Search

Purpose: this article is devoted to the study of issues and the creation of proposals for the formation of a model of indicative planning in the Russian Federation.Methods: the study is based on system analysis methodology. Program and strategic documents of the Russian Federation and modern scientific publications on the topic of research were used as materials for the work.Results: the author analyzed modern ideas about indicative planning and identified the problems of the lack of a systematic scientific and methodological approach in this area. Modern scientific literature does not have a single opinion on the theoretical and methodological provisions of indicative planning. Based on the analysis of foreign experience and Russian practice, the author presented proposals on the role and place of indicative planning in the system of strategic planning and project management documents in order to achieve the established development and security goals. On this basis, proposals are formulated for the formation of a domestic model of indicative planning. It was noted that the popular tools for implementing coherence, monitoring and adjusting goals through digitalization of strategic documents are part of indicative planning.Conclusions and Relevance: The approach to indicative planning is recommended as a process for the formation of a system of indicators (indicators) and the development of measures of state impact on economic processes based on indicators. In this regard, indicative planning should be considered as a combination: 1) the system of goals and objectives described by the corresponding indicators (indicators), 2) the system of measures aimed at achieving these indicators. This measure system also includes an indicative planning tool.As a toolkit, an approach is proposed that determines the conjugation of the two indicated blocks of indicative planning:architecture, which includes rules for building the system and structured on the basis of goals, objectives, indicators;tools that include balance calculations and mathematical modeling, as well as implementing on the basis of indicators the task of resource determination of goals for the development of a system of measures and management decisions.

Six years of the implementation of the Federal Law “On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation” were focused on the development of documents and recommendations for them. This determined the fragmentation of public administration and strategic planning. However, according to the author, the basis of the strategic planning system that meets modern challenges and threats should not be documents, but processes. The introduction of new tools will allow the transition from project management and strategic planning to strategic management in the Russian Federation. Such tools include the introduction of management cycles of strategic planning, resource support for the realization of goals, the organization and implementation of the monitoring and control process, a system of continuous indicative planning and balance sheets.

Purpose: of the article is to prepare evidence-based proposals for the formation of document architecture, strategic planning, fundamental for modern needs and ensuring the integrity of the strategy for all levels of government and business, as well as to ensure the implementation of the principles of unity, integrity, continuity, continuity and delineation of powers in organizing and system functioning, strategic planning as part of a single management cycle. In the framework of the task of creating the architecture of documents, strategic planning also solves the important task of linking issues of socioeconomic development and ensuring national security, and as a result – improving the efficiency of public administration, ensuring coherence and coordination of the country's strategic priorities. Methods: the main method of work is the disclosure of the principles of strategic planning. The architecture of strategic planning documents under development is based on the disclosure of regulatory acts of the Federal Law dated 28.06.2014 N 172-FZ “On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation”. Results: the absence of normatively fixed principles and a system for ensuring strategic planning, as well as the procedure for implementing strategic planning, leads to inconsistency of the approved strategies and forecasting, the development of new documents and studies in the Federal Law “On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation” and other violations of the systematic approach. In this regard, it is necessary to determine the architecture of the system of strategic planning documents developed as part of the target definition, forecasting, planning and programming.Conclusions and Relevance: the architecture of strategic planning documents proposed in the article is based on the creation of a three-level document system with a central place in it the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation as the main document of strategic goalsetting. In accordance with Federal Law N 172-FZ, the level of forecasting, target definition, planning and programming allows you to add a conceptual level that ensures the quality of the overall ideological superstructure, which should provide an idea of what kind of character for the state and its position in the world the strategic planning system should provide. Taking into account the task of minimizing amendments and clarifications to the Federal Law “On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation”, the proposed changes are more in the nature of clarifying the provisions of this law. The architecture of the documents built in this way will allow implementing and, if necessary, further detailing the principles of strategic planning defined by law 172-FZ and, above all, the principles of continuity, balance of the strategic planning system.

On June 30, 2015 has come into force the Federal Law of theRussian Federation(№ 488-FL): “On the industrial Policy in theRussian Federation”. The law requires the innovation Production. At the same time, from the whole spectrum of the strategic documents only for the companies with the State participation the innovation development is required. In this sense, the strategies of the State companies embedded into the Strategical Planning System inRussiais important factor of stimulation of innovative development of Russian Economy. The integration of the State companies strategies and regions in innovation development will be the basis for stability in Russian Economy.

Today, Russia is not secured by the principal – the legal basis for the formation of a unified system of planning and links between federal and regional aspects, and the lack of systematic approach to planning at the state level affects the pace of economic development. Approved are only a few documents regulating work in certain areas of strategic planning, and these documents are often contradictory. Compulsory rules on mandatory components of the strategic, long-term, medium-term, and short-term planning for the country and for regions should be legislatively fixed.

Aliziruyutsya different approaches to the definition of self-appraisal in the structure of self-concept. Emphasis is placed on the fact that it is represented in the minds of teachers authentic, undisputed experience of personal meaning “I”. Process changes in teacher self-appraisal is only possible on the basis of humanitarian and philosophical orientation and acmeologic ensure the development of self-appraisal in the structure of self-concept teachers through the use of person-oriented technology professional development. The author notes that acmeological support the development of self-appraisal contributes to building your own effective strategy development and professionalfulfillment in the context of the modernization of the educational system as a whole.