Search

Aims: Myocardial infarction (MI) with cardiogenic shock (CS) and/or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are conditions with potential loss of autonomy. In patients with MI, the association between CS and OHCA and need for home care or nursing home admission was examined., Methods and Results: Danish nationwide registries identified patients with MI (2008-19), who prior to the event lived at home without home care and discharged alive. One-year cumulative incidences and hazard ratios (HRs) were reported for home care need or nursing home admission, a composite proxy for disability in activities of daily living (ADL), along with all-cause mortality. The study population consisted of 67 109 patients with MI (by groups: -OHCA/-CS: 63 644; -OHCA/+CS: 1776; +OHCA/-CS: 968; and +OHCA/+CS: 721). The 1-year cumulative incidences of home care/nursing home were 7.1% for patients who survived to discharge with -OHCA/-CS, 20.9% for -OHCA/+CS, 5.4% for +OHCA/-CS, and 8.2% for those with +OHCA/+CS. The composite outcome was driven by home care. With the -OHCA/-CS as reference, the adjusted HRs for home care/nursing home were 2.86 (95% CI: 2.57-3.19) for patients with -OHCA/+CS; 1.31 (95% CI: 1.00-1.73) for + OHCA/-CS; and 2.18 (95% CI: 1.68-2.82) for those with +OHCA/+CS. The 1-year cumulative mortality were 5.1% for patients with -OHCA/-CS, 9.8% for -OHCA/+CS, 3.0% for +OHCA/-CS, and 3.4% for those with +OHCA/+CS., Conclusion: In patients discharged alive after a MI, CS, and to a lesser degree OHCA were associated with impaired ADL with a two-fold higher 1-year incidence of home care or nursing home admission compared with MI patients without CS or OHCA., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Autoimmune diseases (AIDs) are associated with a higher risk of heart failure (HF). However, data on the prognosis of HF patients with a history of AID are limited. The aim was to investigate the rates of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization in a large, nationwide cohort of patient with HF according to a history of 29 AIDs., Methods and Results: Using Danish nationwide registries, each HF patient (diagnosed 2000-18) with a history of AID was matched with four HF patients without AID by age, sex, and year of HF diagnosis. Rates of outcomes were compared by Cox regression models. The prevalence of AID in patients with HF was 10.7%. In total, 21 256 HF patients with a history of AID were matched with 85 024 HF patients without AID (median age 77 years; 58.9% female). During a median follow-up of 3.2 years, the incidence rates per 100 person-years for all-cause mortality were 17.1 (95% confidence interval, 16.9-17.4) and 14.4 (14.3-14.6) in patients with and without AID, respectively. The corresponding rates for HF hospitalization were 5.0 (4.9-5.1) and 5.2 (5.1-5.4), respectively. A history of AID was associated with higher rate of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.14 (1.12-1.17)], but not HF hospitalization [HR 1.00 (0.96-1.04)] compared with no AID., Conclusions: In a nationwide cohort study, patients with HF and a history of AID had a higher associated rate of mortality than those without a history of AID., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) eplerenone and spironolactone are beneficial in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but have not been prospectively compared. We compared clinical outcomes, daily dosages, and discontinuation rates for the two drugs in a nationwide cohort., Methods: We identified all patients with HFrEF in the period 2016-2020, who were alive and had initiated MRA treatment at study start, 180 days after HF diagnosis. We estimated the 2-year risk of a composite of death and HF hospitalization, as well as each component separately, using Kaplan-Meier, cumulative incidence functions, and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidities. Secondly, we assessed treatment withdrawal, cross-over, and daily drug dosage., Results: We included 7479 patients; 653 (9%) on eplerenone and 6840 (91%) on spironolactone. Patients in the eplerenone group were younger (median age 65 vs. 69 years), and more often men (91% vs. 68%), both P < 0.001. In adjusted analyses, with spironolactone as reference, there were no differences in the risk of the composite of all-cause death and HF hospitalization (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.82-1.27), all-cause death (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.67-1.30), or HF hospitalization (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.84-1.42). Treatment withdrawal occurred in 34% in the eplerenone group and 53% in the spironolactone group (P < 0.001), treatment cross-over in 3%, and 10%, respectively. Daily dose >25 mg at 12 months, was observed in 230 patients (37%) in the eplerenone group and 771 patients (12%) in the spironolactone (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: In a contemporary nationwide cohort of patients with new-onset HFrEF who initiated MRA, we found no differences in clinical outcomes associated with initiation of eplerenone vs. spironolactone. Treatment was more frequently withdrawn, and daily drug dosage was lower among patients treated with spironolactone., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: While clinical trials have suggested that a high ventricular rate is associated with increased risk of heart failure (HF) and mortality, all-comers studies are warranted., Objective: To assess 1-year risk of new-onset diagnosed HF and all-cause mortality among rate-control treated patients presenting with atrial fibrillation (AF) on an electrocardiogram (ECG) according to ventricular rate., Methods and Results: ECGs recorded at the Copenhagen General Practitioners Laboratory (2001-15) were used to identify patients with AF. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to compare risk of new-onset HF and all-cause mortality after first ECG presenting with AF according to ventricular rate on ECG [<60, 60-79, 80-99, and 100-110, > 110 beats per minute (bpm)]. We identified 7408 patients in treatment with rate control drugs at time of first ECG presenting with AF [median age 78 years (Q1,Q3 = 70-85 years)], 45.8% male, median ventricular rate 83 bpm, (Q1,Q3 = 71-101 bpm)]. During 1-year follow-up, 666 (9.0%) of all patients with AF developed HF and 858 (11.6%) died. Patients with AF ventricular rates 100-110 bpm and >110 bpm had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.46 (CI: 1.10-1.95) and 2.41 (CI: 1.94-3.00) respectively for new-onset HF, compared with 60-79 bpm. Similarly, patients with AF ventricular rates 100-110 bpm and >110 bpm had a HR of 1.44 (CI: 1.13-1.82) and 1.34 (CI: 1.08-1.65) respectively for all-cause mortality, compared with 60-79 bpm., Conclusions: Ventricular rates ≥100 bpm among patients presenting with AF on ECG in treatment with rate control drugs were associated with greater risk of both new-onset HF and all-cause mortality., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Lucas Malta Westergaard: none, Amna Alhakak: none, Rasmus Rørth: none, Emil L. Fosbøl: none, and Søren L. Kristensen: speaker fee from Astra Zeneca. Advisory board at Bayer, Jesper H. Svendsen: research grant, payment to institution, and speaker fee from Medtronic. Advisory board at Medtronic, Claus Graff: none, Jonas B. Nielsen: is employed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., New York, unrelated to this work; Gunnar H. Gislason: research grants from Boerhinger Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Pfizer; Lars Køber: serves as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim and has received other support from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk; and Christian Torp-Pedersen: grant for randomized study from Bayer. Grant for epidemiological study from Novo Nordisk; Christina J-Y Lee: none; and Peter E. Weeke: none., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Physical and mental well-being after critical illness may be objectified by the ability to work. We examined return to work among patients with myocardial infarction (MI) by cardiogenic shock (CS) status., Methods: Danish nationwide registries were used to identify patients with first-time MI by CS status between 2005 and 2015, aged 18-63 years, working before hospitalization and discharged alive. Multiple logistic regression models were used to compare groups., Results: We identified 19 799 patients with MI of whom 653 had CS (3%). The median age was similar for patients with and without CS (53 years, interquartile range 47-58). One-year outcomes in patients with and without CS were as follows: 52% vs. 83% returned to work, 41% vs. 16% did not and 6% vs. 1% died. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) of returning to work was 0.53 [95% confidence limit (CI): 0.42-0.66]. In patients with CS, males and patients surviving OHCA were more likely to return to work (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.15-2.92 and 1.55, 95% CI: 1.00-2.40, respectively), whereas prolonged hospitalization (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22-0.65) and anoxic brain damage (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.18-0.72) were associated with lower likelihood of returning to work., Conclusion: In patients with MI discharged alive, approximately 80% of those without CS returned to work at 1-year follow-up in contrast to 50% of those with CS. Among patients with CS, male sex and OHCA survivors were markers positively related to return to work, whereas prolonged hospitalization and anoxic brain damage were negatively related markers., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death, but not all-cause death in patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure (HF). Whether co-existence of diabetes affects ICD treatment effects is unclear., Methods and Results: We examined the effect of ICD implantation on risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and sudden cardiac death (SCD) according to diabetes status at baseline in the Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Non-ischaemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality (DANISH) trial. Outcomes were analysed by use of cumulative incidence curves and Cox regressions models. Of the 1116 patients enrolled, 211 (19%) had diabetes at baseline. Patients with diabetes were more obese, had worse kidney function and more were in New York Heart Association Class III/IV. The risk of device infections and other complications in the ICD group was similar among patients with and without diabetes (6.1% vs. 4.6% P = 0.54). Irrespective of treatment group, diabetes was associated with higher risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and SCD. The treatment effect of ICD in patients with diabetes vs. patients without diabetes was hazard ratio (HR) = 0.92 (0.57-1.50) vs. HR = 0.85 (0.63-1.13); Pinteraction = 0.60 for all-cause mortality, HR = 0.99 (0.58-1.70) vs. HR = 0.70 (0.48-1.01); Pinteraction = 0.25 for cardiovascular death, and HR = 0.81 (0.35-1.88) vs. HR = 0.40 (0.22-0.76); Pinteraction = 0.16 for sudden cardiac death., Conclusion: Among patients with non-ischaemic systolic HF, diabetes was associated with higher incidence of all-cause mortality, primarily driven by cardiovascular mortality including SCD. Treatment effect of ICD therapy was not significantly modified by diabetes which might be due to lack of power., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)