1. Bone mineral density in pediatric survivors of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas
- Author
-
Anna Panasiuk, Agnieszka Stewart, Jerzy Konstantynowicz, Katarzyna Muszyńska-Rosłan, Maryna Krawczuk-Rybak, and Eryk Latoch
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Peak bone mass ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Cohort Studies ,Young Adult ,Bone Density ,Risk Factors ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Survivors ,Bone Resorption ,Child ,Bone mineral ,Childhood Lymphoma ,business.industry ,Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Hodgkin Disease ,Lymphoma ,Radiation therapy ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Cohort ,Bone mineral content ,Female ,Lumbar spine ,Poland ,business ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Purpose To assess skeletal mass in survivors of childhood Hodgkin disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) 1–5 years after treatment, and to identify potential risk factors influencing bone mineral density (BMD). Patients/methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in a cohort of 43 survivors (HD = 31; NHL = 12); mean age: 16.21 ± 4.4. Total body bone mineral content (TBMC) and density (TBBMD), and lumbar spine density (LSBMD) were determined using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results Three of all 43 patients developed low BMD. No significant differences in height, weight, and/or BMD Z -scores were found between HD and NHL survivors, children who received and did not receive radiotherapy, and the groups with different chemotherapeutic blocks. No differences were noted between the Z -scores of BMC (mean ± SD: 0.31 ± 1.29 vs. −0.089 ± 0.61, p = 0.165), TBBMD (mean ± SD: −0.32 ± 1.21 vs. −0.27 ± 0.91, p = 0.76), or the LSBMD (mean ± SD: −0.183 ± 1.54 vs. −0.17 ± 0.87, p = 0.637) in subgroups, in accordance with time after therapy (subgroup I 2 years after treatment). In HD survivors, age at diagnosis only affected the TBBMD Z -score (a decrease of 0.127 in total BMD Z -score per each year, R 2 = 0.999, p Conclusions Childhood lymphoma survivors demonstrate no significant deficits in bone mass and tend to maintain their BMD within the normal range when presenting during one to five years’ follow-up. However, this specific group requires longitudinal investigation to assess the pattern of peak bone mass achievement and the risk of future bone loss.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF