Back to Search Start Over

Bone mineral density in pediatric survivors of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas

Authors :
Anna Panasiuk
Agnieszka Stewart
Jerzy Konstantynowicz
Katarzyna Muszyńska-Rosłan
Maryna Krawczuk-Rybak
Eryk Latoch
Source :
Advances in Medical Sciences. 59:200-205
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2014.

Abstract

Purpose To assess skeletal mass in survivors of childhood Hodgkin disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) 1–5 years after treatment, and to identify potential risk factors influencing bone mineral density (BMD). Patients/methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in a cohort of 43 survivors (HD = 31; NHL = 12); mean age: 16.21 ± 4.4. Total body bone mineral content (TBMC) and density (TBBMD), and lumbar spine density (LSBMD) were determined using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results Three of all 43 patients developed low BMD. No significant differences in height, weight, and/or BMD Z -scores were found between HD and NHL survivors, children who received and did not receive radiotherapy, and the groups with different chemotherapeutic blocks. No differences were noted between the Z -scores of BMC (mean ± SD: 0.31 ± 1.29 vs. −0.089 ± 0.61, p = 0.165), TBBMD (mean ± SD: −0.32 ± 1.21 vs. −0.27 ± 0.91, p = 0.76), or the LSBMD (mean ± SD: −0.183 ± 1.54 vs. −0.17 ± 0.87, p = 0.637) in subgroups, in accordance with time after therapy (subgroup I 2 years after treatment). In HD survivors, age at diagnosis only affected the TBBMD Z -score (a decrease of 0.127 in total BMD Z -score per each year, R 2 = 0.999, p Conclusions Childhood lymphoma survivors demonstrate no significant deficits in bone mass and tend to maintain their BMD within the normal range when presenting during one to five years’ follow-up. However, this specific group requires longitudinal investigation to assess the pattern of peak bone mass achievement and the risk of future bone loss.

Details

ISSN :
18961126
Volume :
59
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Advances in Medical Sciences
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....0ed28f601447d9333dc41e29a5f5944f
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advms.2014.02.004