Search

The umbilical cord suspends the fetus within the amniotic cavity, where fetal dynamics is one of its many functions. Hence, the umbilical cord is a viable index in determining fetal activity. Fetal movements result in mechanical loads that are fundamental for fetal growth. At present, mechanical environment during early human fetal development is still largely unknown. To determine early fetal movement dynamics at given physiological (0.060 m) and pathological umbilical cord lengths (0.030 m, 0.020 m, 0.017 m and 0.014 m) a 2D computational model was created to simulate dynamic movement conditions. Main findings of this computational model revealed the shortest umbilical cord length (0.014 m) with a 6 ( 10 - 6 ) N , twitch force amplitude had a two-fold increase on linear velocity ( 0.12 m / s ) in comparison with other lengths ( 0.05 m / s ) . Moreover, umbilical cord length effect presented an increasing exponential tension on the fetus body wall from longest to shortest, from 0 N in the control length to 0.05 N for the shortest umbilical cord. Last, tension was always present over a period of time for the shortest cord (0.03 N to 0.08 N). Collectively, for all variables evaluated the shortest umbilical cord (0.014 m) presented remarkable differences with other lengths in particular with the second shortest umbilical cord (0.017 m), suggesting a 0.003 m difference represents a greater biomechanical effect. In conclusion, this computational model brings new insights required by clinicians, where the magnitude of these loads could be associated with different pathologies found in the clinic.

Introduction: The aim is to obtain normal newborn umbilical cord diameters for use it in the evaluation of congenital umbilical hernia., Materials and Methods: The umbilical cord diameter (UCD) at the abdominal wall, maternal age, birth weight, gestational age at birth, birth height, head, chest and abdominal circumferences, and the time of measurement after birth was noted., Results: Mean ± standard deviation and median (minimum-maximum) values of the UCD were 9.9 ± 1.9 mm, 10.0 (5-16 mm), respectively. There was a significance for a positive low correlation between birth height and UCD (p = .039, r = .143). No other birth parameter had a significant correlation with UCD. The gender of the newborn (p = .95) and the type of delivery (p = .056) did not affect UCD., Conclusion: These data may be used in determining the normality of UCD, which could be helpful in the evaluation of umbilical hernias.

To investigate how umbilical cord length relates to pregnancy outcomes, we retrospectively analyzed data from 89,042 deliveries recorded in the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology Successive Pregnancy Birth Registry System. We included term deliveries in which vaginal birth was attempted. Umbilical cord length was categorized into four groups: less than the first percentile, from the first percentile to less than the 10th percentile, from the 10th percentile to less than 25th percentile, and from the 25th percentile to less than the 75th percentile, which constituted the control group. Cord lengths of 33, 43, 48, 63 cm corresponded to the first, 10th, 25th, and 75th percentile values of the cord length distribution, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed in the rate of unplanned cesarean delivery for all three short cord groups compared to control. There was a higher odds ratio for unplanned cesarean delivery as the umbilical cord became shorter.

Purpose: To evaluate the relation between umbilical cord diameter versus pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) level in first trimester women., Method: Cord diameter were measured and patients were divided into two groups according to frequency distribution analysis as below or above 3.7 mm for free loop diameter (FCD) and below or above 3.4 mm for cord measurement at umbilicus (ACD). Groups were compared with each other., Results: Strong correlations were found between ACD versus PAPP-A., Conclusion: By using strong correlation between ACD versus PAPP-A, it may be possible to reduce unnecessary amniocentesis due to false positive screening results.

The objective was to determine the cross-sectional area of the umbilical cord, its diameter and the diameter of its vessels to establish a reference curve for these parameters during pregnancy, through a prospective cross-sectional study, including 2,310 low-risk pregnancies between 12 and 40 weeks' gestation. Means and standard deviations (SDs), plus the 10th, 50th and 90th percentiles for each measurement were calculated using polynomial regression analysis. Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analysis. These parameters increased significantly with gestational age. The area of the cord also varied significantly with parity. Their new reference curves for low risk pregnancies were calculated using polynomial regression, and an almost linear increase in values was found up to 32 weeks of pregnancy, tending to stabilise from then onwards. The regression equation of the umbilical cord area according to gestational age (GA) was: -1.417 + 0.3026*GA-0.008*GA(2) + 0.000007*GA(3) and the degree of adjustment (R(2)) was 0.89.

We performed a retrospective review of the length of the umbilical cords of stillborn fetuses with renal agenesis, cystic kidneys, and bladder outlet obstruction and compared the cord length with normative data. Among the 41 cases, 31 had umbilical cord lengths that were shorter than average. However, the remaining 10 cases had an average to increased cord length. Urinary output in those cases might have been sufficient in early pregnancy to allow adequate fetal activity and sufficient umbilical cord lengthening. We suggest that the length of the umbilical cord can have implications relative to the developmental pathogenesis of some congenital urinary tract abnormalities.

Objective: To establish an umbilical cord thickness nomogram from anatomy ultrasound scans performed between 18 and 23 weeks of gestational age in singleton pregnancies, and compare it to two previously published nomograms., Material and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study of 1107 patients, a total of 650 singleton pregnancies were included. The umbilical cord diameter measurements were performed at the level of fetal abdominal wall insertion, and were correlated with gestational age (GA) and estimated fetal weight (EFW). Statistical analysis with non-parametric polynomial least squares regression analysis was performed., Results: A statistically significant correlation between umbilical cord diameter and GA (P<0001, r=0.399, 95% CI 0.331 to 0.464), and EFW (P<0001, r=0.420, 95% CI 0.353-0.483) was observed. A nomogram of umbilical cord thickness according to GA (y), and EFW (y'), was generated from the following equations:y=-51.30+5.367*x-0.1165*x(2) and y'=6.917+0.007233*x, respectively., Conclusion: Our nomogram is in agreement with one of the previously published nomograms that also measured umbilical cord diameter at the level of the fetal abdominal umbilical cord insertion. Therefore, we recommend umbilical cord thickness to be measured in close proximity to the fetal abdominal wall, but no further than 0.5 cm away from the wall insertion.

Our aim was to review the literature on umbilical cord coiling. Relevant articles in English published between 1966 and 2003 were retrieved by a Medline search and cross-referencing. The normal umbilical cord coiling index (UCI) is 0.17 (+/- 0.009) spirals completed per cm. Abnormal cord coiling, i.e. UCI <10th centile (<0.07) or >90th centile (>0.30) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcome. Hypocoiling of the cord is associated with increased incidence of fetal demise, intrapartum fetal heart rate decelerations, operative delivery for fetal distress, anatomic-karyotypic abnormalities and chorio-amnionitis. Hypercoiling of the cord is associated with increased incidence of fetal growth restriction, intrapartum fetal heart rate decelerations, vascular thrombosis and cord stenosis. It is not clear whether abnormal coiling is actually a cause of pathology, or merely one of the sequelae, or both. We discuss the theories involving the cause of cord coiling, and the consequences of the degree of cord coiling on blood flow through the umbilical vessels. In the future ultrasonographic evaluation of the umbilical cord and the UCI may become an integral part of fetal assessment in high-risk pregnancies.

Objective: To provide reference values for the umbilical coiling index in uncomplicated pregnancy., Methods: Umbilical cords were collected from livebom singleton infants born after uncomplicated pregnancies. The umbilical coiling index (UCI) was calculated as the number of coils divided by the cord length in centimeters. The mean value (SD) for the UCI was calculated, and possible correlations of the UCI with maternal age, parity, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, sex and birth weight of the infant were examined., Results: A total of 122 umbilical cords were included. The frequency distribution of the UCI was skewed to the right. The mean (SD) UCI was 0.17 (0.009) coils/cm. There were no significant correlations of the UCI with maternal age, parity, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, sex or birth weight of the infant., Conclusions: This is the first study to determine the UCI in a group exclusively consisting of uncomplicated pregnancies. The mean value that we found for the UCI may serve as the standard reference, allowing proper interpretation of umbilical coiling in complicated pregnancy.