1. Socioeconomic and urban-rural disparities in genome-matched treatment receipt and survival after genomic tumor testing.
- Author
-
DiBiase JF, Scharnetzki E, Edelman E, Reed EK, Helbig P, Rueter J, Miesfeldt S, Frankenfeld CL, Han PKJ, Jacobs EA, and Anderson EC
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Maine, Urban Population statistics & numerical data, Income, Logistic Models, Adult, Genomics, Genetic Testing statistics & numerical data, Educational Status, Neoplasms mortality, Neoplasms genetics, Neoplasms therapy, Rural Population statistics & numerical data, Proportional Hazards Models, Healthcare Disparities, Socioeconomic Factors
- Abstract
Background: Emerging cancer treatments are often most available to socially advantaged individuals. This study examines the relationship of patient educational attainment, income level, and rurality to the receipt of genome-matched treatment and overall survival., Methods: Survey and clinical data were collected from patients with cancer (n = 1258) enrolled in the Maine Cancer Genomics Initiative. Logistic regression models examined whether receipt of genome-matched treatment differed by patient education, income, and rurality. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were conducted to evaluate 12-month mortality. We completed additional exploratory analyses using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models stratified by receipt of genome-matched treatment. Logistic and Cox regression models were adjusted for age and gender., Results: Educational attainment, income level, and rurality were not associated with genome-matched treatment receipt. Of 1258 patients, 462 (36.7%) died within 365 days of consent. Mortality risk was associated with lower educational attainment (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06 to 1.59; P = .013). No statistically significant differences in mortality risk were observed for income level or rurality. Exploratory models suggest that patients who did not receive genome-matched treatment with lower educational attainment had higher mortality risk (HR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.69; P = .006). For patients who did receive genome-matched treatment, there was no difference in mortality risk between the education groups (HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.56 to 1.81; P > .9)., Conclusion: Although there were no disparities in who received genome-matched treatment, we found a disparity in mortality associated with education level, which was more pronounced for patients who did not receive genome-matched treatment. Future research is warranted to investigate the intersectionality of social disadvantage with clinical outcomes to address survival disparities., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF