Search

Objective To compare the incidence of endophthalmitis after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections with and without patient face masking. Design Two-centre retrospective cohort study Participants Patients receiving a total of 28 501 injections (period 1 before masking: n = 13 863; period 2 after masking: n = 14 638) Methods Periods before and after implementation of patient masking were compared: period 1 (July–December 2019) and period 2 (July–December 2020). All patients requiring treatment for endophthalmitis following intravitreal anti-VEGF injections were reviewed. Endophthalmitis risks were compared. Statistical simulations were run to determine the number of injections or endophthalmitis cases required to detect a statistically significant difference between both periods. Results Five patients (0.036%) had endophthalmitis in period 1 compared with 7 patients (0.048%) in period 2. Odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, for risk of patient masking was 1.326, 0.421–4.179 (p = 0.63). Three patients (0.022%) in period 1 had culture-positive endophthalmitis compared with 2 patients (0.014%) in period 2. Risk of patient masking for culture-positive endophthalmitis was 0.631, 0.105–3.779 (p = 0.61). Assuming similar rates of endophthalmitis, 476,806 injections in both groups would be required to detect a significant difference. Alternatively, assuming that masking would increase endophthalmitis risk in period 2, a significant difference would require twice as many cases (n = 15, 0.102%) for a risk of 2.843, 1.033–7.825 (p = 0.043). Conclusions The implementation of patient masking in clinical practice did not significantly alter the rate of endophthalmitis following intravitreal anti-VEGF injections.

To determine potential factors associated with the long-term visual prognoses in patients with choroidal osteoma undergoing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment.Retrospective case series.Patients diagnosed at tertiary high-volume hospitals between January 2000 and December 2020 were evaluated. The primary outcome measure was visual acuity at 5-year follow-up. The secondary outcome measures included factors associated with favorable vision, defined as loss of1 line and20/200 vision.Of 38 eyes from 36 patients (22 female, 61%; mean age 38 years) with choroidal osteoma, 23 eyes (61%) received anti-VEGF treatment (bevacizumab 1.25mg/0.05 cc, monthly or treat-and-extend) and 65% completed the 5 years of follow-up. All treated eyes had associated chorioretinal comorbidities (subretinal fluid 91%; choroidal neovascularization 74%; subretinal hemorrhage 30%). Although there was significant vision loss by 5 years (P = .002), 12 eyes (44%) had favorable outcomes. Only tumor thickness was significantly associated with unfavorable visual outcomes (OR 917.1, 95% CI 1.0-5687.7; P = .049). The optimal cut-off point predictive of visual outcomes was 1.4 mm, and tumor thickness ≥ 1.4 mm was associated with unfavorable vision (OR 27.0, 95% CI 2.0-368.4; P = .013).Among patients with choroidal osteoma undergoing anti-VEGF therapy, a particular patient subset presented with divergent outcomes with very poor vision. Tumor thickness appeared to be the differentiating factor and is thus a potential prognostic indicator for long-term visual prognoses.

Patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) require intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (Bev) or other drugs, often on a monthly basis, which is a burden on the healthcare system. Here, we developed an in-situ forming hydrogel comprised of Bev and hyaluronic acid (HA) crosslinked with poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate for slow release of Bev after injection into the suprachoroidal space (SCS) of the eye using a microneedle. Liquid Bev formulations were cleared from SCS within 5 days, even when formulated with high viscosity, unless Bev was conjugated to a high molecular-weight HA (2.6 MDa), which delayed clearance until 1 month. To extend release to 6 months, we synthesized in-situ forming Bev-HA hydrogel initially as a low-viscosity mixture suitable for injection and flow in the SCS to cover a large area extending to the posterior pole of the eye where the macula is located in humans. Within 1 h after injection, Bev and HA were crosslinked, which retained Bev for slow release as the hydrogel biodegraded. In vivo studies in the rabbit eye reported Bev release for6 months, depending on gel formulation and Bev assay. The in-situ forming Bev-HA hydrogel was well tolerated, as assessed by clinical exam, fundus imaging, histological analysis, and intraocular pressure measurement. We conclude that Bev released from an in-situ forming hydrogel may enable long-acting treatments of AMD and other posterior ocular indications.

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) often requires intensive therapy with anti-VEGF injections. In prior post hoc studies, early residual fluid (ERF) after the loading phase was associated with poorer treatment outcomes. This retrospective study examined the impact of ERF on vision using machine learning (ML) methods in routine clinical practice.Retrospective cohort.This study included treatment-naïve patients with nAMD who were initiated on anti-VEGF between 2012 and 2018, with at least 1 year of follow-up.Overall, 286 patients with nAMD were included. An ML algorithm quantified intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and total retinal fluid from OCTs. The ERF group included those with fluid at week 12 and was further stratified by fluid subtype. Paired t tests and analysis of variance compared best visual acuity (BVA) and fluid among subgroups, and a quartile analysis correlated fluid volumes to week 52 BVA. The risk of ERF was predicted from baseline factors using 3 ML methods: Ridge logistic regression, k nearest neighbors classification, and support vector classification.Mean change in BVA from baseline to week 52 according to week 12 fluid status.At week 12, 58.4% of patients had ERF. The breakdown of those in the ERF group included SRF-only (45.5%), IRF-only (21.6%), and IRF and SRF (32.9%). The ERF and ERF-free groups had similar BVA gains from baseline to week 52 (+5.7 ± 15.4 vs. +4.9 ± 18; P = 0.69). Examining specific ERF subgroups revealed no significant differences among the IRF-only (+4.6 ± 16.4), SRF-only (+5.6 ± 12.5), and IRF and SRF (+6.6 ± 18.5, P = 0.93) groups. Quartile analysis of week 12 fluid revealed no predictive pattern for BVA gains. Three ML methods were developed to predict those at risk for ERF achieved equivalent performance, with F1 score of 0.73 to 0.76.These results diverge from prior post hoc studies, in that there was no significant difference in long-term BVA gains between ERF and ERF-free cohorts, as well as between the week 12 fluid subgroups.

To highlight the financial incentive to the physician of choosing an intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-based strategy for treating non-proliferative and proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and its possible risks to the patient and costs to the health care system.Perspective with retrospective cost and profit analysis.Review and synthesis of selected literature on the treatment of diabetic retinopathy, with interpretation of activity-based and time-based costing of an intravitreal aflibercept strategy for diabetic retinopathy. Data from the DRCR Retina Network Protocols W and AB and PANORAMA trial were used to illustrate the potential financial incentive underlying such a treatment strategy.Physician treatment algorithms for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage and non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy may be influenced by the substantial financial incentives that intravitreal aflibercept strategies present, despite functional equivalence with alternative and less profitable strategies. For example, pursuing an intravitreal aflibercept-based strategy for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage presents a 76% increased profit over pars plana vitrectomy with laser, with equivalent functional outcomes. For non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, preventative aflibercept injections represent a potential 414% increase in profit over observation and an increased cost of $12,164 to $17,542 over 2 years per patient, with no improvement in visual function. These findings demonstrate that there may be misaligned financial incentives in the management of diabetic retinopathy.While anti-VEGF therapy is a useful tool in the management of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema, it is believed that physicians should avoid overreliance on anti-VEGF injections in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Retinal specialists should be cognizant of the limitations, costs, and risks of anti-VEGF monotherapy and prophylactic therapy, and of the imperative to avoid bias towards financially remunerative practice patterns when equally effective alternatives exist.

To examine the risk, prevalence, and progression of glaucoma development in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) eyes receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections compared to controls.Retrospective clinical cohort study.Retrospective review of eyes receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF injections from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2013, for exudative AMD. Age- and sex-matched control groups of eyes included eyes with nonexudative AMD (NEAMD) and no AMD. Eyes with a diagnosis of glaucoma or glaucoma suspect were reviewed for injection details, type and date of glaucoma diagnosis, glaucoma treatments, standard automated perimetry (SAP), and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Qualitative progression was determined by indication of glaucoma progression in provider notes. Quantitative progression was assessed based on change in mean deviation (MD) on SAP, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness on SD-OCT, and intraocular pressure (IOP).There were 707 eyes of 504 patients treated with anti-VEGF injections and 1008 eyes in the NEAMD and no-AMD cohorts. There was no difference in glaucoma or suspect prevalence at initial presentation between eyes treated with injections and NEAMD (6.9% vs 9.7%, P = .22) or no-AMD controls (vs 8.5%, P = .55). There was no difference in cumulative 5-year probability of new glaucoma diagnosis after anti-VEGF injections compared to NEAMD (1.9% vs 1.0%, P = .69) or no-AMD controls (vs 1.6%, P = .88). There was no difference in qualitative progression of glaucoma in the injection cohort vs NEAMD (P = .19) or no-AMD controls (P = .61). The rate of MD change in injection eyes was similar to NEAMD eyes (P = .74) but greater than no-AMD eyes (P = .02). Eyes receiving injections required more topical glaucoma medications compared with NEAMD (P = .03) and more glaucoma laser treatments compared with no-AMD controls (P = .009). Eyes receiving injections did not require more frequent incisional glaucoma surgery compared with NEAMD (21.0% vs 15.0%, P = .95) or no-AMD controls (vs 10.0%, P = .10).Eyes treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for exudative AMD did not have increased risk of developing glaucoma compared with controls. Of those with a glaucoma diagnosis, exudative AMD eyes receiving injections required a greater number of topical glaucoma medications compared with NEAMD eyes and had a greater rate of MD loss than no-AMD controls.

To assess the association between treatment interval and likelihood of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) discontinuation among patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in a real-world setting in the United States.Retrospective clinical cohort study.Health insurance claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases were retrospectively reviewed to identify adults with nAMD who received anti-VEGF for the first time between July 1, 2011, and June 30, 2017. The proportion of discontinued patients was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the association between treatment intervals at 24 months and anti-VEGF discontinuation.The analysis included 8167 patients on continuous, unilateral anti-VEGF treatment for at least 24 months. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were well balanced between treatment interval groups. The overall rate of discontinuation from 24 months until 60 months after treatment initiation was 30.4%. At 60 months, patients on shorter treatment intervals were more likely to remain on treatment than those on longer intervals, ranging from 76.8% (4-week interval group) to 60.6% (12-week interval group) and corresponding to a 28% lower likelihood (HR [SE] 0.72 [0.12], P.01) and 55% higher likelihood of discontinuing treatment (HR [SE] 1.55 [0.07], P.01), respectively, compared with the 8-week group.nAMD patients on longer anti-VEGF treatment intervals at 24 months had consistently higher discontinuation rates than patients on shorter intervals in the following years. This highlights the need to support and educate patients on long treatment intervals to continue with their treatment.

The RENOWNED study investigated the treatment patterns, real-world effectiveness and safety of ranibizumab in Taiwanese patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with ranibizumab 0.5 mg in accordance with the first reimbursement scheme effective from 2012 to 2014.This study was a Phase IV, 12-month, open-label, prospective, observational study conducted in Taiwan. Patients with visual impairment due to nAMD initiating treatment with ranibizumab 0.5 mg were included. The primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from Baseline at Month 3.Overall, 202 patients with nAMD were included. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) BCVA Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters improved from Baseline (49.6 [21.5] letters) at Month 3 (+4.9 [11.8], P 0.0001), and at Month 12 (+3.5 [14.1], P = 0.0043). The proportion of patients with nAMD who lost ≥5 letters at Months 3 and 12 was 13.6% (n = 27) and 26.6% (n = 37), respectively. Mean (SD) central retinal thickness decreased from Baseline (320.1 [127.2] μm) with a mean reduction of 49.1 (107.3) μm at Month 3 (P 0.0001), but was not significant at Month 12 with a mean reduction of 11.6 (115.6) μm (P = 0.2861). Mean (SD) number of ranibizumab injections over 12 months was 3.1 (1.0). A mean treatment interval of 109.5 days was observed between the third and fourth injections. After limited reimbursed ranibizumab injections, 43.8% patients received other treatments. The safety findings are consistent with previous studies.Ranibizumab 0.5 mg treatment for 12 months under real-world settings improved visual outcomes in Taiwanese patients with nAMD.

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections are the gold standard treatment for wet age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to the cancellation of many scheduled intravitreal anti-VEGF injection visits. We compared the functional and structural visual outcomes of wet AMD patients who did not adhere to their planned intervals (group 1) with those who did (group 2).Wet AMD patients of Swiss Visio Montchoisi and RétinElysée were included. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) changes between their first visit after the end of the first national lockdown in Switzerland (27 April 2020, first post-lockdown visit) and their last visit before the beginning of the first national lockdown in Switzerland (13 March 2020, last pre-lockdown visit) were assessed. The BCVA outcome was defined as unfavorable when there was a loss of≥5 ETDRS letters in the first post-lockdown visit compared to the BCVA at last pre-lockdown visit. The OCT outcome was defined as unfavorable when there was an increase in at least one of the parameters, intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), or pigment epithelial detachment (PED), at the first post-lockdown visit compared to the last pre-lockdown visit.Group 1 (89 patients, 109 eyes) had a 13.41% greater rate of unfavorable BCVA outcomes and a 38.27% greater rate of unfavorable OCT outcomes than group 2 (96 patients, 122 eyes) (P=0.04, P0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that the more the patients deviated from their programmed injections and the higher the BCVA pre-lockdown, the higher the rate of unfavorable BCVA outcomes (P=0.03 and P=0.02, respectively). OCT outcomes were not a predictive factor for an unfavorable BCVA outcome.The cancellation of many intravitreal anti-VEGF injection appointments resulted in worse functional and structural outcomes in wet AMD patients. The COVID-19 pandemic led many patients to refrain from their routine intravitreal anti-VEGF injection appointments, allowing us to analyze the role of designated intervals in the treatment of wet AMD. During any future lockdown due to COVID-19 or similar circumstances, continuity of care for wet AMD patients should be maintained.

To evaluate differences in Medicare reimbursements between male and female ophthalmologists between 2013 and 2019.Retrospective cohort study.Ophthalmologists receiving Medicare reimbursements between 2013 and 2019.The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File was used to determine total reimbursements and number of services submitted by ophthalmologists between 2013 and 2019. Reimbursements were standardized to account for geographic differences in Medicare reimbursement per service. Data from the American Community Survey (ACS) were used to determine socioeconomic characteristics (unemployment, poverty, income, and education) by zip code for the location of each physician's practice. A multivariate linear regression model was used to evaluate differences in annual reimbursements by sex, accounting for calendar year, years of experience, total number of services, ACS zip code data, and proportion of procedural services.Annual Medicare reimbursement and use of billing codes (e.g., outpatient office visits and eye examinations, diagnostic testing, laser treatment, and surgery).Among 20 281 ophthalmologists who received Medicare reimbursements between 2013 and 2019, 15 451 (76%) were men. The most common billing codes submitted were for outpatient visits and eye examinations (13.8 million charges/year), diagnostic imaging of the retina (5.6 million charges/year), intravitreal injections (2.9 million charges/year), and removal of cataract with insertion of lens (2.4 million charges/year). Compared with men, female ophthalmologists received less in median annual reimbursements (median, $94 734.21 [interquartile range (IQR), $30 944.52-$195 701.70] for women vs. $194 176.90 [IQR, $76 380.76-$355 790.80] for men; P0.001) and billed for fewer annual median services (median, 1228 [IQR, 454-2433] vs. 2259 [IQR, 996-4075, respectively]; P0.001). After adjustment for covariates, female ophthalmologists billed for 1015 fewer services (95% confidence interval [CI], 1001-1029; P0.001) and received $20 209.12 less in reimbursements than men (95% CI, -$21 717.57 to -$18 700.66; P0.001).Female ophthalmologists billed for fewer services and received less in reimbursement from Medicare than men over time and across all categories of billing codes. Disparities persisted after controlling for physician and practice characteristics.

To investigate 5-year outcomes in eyes initially treated with aflibercept or bevacizumab for macular edema due to central retinal or hemiretinal vein occlusion.Long-term follow-up (LTF) after a randomized clinical trial from 64 centers in the United States. Participants were followed up to 60 months and treated at investigator discretion after completing the 12-month treatment protocol. Main outcomes were visual acuity letter score (VALS) and central subfield thickness (CST) on optical coherence tomography.Seventy-five percent (248/330) of eligible participants completed at least 1 visit between months 24 and 60, and 45% completed the month 60 visit. Among participants completing month 60, overall mean VALS improvement over baseline was 13.5 (95% CI: 9.6, 17.5), less than the mean improvement of 20.6 (95% CI: 18.7, 22.4) observed at month 12, with no significant differences between originally assigned study groups. Further, 66% (99/150) had at least 1 treatment between months 48 and 60 with a mean (SD) of 3.41 (3.69) treatments over this period. Mean CST was 671 μm at baseline and 261 μm (95% CI: 241.2, 280.9) at month 60.Although VALS improved substantially when patients were treated per protocol through month 12, improvement lessened when treatment was at investigator discretion and fewer treatments were received although VALS remained markedly improved over baseline through year 5. Most patients continued to receive treatment in year 5. This suggests that continued monitoring and, if warranted, treatment with anti-VEGF therapy benefits patients with macular edema associated with central retinal or hemiretinal vein occlusion. Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.

To compare progression of myopia and refractive error in former premature infants with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treated using intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) or laser.Retrospective clinical cohort study.We identified premature infants with ROP treated using IVB from 2011 to 2020 and compared their longitudinal cycloplegic refraction data to that of infants with ROP treated using laser during the same timeframe. A subset of infants treated using IVB also underwent additional treatment using laser. We included cycloplegic refractions from 789 cumulative visits over a median 3.2 years. We used a linear mixed-effects model with a log decay function to evaluate how refraction changed with age after treatment.In aggregate, the model estimated a significant (P.001) trend in refraction-from slight hyperopia to relatively more myopic states. However, progression in laser-treated eyes was significantly (P.001) more rapid, regardless of treatment with IVB. The number of laser spots resulted in increased myopic progression by approximately 0.16 diopters per 100 laser spots. Both ROP stage and zone had a significant effect on myopic progression, with more severe disease resulting in faster myopic progression. Random effects, including individual subject variation with nested variance for left and right eye, accounted for 86.4% of the remaining variance not explained by age and treatment.Laser treatment for severe ROP increases the trend to severe myopia. In our sample, IVB did not affect myopic progression but did substantially reduce the amount of consequent laser required to treat ROP. The effect of laser persists after accounting for differences in ROP stage and zone.

Macular hemorrhages are a severe complication of other retinal pathologies, such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or macroaneurysms. Their therapeutic approach is not standardized, and can vary from observation to surgical treatment.Retrospective analysis of 22 cases of macular hemorrhage, treated with vitrectomy associated to subretinal rTPA and intravitreal anti-VEGF over a period of 5 years.22 eyes of 22 patients were included, of which 12 (52%) were women. The mean age at diagnosis was 84.4 years. 13 patients were pseudophakic (54.1%) and 19 (86.36%) had previous ophthalmological comorbidities. The etiology of the macular hemorrhage was AMD in 19 patients (86.36%). The mean of best VA corrected at diagnosis was 24.55 (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study score -ETDRS), with a statistically significant improvement to 36.78 3 months after surgery (p = 0.011). With an average of 23.5 months of follow-up, no differences in prognosis associated with the etiology or size of the hemorrhage were observed.The treatment of macular hemorrhages by vitrectomy, subretinal rTPA and antiVEGF improves the visual prognosis of affected patients.

Uveitis is among the leading causes of visual loss in the working age population. In noninfectious uveitis, corticosteroids are the first line therapy. We sought to review systematically the evidence regarding the regional corticosteroid delivery modalities in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis. A 5-database search (Pubmed, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Scopus) was performed from inception to February, 2021. Nineteen studies with a total of 1,935 eyes of 1,753 patients were selected from 8,922 abstracts retrieved by the initial search. The most frequently compared regimens were intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection and orbital floor triamcinolone acetonide injection (2 studies), intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection and posterior sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide injection (2 studies), and posterior sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide injection with the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (2 studies). Our results show that the intravitreal injection of corticosteroids is more effective, but is associated with more adverse events, than periocular injection. Some evidence supports the use of subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide over intravitreal/periocular triamcinolone acetonide. Moreover, the overall results of 0.59 mg dosage of the intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant were superior to those from the 2.1 mg dose. The evidence, however, is not robust, and further studies with standardized outcomes are warranted.

To identify baseline OCT predictors of the 3-year visual outcome for type 3 (T3) macular neovascularization (MNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treated by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy.Retrospective longitudinal study.Forty eyes of 30 patients affected by exudative treatment-naive T3 MNV were enrolled.Baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and several baseline OCT features were assessed and included in the analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses served to identify risk factors associated with the 3-year BCVA.Baseline OCT features that are associated with bad or good visual outcomes of T3 MNV treated by anti-VEGF injections.Mean baseline BCVA was 0.34 ± 0.28 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR), which significantly decreased to 0.52 ± 0.37 LogMAR at the end of the 3-year follow-up (P = 0.002). In the univariate analysis, the following baseline features were associated with the 3-year BCVA outcome: baseline BCVA (P = 0.004), foveal involvement of exudation (P = 0.004), and presence of subretinal fluid (SRF; P = 0.004). In the multivariate model, baseline BCVA (P = 0.032), central macular thickness (P = 0.036), number of active T3 lesions (P = 0.034), and presence of SRF (P = 0.008) were associated with the 3-year BCVA outcome. Interestingly, 3-year BCVA was significantly lower in 19 eyes with SRF at the baseline (0.69 ± 0.42 LogMAR) than 21 eyes without SRF (0.37 ± 0.24 LogMAR; P = 0.004).We identified structural OCT features associated with BCVA outcome after 3-year treatment with anti-VEGF injections. In contrast to previous studies on neovascular AMD, in our series, the presence of SRF at baseline was the most significant independent negative predictor of functional outcomes. Current findings may be employed to identify less favorable T3 patterns potentially deserving a more intensive treatment.

To evaluate whether topical acrizanib (LHA510), a small-molecule vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, could suppress the need for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy over a 12-week period in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.A phase 2 multicenter randomized double-masked, vehicle-controlled proof-of-concept study.Trial includes n = 90 patients with active choroidal neovascularization due to neovascular age-related macular degeneration and under anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment. All patients received an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab at baseline and were retreated when there was evidence of disease recurrence (rescue). Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive topical LHA510 or vehicle for 12 weeks. Drops were administered twice a day for 8 weeks and then 3 times a day for the last 4 weeks.The primary outcome was the number of patients requiring rescue over 84 days of topical dosing. Key secondary outcome measures were time to first rescue, total number of ranibizumab injections, changes in central subfield thickness, and changes of visual acuity from baseline to day 84.The extended per protocol set included 70 patients of whom 25 of 33 patients in the LHA510 group (75.8%) and 25 of 37 patients in the placebo group (67.6%) required rescue by day 84 (P = .8466). Secondary and subgroup analysis did not support evidence of efficacy. Twenty-one of 46 patients administered LHA510 developed a reversible corneal haze that resolved with cessation of treatment and did not recur in patients restarted at once daily frequency.In spite of extensive optimization for topical efficacy, LHA510 failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy.

Retinal nonperfusion (RNP) is an important biomarker for diabetic retinopathy (DR). Data suggest that consistent anti-VEGF pharmacotherapy can slow RNP development. The RECOVERY trial evaluated the impact of aflibercept (Eylea, Regeneron) on RNP among eyes with proliferative DR (PDR).Prospective, randomized clinical trial with treatment crossover in the second year.Eyes with PDR and RNP.At baseline, the subjects were randomized 1:1 to monthly (arm 1) or quarterly (arm 2) intravitreal 2 mg aflibercept. At the beginning of year 2, the treatment arms were crossed over so that the monthly-dosed subjects subsequently received quarterly dosing and the quarterly-dosed subjects subsequently received monthly dosing.Change in total RNP area (mmAmong all subjects, from baseline to year 2, the mean RNP increased from 235 mmThrough year 2 of the RECOVERY trial, both treatment arms experienced significant increases in RNP. Despite the expansion of the RNP area in nearly all subjects, 82% of subjects demonstrated an improvement in DRSS levels from baseline, with no subjects experiencing worsening in DRSS scores.

PURPOSE To compare the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab with aflibercept in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN Double-masked, 100-week, multicenter, active-controlled, randomized trials. METHODS Subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to brolucizumab 3 mg/6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg in KESTREL (n = 566) or 1:1 to brolucizumab 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg in KITE (n = 360). Brolucizumab groups received 5 loading doses every 6 weeks (q6w) followed by 12-week (q12w) dosing, with optional adjustment to every 8 weeks (q8w) if disease activity was identified at predefined assessment visits; aflibercept groups received 5 doses every 4 weeks (q4w) followed by fixed q8w dosing. The primary endpoint was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline at Week 52; secondary endpoints included the proportion of subjects maintained on q12w dosing, change in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale score, and anatomical and safety outcomes. RESULTS At Week 52, brolucizumab 6 mg was noninferior (NI margin 4 letters) to aflibercept in mean change in BCVA from baseline (KESTREL: +9.2 letters vs +10.5 letters; KITE: +10.6 letters vs +9.4 letters; P < .001), more subjects achieved central subfield thickness (CSFT)

To determine the root causes of patient safety events in a high-volume intravitreal injection clinic and to assess the effect of interventions to reduce the rate of events.Quality improvement study.All cases of intravitreal injection in a designated injection clinic between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019.The injection clinic model involved an injecting physician, who usually differed from a prescribing physician. The procedural injection area was also physically separate from the retina outpatient clinic. A root cause analysis was used to determine the factors that contributed to possible patient safety events in an institutional quality improvement project. Specific interventions were implemented to address each specific root cause. The rates of patient safety events (never events and near misses), whether associated with patient harm or not, were compared before and after the intervention.Frequency (%) of patient-safety-related intravitreal injection events before (January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018) and after (January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019) intervention.The root cause analysis included complex treatment plans that could be difficult to interpret, insufficient time to adequately review the designated treatment plans, and the risk of human error given the pace and volume of scheduled injections. Quality improvement strategies included revising the standardized treatment plan documentation template, scheduling block time for injecting physicians to review treatment plans within 24 hours of the injection clinic, and requiring agreement between dual, independent, site, and medication verifications of the treatment plan by the injecting physician and an allied health coordinator before site marking. The rate of events was 0.1% (28 in 27 400, or 9.3 events per year) before intervention and decreased to 0.01% (1 in 9375, or 1 event per year) after intervention (P = 0.01). Most events were classified as near misses, and there were no instances of patient harm.A high level of patient safety can be achieved in a complex, high-volume intravitreal injection practice by recognizing potential safety issues and root causes and implementing relevant quality improvements. Although most events were near misses and no patients were harmed, reducing near misses can reduce the likelihood of harm associated with never events.

Ocriplasmin is used to treat vitreomacular traction (VMT), with or without full-thickness macular hole (MH). We systematically reviewed the evidence on ocriplasmin's effect on vitreomacular adhesion resolution (VMAR), MH closure, vitrectomy, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and investigated the effect of baseline covariates on outcome. We applied individual participant data meta-analyses to the entire population and to subgroups defined by MH or epiretinal membrane (ERM) presence. Safety data were pooled and tabulated. Five randomized controlled trials (1,067 participants) were included. Six months after treatment, ocriplasmin achieved higher rates of VMAR and MH closure versus control, lowered vitrectomy odds, and increased the likelihood of a ≥10-letter BCVA increase. VMAR rates were lower when ERM, broad VMA (> 1500 µm), diabetic retinopathy, or pseudophakia were present and higher in younger participants, women, and eyes with MHs. Ocriplasmin-treated participants experienced more short-term visual impairment that was not predictive of final BCVA, as well as vitreous floaters, photopsia, photophobia, eye pain, blurred vision, and dyschromatopsia. The most common serious adverse events for ocriplasmin and control, respectively, were MH progression (22.5%, 17.3%), new MH (1.5%, 3.4%) and retinal detachment (0.8%, 1.2%). Ocriplasmin promotes VMAR and MH closure. Transient visual phenomena are not uncommon.

PURPOSE To assess the relationship between best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield optical coherence tomography (OCT) features in noninfectious uveitis (NIU)-related macular edema (ME). DESIGN Clinical cohort study from post hoc analysis of two phase 3 clinical trials' data. METHODS Correlation and longitudinal treatment analyses were performed. Of 198 patients with NIU, 134 received suprachoroidally administered CLS-TA (Clearside Biomedical, Inc. proprietary formulation of a triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension) and 64 received sham, with 12.9% and 72% respectively receiving rescue therapy. RESULTS At baseline, mean BCVA progressively worsened with each ordinal drop in ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity. Eyes with normal baseline EZ experienced greater 24-week change in BCVA compared to eyes with some degree of baseline EZ disruption (11.9 vs 9.4 letters, P=0.006). In contrast, eyes without central subfield cystoid spaces and/or central subfield SRF at baseline showed less improvement (5.5 letters or 9.5 letters, respectively) at 24 weeks, compared to those eyes with such OCT findings (13.7 letters, P = 0.012 or 17.2 letter, P

To investigate the functional associations of intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) volumes at baseline and after the loading dose as well as fluid change after the first injection with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) who received an anti-VEGF treatment over 24 months.Post hoc analysis of a phase III, randomized, multicenter trial in which ranibizumab was administered monthly or in a pro re nata regimen (HARBOR).Study eyes of 1094 treatment-naïve patients with nAMD.IRF and SRF volumes were segmented automatically on monthly spectral domain OCT images. Fluid volumes and changes thereof were included as covariates into longitudinal mixed-effects models, which modeled BCVA trajectories.BCVA estimates corresponding to baseline, follow-up, and persistent IRF/SRF volumes after the loading dose; BCVA estimates of change in fluid volumes after the first injection; and marginal and conditional RAnalysis of 22 494 volumetric scans revealed that foveal IRF consistently shows a negative correlation with BCVA at baseline and subsequent visits (-3.23 and -4.32 letters/100 nL, respectively). After the first injection, BCVA increased by +2.13 letters/100 nL decrease in foveal IRF. Persistent IRF was associated with lower baseline BCVA and less improvement. Foveal SRF correlated with better BCVA at baseline and subsequent visits (+6.52 and +1.42 letters/100 nL, respectively). After the first injection, SRF decrease was associated with significant vision gain (+5.88 letters/100 nL). Foveal fluid correlated more with BCVA than parafoveal IRF/SRF.Although IRF consistently correlates with decreased function and recovery throughout therapy, SRF is associated with a more pronounced functional improvement. Moreover, SRF resolution provides increased benefit. Fluid-function correlation represents an essential base for the development of personalized treatment regimens, optimizing functional outcomes, and reducing treatment burden.

To compare visual outcome and recurrence rates of eyes with noninfectious inflammatory choroidal neovascularization (CNV) treated with or without anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections and immunosuppression.Retrospective, nonrandomized clinical study.Participants: Patients with CNV secondary to noninfectious inflammatory causes who attended uveitis clinics at Moorfields Eye Hospital between January 2000 and April 2016. Data were gathered from the clinical notes of all subjects examined in clinic.change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mean time to CNV recurrence, moderate vision loss (≤20/50), and severe vision loss (≤20/200).A total of 166 patients (204 eyes) with noninfectious inflammatory CNV were included in this study with a median follow-up of 6.9 years (interquartile range: 2.9-11.7; 1652 eye-years). The mean BCVA at the time of CNV diagnosis was 0.38 ± 0.05 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (Snellen equivalent 20/47) in the eyes that received the first-line anti-VEGF treatment and 0.44 ± 0.03 logMAR (Snellen equivalent 20/55) in the eyes on other treatment modalities (P = .39). Eyes treated first with anti-VEGF (n = 55) received the mean of 4.35 ± 0.53 injections and showed a statistically significant improvement in vision at all time points (P.001) except for a 5-year visit (P = .25). The rest of the eyes demonstrated no significant change in vision throughout follow-up (all P.05). At the final visit, the mean BCVA was 0.26 ± 0.11 logMAR (Snellen equivalent 20/36) in the former and 0.35 ± 0.06 logMAR (Snellen equivalent 20/44) in the latter. The mean time to CNV recurrence was 186 ± 15.1 months, and the risk was significantly reduced by treatment with oral corticosteroids (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.32, confidence interval: 0.17-0.59, P.001) or anti-VEGF injections (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.31, confidence interval: 0.18-0.52, P.001).Eyes that developed inflammatory CNV were at risk of vision loss. Those receiving early anti-VEGF injections achieved a better visual outcome and had a reduced risk of CNV recurrence. Oral corticosteroids also had an effect that reduces the risk of recurrence in eyes previously treated.

Purpose Determine associations between early residual fluid (ERF)-free status and improved long-term visual outcomes. Design Clinical cohort study from post hoc analysis of two phase 3 clinical trials’ data. Methods Independent of treatment allocation, patients from the multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-masked HAWK and HARRIER trials who received either brolucizumab 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg were split into two cohorts dependent on presence or absence of ERF at week 12. Additionally, similar analyses were performed on presence or absence of early residual intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) at week 12. The two groups, ERF-free (N=1051) and ERF (N=366) were compared. Changes from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST) were determined. Results From week 12 to 96, patients who were ERF-free had greater least square (LS) mean increases from baseline for BCVA and CST compared to ERF patients. Greater LS mean differences in BCVA from week 12 to 96 were noted between ERF-free and ERF patients. A greater proportion of patients in the ERF-free cohort reported a ≥5, ≥10, or ≥15 letter improvement and a higher proportion reported BCVA ≥70 letters from baseline to week 96 compared to those with fluid. Conclusions Improvements in visual outcomes in ERF-free patients were greater than in ERF patients occurring as early as 4 weeks (week 12) following the last loading dose and continued to week 96. Therefore, ERF status may be a useful indicator of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment response.

The prognosis of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) has improved significantly since the advent of antiangiogenic treatments. However, several «real life» studies have shown lower number of injections and a markedly worse visual prognosis than pivotal clinical trials.To assess the effectiveness and safety of the treatment of neovascular AMD and analyse clinical factors related to the functional and structural prognosis in routine clinical practice.Retrospective, observational, single-centre study that included 143 eyes of 122 patients diagnosed with neovascular AMD between the years 2015 and 2016, who received treatment with antiangiogenic drugs and were followed up for two or more years.Visual acuity improved in 45% of patients after two years of treatment. The mean decrease in central macular thickness was 85 μm (p 0.001) and the mean number of injections was 13. Retinal pigment epithelium rupture was present in 3.5%. Ranibizumab was the drug most used as a first option, although 79 patients (55.2%) required a change in treatment, most being switched to aflibercept. A greater number of visits (p 0.001) and a lower number of injections (p 0.01) were predictors of worse structural outcome. The number of visits was associated with better visual acuity (p 0.001).The treatment has demonstrated its efficacy by improving visual acuity and central macular thickness. However, the number of injections performed has generally been higher than in other real-life studies.

Purpose To evaluate the safety and tolerability of single and multiple intravitreal injections of NGM621 in patients with geographic atrophy (GA) and to characterize the pharmacokinetics and immunogenic potential. Design Multicenter, open-label, single- and multiple-dose phase 1 study. Methods Fifteen patients enrolled at 4 sites in the United States. Participants had GA secondary to age-related macular degeneration, lesion size ≥2.5 mm2 and best-corrected visual acuity of 4 to 54 letters (20/80 to 20/800 Snellen equivalent) in the study eye and no history of choroidal neovascularization in either eye. Patients who met eligibility criteria were treated in a single ascending-dose phase (2 mg, 7.5 mg, 15 mg) or received 2 doses NGM621 15 mg 4 weeks apart in the multidose phase and were followed for 12 weeks (85 days). Assessments included adverse events, best-corrected visual acuity, low luminance visual acuity, vital signs, clinical laboratory evaluations, GA lesion area as measured by fundus autofluorescence, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and pharmacokinetic, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamic assessments. Results All 15 participants completed the 12-week study. There were no serious adverse events and no drug-related adverse events, and no choroidal neovascularization developed in either eye. Mean visual acuity and GA lesion area appeared stable through week 12 for all cohorts. Pharmacokinetic analyses indicated that NGM621 serum exposures appeared to be dose proportional, and no antidrug antibodies were identified at any of the evaluated time points. Conclusions In this small, open-labelled, 12-week phase 1 study, NGM621 was safe and tolerable when administered intravitreally up to 15 mg.

PURPOSE To compare outcomes of glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation and trabeculectomies with and without postoperative intravitreal injections (IVIs) in glaucoma patients with a history of preoperative IVIs. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS A total of 133 eyes of 133 glaucoma patients who underwent GDD implantation or trabeculectomy with at least 1 IVI preoperatively between January 2005 and October 2020 at Massachusetts Eye and Ear. METHODS Chart review of glaucoma patients with traditional glaucoma surgery and at least 1 IVI before surgery. All statistical analyses were conducted with R statistical programming software. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Intraocular pressure (IOP), medication burden, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Kaplan-Meier success rates, adjusted hazard ratios (HRs), and complications. RESULTS Baseline demographics were similar between the groups with and without postoperative IVIs. The group with postoperative IVIs had a higher proportion of diabetic retinopathy and retinal vascular occlusions than the group without postoperative IVIs, which had more eyes with age-related macular degeneration. Intraocular pressure, medication burden, and visual acuity were similar between groups at all time points except for IOP at 6 weeks, which was lower in the group with postoperative IVIs. The group with postoperative IVIs had significantly more preoperative IVIs than the group without postoperative IVIs (6.6 vs. 3.3, P = 0.017). For success defined as IOP reduction ≥ 20% with 5 < IOP ≤ 21 mmHg, Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated similar success rates between groups with and without IVIs. When stratified by the number of IVIs, success rates for the group with 7 or more IVIs were significantly higher than the success rates for the group with 0-6 IVIs (P = 0.005). Each additional postoperative IVI resulted in a 7.2% decrease in the hazard of failure to achieve our stated success criteria. With regard to late complications, the group with postoperative IVIs had a higher incidence of vitreous hemorrhage (18.5% vs. 3.2%, P = 0.039) than the group without postoperative IVIs. CONCLUSIONS A higher number of postoperative IVIs, specifically 7 or more IVIs, may be associated with improved success rates of traditional glaucoma surgery in glaucoma patients who received IVIs before surgery.

Purpose This analysis of the pivotal phase 3 HAWK and HARRIER trials aimed to provide insights on the timing of presentation, management, and outcomes of intraocular inflammation (IOI)-related adverse events (AEs), as reported by investigators in these trials. Design Post hoc analysis of investigator-reported IOI-related AEs in HAWK and HARRIER. Participants Of 1088 brolucizumab-treated eyes (3 or 6 mg), 49 eyes demonstrated at least 1 IOI-related AE and were included in this analysis. Methods Reports of IOI-related AEs were analyzed and descriptive statistics were provided for outcome measures. Main Outcome Measures Incidence and description of eyes with IOI-related AEs, timing of presentation, management, clinical outcomes, and brolucizumab treatment after the first IOI-related AE. Results Seventy IOI-related AEs were reported in 49 eyes. Before the onset of first IOI-related AE, eyes received a mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 3.9 ± 2.2 brolucizumab injections. Median time to first IOI-related AE from the last administered brolucizumab injection was 18.0 days (interquartile range, 4.0–29.0 days). Of the 70 AEs, 61 (87.1%) were treated, most with topical corticosteroids; systemic and intraocular corticosteroids were used for 3 AEs each. Overall, inflammation resolved completely in 39 eyes (79.6%), resolved with sequelae in 5 eyes (10.2%), and did not resolve in 5 eyes (10.2%) by end-of-study (EOS). Overall, the mean ± SD best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline to EOS, before AE to the lowest BCVA in 3 months after AE, and from before AE to EOS were −0.84 ± 20.6 , −16.31 ± 17.6, and −0.22 ± 18.9 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters, respectively. Of the 36 eyes (73.5%) that continued with brolucizumab therapy after the first IOI-related AE, 24 completed the trials and 12 discontinued; mean ± SD BCVA change in these eyes was 2.6 ± 17.6, 7.8 ± 13.2, and −7.7 ± 21.3 ETDRS letters, respectively, from baseline to EOS. The remaining 13 eyes (26.5%) were not treated with brolucizumab after first IOI-related AE and showed a mean ± SD BCVA change of −10.4 ± 25.5 ETDRS letters from baseline to EOS. Conclusions Findings of this analysis highlight the need for continued vigilance and monitoring for any signs of IOI-related events in patients receiving brolucizumab.

Purpose To evaluate early predictive factors of visual loss in patients treated with anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections under an as-needed regimen for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Design Post hoc analysis from the randomized controlled trial Groupe d’Evaluation Francais Avastin versus Lucentis (GEFAL). Participants A total of 393 patients with neovascular AMD. Methods The present analysis is based on 1-year data from patients included in the study. Patients were separately categorized according to the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change at 3 months and 1 year into 3 trajectories: (1) patients with no vision loss ≥5 letters at 3 months and 1 year (absence of loss ≥5 letters); (2) patients with no vision loss ≥5 letters at 3 months but loss ≥5 letters at 1 year (secondary loss ≥5 letters); and (3) patients with vision loss ≥5 letters at 3 months and 1 year (initial loss ≥5 letters). Main Outcome Measures The following factors were evaluated at baseline and 3 months: age, sex, BCVA, presence of fluid, central macular thickness, angiographic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) subtype, CNV area measured in disc area on fluorescein angiography, and number of intravitreal injections. Results An absence of loss ≥5 letters was found in 225 patients (57.3%), a secondary loss ≥5 letters after 3 months was found in 109 patients (27.7%), and an initial loss ≥5 letters was found in 59 patients (15%). Baseline characteristics were comparable among the 3 groups except for the total CNV area, which was larger in the initial and secondary loss groups (P = 0.0412). At 3 months, a significant association was found between presence of subretinal fluid (SRF) (P = 0.0318) and vision loss ≥5 letters, and an even stronger significant association between the presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF) (P = 0.0066) and vision loss ≥5 letters. Conclusions In the present study, we found that a large CNV area at baseline was significantly associated with initial or secondary loss of visual acuity ≥5 letters despite anti-VEGF injection. The presence of fluid, both SRF and IRF, at 3 months was found in patients with poorer trajectories.

To reduce treatment burden and optimise patient outcomes in diabetic macular oedema, we present 1-year results from two phase 3 trials of faricimab, a novel angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A bispecific antibody.YOSEMITE and RHINE were randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority trials across 353 sites worldwide. Adults with vision loss due to centre-involving diabetic macular oedema were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to intravitreal faricimab 6·0 mg every 8 weeks, faricimab 6·0 mg per personalised treatment interval (PTI), or aflibercept 2·0 mg every 8 weeks up to week 100. PTI dosing intervals were extended, maintained, or reduced (every 4 weeks up to every 16 weeks) based on disease activity at active dosing visits. The primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity at 1 year, averaged over weeks 48, 52, and 56. Efficacy analyses included the intention-to-treat population (non-inferiority margin 4 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters); safety analyses included patients with at least one dose of study treatment. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (YOSEMITE NCT03622580 and RHINE NCT03622593).3247 patients were screened for eligibility in YOSEMITE (n=1532) and RHINE (n=1715). After exclusions, 940 patients were enrolled into YOSEMITE between Sept 5, 2018, and Sept 19, 2019, and 951 patients were enrolled into RHINE between Oct 9, 2018, and Sept 20, 2019. These 1891 patients were randomly assigned to faricimab every 8 weeks (YOSEMITE n=315, RHINE n=317), faricimab PTI (n=313, n=319), or aflibercept every 8 weeks (n=312, n=315). Non-inferiority for the primary endpoint was achieved with faricimab every 8 weeks (adjusted mean vs aflibercept every 8 weeks in YOSEMITE 10·7 ETDRS letters [97·52% CI 9·4 to 12·0] vs 10·9 ETDRS letters [9·6 to 12·2], difference -0·2 ETDRS letters [-2·0 to 1·6]; RHINE 11·8 ETDRS letters [10·6 to 13·0] vs 10·3 ETDRS letters [9·1 to 11·4] letters, difference 1·5 ETDRS letters [-0·1 to 3·2]) and faricimab PTI (YOSEMITE 11·6 ETDRS letters [10·3 to 12·9], difference 0·7 ETDRS letters [-1·1 to 2·5]; RHINE 10·8 ETDRS letters [9·6 to 11·9], difference 0·5 ETDRS letters [-1·1 to 2·1]). Incidence of ocular adverse events was comparable between faricimab every 8 weeks (YOSEMITE n=98 [31%], RHINE n=137 [43%]), faricimab PTI (n=106 [34%], n=119 [37%]), and aflibercept every 8 weeks (n=102 [33%], n=113 [36%]).Robust vision gains and anatomical improvements with faricimab were achieved with adjustable dosing up to every 16 weeks, demonstrating the potential for faricimab to extend the durability of treatment for patients with diabetic macular oedema.F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Faricimab is a bispecific antibody that acts through dual inhibition of both angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor A. We report primary results of two phase 3 trials evaluating intravitreal faricimab with extension up to every 16 weeks for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).TENAYA and LUCERNE were randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority trials across 271 sites worldwide. Treatment-naive patients with nAMD aged 50 years or older were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravitreal faricimab 6·0 mg up to every 16 weeks, based on protocol-defined disease activity assessments at weeks 20 and 24, or aflibercept 2·0 mg every 8 weeks. Randomisation was performed through an interactive voice or web-based response system using a stratified permuted block randomisation method. Patients, investigators, those assessing outcomes, and the funder were masked to group assignments. The primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline averaged over weeks 40, 44, and 48 (prespecified non-inferiority margin of four letters), in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses included patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (TENAYA NCT03823287 and LUCERNE NCT03823300).Across the two trials, 1329 patients were randomly assigned between Feb 19 and Nov 19, 2019 (TENAYA n=334 faricimab and n=337 aflibercept), and between March 11 and Nov 1, 2019 (LUCERNE n=331 faricimab and n=327 aflibercept). BCVA change from baseline with faricimab was non-inferior to aflibercept in both TENAYA (adjusted mean change 5·8 letters [95% CI 4·6 to 7·1] and 5·1 letters [3·9 to 6·4]; treatment difference 0·7 letters [-1·1 to 2·5]) and LUCERNE (6·6 letters [5·3 to 7·8] and 6·6 letters [5·3 to 7·8]; treatment difference 0·0 letters [-1·7 to 1·8]). Rates of ocular adverse events were comparable between faricimab and aflibercept (TENAYA n=121 [36·3%] vs n=128 [38·1%], and LUCERNE n=133 [40·2%] vs n=118 [36·2%]).Visual benefits with faricimab given at up to 16-week intervals demonstrates its potential to meaningfully extend the time between treatments with sustained efficacy, thereby reducing treatment burden in patients with nAMD.F Hoffmann-La Roche.

To determine the long-term cognitive outcomes in children who underwent intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).Prospective cohort study.This single-center study enrolled 186 children between 3 and 6 years of age and included 101 children in the final analysis: premature without ROP (group 1), ROP not needing treatment (group 2), IVB monotherapy (group 3), IVB plus laser therapy (group 4), and laser monotherapy (group 5). The Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ) was evaluated by the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence Test at baseline and then annually for 1-2 years and compared among groups.The age at cognitive evaluation was 4.5-4.9 years at baseline and 6.1-7.0 years at the last follow-up. The FSIQ was comparable among the groups at both time points (P = .08 and .50, respectively). Severe cognitive impairment (FSIQ70) was more common in group 4 at baseline (4%, 22%, 13%, 33%, and 0% in groups 1-5, respectively; P = .03) but did not differ among the groups at the last follow-up (6%, 0%, 4%, 22%, and 0%; P = .22). After adjusting for sex, Apgar score, neonatal adverse events, and days on mechanical ventilation, IVB was not associated with FSIQ either at baseline or at the last follow-up.At 4.5 to beyond 6 years of age, children who underwent IVB monotherapy had comparable cognitive outcomes compared to the other premature children without prior IVB. Children who underwent IVB plus laser showed higher severe cognitive impairment at 4.5 years of age.

Purpose This trial was conducted to investigate the clinical equivalence of the proposed biosimilar FYB201 and reference ranibizumab in patients with treatment-naive, subfoveal choroidal neovascularization caused by neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Design This was a prospective, multicenter, evaluation-masked, parallel-group, 48-week, phase III randomized study. Participants A total of 477 patients were randomly assigned to receive FYB201 (n = 238) or reference ranibizumab (n = 239). Methods Patients received FYB201 or ranibizumab 0.5 mg by intravitreal injection in the study eye every four weeks. Main Outcome Measures The primary end point was change from baseline in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at 8 weeks prior to the third monthly intravitreal injection. Biosimilarity of FYB201 to its originator was assessed via a two-sided equivalence test, with an equivalence margin in BCVA of 3 ETDRS letters. Results BCVA improved in both groups, with a mean improvement of +5.1 (FYB201) and +5.6 (reference ranibizumab) ETDRS letters at week 8. The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) least squares mean difference for the change from baseline between FYB201 and reference ranibizumab was –0.4 ETDRS letters with a 90% confidence interval (CI) of –1.6 to 0.9. Primary end point was met as the 90% CI was within the predefined equivalence margin. Adverse events were comparable between treatment groups. Conclusions FYB201 is biosimilar to reference ranibizumab in terms of clinical efficacy and ocular and systemic safety in the treatment of patients with nAMD.

Purpose : To evaluate the effect of loss to follow up (LTFU) on outcomes in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Design : Retrospective cohort study Methods : Single-center study of 90 eyes of 73 patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and DME treated with anti-VEGF injections who were LTFU for >6 months. Main outcomes were the change in mean visual acuity (VA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) at the return and final visits compared to the visit before LTFU. Results : Mean age was 64.5 years, mean LTFU duration was 322 days, and mean follow-up duration after return was 502 days. Compared to the mean VA at the visit before LTFU (0.42, Snellen ∼20/52), mean VA worsened at the return visit (0.54, Snellen ∼20/69, p=0.004). No significant change in the mean VA was noted at the 3-month after return visit (0.50, Snellen ∼20/63), the 6-month after return visit (0.46, Snellen ∼20/57), the 12-month after return visit (0.42, Snellen ∼20/52) and the final follow up (0.47, Snellen ∼20/59). When analyzed by NPDR severity before LTFU, no difference in VA was found from the visit before LTFU to the final visit. Mean CFT increased when comparing the visit before LTFU (270 μm) to the return visit (305 μm, p=0.012), but no difference was found by the final visit [247 μm, p=0.07]. Conclusions : Anti-VEGF treated DME patients who were LTFU for a prolonged period experienced a modest decline in VA that recovered after restarting treatment.

PURPOSE To investigate the recurrence rate of active macular neovascularization in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) previously followed up in a treat-and-extend (TE) regimen in which treatment had been stopped because of disease stability. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS One hundred five patients with nAMD previously followed up in a TE regimen treated with aflibercept injections. METHODS All patients with a dry macula on 3 consecutive visits 12 weeks apart were eligible to participate in the study. Patients were examined at baseline and then monitored for disease recurrence 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 months after the last injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The proportion of patients with recurrent disease within 12 months after the last injection. Change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the time of recurrence and after resumed therapy. RESULTS Evidence of recurrent nAMD was seen in 54 of 102 patients (52.9%) after 12 months of follow-up. The mean time to recurrence after the last injection was 6.7 ± 2.2 months. The BCVA decreased from 71.7 ± 10.0 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at baseline to 68.1 ± 11.1 ETDRS letters at the recurrence (P = 0.12). After treatment resumed, BCVA increased to 71.4 ± 10.0 ETDRS letters (P = not significant compared with baseline). Patients with a pigment epithelial detachment (PED) at baseline showed a 74% (14/19) recurrence rate compared with 48% (40/83) in patients without a PED (P < 0.05). Only 22 of 54 patients (40.7%) with recurrent disease showed symptoms of visual loss or metamorphopsia. CONCLUSIONS Recurrent nAMD is common in previously stable patients for whom anti-VEGF injections have been suspended. It is difficult to predict which patients will experience a recurrence, and most of these patients do not show symptoms in the early stages of reactivation. Long-term follow-up is important, and early detection of recurrent disease can improve the chances for maintained visual function.

PURPOSE This study examines the relationship between fluctuations in central subfield thickness (CST) and visual acuity (VA) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) using data from 2 large clinical trials. DESIGN Clinical cohort study using post hoc analysis of clinical trial databases. METHODS Standard deviation (SD) of all recorded CSTs for each patient during the study period were used to quantify the fluctuations in CST. Patients from each protocol were grouped into quartiles based on the CST SD. Eyes with at least 3 CSTs and VA at 1 year were included. The main outcome measures were VA at 1 and 2 years for each protocol, stratified by SD quartile. RESULTS A total of 1197 eyes were included in the analysis. There were significant VA differences based on CST SD quartile for both protocols while adjusting for mean baseline VA, baseline CST, lens status, hemoglobin A1c, and treatment arm. At week 52 in protocol T, the difference between the first and fourth quartiles was -1.61 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (95% confidence interval [CI] -3.52 to 0.30, P = .0986). At week 104, this difference was -3.59 letters (95% CI -6.17 to -1.00, P = .0066). In protocol V, at week 52, the difference between the first and fourth quartiles was -3.04 letters (95% CI -4.18 to -1.91, P < .0001). At week 104, this difference was -2.35 letters (95% CI -3.58 to -1.13, P = .0005). CONCLUSION Large fluctuations in CST may portend worse VA outcomes at the 2-year end point in patients with DME.

Summary Objective To evaluate the response of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) in eyes treated with intravitreal bevacizumab (BVZ) and untreated fellow eyes in black Africans. Methods We studied 22 eyes (12 patients) divided into 12 treated and 10 untreated eyes from January 2017 to January 2020. Treated eyes received 1 monthly injection of BVZ 2.5 mg for 3 months, with optional additional injections depending on the patient's course. Both groups of eyes were evaluated at presentation and then at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after treatment. Outcome measures were visual acuity (VA) and ophthalmoscopic and OCT findings. Results The mean age of the patients was 66.3 ± 5.6 years. In treated eyes, VA remained stable from 0.10 ± 0.12 at baseline to 0.20 ± 0.30 at month 12, P = 0.84. VA was stable in 83.3% and improved in 16.7% of eyes. On OCT, 41.7% of eyes showed decreased and another 41.7% disappearance of subretinal fluid (SRF) at 12 months. Pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height decreased in 9 eyes (75.0%) but remained unchanged in 3 eyes (25%). In untreated eyes, no difference was observed between the baseline (0.53 ± 0.42) and 12-month VA (0.58 ± 0.40), P = 0.82. VA improved in 2 eyes, decreased in one eye, and remained unchanged in 7 eyes. OCT lesions remained stable in 6 eyes. The PED enlarged in one eye but remained stable in 3 other eyes. Conclusion Intravitreal injection of BVZ 2.5 mg led to stabilization of VA, resorption of SRF, and reduction in the size of the PED in the majority of eyes with PCV but was ineffective on the polyps. The one-year prognosis in untreated eyes with PCV was favorable and marked by functional and structural stability.

In eyes with neovascular AMD, early persistent retinal dryness response to anti-VEGFs was associated with clinically relevant improvements in vision-related function and a greater visual acuity gain compared with when intraretinal fluid was present.

Purpose To evaluate the predictive usefulness of quantitative imaging biomarkers, acquired automatically from OCT scans, of cross-sectional and future visual outcomes of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) starting anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. Design Retrospective cohort study. Participants Treatment-naive, first-treated eyes of patients with neovascular AMD between 2007 and 2017 at Moorfields Eye Hospital (a large, United Kingdom single center) undergoing anti-VEGF therapy. Methods Automatic segmentation was carried out by applying a deep learning segmentation algorithm to 137 379 OCT scans from 6467 eyes of 3261 patients with neovascular AMD. After applying selection criteria, 926 eyes of 926 patients were analyzed. Main Outcome Measures Correlation coefficients (R2 values) and mean absolute error (MAE) between quantitative OCT (qOCT) parameters and cross-sectional visual function, as well as the predictive value of these parameters for short-term visual change, that is, incremental visual acuity (VA) resulting from an individual injection, as well as VA at distant time points (up to 12 months after baseline). Results Visual acuity at distant time points could be predicted: R2 = 0.80 (MAE, 5.0 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters) and R2 = 0.7 (MAE, 7.2 ETDRS letters) after injection at 3 and at 12 months after baseline (P Conclusions Automatic segmentation enables rapid acquisition of quantitative and reproducible OCT biomarkers with potential to inform treatment decisions in the care of neovascular AMD. This furthers development of point-of-care decision-aid systems for personalized medicine.

This study characterizes the association of risk factors including race, ethnicity, and insurance status with presenting visual acuity (VA) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity in patients initiating treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME).Retrospective, cross-sectional study.The Academy Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) Registry database was queried for patients who initiated anti-VEGF injection treatment for DME between 2012 and 2020 (n = 203 707).Multivariate regression analyses were conducted to understand how race, ethnicity, insurance status, and geographic location were associated with baseline features.Visual acuity and DR severity.Patients on Medicare and private insurance presented with higher baseline VA compared with patients on Medicaid (median of 2.31 and 4.17 greater Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Scale [ETDRS] letters, respectively P0.01). White and non-Hispanic patients presented with better VA compared with their counterparts (median of 0.68 and 2.53 greater ETDRS letters, respectively; P0.01). Black and Hispanic patients presented with a worse baseline DR severity compared with White and non-Hispanic patients (odds ratio, 1.23 and 1.71, respectively; P0.01).There are ethnic and insurance-based disparities in VA and disease severity upon initiation of anti-VEGF therapy for DME treatment. Public health initiatives could improve timely initiation of treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To describe predominantly persistent subretinal fluid (SRF) in eyes receiving ranibizumab or bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration and compare visual acuity (VA) to eyes with non-persistent SRF. DESIGN: Cohort within randomized clinical trial PARTICIPANTS: Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials patients assigned to pro re nata (PRN) treatment. METHODS: Reading center graders evaluated optical coherence tomography scans at baseline and monthly follow-up visits for SRF. Predominantly persistent SRF through week 12 was defined as SRF at baseline, weeks 4, 8, and 12. Predominantly persistent SRF through 1 or 2 years was defined as SRF in ≥80% of visits by year 1 or year 2, respectively. Adjusted mean VA score and VA change from baseline were compared between eyes with predominantly persistent SRF and eyes non-persistent SRF over the same duration using linear regression models including baseline predictors of VA and predominantly persistent intraretinal fluid (IRF). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Predominantly persistent SRF through year 1, adjusted VA score and VA change, and SRF thickness at the foveal center. RESULTS: Among 406 eyes with baseline SRF, SRF persisted in 108 (26.6%) through week 12, 94 (23.2%) through year 1, and 77 (19.0%) through year 2. Adjusted VA means (letters) at year 1 were similar between eyes with predominantly persistent vs. non-persistent SRF by week 12, (68.1 vs. 70.2; P=0.18), year 1 (67.6 vs. 70.2; P=0.11), and year 2 (71.4 vs. 70.9; P=0.78). Adjusted change in VA at year 1 means were similar between eyes with predominantly persistent vs. non-persistent SRF by week 12 (6.3 vs. 7.6; P=0.38), year 1 (5.5 vs. 7.8; P=0.14), and year 2 (8.1 vs. 7.7; P=0.78). Among eyes with predominantly persistent SRF through year 1, SRF was absent in the foveal center in 46 (48.9%), thickness was 1-200 μm in 48 (50.0%) and >200 μm in 1 (1.1%) at year 1. CONCLUSIONS: Eyes with predominantly persistent and non-persistent SRF through week 12, year 1, or year 2 had similar VA outcomes after adjustment for baseline covariates and persistent IRF. At the foveal center, predominantly persistent SRF was most commonly absent or present in small quantities.

Purpose To describe a clinical picture resembling classic multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS) potentially triggered by previous or concurrent, apparently unrelated, ocular events and to provide a literature review of similar presentations. Design Retrospective chart series and literature review. Participants Consecutive patients diagnosed with MEWDS at the Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, and the IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, between July 2019 and June 2020. Methods Charts of patients were reviewed. Ophthalmic history, best-corrected visual acuity, spectral-domain OCT results, OCT angiography results, fundus autofluorescence results, ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography results, and indocyanine green angiography results were collected. A PubMed-based search was carried out for similar presentations using the terms MEWDS and white spot syndromes. Main Outcome Measures An ocular history positive for previous or concurrent ocular events in patients with MEWDS was sought in our cohort and the existing literature. Results Five eyes of 4 patients (2 females; age range, 16–81 years) were included. The first eye had a history of bilateral Best vitelliform dystrophy and unilateral choroidal neovascularization. The second eye had angioid streaks complicated by choroidal neovascularization and underwent prior thermal laser photocoagulation. The third eye had a history of high myopia and a scleral buckle procedure for retinal detachment. The fourth patient had bilateral idiopathic retinochoroiditis. We identified 16 case reports from 5 previous publications that support a MEWDS-like reaction to previous ocular insults. Conclusions We suggest a MEWDS-like reaction may be elicited by ocular events in a subset of susceptible patients. We hypothesize that damage to the outer retina may play a role in triggering the local inflammatory response.

Purpose To examine the effect of delay in care on visual acuity (VA) in patients requiring intravitreal injections (IVIs). Design Retrospective cohort study. Participants Patients 18 years of age or older with diabetic macular edema (DME), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), or both; neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD); or retinal vein occlusion (RVO) scheduled to see a retina specialist during the mandated lockdown period (March 14 - May 4, 2020 [the coronavirus disease 2019 period]) and who had received an IVI in the 12 weeks prior. Methods Chart review was performed and demographics, diagnoses, procedures, and VA were recorded. Main Outcome Measures VA in patients who completed, canceled, and no-showed for the scheduled visit. Results Of the 1041 total patients, 620 (60%) completed the scheduled visit, whereas 376 (36%) canceled and 45 (4%) no-showed. In patients who missed the visit, the average delay in care was 5.34 weeks. In those who missed a visit, VA was assessed at the subsequent visit. Patients who canceled a visit were older, and patients who no-showed had lower baseline vision (mean Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters ± standard error [SE]: no-show, 53.27 ± 3.21 letters; canceled, 60.79 ± 1.11 letters; and completed, 62.81 ± 0.84 letters; P = 0.0101) and were more likely to have DME, PDR, or both (no-show, 13 patients [29%]; canceled, 56 patients [16%]; completed, 81 patients [13%]; P = 0.0456). Patients who missed a visit lost vision as compared with the patients who completed one (no-show, –5.024 ± 1.88 letters; canceled, –1.633 ± 0.65 letters; completed, 0.373 ± 0.50 letters; P = 0.0028). Patients with DME, PDR, or both (–3.48 ± 1.95 letters vs. 2.71 ± 1.75 letters; P = 0.0203), with RVO (–3.22 ± 1.41 letters vs. 0.95 ± 1.23 letters; P = 0.0230), and, to lesser degree, with nAMD (–1.23 ± 0.70 letters vs. –0.24 ± 0.56 letters; P = 0.2679) lost vision compared with patients with same diagnoses who completed the scheduled visit. Conclusions In patients requiring IVIs, a delay in care of 5.34 weeks resulted in vision loss. It was seen in all patients, but was more prominent in patients with DME, PDR or both and RVO. Further studies are necessary to examine whether these vision changes persist over a longer duration.

Purpose To evaluate the association between baseline demographic and spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) features with visual acuity (VA) in the Study of COmparative Treatments for REtinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2) over 2 years. Design Post hoc analysis of prospective clinical trial data. Participants A total of 362 SCORE2 participants with macular edema secondary to central retinal (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO). Methods Spectral domain OCT volume scans were assessed at the SCORE2 reading center at baseline, month 01 (M01), month 06 (M06), month 12 (M12), and month 24 (M24) for central subfield thickness (CST), subretinal fluid, intraretinal fluid, vitreoretinal interface abnormalities, disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL), and ellipsoid zone (EZ) within the central subfield (CSF). Main Outcome Measures Visual acuity at M06, M12, and M24. Results Mean baseline age was 68.9 years. Mean VA at M01 was 63.2 letters, and CST was 299.7 μm. At M01, subretinal fluid was seen in 28.5% intraretinal fluid in 67.2%, DRIL was seen in 73.8%, mostly within the CSF, and the EZ was absent in 9.8 and patchy in 31.7%. In multivariate analysis including all M01 demographics and SD-OCT parameters and their association with VA at M06, M12, and M24, VA at M01 remained significant across all time points up to M24 (P Conclusions In this 2-year follow-up of eyes that were treated with both per protocol and off protocol for RVO, VA at M01 was an important predictor of long-term vision and change in vision. Establishing predictors of visual recovery helps identify causes for poor responders to treatment in patients with RVO.

PURPOSE: Since eyes with center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) and good baseline visual acuity (VA) showed no difference in VA loss when managed initially with observation, laser, or aflibercept, understanding the estimated costs of these strategies to the US population is relevant for health care planning. METHODS, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Total costs for managing participants with CI-DME and good baseline VA assigned to aflibercept (n= 236), laser (n=240), or observation (n = 236) during the 2-year trial were calculated. Using epidemiological data and extrapolating costs, 10-year costs for caring for persons with CI-DME and good baseline VA throughout the US was estimated. INTERVENTIONS: Observation or laser groups initiated aflibercept if VA decreased. Aflibercept group received injections up to every 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Estimated 10-year U.S. population costs to manage CI-DME with good VA. RESULTS: Assuming all patients in the US with CI-DME and good baseline VA received aflibercept initially, 10-year costs were projected to be $28.80 billion compared with $14.42 billion if initially receiving laser treatment or $15.70 billion if initially observed, with aflibercept added if VA worsened in the laser or observation arms. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Similar VA outcomes on average are obtained by initially managing CI-DME and good baseline VA with laser or observation strategies instead of immediately using aflibercept. While any one of these three strategies might be warranted depending on an individual’s specific circumstances, on a societal level, cost savings might be achieved with these first two approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01909791

To evaluate clinical characteristics of eyes in which investigator-determined new-onset exudative age-related macular degeneration (eAMD) developed during the FILLY trial.Post hoc analysis of the phase 2 study of intravitreal pegcetacoplan in geographic atrophy (GA).Patients with GA secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), n = 246.Either 15 mg intravitreal pegcetacoplan or sham given monthly or every other month for 12 months followed by a 6-month off-treatment period.Time of new eAMD onset in the study eye, history of eAMD in the fellow eye, presence of double-layer sign (DLS) on structural OCT in the study eye, changes in retinal anatomic features by structural OCT and fluorescein angiography (FA), and changes in visual acuity.Exudation was reported in 26 study eyes across treatment groups over 18 months. Mean time to eAMD diagnosis was 256 days (range, 31-555 days). Overall, a higher proportion of patients with a baseline history of eAMD in the fellow eye (P = 0.016) and a DLS in the study eye (P = 0.0001) demonstrated eAMD. Among study eyes in which eAMD developed, 18 of 26 (69%) had history of fellow-eye eAMD and 19 of 26 (73.1%) had DLS at baseline, compared with 76 of 217 study eyes (35%; P = 0.0007) and 70 of 215 study eyes (32.5%; P0.0001), respectively, in which eAMD did not develop. All 21 patients with structural OCT imaging at the time of eAMD diagnosis demonstrated subretinal fluid, intraretinal cysts, or both consistent with exudation. Among 17 patients who underwent FA at eAMD diagnosis, 10 showed detectable macular neovascularization (MNV), all occult lesions. Development of eAMD did not have an appreciable impact on visual acuity, and all patients responded to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy.Intravitreal pegcetacoplan slowed the rate of GA growth and was associated with an unexpected dose-dependent increased incidence of eAMD with no temporal clustering of onset. Exudative AMD seemed to be associated with baseline eAMD in the contralateral eye and a DLS, suggestive of nonexudative MNV, in the study eye. The safety profile of pegcetacoplan was acceptable to proceed to phase 3 studies without adjustments to enrollment criteria.

Purpose To investigate long-term visual outcome in inferior posterior staphyloma (IPS) in each group classified based on macular complications and to examine the treatment effect for eyes with IPS with choroidal neovascularization (CNV). Design Prospective clinical cohort study. Participants We analyzed 56 eyes of 43 consecutive patients with IPS who were followed for 4 years. Methods We classified eligible eyes into 3 groups based on baseline findings: eyes without CNV or retinal exudate (no-exudate group), eyes without CNV and with retinal exudate (exudate group), and eyes with CNV (CNV group). We investigated the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and associated parameters for 4 years. Results BCVA declined during 4 years only in the exudate group (P = .002), whereas it was maintained for 4 years in the no-exudate and CNV groups (P = .53 and .20, respectively). Baseline BCVA was lower in the CNV group than in the exudate group (P = .004); however, the 4-year BCVA was not (P = .84). The 4-year BCVA was associated with baseline BCVA in all groups. Eyes in the CNV group required 9.0 ± 8.7 anti–vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in 4 years. Conclusions Better baseline BCVA in eyes with exudative IPS without CNV spontaneously declined in 4 years, whereas worse baseline BCVA in eyes with IPS with CNV did not, probably because of treatment for retinal exudate from CNV. Anti–vascular endothelial growth factor therapy would be effective for long-term maintenance of BCVA in eyes with IPS with CNV, similar to other diseases with CNV.

Topical povidone-iodine (PI) is widely used as an ocular surface antiseptic for intravitreal injections (IVIs). Although PI is generally well tolerated, it can be associated with significant ocular irritation. Aqueous chlorhexidine (AqCHX) has been described as a possibly better tolerated antimicrobial for ophthalmic procedures. We compared patient pain scores, ocular surface characteristics, and antimicrobial efficacy between PI 5% and AqCHX 0.1% during IVIs.Prospective single-center, randomized clinical trial.Patients receiving same-day bilateral intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections.Each patient had 1 eye randomized to PI or AqCHX, and the second eye received the other agent. Both eyes received topical proparacaine 0.5%.After IVIs, participants rated their pain (Wong-Baker, scale 0-10) for each eye 1 minute after PI or AqCHX instillation and 1 day after the procedure. Each eye was assessed using a standardized quantitative grading system of corneal epitheliopathy (ocular staining score). Microbial swab cultures of the conjunctiva both before instillation of topical antisepsis and 10 minutes after IVIs were given.A total of 100 eyes of 50 patients were included. The mean patient age was 68 years (range, 39-92), and 30 of 50 (60%) were male. Compared with AqCHX, eyes receiving PI had a greater mean pain score immediately after injection (1.44 vs. 0.44, P0.001) but not on postprocedure day 1 (1.04 vs. 0.48, P = 0.06). Eyes that received PI had a higher ocular staining score indicating worse corneal epitheliopathy (4.22 vs. 3.10, P0.001). There was no difference in rates of positive microbial cultures between groups. There was no difference in rates of adverse events between groups (P = 0.99), and no cases of endophthalmitis occurred.Povidone-iodine demonstrated greater ocular surface discomfort and corneal epitheliopathy compared with AqCHX during same-day bilateral IVIs. The 2 agents otherwise demonstrated no difference in positive microbial cultures or adverse events. Aqueous chlorhexidine may be a better tolerated alternative to PI for antimicrobial prophylaxis during IVIs for some patients.

PURPOSE: Management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) has evolved over the last decade with several treatment regimens and different medications. This study describes the treatment patterns and, importantly, visual outcomes over ten years in a large cohort of patients. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of electronic health records from 27 National Health Service (NHS) secondary care healthcare providers in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Treatment-naïve patients receiving at least three intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections for nAMD in their first six months of follow-up were included. Patients with missing data for age or gender and those aged less than 55 were excluded. METHODS: Eyes with at least three years of follow-up were grouped by years of treatment initiation, and three-year outcomes were compared between the groups. Data were generated during routine clinical care between 09/2008 and 12/2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity, number of injections, number of visits. RESULTS: A total of 15,810 eyes of 13,705 patients receiving 194,904 injections were included. Visual acuity (VA) improved from baseline during the first year, but dropped thereafter, resulting in loss of visual gains. This trend remained consistent throughout the past decade. Although an increasing proportion of eyes remained in the driving standard, this was driven by better presenting visual acuities over the decade. The number of injections dropped substantially between the first and subsequent years, from a mean of 6.25 in year 1 to 3 in year 2 and 2.5 in year 3, without improvement over the decade. In a multivariable regression analysis, final VA improved by 0.24 letters for each year since 2008, and younger age and baseline VA were significantly associated with VA at three years. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that despite improvement in functional VA over the years, primarily driven by improving baseline VA, patients continue to lose vision after the first year of treatment, with only marginal change over the past decade. The data suggest that these results may be related to suboptimal treatment patterns, which have not improved over the years. Rethinking treatment strategies may be warranted, possibly on a national level or through the introduction of longer-acting therapies.