsukami, Neal L. Benowitz, and Benjamin A. Toll
- Subjects
Psychotherapist ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Clinical Sciences ,Context (language use) ,Review ,Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems ,Tobacco industry ,Nicotine ,Substance Misuse ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Promotion (rank) ,Tobacco ,Behavioral and Social Science ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Cancer ,media_common ,Marketing ,Harm reduction ,Tobacco Smoke and Health ,Prevention ,Addiction ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Tobacco Use Disorder ,Tobacco Products ,Abstinence ,Tobacco Use Cessation Devices ,Brain Disorders ,Product (business) ,Good Health and Well Being ,Public Health and Health Services ,Public Health ,Drug Abuse (NIDA only) ,Psychology ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,medicine.drug - Abstract
The introduction of alternative nicotine and tobacco products (such as e-cigarettes, heat-not-burn devices, nicotine pouches) warrants an updated framework from which to conceptualize tobacco use disorder (TUD). The following review provides considerations for TUD within the context of novel products. Historically, the tobacco industry falsely claimed that cigarettes were not addictive or harmful and that those who smoked simply chose to do so. This generated an inaccurate lay perception that smoking is a free or informed choice. Research on nicotine pharmacology demonstrates the powerful addictive potential of nicotine, which is shaped by dose, speed of delivery, and other constituents generated. In addition, non-pharmacologic reinforcers motivate and maintain tobacco use behaviors for both traditional cigarettes and novel products. The negative consequences of combustible tobacco use are well known; however, these outcomes may differ for alternative products. Strategies used for combustible product cessation may be adapted for novel products, and treatment recommendations for TUD should be made within the context of a harm reduction framework wherein alternative product use may be the desired outcome. Providers must therefore be willing to modify their perceptions of products and treatment recommendations accordingly. Better public health outcomes are accomplished through promotion of abstinence from combustible smoking. For those who cannot wean from nicotine entirely, switching to less risky modes of delivery might be a secondary goal, with an eventual aim of stopping use of the alternative product. Implications: Given the advent of novel, alternative tobacco products, tobacco use disorder (TUD) must be conceptualized within a contemporary framework that includes harm reduction and alternative outcomes. The unique contributions of nicotine pharmacology, non-pharmacologic reinforcers, and consequences of use can be used to inform treatments for TUD with the ultimate goal of improving the health of individuals who use tobacco.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF