Search

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin condition characterized by widely variable cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus abundance that contributes to disease severity and rapidly responds to type 2 immune blockade (ie, dupilumab). The molecular mechanisms regulating S aureus levels between AD subjects remain poorly understood., Objective: We investigated host genes that may be predictive of S aureus abundance and correspond with AD severity., Methods: We studied data derived from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases-funded (NCT03389893 [ADRN-09]) randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study of dupilumab in adults (n = 71 subjects) with moderate-to-severe AD. Bulk RNA sequencing of skin biopsy samples (n = 57 lesional, 55 nonlesional) was compared to epidermal S aureus abundance, lipidomic, and AD clinical measures., Results: S aureus abundance and ceramide synthase 1 (CERS1) expression positively correlated at baseline across both nonlesional (r = 0.29, P = .030) and lesional (r = 0.41, P = .0015) skin. Lesional CERS1 expression also positively correlated with AD severity (ie, SCORAD r = 0.44, P = .0006) and skin barrier dysfunction (transepidermal water loss area under the curve r = 0.31, P = .025) at baseline. CERS1 expression (forms C 18:0 sphingolipids) was negatively associated with elongation of very long-chain fatty acids (ELOVL6; C 16:0 →C 18:0 ) expression and corresponded with a shorter chain length sphingolipid composition. Dupilumab rapidly reduced CERS1 expression (day 7) and ablated the relationship with S aureus abundance and ELOVL6 expression by day 21., Conclusion: CERS1 is a unique molecular biomarker of S aureus abundance and AD severity that may contribute to dysfunctional skin barrier and shorter-chain sphingolipid composition through fatty acid sequestration as a maladaptive compensatory response to reduced ELOVL6., Competing Interests: Disclosure statement Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), including T32GM007356 (to H.M.K.), F30AG076326 (H.M.K.), U19AI117673 (Atopic Dermatitis Research Network [ADRN] investigators), UM1AI151958 (ADRN investigators), UM2AI117870 (Rho Inc), and UM1TR004399 (University of Colorado investigators). This article’s contents are the authors’ sole responsibility and do not necessarily represent official NIH views. Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: L. A. Beck has been consultant for Allakos, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Dermavent, DermTech, Evelo Biosciences, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Merck, Nektar Therapeutics, Numab Therapeutics, Pfizer, Rapt Therapeutics, Regeneron, Ribon Therapeutics, Sanofi/Genzyme, Sanofi-Aventis, Stealth BioTherapeutics, Trevi Therapeutics, Union Therapeutics, and Xencor; and investigator for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, DermTech, Kiniksa, Pfizer, Regeneron, Ribon Therapeutics, and Sanofi. M. Boguniewicz has been investigator and advisory board member for Regeneron and Sanofi. Z. C. Chiesa Fuxench has received research grants from Lilly, Brexogen, LEO Pharma, Regeneron, Sanofi, Tioga, and Vanda for work related to atopic dermatitis, and from Menlo Therapeutics and Galderma for work related to prurigo nodularis; has served as consultant for the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, National Eczema Association, AbbVie, Incyte, and Pfizer; and received honoraria for continuing medical education work in atopic dermatitis sponsored by education grants from Regeneron/Sanofi and Pfizer and from Beirsdorf for work related to skin cancer and sun protection. A. De Benedetto has been a consultant for AbbVie, Incyte, and Sanofi-Advent; and has received grant or clinical trial support paid to institution from Incyte and Pfizer. D. Y. M. Leung reports grants to his institution from National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Genentech, and Sanofi; and personal consulting fees from Sanofi, Jasper Therapeutics, and Leo Pharma. P. Y. Ong has been on advisory boards for Dermavant, Amgen, Johnson & Johnson, and AbbVie; and has received research funding from Incyte, Leo, Regeneron, and Sanofi. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) often have elevated type 2 inflammatory serum biomarkers., Objective: The aim was to report changes in thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC)/CC chemokine ligand 17 (CCL17), total IgE, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and eosinophils in pediatric patients treated with dupilumab or placebo., Methods: Biomarker data were analyzed from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies of patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Patients ages 6 months to 5 years were randomly assigned to weight-dependent dupilumab 200/300 mg every 4 weeks (q4w) or placebo; ages 6 to 11 years, to dupilumab 100/200 mg every 2 weeks (q2w), dupilumab 300 mg q4w, or placebo; ages 12 to 17 years, to dupilumab 200/300 mg q2w, dupilumab 300 mg q4w, or placebo. In the youngest 2 groups, topical corticosteroids were also applied. Median percent changes from baseline to week 16 were reported using last observation carried forward analysis, censoring after rescue treatment., Results: Pediatric patients who received dupilumab versus placebo achieved significantly greater median percent reductions at week 16 in TARC/CCL17 (-83.3% to -72.4% vs -14.9% to -1.8%), total IgE (-71.2% to -58.4% vs -21.0% to +28.1%), and LDH (-26.2% to -9.8% vs -1.5% to +1.5%). All comparisons were significantly different (P < .0001) between each dupilumab dosing group and respective placebo groups. In contrast, absolute changes in eosinophils were small in all groups., Conclusions: Dupilumab treatment for pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe AD significantly reduced levels of TARC/CCL17, total IgE, and LDH to levels comparable with those of healthy controls, reflecting a reduction in systemic type 2 and general inflammation., Competing Interests: Disclosure statement This research was sponsored by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: L. A. Beck is a consultant for AbbVie, Allakos, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Aslan Pharma, Astria Therapeutics, Celldex, Dermavent, DermTech, Escient Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Evelo Biosciences, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Merck, Nektar Therapeutics, Numab Therapeutics, Pfizer, Proteologix, RAPT Therapeutics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ribon Therapeutics, Sanofi/Genzyme, Sanofi-Aventis, Sitryx Therapeutics, Stealth BioTherapeutics, Trevi Therapeutics, Union Therapeutics, Xencor, and Yuhan and an investigator for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, DermTech, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ribon Therapeutics, and Sanofi. A. Muraro is a member of advisory boards and speaker for Aimmune Therapeutics, DVB Technologies, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Sanofi, and Viatris. M. Boguniewicz is a recipient of research grants and member of advisory boards for Incyte, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, and Sanofi and a member of advisory boards for AbbVie, Amgen, Dermavant, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, LEO Pharma, and Pfizer. Z. Chen and J. Zahn are employees and shareholders of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. A. Rodríguez Marco is an employee of Sanofi and may hold stock and/or stock options in the company., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor that has wide-ranging roles, including regulation of inflammation and homeostasis. AhR is not a cell surface receptor; rather, it exists in a cytoplasmic complex that responds to a wide variety of structurally dissimilar endogenous, microbial, and environmental ligands. The ubiquitous expression of AhR, its ability to be activated by a wide range of ligands, and its capacity to act as a master regulator for gene expression and homeostasis make it a promising new therapeutic target. Clinical trials of tapinarof cream have now validated AhR agonism as a therapeutic approach that can deliver significant efficacy for treating inflammatory skin diseases, including psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. Tapinarof 1% cream is a first-in-class, nonsteroidal, topical, AhR agonist with a pharmacokinetic profile that results in localized exposure at sites of disease, avoiding systemic safety concerns, drug interactions, or off-target effects. Psoriasis and atopic dermatitis both involve epidermal inflammation, cellular immune responses, dysregulation of skin barrier protein expression, and oxidative stress. On the basis of the clinical effectiveness of tapinarof cream for treating inflammatory skin diseases, we review how targeting AhR may offer a significant opportunity in other conditions that share key aspects of pathogenesis, including asthma, inflammatory bowel disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, ophthalmic, and nervous system diseases., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common skin condition with multiple topical treatment options, but uncertain comparative effects., Objective: We sought to systematically synthesize the benefits and harms of AD prescription topical treatments., Methods: For the 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters AD guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, LILACS, ICTRP, and GREAT databases to September 5, 2022, for randomized trials addressing AD topical treatments. Paired reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects network meta-analyses addressed AD severity, itch, sleep, AD-related quality of life, flares, and harms. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach informed certainty of evidence ratings. We classified topical corticosteroids (TCS) using 7 groups-group 1 being most potent. This review is registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/q5m6s)., Results: The 219 included trials (43,123 patients) evaluated 68 interventions. With high-certainty evidence, pimecrolimus improved 6 of 7 outcomes-among the best for 2; high-dose tacrolimus (0.1%) improved 5-among the best for 2; low-dose tacrolimus (0.03%) improved 5-among the best for 1. With moderate- to high-certainty evidence, group 5 TCS improved 6-among the best for 3; group 4 TCS and delgocitinib improved 4-among the best for 2; ruxolitinib improved 4-among the best for 1; group 1 TCS improved 3-among the best for 2. These interventions did not increase harm. Crisaborole and difamilast were intermediately effective, but with uncertain harm. Topical antibiotics alone or in combination may be among the least effective. To maintain AD control, group 5 TCS were among the most effective, followed by tacrolimus and pimecrolimus., Conclusions: For individuals with AD, pimecrolimus, tacrolimus, and moderate-potency TCS are among the most effective in improving and maintaining multiple AD outcomes. Topical antibiotics may be among the least effective., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin condition with multiple systemic treatments and uncertainty regarding their comparative impact on AD outcomes., Objective: We sought to systematically synthesize the benefits and harms of AD systemic treatments., Methods: For the 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters AD guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and GREAT databases from inception to November 29, 2022, for randomized trials addressing systemic treatments and phototherapy for AD. Paired reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects network meta-analyses addressed AD severity, itch, sleep, AD-related quality of life, flares, and harms. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach informed certainty of evidence ratings. This review is registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/e5sna)., Results: The 149 included trials (28,686 patients with moderate-to-severe AD) evaluated 75 interventions. With high-certainty evidence, high-dose upadacitinib was among the most effective for 5 of 6 patient-important outcomes; high-dose abrocitinib and low-dose upadacitinib were among the most effective for 2 outcomes. These Janus kinase inhibitors were among the most harmful in increasing adverse events. With high-certainty evidence, dupilumab, lebrikizumab, and tralokinumab were of intermediate effectiveness and among the safest, modestly increasing conjunctivitis. Low-dose baricitinib was among the least effective. Efficacy and safety of azathioprine, oral corticosteroids, cyclosporine, methotrexate, mycophenolate, phototherapy, and many novel agents are less certain., Conclusions: Among individuals with moderate-to-severe AD, high-certainty evidence demonstrates that high-dose upadacitinib is among the most effective in addressing multiple patient-important outcomes, but also is among the most harmful. High-dose abrocitinib and low-dose upadacitinib are effective, but also among the most harmful. Dupilumab, lebrikizumab, and tralokinumab are of intermediate effectiveness and have favorable safety., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a heterogeneous, chronic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disease associated with considerable physical, psychological, and economic burden. The pathology of AD includes complex interactions involving abnormalities in immune and skin barrier genes, skin barrier disruption, immune dysregulation, microbiome disturbance, and other environmental factors. Many of the cytokines involved in AD pathology, including IL-4, IL-13, IL-22, IL-31, thymic stromal lymphopoietin, and IFN-γ, signal through the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activation of transcription (STAT) pathway. The JAK family includes JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and tyrosine kinase 2; the STAT family includes STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5A/B, and STAT6. Activation of the JAK-STAT pathway has been implicated in the pathology of several immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including AD. However, the exact mechanisms of JAK-STAT involvement in AD have not been fully characterized. This review aims to discuss current knowledge about the role of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway and, specifically, the role of JAK1 in the pathology and symptomology of AD., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory disorder characterized by dominant type 2 inflammation leading to chronic pruritic skin lesions, allergic comorbidities, and Staphylococcus aureus skin colonization and infections. S aureus is thought to play a role in AD severity., Objectives: This study characterized the changes in the host-microbial interface in subjects with AD following type 2 blockade with dupilumab., Methods: Participants (n = 71) with moderate-severe AD were enrolled in a randomized (dupilumab vs placebo; 2:1), double-blind study at Atopic Dermatitis Research Network centers. Bioassays were performed at multiple time points: S aureus and virulence factor quantification, 16s ribosomal RNA microbiome, serum biomarkers, skin transcriptomic analyses, and peripheral blood T-cell phenotyping., Results: At baseline, 100% of participants were S aureus colonized on the skin surface. Dupilumab treatment resulted in significant reductions in S aureus after only 3 days (compared to placebo), which was 11 days before clinical improvement. Participants with the greatest S aureus reductions had the best clinical outcomes, and these reductions correlated with reductions in serum CCL17 and disease severity. Reductions (10-fold) in S aureus cytotoxins (day 7), perturbations in T H 17-cell subsets (day 14), and increased expression of genes relevant for IL-17, neutrophil, and complement pathways (day 7) were also observed., Conclusions: Blockade of IL-4 and IL-13 signaling, very rapidly (day 3) reduces S aureus abundance in subjects with AD, and this reduction correlates with reductions in the type 2 biomarker, CCL17, and measures of AD severity (excluding itch). Immunoprofiling and/or transcriptomics suggest a role for T H 17 cells, neutrophils, and complement activation as potential mechanisms to explain these findings., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD, eczema) is driven by a combination of skin barrier defects, immune dysregulation, and extrinsic stimuli such as allergens, irritants, and microbes. The role of environmental allergens (aeroallergens) in triggering AD remains unclear., Objective: We systematically synthesized evidence regarding the benefits and harms of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) for AD., Methods: As part of the 2022 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology/American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters AD Guideline update, we searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, LILACS, Global Resource for Eczema Trials, and Web of Science databases from inception to December 2021 for randomized controlled trials comparing subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), and/or no AIT (placebo or standard care) for guideline panel-defined patient-important outcomes: AD severity, itch, AD-related quality of life (QoL), flares, and adverse events. Raters independently screened, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias in duplicate. We synthesized intervention effects using frequentist and Bayesian random-effects models. The GRADE approach determined the quality of evidence., Results: Twenty-three randomized controlled trials including 1957 adult and pediatric patients sensitized primarily to house dust mite showed that add-on SCIT and SLIT have similar relative and absolute effects and likely result in important improvements in AD severity, defined as a 50% reduction in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (risk ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.53 [1.31-1.78]; 26% vs 40%, absolute difference 14%) and QoL, defined as an improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index by 4 points or more (risk ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.44 [1.03-2.01]; 39% vs 56%, absolute difference 17%; both outcomes moderate certainty). Both routes of AIT increased adverse events (risk ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.61 [1.44-1.79]; 66% with SCIT vs 41% with placebo; 13% with SLIT vs 8% with placebo; high certainty). AIT's effect on sleep disturbance and eczema flares was very uncertain. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were consistent with the main findings., Conclusions: SCIT and SLIT to aeroallergens, particularly house dust mite, can similarly and importantly improve AD severity and QoL. SCIT increases adverse effects more than SLIT. These findings support a multidisciplinary and shared decision-making approach to optimally managing AD., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Children with severe atopic dermatitis (AD) have limited treatment options., Objective: We report the efficacy and safety of dupilumab + topical corticosteroids (TCS) in children aged 6-11 years with severe AD inadequately controlled with topical therapies., Methods: In this double-blind, 16-week, phase 3 trial (NCT03345914), 367 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to 300 mg dupilumab every 4 weeks (300 mg q4w), a weight-based regimen of dupilumab every 2 weeks (100 mg q2w, baseline weight <30 kg; 200 mg q2w, baseline weight ≥30 kg), or placebo; with concomitant medium-potency TCS., Results: Both the q4w and q2w dupilumab + TCS regimens resulted in clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in signs, symptoms, and quality of life (QOL) versus placebo + TCS in all prespecified endpoints. For q4w, q2w, and placebo, 32.8%, 29.5%, and 11.4% of patients, respectively, achieved Investigator's Global Assessment scores of 0 or 1; 69.7%, 67.2%, and 26.8% achieved ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index scores; and 50.8%, 58.3%, and 12.3% achieved ≥4-point reduction in worst itch score. Response to therapy was weight-dependent: optimal dupilumab doses for efficacy and safety were 300 mg q4w in children <30 kg and 200 mg q2w in children ≥30 kg. Conjunctivitis and injection-site reactions were more common with dupilumab + TCS than with placebo + TCS., Limitations: Short-term 16-week treatment period; severe AD only., Conclusion: Dupilumab + TCS is efficacious and well tolerated in children with severe AD, significantly improving signs, symptoms, and QOL., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic pruritic inflammatory disease that commonly presents in the pediatric population. Although definitions and diagnosis of AD have largely been agreed upon, allergists and dermatologists have similar and divergent approaches to the management of AD. This review facilitated integration of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology/American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Joint Task Force 2012 AD Practice Parameter and the 2014 American Academy of Dermatology guidelines to highlight the basic principles of AD management and discuss therapies and management of AD from the distinct perspectives of the allergist and dermatologist., (Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Additional topical treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) are needed that provide relief while minimizing risks., Objective: We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of crisaborole ointment, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in two phase III AD studies (AD-301: NCT02118766; AD-302: NCT02118792)., Methods: Two identically designed, vehicle-controlled, double-blind studies enrolled and randomly assigned (2:1, crisaborole:vehicle) patients aged 2 years or older with an Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) score of mild or moderate for twice-daily application for 28 days. The primary end point was ISGA score at day 29 of clear (0)/almost clear (1) with 2-grade or greater improvement from baseline. Additional analyses included time to success in ISGA score, percentage of patients achieving clear/almost clear, reduction in severity of AD signs, and time to improvement in pruritus., Results: More crisaborole- than vehicle-treated patients achieved ISGA score success (clear/almost clear with ≥2-grade improvement; AD-301: 32.8% vs 25.4%, P = .038; AD-302: 31.4% vs 18.0%, P < .001), with a greater percentage with clear/almost clear (51.7% vs 40.6%, P = .005; 48.5% vs 29.7%, P < .001). Crisaborole-treated patients achieved success in ISGA score and improvement in pruritus earlier than those treated with vehicle (both P ≤ .001). Treatment-related adverse events were infrequent and mild to moderate in severity., Limitations: Short study duration was a limitation., Conclusions: Crisaborole demonstrated a favorable safety profile and improvement in all measures of efficacy, including overall disease severity, pruritus, and other signs of AD., (Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To estimate the health and economic impact of feeding partially hydrolyzed formula-whey (PHF-W) instead of standard cow's milk formula (CMF) for the first 4 months of life among US infants at high risk for developing atopic dermatitis (AD)., Study Design: A Markov model was developed integrating published data, a survey of US pediatricians, costing sources and market data, and expert opinion. Key modeled outcomes included reduction in AD risk, time spent post AD diagnosis, days without AD flare, and AD-related costs. Costs and clinical consequences were discounted at 3% annually., Results: An estimated absolute 14-percentage point reduction in AD risk was calculated with the use of PHF-W compared with CMF (95% CI for difference, 3%-22%). Relative to CMF, PHF-W decreased the time spent post-AD diagnosis by 8.3 months (95% CI, 2.78-13.31) per child and increased days without AD flare by 39 days (95% CI, 13-63) per child. The AD-related, 6-year total cost estimate was $495 less (95% CI, -$813 to -$157) per child with PHF-W ($724 per child; 95% CI, $385-$1269) compared with CMF ($1219 per child; 95% CI, $741-$1824)., Conclusion: Utilization of PHF-W in place of CMF as the initial infant formula administered to high-risk US infants not exclusively breastfed during the first 4 months of life may reduce the incidence and economic burden of AD. Broad implementation of this strategy could result in a minimum savings of $355 million per year to society., (Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To describe atopic dermatitis (AD) management patterns in children ≤36 months old as reported by pediatricians, dermatologists, and allergists in the US., Study Design: A nationally-representative survey was administered to pediatricians (n = 101), dermatologists (n = 26), and allergists (n = 26). Main outcomes included referrals to health care professionals, suggested/ordered laboratory tests, management approach (dietary, pharmacologic, or combination of both) by age, AD location, and severity., Results: Significant differences were observed in referrals to healthcare professionals (P < .001). Pediatricians more frequently referred to dermatologists than allergists in mild (52.4% vs 32.0%) and moderate/severe (60.6% vs 38.1%) cases. Dermatologists referred to allergists less frequently for mild (9.1%) than moderate/severe (40.7%) AD cases. Pediatricians (59%), allergists (61.5%), and dermatologists (26.9%) reported treating at least some of their patients with AD with dietary management (infant formula change) alone (with or without emollients). Soy-based formulas were often used. For mild AD, the most commonly reported first-line pharmacologic treatments included topical emollients, topical corticosteroids, and barrier repair topical therapy/medical devices. Over 80% of physicians used a dietary and pharmacologic combination approach. Dermatologists were most likely to manage AD symptoms with a pharmacologic-only approach. AD lesion location influenced pharmacologic treatment in >80% of physicians., Conclusions: Significant and distinct differences in AD treatment approach exist among physicians surveyed. Most pediatricians and allergists use formula change as a management strategy in some patients, whereas dermatologists favor a pharmacologic approach. This diversity may result from inadequate evidence for a standard approach. Consistent methods for managing AD are needed., (Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

This parameter was developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI); and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. The AAAAI and the ACAAI have jointly accepted responsibility for establishing "Atopic dermatitis: a practice parameter update 2012." This is a complete and comprehensive document at the current time. The medical environment is a changing environment, and not all recommendations will be appropriate for all patients. Because this document incorporated the efforts of many participants, no single individual, including those who served on the Joint Task Force, is authorized to provide an official AAAAI or ACAAI interpretation of these practice parameters. Any request for information about or an interpretation of these practice parameters by the AAAAI or ACAAI should be directed to the Executive Offices of the AAAAI, the ACAAI, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. These parameters are not designed for use by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotion. Published practice parameters of the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters for Allergy & Immunology are available online at http://www.jcaai.org., (Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with increased susceptibility to recurrent skin infections., Objective: We sought to determine why a subset of patients with AD have an increased risk of disseminated viral skin infections., Methods: Human subjects with AD with a history of eczema herpeticum (EH) and various control groups were enrolled. Vaccinia virus (VV) expression was measured by means of PCR and immunofluorescent staining in skin biopsy specimens from each study group after incubation with VV. Transgenic mice with a constitutively active signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 gene (STAT6) were characterized for response to VV skin inoculation. Genotyping for 10 STAT6 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was performed in a white patient sample (n = 444)., Results: VV gene and protein expression were significantly increased in the skin of patients with EH compared with other subject groups after incubation with VV in vitro. Antibody neutralization of IL-4 and IL-13 resulted in lower VV replication in patients with a history of EH. Mice that expressed a constitutively active STAT6 gene compared with wild-type mice had increased mortality and satellite lesion formation after VV skin inoculation. Significant associations were observed between STAT6 SNPs and EH (rs3024975, rs841718, rs167769, and rs703817) and IFN-γ production. The strongest association was observed for a 2-SNP haplotype (patients with AD with a history of EH vs patients with AD without a history of EH, 24.9% vs 9.2%; P = 5.17 × 10(-6))., Conclusion: The STAT6 gene increases viral replication in the skin of patients with AD with a history of EH. Further genetic association studies and functional investigations are warranted., (Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The basis for increased susceptibility of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) to develop disseminated viral skin infections such as eczema herpeticum (AD with a history of eczema herpeticum, ADEH(+)) is poorly understood., Objective: We sought to determine whether subjects with AD prone to disseminated viral skin infections have defects in their IFN responses., Methods: GeneChip profiling was used to identify differences in gene expression of PBMCs from patients with ADEH(+) compared with patients with AD without a history of eczema herpeticum (ADEH(-)) and nonatopic controls. Key differences in protein expression were verified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay and/or ELISA. Clinical relevance was further demonstrated by a mouse model of disseminated viral skin infection and genetic association analysis for genetic variants in IFNG and IFNGR1 and ADEH among 435 cases and controls., Results: We demonstrate by global gene expression analysis selective transcriptomic changes within the IFN superfamily of PBMCs from subjects with ADEH(+) reflecting low IFN-γ and IFN-γ receptor gene expression. IFN-γ protein production was also significantly lower in patients with ADEH(+) (n = 24) compared with patients with ADEH(-) (n = 20) and nonatopic controls (n = 20). IFN-γ receptor knockout mice developed disseminated viral skin infection after epicutaneous challenge with vaccinia virus. Genetic variants in IFNG and IFNGR1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were significantly associated with ADEH (112 cases, 166 controls) and IFN-γ production: a 2-SNP (A-G) IFNGR1 haplotype (rs10457655 and rs7749390) showed the strongest association with a reduced risk of ADEH+ (13.2% ADEH(+) vs 25.5% ADEH(-); P = .00057)., Conclusion: Patients with ADEH(+) have reduced IFN-γ production, and IFNG and IFNGR1 SNPs are significantly associated with ADEH(+) and may contribute to an impaired immune response to herpes simplex virus., (Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is characterized by dry skin and a hyperactive immune response to allergens, 2 cardinal features that are caused in part by epidermal barrier defects. Tight junctions (TJs) reside immediately below the stratum corneum and regulate the selective permeability of the paracellular pathway., Objective: We evaluated the expression/function of the TJ protein claudin-1 in epithelium from AD and nonatopic subjects and screened 2 American populations for single nucleotide polymorphisms in the claudin-1 gene (CLDN1)., Methods: Expression profiles of nonlesional epithelium from patients with extrinsic AD, nonatopic subjects, and patients with psoriasis were generated using Illumina's BeadChips. Dysregulated intercellular proteins were validated by means of tissue staining and quantitative PCR. Bioelectric properties of epithelium were measured in Ussing chambers. Functional relevance of claudin-1 was assessed by using a knockdown approach in primary human keratinocytes. Twenty-seven haplotype-tagging SNPs in CLDN1 were screened in 2 independent populations with AD., Results: We observed strikingly reduced expression of the TJ proteins claudin-1 and claudin-23 only in patients with AD, which were validated at the mRNA and protein levels. Claudin-1 expression inversely correlated with T(H)2 biomarkers. We observed a remarkable impairment of the bioelectric barrier function in AD epidermis. In vitro we confirmed that silencing claudin-1 expression in human keratinocytes diminishes TJ function while enhancing keratinocyte proliferation. Finally, CLDN1 haplotype-tagging SNPs revealed associations with AD in 2 North American populations., Conclusion: Collectively, these data suggest that an impairment in tight junctions contributes to the barrier dysfunction and immune dysregulation observed in AD subjects and that this may be mediated in part by reductions in claudin-1., (Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common complex disease that frequently follows a chronic relapsing course and affects the quality of life of patients and families in a significant manner. New insights into the pathophysiology of AD point to an important role of structural abnormalities in the epidermis combined with immune dysregulation. Patients with AD have a unique predisposition to colonization or infection by a number of microbial organisms, most notably Staphylococcus aureus and herpes simplex virus. A multipronged approach directed at healing or protecting the skin barrier and addressing the immune dysregulation is necessary to improve the likelihood of successful outcomes., (Copyright 2010 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Eczema vaccinatum (EV), a disseminated viral skin infection, is a life-threatening complication of vaccinia virus (VV) inoculation in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and is thought to be associated with a defective innate immune response. However, the precise mechanism or mechanisms and key factor or factors of EV are unknown., Objective: Given that patients with psoriasis, another inflammatory skin disorder, are not susceptible to EV, we compared the global transcriptional response of skin to VV in healthy subjects, patients with psoriasis, and patients with AD, focusing on AD-specific genes. We hypothesized that differences in the transcriptional response to VV between patients with AD and patients with psoriasis or healthy subjects would identify a defective pathway or pathways that might be associated with the development of EV., Methods: Gene expression profiling of sham-treated and VV-treated unaffected skin explants from patients with AD (n = 12), patients with psoriasis (n = 12), or healthy subjects (n = 13) were generated with U133&#95;Plus2 (54,613 probe sets) GeneChips and analyzed with the GCOS&#95;1.4/SAM&#95;2.1/MAPPFinder&#95;2.0 pipeline., Results: Sixty-seven genes were significantly affected by VV in AD skin but not in psoriatic and healthy skin. Genes associated with defense response, response to wounding, and immune response were the most affected by VV in AD skin. All genes in these ontologies were downregulated, including the innate immunity genes leukotriene B(4) receptor (LTB4R), orosomucoid 1 (ORM1), coagulation factor II (thrombin) receptor (F2R), complement component 9 (C9), and LPS-binding protein (LBP). These findings were confirmed by means of real-time PCR and validated by means of PubMatrix analysis. ORM1, Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), and NLR family pyrin domain containing 1 (NLRP1) genes were also linked to AD severity., Conclusion: This study identified groups of innate immunity genes that are associated with the aberrant response of AD skin to VV and represent potential targets for EV pathogenesis., (Copyright 2010 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that is characterized by a defective skin barrier function. Recent studies have reported mutations of the skin barrier gene encoding filaggrin in a subset of patients with AD., Objective: We investigated whether reduced filaggrin expression was found in patients with AD who were not carriers of known filaggrin mutations and whether filaggrin expression was modulated by the atopic inflammatory response., Methods: Filaggrin expression was measured in skin biopsies and cultured keratinocytes using real-time RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. Filaggrin loss-of-function mutations were screened in a total of 69 subjects., Results: Compared with normal skin, filaggrin expression was significantly reduced (P < .05) in acute AD skin, with further reduction seen in acute lesions from 3 European American subjects with AD who were heterozygous for the 2282del4 mutation. This was confirmed by using immunohistochemistry. AD skin is characterized by the overexpression of IL-4 and IL-13. Keratinocytes differentiated in the presence of IL-4 and IL-13 exhibited significantly reduced filaggrin gene expression (0.04 +/- 0.01 ng filaggrin/ng glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; P < .05) compared with media alone (0.16 +/- 0.03)., Conclusion: Patients with AD have an acquired defect in filaggrin expression that can be modulated by the atopic inflammatory response., Clinical Implications: The atopic immune response contributes to the skin barrier defect in AD; therefore, neutralization of IL-4 and IL-13 could improve skin barrier integrity.

Background: Loss-of-function null mutations R501X and 2282del4 in the skin barrier gene, filaggrin (FLG), represent the most replicated genetic risk factors for atopic dermatitis (AD). Associations have not been reported in African ancestry populations. Atopic dermatitis eczema herpeticum (ADEH) is a rare but serious complication of AD resulting from disseminated cutaneous herpes simplex virus infections., Objective: We aimed to determine whether FLG polymorphisms contribute to ADEH susceptibility., Methods: Two common loss-of-function mutations plus 9 FLG single nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped in 278 European American patients with AD, of whom 112 had ADEH, and 157 nonatopic controls. Replication was performed on 339 African American subjects., Results: Significant associations were observed for both the R501X and 2282del4 mutations and AD among European American subjects (P = 1.46 x 10(-5), 3.87 x 10(-5), respectively), but the frequency of the R501X mutation was 3 times higher (25% vs 9%) for ADEH than for AD without eczema herpeticum (EH) (odds ratio [OR], 3.4; 1.7-6.8; P = .0002). Associations with ADEH were stronger with the combined null mutations (OR, 10.1; 4.7-22.1; P = 1.99 x 10(-11)). Associations with the R501X mutation were replicated in the African American population; the null mutation was absent among healthy African American subjects, but present among patients with AD (3.2%; P = .035) and common among patients with ADEH (9.4%; P = .0049). However, the 2282del4 mutation was absent among African American patients with ADEH and rare (<1%) among healthy individuals., Conclusion: The R501X mutation in the gene encoding filaggrin, one of the strongest genetic predictors of AD, confers an even greater risk for ADEH in both European and African ancestry populations, suggesting a role for defective skin barrier in this devastating condition.

Background: A subset of subjects with atopic dermatitis (AD) are susceptible to serious infections with herpes simplex virus, called eczema herpeticum, or vaccina virus, called eczema vaccinatum., Objective: This National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases-funded multicenter study was performed to establish a database of clinical information and biologic samples on subjects with AD with and without a history of eczema herpeticum (ADEH(+) and ADEH(-) subjects, respectively) and healthy control subjects. Careful phenotyping of AD subsets might suggest mechanisms responsible for disseminated viral infections and help identify at-risk individuals., Methods: We analyzed the data from 901 subjects (ADEH(+) subjects, n = 134; ADEH(-) subjects, n = 419; healthy control subjects, n = 348) enrolled between May 11, 2006, and September 16, 2008, at 7 US medical centers., Results: ADEH(+) subjects had more severe disease based on scoring systems (Eczema Area and Severity Index and Rajka-Langeland score), body surface area affected, and biomarkers (circulating eosinophil counts and serum IgE, thymus and activation-regulated chemokine, and cutaneous T cell-attracting chemokine) than ADEH(-) subjects (P < .001). ADEH(+) subjects were also more likely to have a history of food allergy (69% vs 40%, P < .001) or asthma (64% vs 44%, P < .001) and were more commonly sensitized to many common allergens (P < .001). Cutaneous infections with Staphylococcus aureus or molluscum contagiosum virus were more common in ADEH(+) subjects (78% and 8%, respectively) than in ADEH(-) subjects (29% and 2%, respectively; P < .001)., Conclusion: Subjects with AD in whom eczema herpeticum develops have more severe T(H)2-polarized disease with greater allergen sensitization and more commonly have a history of food allergy, asthma, or both. They are also much more likely to experience cutaneous infections with S. aureus or molluscum contagiosum.

Background: Individuals with atopic dermatitis (AD) have frequent colonization and infection with Staphylococcus aureus. Rapid elimination of S. aureus depends on constitutive synthesis and mobilization of human beta-defensin-3 (HBD-3)., Objective: To determine whether keratinocytes in AD, compared with normal, skin are less able to kill S. aureus rapidly, and to assess the potential role that abnormally low mobilization of HBD-3 onto S. aureus has in this process., Methods: Skin samples from 10 normal individuals and 10 patients with AD were compared for synthesis and mobilization of HBD-3 onto surface-associated S. aureus. Furthermore, keratinocytes from 10 individuals were studied for the effects of T(H)2 cytokines on the ability of the cells to synthesize and mobilize HBD-3, and to kill S. aureus., Results: Keratinocytes in skin biopsies from subjects with AD were defective in killing S. aureus relative to normal individuals (P < .001). The constitutive levels of HBD-3 in the epidermal keratinocytes were similar between normal individuals and those with AD. However, the cells of patients with AD were unable to mobilize HBD-3 efficiently to kill S. aureus. Physiologic Ca(++) was essential for development of normal HBD-3 levels by cultured human keratinocytes. Mobilization of HBD-3 and the ability to kill S. aureus were significantly (P < .05) inhibited by IL-4 and IL-13. Antagonism of IL-4/10/13 with antibodies significantly (P < .01) improved mobilization of HBD-3 onto the surface of S. aureus by skin from patients with AD., Conclusion: Patients with AD have problems with S. aureus skin infection. This is a result of increased levels of T(H)2 cytokines, which inhibit keratinocyte mobilization of HBD-3.

Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of MAS063DP (Atopiclair) cream in the management of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in infants and children., Study Design: One hundred forty-two patients aged 6 months to 12 years were administered MAS063DP (n = 72) or vehicle (n = 70) cream 3 times per day to affected areas and sites prone to develop atopic dermatitis. The primary endpoint for efficacy was the Investigator's Global Assessment at day 22. Secondary endpoints included Investigator's Global Assessment at other time-points, patient's/caregiver's assessment of pruritus, onset, duration of itch relief, Eczema Area and Severity Index, subject's/caregiver's assessment of global response, and need for rescue medication in the event of an atopic dermatitis flare., Results: MAS063DP cream was statistically more effective (P < .0001) than vehicle cream for the primary endpoint and all secondary endpoints. Treatment discontinuation as a result of an adverse event occurred in 9.9% of patients using MAS063DP cream and 16% of patients using vehicle cream., Conclusion: MAS063DP cream is effective and safe as monotherapy for the treatment of symptoms of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in infants and children.

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that is characterized by a defective skin barrier function. Recent studies have reported mutations of the skin barrier gene encoding filaggrin in a subset of patients with AD., Objective: We investigated whether reduced filaggrin expression was found in patients with AD who were not carriers of known filaggrin mutations and whether filaggrin expression was modulated by the atopic inflammatory response., Methods: Filaggrin expression was measured in skin biopsies and cultured keratinocytes using real-time RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. Filaggrin loss-of-function mutations were screened in a total of 69 subjects., Results: Compared with normal skin, filaggrin expression was significantly reduced (P < .05) in acute AD skin, with further reduction seen in acute lesions from 3 European American subjects with AD who were heterozygous for the 2282del4 mutation. This was confirmed by using immunohistochemistry. AD skin is characterized by the overexpression of IL-4 and IL-13. Keratinocytes differentiated in the presence of IL-4 and IL-13 exhibited significantly reduced filaggrin gene expression (0.04 +/- 0.01 ng filaggrin/ng glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; P < .05) compared with media alone (0.16 +/- 0.03)., Conclusion: Patients with AD have an acquired defect in filaggrin expression that can be modulated by the atopic inflammatory response., Clinical Implications: The atopic immune response contributes to the skin barrier defect in AD; therefore, neutralization of IL-4 and IL-13 could improve skin barrier integrity.

Background: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) are prone to disseminated viral skin infections and therefore are not vaccinated against smallpox because of potential complications. Macrophage inflammatory protein 3alpha (MIP-3alpha) is a C-C chemokine expressed by keratinocytes that exhibits antimicrobial activity against bacteria and fungi; however, its role in antiviral innate immunity is unknown., Objective: Evaluate the level of MIP-3alpha in AD skin and its role in the innate immune response to vaccinia virus (VV)., Methods: Macrophage inflammatory protein 3alpha levels were evaluated using real-time RT-PCR, immunodot-blot, and immunohistochemistry. The antiviral activity of MIP-3alpha was determined using a standard viral plaque assay., Results: Macrophage inflammatory protein 3alpha gene expression was significantly (P < .01) decreased in AD skin (0.21 +/- 0.05 ng MIP-3alpha/ng glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) compared with psoriasis skin (0.67 +/- 0.13). This was confirmed at the protein level using immunohistochemistry. We further demonstrate that T(H)2 cytokines downregulate MIP-3alpha expression. The importance of MIP-3alpha in the innate immune response against VV was established by first demonstrating that MIP-3alpha exhibits activity against VV. Second, VV replication was significantly increased (P < .01) in keratinocytes treated with an antibody to neutralize MIP-3alpha., Conclusion: The current study demonstrates that MIP-3alpha exhibits antiviral activity against VV and demonstrates the importance of MIP-3alpha in the innate immune response against VV. In addition, AD skin is deficient in MIP-3alpha, in part because of the overexpression of T(H)2 cytokines in AD skin., Clinical Implications: MIP-3alpha deficiency in AD skin contributes to patients' increased propensity toward eczema vaccinatum. Increasing MIP-3alpha or neutralizing T(H)2 cytokines could prevent adverse reactions in patients with AD after smallpox vaccination.

There are remarkable differences in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of atopic dermatitis practiced by dermatologists and pediatricians in different countries. Therefore, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology nominated expert teams who were given the task of finding a consensus to serve as a guideline for clinical practice in Europe as well as in North America. The consensus report is part of the PRACTALL initiative, which is endorsed by both academies.

Background: The cathelicidin family of antimicrobial peptides is an integral component of the innate immune response that exhibits activity against bacterial, fungal, and viral pathogens. Eczema herpeticum (ADEH) develops in a subset of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) because of disseminated infection with herpes simplex virus (HSV)., Objective: This study investigated the potential role of cathelicidins in host susceptibility to HSV infection., Methods: Glycoprotein D was measured by means of real-time RT-PCR as a marker of HSV replication in skin biopsy specimens and human keratinocyte cultures. Cathelicidin expression was evaluated in skin biopsy specimens from patients with AD (n = 10) without a history of HSV skin infection and from patients with ADEH (n = 10)., Results: The cathelicidin peptide LL-37 (human cathelicidin) exhibited activity against HSV in an antiviral assay, with significant killing (P < .001) within the physiologic range. The importance of cathelicidins in antiviral skin host defense was confirmed by the observation of higher levels of HSV-2 replication in cathelicidin-deficient (Cnlp-/-) mouse skin (2.6 +/- 0.5 pg HSV/pg GAPDH, P < .05) compared with that seen in skin from their wild-type counterparts (0.9 +/- 0.3). Skin from patients with ADEH exhibited significantly (P < .05) lower levels of cathelicidin protein expression than skin from patients with AD. We also found a significant inverse correlation between cathelicidin expression and serum IgE levels (r2 = 0.46, P < .05) in patients with AD and patients with ADEH., Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the cathelicidin peptide LL-37 possesses antiviral activity against HSV and demonstrates the importance of variable skin expression of cathelicidins in controlling susceptibility to ADEH. Additionally, serum IgE levels might be a surrogate marker for innate immune function and serve as a biomarker for which patients with AD are susceptible to ADEH., Clinical Implications: A deficiency of LL-37 might render patients with AD susceptible to ADEH. Therefore increasing production of skin LL-37 might prevent herpes infection in patients with AD.

Atopic dermatitis is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease often preceding the development of asthma and allergic disorders, such as food allergy or allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Pathophysiology involves a complex series of interactions between resident and infiltrating cells orchestrated by proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. A deficiency of antimicrobial peptides might contribute to the propensity for colonization or infection by microbial organisms seen in atopic dermatitis. New treatment approaches include use of topical steroids as maintenance therapy and use of topical calcineurin inhibitors for early intervention with topical steroids used as rescue therapy.

Background: IL-31 is a newly discovered T-cell cytokine that, when overexpressed in mice, results in pruritus and skin dermatitis resembling human atopic dermatitis (AD)., Objective: We sought to investigate the expression of IL-31 and IL-31 receptor A (IL-31RA) in skin biopsy specimens and peripheral blood cells from patients with AD and healthy individuals., Methods: Expression of IL-31 and IL-31RA was evaluated in skin biopsy specimens from patients with AD and healthy individuals by means of immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR. IL-31 protein production by skin-homing cutaneous lymphocyte antigen (CLA)-positive T cells was also assessed., Results: IL-31RA protein was expressed by keratinocytes and infiltrating macrophages in skin biopsy specimens from patients with AD. Comparisons between skin from patients with AD and healthy skin showed IL-31RA expression at higher levels on epidermal keratinocytes in AD samples. Infiltrating cells, more numerous in skin from patients with AD compared with that of healthy individuals, expressed IL31 mRNA. Histomorphometric analysis of these cells indicated they were of the lymphocytic lineage, with the majority of cells staining positive for CLA and CD3. IL31 mRNA and protein expression is largely restricted to CD45RO(+) (memory) CLA(+) T cells in peripheral blood of patients with AD and healthy volunteers. Moreover, circulating CLA(+) T cells from patients with AD, but not from patients with psoriasis, are capable of producing higher levels of IL-31 compared with CLA(+) T cells from healthy individuals. However, the average levels of IL-31 were not significantly different between patients with AD and healthy individuals., Conclusion: We provide evidence that IL-31 expression is associated with CLA(+) T cells and might contribute to the development of AD-induced skin inflammation and pruritus.

Background/objective: Tacrolimus ointment is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD). We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment 0.03% compared with vehicle in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate AD., Methods: Two identically designed, independent, randomized, double-blind, 6-week studies--one pediatric and one adult--in patients with mild to moderate AD were conducted. Combined data from 617 patients were used in the analysis. The primary efficacy end point was percentage of patients with treatment success (defined as "clear" or "almost clear" on the Investigator's Global AD Assessment) at end of study., Results: As early as day 4, treatment success occurred in 17.7% of patients treated with tacrolimus compared with 9.8% of patients treated with vehicle ( P = .003), and by study end had increased to 49.7% for tacrolimus versus 29.0% for vehicle (P < .0001). Tacrolimus was associated with significantly less application site pruritus than vehicle (29.0% vs 37.5%; P = .03). There was no difference between tacrolimus and vehicle in the incidence of application site skin burning and stinging., Conclusion: Tacrolimus ointment 0.03% is effective and safe for the management of mild to moderate AD in both adult and pediatric patients, and has a rapid onset of action.

Objective: To evaluate pimecrolimus cream 1% and tacrolimus ointment 0.03% in pediatric patients with moderate atopic dermatitis (AD)., Methods: 141 patients (aged 2-17 years) were randomized to treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% (n=71) or tacrolimus ointment 0.03% (n=70) twice daily for 6 weeks., Results: At day 4, local, application-site reactions were less common and of shorter duration with pimecrolimus than with tacrolimus. Incidence of erythema/irritation was 8% (6/71) with pimecrolimus compared with 19% (13/70) with tacrolimus (P=.039). Fewer patients receiving pimecrolimus (0%, 0/6) experienced erythema/irritation lasting >30 minutes, compared with those receiving tacrolimus (85%, 11/13; P <.001). Fewer patients reported itching with pimecrolimus (8%; 6/71) than with tacrolimus (20%; 14/70; P=.073). Incidence of warmth, stinging, and burning was similar in both groups; however, reactions lasting >30 minutes were fewer with pimecrolimus (0%, 0/14) than with tacrolimus (67%, 8/12; P <.001). More patients receiving pimecrolimus rated ease of application as 'excellent' or 'very good', compared with tacrolimus (76% vs 59%, respectively; P <.020). Efficacy was similar in both groups at day 43. Both treatments were generally well tolerated with no unexpected adverse events., Conclusion: Pimecrolimus cream 1% had better formulation attributes and local tolerability than tacrolimus ointment 0.03% while providing similar efficacy and overall safety in pediatric patients with moderate AD.

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis are the two most common chronic inflammatory skin diseases. Both of these diseases have distinct clinical findings and specific inflammatory cell infiltrates. Previous reports have focused individually on one or two genes or gene products in the lesions of both skin diseases. However, they have not captured the complex gene expression that must occur to induce specific cellular infiltrates in the skin lesions of these two diseases. DNA microarray studies allow the simultaneous comparison of thousands of messenger RNAs that may identify the disease-specific pattern of tissue inflammatory responses., Objective: To compare the complex gene expression pattern of AD versus psoriasis skin lesions., Methods: RNA was extracted from skin biopsy specimens of 6 patients with AD and 7 patients with psoriasis and analyzed with the use of Hu-U95Av.GeneChip microarrays. To confirm GeneChip results, real-time PCR of selected genes were performed., Results: In AD skin, a total of 18 genes including the CC chemokines, CCL-13/MCP-4, CCL-18/PARC, and CCL-27/CTACK showed a statistically significant, >2-fold increase of gene expression compared with psoriasis. In psoriasis skin, a total of 62 genes including CCL-4/MIP-1beta, CCL-20/MIP-3alpha, CXCL-2/GRO-beta CXCL-8/IL-8, and CXCR2/IL-8R showed a >2-fold increase of gene expression compared with AD skin. Real-time PCR confirmed several of these GeneChip results., Conclusions: These results show a very distinctive gene expression pattern in AD as compared with psoriasis that may explain several features of AD and psoriasis including the specific inflammatory cell infiltrates observed in these disorders, that is, T(H)2 cells, eosinophils, and mast cells in AD and T(H)1 cells and neutrophils in psoriasis. Such observations may contribute to a characteristic "signature" for these two skin diseases.

Treatment of atopic dermatitis requires a comprehensive approach that includes evaluation of potential triggers and education of the patient and family regarding proper avoidance measures. Hydration of the skin and maintenance of an intact skin barrier remain integral to proper management. Although topical corticosteroids have been a mainstay of anti-inflammatory therapy, the newer topical calcineurin inhibitors offer advantages for treatment of this chronic, relapsing disease. Studies aimed at defining optimal combination therapy and early intervention might change the treatment paradigm for atopic dermatitis.

Background: Few cost-effectiveness analyses have been conducted on topical therapies for atopic dermatitis., Objective: We sought to compare cost-effectiveness of high-potency topical corticosteroids (HPTCs) and tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis for patients who are not responsive to or not well controlled with mid-potency topical corticosteroids., Methods: A Markov model represented the cyclic nature of atopic dermatitis. Clinical outcomes were derived from published literature. "Efficacy" was defined as disease-controlled days on which patients experienced a greater than 75% improvement in their disease. Resource use and changes in management were on the basis of opinions of a physician panel; secondary treatment was an oral antibiotic with topical corticosteroids. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for all variables., Results: The model was sensitive to duration of continuous treatment with HPTCs. HPTCs, when limited to 2-week treatment cycles, were associated with the highest total costs ($1682 per year) and the least efficacy (185 disease-controlled days). HPTCs in 4-week treatment intervals and tacrolimus ointment were similar in total costs and efficacy ($1317 vs $1323 for 194 vs 190 disease-controlled days, respectively). Although primary drug costs were higher for patients treated with tacrolimus ointment, patients treated with regimens of HPTCs incurred higher secondary drug costs., Conclusion: In the base case analyses, tacrolimus ointment was more cost-effective than HPTCs administered in 2-week treatment cycles, and similar in cost-effectiveness to 4-week cycles of HPTCs.

Background: In atopic dermatitis (AD) there is evidence of tissue fibrosis involving a number of structural changes, including papillary dermal fibrosis and epidermal hyperplasia. These changes are suggested to be the result of chronic inflammation of the skin. Several remodeling-associated cytokines, including transforming growth factor (TGF) beta1, IL-11, and IL-17, have been shown to be increased in allergic diseases, including asthma., Objective: We investigated TGF-beta1, IL-11, and IL-17 expression in skin biopsy specimens recovered from acute and chronic skin lesions from patients with AD, as well as from uninvolved skin of patients with AD and skin from healthy volunteers. We also examined the correlation between the expression of these cytokines and the extent of total, type I, and type III collagen deposition., Methods: We evaluated the expression of TGF-beta1, IL-11, and IL-17 by means of immunohistochemistry. Collagen deposition was assessed by means of immunohistochemistry and van Gieson staining., Results: TGF-beta1 expression was markedly enhanced in both acute and particularly chronic lesions (P <.001). Although IL-11 expression was significantly increased only in chronic lesions (P <.0001), IL-17 was preferentially associated with acute lesions (P <.005). Although collagen type III deposition was not significantly different among the groups, type I collagen deposition was significantly increased in chronic AD lesions (P <.0005). There was a significant correlation between IL-11 and type I collagen deposition, as well as the number of eosinophils in skin specimens from patients with AD (r (2) = 0.527, and r (2) = 0.622, respectively; P <.0001)., Conclusion: These results suggest that TGF-beta1, IL-11, and IL-17 are involved in the remodeling of skin lesions in patients with AD. However, IL-11 and IL-17 are preferentially expressed at different stages of the disease. Type I collagen appeared to be the major subtype involved in this repair process.

During the past year there have been significant advances in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying allergic skin diseases. This article reviews some of these advances in atopic dermatitis and urticaria. The introduction of a new class of topical anti-inflammatory medications, topical calcineurin inhibitors, has significantly increased our treatment options and led to a rethinking of potential management approaches in atopic dermatitis.

Background: The ascomycin derivative pimecrolimus (ASM 981) is a cell-selective cytokine inhibitor, specifically developed for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases., Objective: When applied topically, pimecrolimus cream 1% has shown promise as a treatment for inflammatory skin conditions, including atopic dermatitis (AD) in children and adults, allergic contact dermatitis, and chronic contact irritant hand dermatitis in adults., Methods: In two independent 6-week, randomized, multicenter studies of identical design, the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% in children with predominantly moderate AD were compared with vehicle. Pooled data from a total of 403 patients were used in the analysis. The primary efficacy parameter was the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score. Secondary parameters included Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and severity of pruritus scores. Subjects were also asked to assess their disease control as uncontrolled, limited, good, or complete., Results: Significant therapeutic benefits relative to vehicle were observed in the pimecrolimus-treated group at the first efficacy assessment, 8 days after initial application of the study medication (eg, relief of pruritus). At each subsequent postbaseline visit, pimecrolimus-treated patients showed significant improvement relative to controls in all efficacy measures. The medication was well tolerated., Conclusion: Pimecrolimus cream 1% appears to be a safe and effective alternative to currently used therapies for AD.

Background: Atopic dermatitis/eczema (AD/E) is a common disease. Few studies have attempted to quantify the cost to third-party payers., Objective: Our purpose was to identify the annual cost of medical services and prescription drugs for the treatment of AD/E to private insurance and Medicaid payers in the United States., Methods: We used a retrospective study design employing claims data from 1997 and 1998 from a private insurer and a state Medicaid program to analyze costs incurred. Beneficiaries were considered to have AD/E if they had at least one claim in 1997 with a primary or secondary listing of 1 of 3 diagnosis codes: 691.8, other atopic dermatitis and related conditions; 692.9, contact dermatitis and other eczema when no cause is specified; or 373.3, noninfectious dermatoses of eyelid. Patients who did not meet the diagnosis criteria served as a control group in each payer for comparisons of expenditures with the AD/E group., Results: Disease prevalence was 2.4% (private insurer) to 2.6% (Medicaid) of all eligible beneficiaries, and 3.5% to 4.1% of patients submitted at least one health care claim during the study period. Medicaid-insured patients used outpatient hospital visits and hospitalizations at a greater rate than did privately insured patients; neither used emergency departments extensively. The third-party payer cost of illness for AD/E ranged from $0.9 billion to $3.8 billion when projected across the total number of persons younger than 65 years insured by private insurers and Medicaid in the United States. More than one fourth of all health care costs for patients with AD/E may be attributed to AD/E and co-morbid conditions., Conclusions: Annual costs of AD/E are similar to those of other diseases such as emphysema, psoriasis, and epilepsy. Patients incur significant costs associated with AD/E and co-morbid conditions.