Search

Very-high-risk (VHR) prostate cancer (PC) is an aggressive subgroup with high risk of distant disease progression. Systemic treatment intensification with abiraterone or docetaxel reduces PC-specific mortality (PCSM) and distant metastasis (DM) in men receiving external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Whether prostate-directed treatment intensification with the addition of brachytherapy (BT) boost to EBRT with ADT improves outcomes in this group is unclear.This cohort study from 16 centers across 4 countries included men with VHR PC treated with either dose-escalated EBRT with ≥24 months of ADT or EBRT + BT boost with ≥12 months of ADT. VHR was defined by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria (clinical T3b-4, primary Gleason pattern 5, or ≥2 NCCN high-risk features), and results were corroborated in a subgroup of men who met Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy (STAMPEDE) trials inclusion criteria (≥2 of the following: clinical T3-4, Gleason 8-10, or PSA ≥40 ng/mL). PCSM and DM between EBRT and EBRT + BT were compared using inverse probability of treatment weight-adjusted Fine-Gray competing risk regression.Among the entire cohort, 270 underwent EBRT and 101 EBRT + BT. After a median follow-up of 7.8 years, 6.7% and 5.9% of men died of PC and 16.3% and 9.9% had DM after EBRT and EBRT + BT, respectively. There was no significant difference in PCSM (sHR, 1.47 [95% CI, 0.57-3.75]; P = .42) or DM (sHR, 0.72, [95% CI, 0.30-1.71]; P = .45) between EBRT + BT and EBRT. Results were similar within the STAMPEDE-defined VHR subgroup (PCSM: sHR, 1.67 [95% CI, 0.48-5.81]; P = .42; DM: sHR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.15-2.04]; P = .38).In this VHR PC cohort, no difference in clinically meaningful outcomes was observed between EBRT alone with ≥24 months of ADT compared with EBRT + BT with ≥12 months of ADT. Comparative analyses in men treated with intensified systemic therapy are warranted.

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting TROP2, which has recently been approved for treatment-refractory metastatic urothelial cancer (UC). However, the variability of TROP2 expression across different bladder cancer (BC) subtypes, as well as after enfortumab vedotin (EV) exposure, remains unknown. Using gene expression data from four clinical cohorts with1400 patient samples of muscle-invasive BC and a BC tissue microarray, we found that TROP2 mRNA and protein are highly expressed across basal, luminal, and stroma-rich subtypes, but depleted in the neuroendocrine subtype. In addition, TROP2 mRNA levels are correlated with NECTIN4 mRNA but are more highly expressed than NECTIN4 mRNA in patient cohorts and BC cell lines. Moreover, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockdown of TROP2 demonstrates that its expression is one factor governing SG sensitivity. After prolonged EV exposure, cells can downregulate NECTIN4, leading to EV resistance, but retain TROP2 expression and remain sensitive to SG, suggesting nonoverlapping resistance mechanisms to these ADCs. While our findings warrant further validation, they have significant implications for biomarker development, patient selection, and treatment sequencing in the clinic as well as clinical trial design and stratification for metastatic BC patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we investigated the expression levels of the drug target TROP2 across different molecular subtypes of bladder cancer in multiple patient cohorts and cell lines. We found high levels of TROP2 in most subtypes except in the neuroendocrine subtype. Overall, TROP2 gene expression is higher than NECTIN4 gene expression, and cells resistant to enfortumab vedotin (EV), a NECTIN4-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, remain sensitive to sacituzumab govitecan (SG). Our findings suggest that SG may be effective across most bladder cancer subtypes, including the bladder cancers previously treated with EV.

The immunoinflammatory state has been shown to be associated with poor outcomes after radiation therapy (RT). We conducted an a priori designed validation study using serum specimens from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0521. It was hypothesized the pretreatment inflammatory state would correlate with clinical outcomes.Patients on RTOG 0521 had serum banked for biomarker validation. This study was designed to validate previous findings showing an association between elevations in C-reactive protein (CRP) and shorter biochemical disease free survival (bDFS). CRP levels were measured in pretreatment samples. An exploratory panel of related cytokines was also measured including: monocyte chemotactic protein-1, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interferon-γ, interleukin (IL)-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-23, and tumor necrosis factor. The primary endpoint examined was bDFS. Additional exploratory endpoints included overall survival, distant metastases, and toxicity events attributed to RT.Two hundred and two patients in RTOG/NRG 0521 had serum samples available. Median age was 66 years (48-83), and 90% of patients were White. There was not an association between CRP and bDFS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.07 per 1 log increase in CRP; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.38; P = .60). In the exploratory, unplanned analysis, pretreatment IL-10 was significantly associated with worse bDFS (adjusted HR, 1.61 per log increase; P = .0027) and distant metastases (HR, 1.55 per log increase; P = .028). The association of IL-10 with bDFS was maintained on a multiplicity adjustment. The exploratory analyses of pretreatment levels of interferon-γ, IL-1b, IL-2, IL-13, IL-23 were negatively associated with grade 2 or higher pollakiuria (adjusted odds ratio, 0.64, 0.65, 0.71, 0.72, and 0.74, respectively, all P.05), and IL-6 was negatively associated with grade 2 or higher erectile dysfunction (odds ratio, 0.62; P = .027).Pretreatment CRP was not associated with a poorer bDFS after RT. In a hypothesis- generating analysis, higher baseline levels of IL-10 were associated with lower rates of bDFS. These findings require additional prospective evaluation.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is an emerging imaging modality with greater sensitivity and specificity over conventional imaging for prostate cancer (PCa) staging. Using data from two prospective trials (NCT03368547 and NCT04050215), we explored predictors of overall upstaging (nodal and metastatic) by PSMA PET/CT among patients with cN0M0 National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk PCa on conventional imaging (n = 213). Overall, 21.1%, 8.9%, and 23.9% of patients experienced nodal, metastatic, and overall upstaging, respectively, without histologic confirmation. On multivariable analysis, Gleason grade group (GG) and percent positive core (PPC) on systematic biopsy significantly predict overall upstaging (odds ratio [OR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-3.45; p = 0.002; and OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04; p

Background: Randomised trials have investigated various androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) intensification strategies in men receiving radiotherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer. This individual patient data meta-analysis of relevant randomised trials aimed to quantify the benefit of these interventions in aggregate and in clinically relevant subgroups. Methods: For this meta-analysis, we performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, trial registries, the Web of Science, Scopus, and conference proceedings to identify trials with results published in English between Jan 1, 1962, and Dec 30, 2020. Multicentre randomised trials were eligible if they evaluated the use or prolongation of ADT (or both) in men with localised prostate cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy, reported or collected distant metastasis and survival data, and used ADT for a protocol-defined finite duration. The Meta-Analysis of Randomized trials in Cancer of the Prostate (MARCAP) Consortium was accessed to obtain individual patient data from randomised trials. The primary outcome was metastasis-free survival. Hazard ratios (HRs) were obtained through stratified Cox models for ADT use (radiotherapy alone vs radiotherapy plus ADT), neoadjuvant ADT extension (ie, extension of total ADT duration in the neoadjuvant setting from 3–4 months to 6–9 months), and adjuvant ADT prolongation (ie, prolongation of total ADT duration in the adjuvant setting from 4–6 months to 18–36 months). Formal interaction tests between interventions and metastasis-free survival were done for prespecified subgroups defined by age, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk group, and radiotherapy dose. This meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021236855. Findings: Our search returned 12 eligible trials that provided individual patient data (10 853 patients) with a median follow-up of 11·4 years (IQR 9·0–15·0). The addition of ADT to radiotherapy significantly improved metastasis-free survival (HR 0·83 [95% CI 0·77–0·89], p

Androgen deprivation therapy remains the backbone therapy for the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). In recent years, several treatments, including docetaxel, abiraterone + prednisone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide, have each been shown to demonstrate survival benefit when used upfront along with androgen deprivation therapy. However, treatment selection for an individual patient remains a challenge. There is no high level clinical evidence for treatment selection among these choices based on biological drivers of clinical disease. In August 2020, the Prostate Cancer Foundation convened a working group to meet and discuss biomarkers for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, the proceedings of which are summarized here. This meeting covered the state of clinical and biological evidence for systemic therapies in the mHSPC space, with emphasis on charting a course for the generation, interrogation, and clinical implementation of biomarkers for treatment selection.

Tumor biology may play an important role as an effective predictive biomarker that is complementary to functional imaging for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

Context In addition to genetic alterations, epigenetic alterations play a crucial role during prostate cancer progression. A better understanding of the epigenetic factors that promote prostate cancer progression may lead to the design of rational therapeutic strategies to target prostate cancer more effectively. Objective To systematically review recent literature on the role of epigenetic factors in prostate cancer and highlight key preclinical and translational data with epigenetic therapies. Evidence acquisition We performed a systemic literature search in PubMed. At the request of the editors, we limited our search to articles published between January 2015 and August 2020 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Clinical trials targeting epigenetic factors were retrieved from clinicaltrials.gov. Evidence synthesis We retrieved 1451 articles, and 62 were finally selected for review. Twelve additional foundational studies outside this time frame were also included. Findings from both preclinical and clinical studies were reviewed and summarized. We also discuss 12 ongoing clinical studies with epigenetic targeted therapies. Conclusions Epigenetic mechanisms impact prostate cancer progression. Understanding the role of specific epigenetic factors is critical to determine how we may improve prostate cancer treatment and modulate resistance to standard therapies. Recent preclinical studies and ongoing or completed clinical studies with epigenetic therapies provide a useful roadmap for how to best deploy epigenetic therapies clinically to target prostate cancer. Patient summary Epigenetics is a process by which gene expression is regulated without changes in the DNA sequence itself. Oftentimes, epigenetic changes influence cellular behavior and contribute to cancer development or progression. Understanding how epigenetic changes occur in prostate cancer is the first step toward therapeutic targeting in patients. Importantly, laboratory-based studies and recently completed and ongoing clinical trials suggest that drugs targeting epigenetic factors are promising. More work is necessary to determine whether this class of drugs will add to our existing treatment arsenal in prostate cancer.

Summary Background The international Intermediate Clinical Endpoints in Cancer of the Prostate working group has established metastasis-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in localised prostate cancer based on the findings of 19 predominantly radiotherapy-based trials. We sought to comprehensively assess aggregate trial-level performance of commonly reported intermediate clinical endpoints across all randomised trials in localised prostate cancer. Methods For this meta-analysis, we searched PubMed for all trials in localised or biochemically recurrent prostate cancer published between Jan 1, 1970, and Jan 15, 2020. Eligible trials had to be randomised, therapeutic, reporting overall survival and at least one intermediate clinical endpoint, and with a sample size of at least 70 participants. Trials of metastatic disease were excluded. Intermediate clinical endpoints included biochemical failure, local failure, distant metastases, biochemical failure-free survival, progression-free survival, and metastasis-free survival. Candidacy for surrogacy was assessed using the second condition of the meta-analytical approach (ie, correlation of the treatment effect of the intermediate clinical endpoint and overall survival), using R2 weighted by the inverse variance of the log intermediate clinical endpoint hazard ratio. The intermediate clinical endpoint was deemed to be a surrogate for overall survival if R2 was 0·7 or greater. Findings 75 trials (53 631 patients) were included in our analysis. Median follow-up was 9·1 years (IQR 5·7–10·6). Biochemical failure (R2 0·38 [95% CI 0·11–0·64]), biochemical failure-free survival (R2 0·12 [0·0030–0·33]), biochemical failure and clinical failure (R2 0·28 [0·0045–0·65]), and local failure (R2 0·085 [0·00–0·37]) correlated poorly with overall survival. Progression-free survival (R2 0·46 [95% CI 0·22–0·67]) showed moderate correlation with overall survival, and metastasis-free survival (R2 0·78 [0·59–0·89]) correlated strongly. Interpretation Intermediate clinical endpoints based on biochemical and local failure did not meet the second condition of the meta-analytical approach and are not surrogate endpoints for overall survival in localised prostate cancer. Our findings validate metastasis-free survival as the only identified surrogate endpoint for overall survival to date. Funding Prostate Cancer Foundation and National Institutes of Health.

Background and purposeThe optimal dose for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is still unknown. This study evaluated the dose-response relationships for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decay and biochemical recurrence (BCR) among 4 SBRT dose regimens.Materials and methodsIn 1908 men with low-risk (50.0%), favorable intermediate-risk (30.9%), and unfavorable intermediate-risk (19.1%) prostate cancer treated with prostate SBRT across 8 institutions from 2003 to 2018, we examined 4 regimens (35Gy/5 fractions [35/5, n=265, 13.4%], 36.25Gy/5 fractions [36.25/5, n=711, 37.3%], 40Gy/5 fractions [40/5, n=684, 35.8%], and 38Gy/4 fractions [38/4, n=257, 13.5%]). Between dose groups, we compared PSA decay slope, nadir PSA (nPSA), achievement of nPSA ≤0.2 and ≤0.5ng/mL, and BCR-free survival (BCRFS).ResultsMedian follow-up was 72.3months. Median nPSA was 0.01ng/mL for 38/4, and 0.17-0.20ng/mL for 5-fraction regimens (p&nbsp

Purpose Oligorecurrent prostate cancer has historically been treated with indefinite androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), although many patients and providers opt to defer this treatment at the time of recurrence given quality-of-life and/or comorbidity considerations. Recently, metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) has emerged as a potential intermediary between surveillance and immediate continuous ADT. Simultaneously, advanced systemic therapy in addition to ADT has also been shown to improve survival in metastatic hormone-sensitive disease. This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of treating oligorecurrent patients with upfront MDT before standard-of-care systemic therapy. Methods and Materials A Markov-based cost-effectiveness analysis was constructed comparing 3 strategies: (1) upfront MDT → salvage abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) + ADT → salvage docetaxel + ADT; (2) upfront AAP + ADT → salvage docetaxel + ADT; and (3) upfront docetaxel + ADT → salvage AAP + ADT. Transition probabilities and utilities were derived from the literature. Using a 10-year time horizon and willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY), net monetary benefit values were subsequently calculated for each treatment strategy. Results At 10 years, the base case revealed a total cost of $141,148, $166,807, and $136,154 with QALYs of 4.63, 4.89, and 4.00, respectively, reflecting a net monetary benefit of $322,240, $322,018, and $263,407 for upfront MDT, upfront AAP + ADT, and upfront docetaxel + ADT, respectively. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a Monte Carlo simulation (1,000,000 simulations), upfront MDT was the cost-effective strategy in 53.6% of simulations. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed 95% confidence intervals for cost ($75,914-$179,862, $124,431-$223,892, and $103,298-$180,617) and utility in QALYs (3.85-6.12, 3.91-5.86, and 3.02-5.22) for upfront MDT, upfront AAP + ADT, and upfront docetaxel + ADT, respectively. Conclusions At 10 years, upfront MDT followed by salvage AAP + ADT, is comparably cost-effective compared with upfront standard-of-care systemic therapy and may be considered a viable treatment strategy, especially in patients wishing to defer systemic therapy for quality-of-life or comorbidity concerns. Additional studies are needed to determine whether MDT causes a sustained meaningful delay in disease natural history and whether any benefit exists in combining MDT with upfront advanced systemic therapy.

To inform treatment decisions for patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa), we determined rates of adverse pathologic factors and overall survival (OS) among subgroups of high-risk men.Using the National Cancer Database, 89,450 patients with clinical N0M0 unfavorable intermediate-risk, favorable high-risk (cT1c, Gleason 6, prostate-specific antigen [PSA]20 ng/mL or cT1c, biopsy Gleason 8, PSA10 ng/mL), standard high-risk (all other cT3a, biopsy Gleason ≥ 8, or PSA20 ng/mL), or very high-risk (cT3b-T4 or biopsy primary Gleason pattern 5) PCa treated with radical prostatectomy were identified. Rates of adverse pathologic factors (positive surgical margins, T4 disease, or pathologic lymph node involvement) were compared across subgroups.Patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk (n = 31,381) and favorable high-risk (n = 10,296) disease had similar rates of adverse features (7.6% vs 8.2%, adjusted odds ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.92-1.08, P= .974). Patients with standard high-risk (n = 30,260) or very high-risk (n = 7513) disease were significantly more likely to have adverse pathologic factors (15.9% and 26.5%, P.001 for both). Patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk and favorable high-risk disease had similar 5-year OS (95.7% vs 95.1%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.92-1.21, P = .411) but better OS compared to standard and very high-risk patients (93.4% and 88.1%, respectively; P.001).Unfavorable intermediate-risk or favorable high-risk PCa patients had low rates of adverse pathologic factors and similar OS. In contrast, standard and very high-risk PCa patients had significantly higher rates of adverse pathologic factors and worse OS. This 3-tiered subclassification of high-risk disease may allow for improved treatment selection among patients considering surgery.

Gleason grade group (GG) 5 prostate cancer has been associated with an aggressive natural history, and retrospective data support a role for treatment intensification. However, clinical outcomes remain heterogeneous in this cohort, and intensified treatments carry an increased risk of adverse events. We sought to explore the transcriptomic heterogeneity of GG 5 tumors by querying transcriptomic data from the tumors of 2138 patients with GG 5 disease who underwent prostatectomy. Four distinct consensus clusters were identified with respect to differential transcriptional activation of hallmark pathways, with distinct molecular subtyping profiles and different average genomic risks (AGRs). One cluster, accounting for 325 tumors (15.2% of the population), was enriched for genes related to the cell cycle/proliferation, metabolic pathways, androgen response pathways, and DNA repair, and had a higher AGR than the other clusters (p

Background: Innovations in treatments, imaging, and molecular characterisation in advanced prostate cancer have improved outcomes, but there are still many aspects of management that lack high-level evidence to inform clinical practice. The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2019 addressed some of these topics to supplement guidelines that are based on level 1 evidence. Objective: To present the results from the APCCC 2019. Design, setting, and participants: Similar to prior conferences, experts identified 10 important areas of controversy regarding the management of advanced prostate cancer: locally advanced disease, biochemical recurrence after local therapy, treating the primary tumour in the metastatic setting, metastatic hormone-sensitive/naive prostate cancer, nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, bone health and bone metastases, molecular characterisation of tissue and blood, inter- and intrapatient heterogeneity, and adverse effects of hormonal therapy and their management. A panel of 72 international prostate cancer experts developed the programme and the consensus questions. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 123 predefined questions, which were developed by both voting and nonvoting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. Results and limitations: Panellists voted based on their opinions rather than a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions had varying degrees of support by the panel, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results reported in the Supplementary material. Conclusions: These voting results from a panel of prostate cancer experts can help clinicians and patients navigate controversial areas of advanced prostate management for which high-level evidence is sparse. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised based on patient-specific factors, such as disease extent and location, prior lines of therapy, comorbidities, and treatment preferences, together with current and emerging clinical evidence and logistic and economic constraints. Clinical trial enrolment for men with advanced prostate cancer should be strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2019 once again identified important questions that merit assessment in specifically designed trials. Patient summary: The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference, which has been held three times since 2015, aims to share the knowledge of world experts in prostate cancer management with health care providers worldwide. At the end of the conference, an expert panel discusses and votes on predefined consensus questions that target the most clinically relevant areas of advanced prostate cancer treatment. The results of the voting provide a practical guide to help clinicians discuss therapeutic options with patients as part of shared and multidisciplinary decision making. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.

Androgen receptor (AR) and its constitutively active variants (AR-Vs) have been extensively implicated in the progression and recurrence of prostate cancer, making them attractive targets in the treatment of this disease. Whether and how neddylation modification regulates AR, and the therapeutic implications of this potential regulation, are relatively unexplored areas of investigation. Here we report that neddylation inactivation by the pharmacological inhibitor MLN4924 or Lenti-shRNA-based genetic knockdown of neddylation activating enzyme (NAE) selectively suppressed growth and survival of prostate cancer cells with minor, if any, effect on normal prostate epithelial cells. MLN4924 also significantly suppressed the invasive capacity of prostate cancer cells. Furthermore, compared to monotherapy, the combination of MLN4924 with AR antagonist or castration significantly enhanced growth suppression of prostate cancer cells in vitro, and tumor growth in an in vivo xenograft model. Mechanistically, MLN4924 repressed the transcription of AR/AR-V7 and its downstream targets, and blocked MMP2 and MMP9 expression. Taken together, our study reveals that the neddylation pathway positively regulates AR/AR-V7 transcription, and that the neddylation inhibitor MLN4924 has therapeutic potential for the treatment of aggressive prostate cancers. Keywords: Neddylation, MLN4924, Androgen receptor, Prostate cancer, Targeted therapy

Radiopharmaceuticals, including Ga-68-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 and F-18-Fluciclovine, are increasingly used to inform therapies for prostate cancer (CaP). Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to PET-detected oligometastatic CaP has been shown to improve progression free survival (PFS) and delay androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to observation. For men who subsequently develop oligorecurrent CaP, outcomes following second SBRT are unknown.A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Eligibility criteria included patients with oligometastatic (1-5 lesions) CaP detected on PSMA or Fluciclovine PET who underwent 2 consecutive SBRT courses to tracer-avid sites. Data on stage, tracer type, concurrent systemic therapy, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses for first SBRT (SBRT1) and second SBRT (SBRT2) were collected. Outcomes included PSA decline ≥50% (PSA50), PFS after SBRT2, and ADT initiation or intensification-free survival after SBRT2. Factors potentially associated with PSA50 after SBRT2 was evaluated with multivariable logistic regression. Factors potentially associated with PFS and ADT initiation/intensification-free survival after SBRT2 were evaluated with separate multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models.Twenty-five patients were identified. At SBRT2, oligorecurrence was detected on PSMA and Fluciclovine PET in 17 (68%) and 8 (32%) patients, respectively. Fifteen (60%) patients had castration-sensitive disease and 10 (40%) had castration-resistant disease. After SBRT2, 16 (64%) achieved a PSA50 response, median PFS was 11.0mo, and median ADT initiation/intensification-free survival was 23.2mo. On multivariable analysis, maximum percent change in PSA after SBRT1 (OR 0.94, 95%CI 0.88-0.99, P = 0.046) and concurrent change in systemic therapy (OR 21.61, 95%CI 1.12-417.9, P = 0.042) were associated with PSA50 responses after SBRT2. PSA50 response after SBRT1 was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.00-0.42, P = 0.008) and ADT initiation/intensification-free survival (HR 0.07, 95%CI 0.01-0.68, P = 0.021) after SBRT2. From SBRT1 to last follow-up (median 48 months), 7 (28%) patients remained ADT-free.Serial SBRT for oligometastatic CaP detected on PSMA or Fluciclovine PET is feasible and can achieve PSA declines, with or without systemic therapy. Degree of biochemical response to first SBRT warrants further study as a potential predictor of PSA response, PFS, and ADT initiation/intensification-free survival following a subsequent SBRT course. This preliminary evidence provides rationale for larger, prospective studies of this strategy.

Background: innovations in treatments, imaging, and molecular characterisation in advanced prostate cancer have improved outcomes, but various areas of management still lack high-level evidence to inform clinical practice. The 2021 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) addressed some of these questions to supplement guidelines that are based on level 1 evidence. Objective: to present the voting results from APCCC 2021. Design, setting, and participants: the experts identified three major areas of controversy related to management of advanced prostate cancer: newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), the use of prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands in diagnostics and therapy, and molecular characterisation of tissue and blood. A panel of 86 international prostate cancer experts developed the programme and the consensus questions. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 107 pre-defined questions, which were developed by both voting and non-voting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. Results and limitations: the voting reflected the opinions of panellists and did not incorporate a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions received varying degrees of support from panellists, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results reported in the Supplementary material. Conclusions: these voting results from a panel of experts in advanced prostate cancer can help clinicians and patients to navigate controversial areas of management for which high-level evidence is scant. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised according to patient characteristics, such as the extent and location of disease, prior treatment(s), comorbidities, patient preferences, and treatment recommendations, and should also incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence and logistic and economic constraints. Enrolment in clinical trials should be strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2021 once again identified salient questions that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials. Patient summary: the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference is a forum for discussing current diagnosis and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. An expert panel votes on predefined questions focused on the most clinically relevant areas for treatment of advanced prostate cancer for which there are gaps in knowledge. The voting results provide a practical guide to help clinicians in discussing treatment options with patients as part of shared decision-making., National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Practitioner Fellowship; Prostate Cancer Foundation; Peter MacCallum Foundation; NHMRC Investigator Grant

Patients with advanced prostate cancer (APC) may be at greater risk for severe illness, hospitalisation, or death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to male gender, older age, potential immunosuppressive treatments, or comorbidities. Thus, the optimal management of APC patients during the COVID-19 pandemic is complex. In October 2021, during the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2021, the 73 voting members of the panel members discussed and voted on 13 questions on this topic that could help clinicians make treatment choices during the pandemic. There was a consensus for full COVID-19 vaccination and booster injection in APC patients. Furthermore, the voting results indicate that the expert’s treatment recommendations are influenced by the vaccination status: the COVID-19 pandemic altered management of APC patients for 70% of the panellists before the vaccination was available but only for 25% of panellists for fully vaccinated patients. Most experts (71%) were less likely to use docetaxel and abiraterone in unvaccinated patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. For fully vaccinated patients with high-risk localised prostate cancer, there was a consensus (77%) to follow the usual treatment schedule, whereas in unvaccinated patients, 55% of the panel members voted for deferring radiation therapy. Finally, there was a strong consensus for the use of telemedicine for monitoring APC patients. Patient summary In the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021, the panellists reached a consensus regarding the recommendation of the COVID-19 vaccine in prostate cancer patients and use of telemedicine for monitoring these patients.

Background The Decipher genomic classifier (GC) is increasingly being used to determine metastasis risk in men with localized prostate cancer (PCa). Whether GCs predict for the presence of occult metastatic disease at presentation or subsequent metastatic progression is unknown. Objective To determine if GC scores predict extraprostatic 68Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA-11) positron emission tomography (PET) positivity at presentation. Design, setting, and participants Between December 2015 and September 2018, 91 PCa patients with both GC scores and pretreatment 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET scans were identified. Risk stratification was performed using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA), and GC scores. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Logistic regression was used to identify factors correlated with PSMA-positive disease. Results and limitations The NCCN criteria identified 23 (25.3%) and 68 patients (74.7%) as intermediate and high risk, while CAPRA scores revealed 28 (30.8%) and 63 (69.2%) as low/intermediate and high risk, respectively. By contrast, only 45 patients (49.4%) had high-risk GC scores. PSMA-avid pelvic nodal involvement was identified in 27 patients (29.7%). Higher GC score was significantly associated with pelvic nodal involvement (odds ratio [OR] 1.38 per 0.1 units; p = 0.009) and any PSMA-avid nodal involvement (pelvic or distant; OR 1.40 per 0.1 units; p = 0.007). However, higher GC score was not significantly associated with PSMA-avid osseous metastases (OR 1.11 per 0.1 units; p = 0.50). Limitations include selection bias for patients able to receive both tests and the sample size. Conclusions Each 0.1-unit increase in GC score was associated with an approximate 40% increase in the odds of PSMA-avid lymph node involvement. These data suggest that patients with GC high risk might benefit from more nodal imaging and treatment intensification, potentially via pelvic nodal dissection, pelvic nodal irradiation, and/or the addition of chemohormonal agents. Patient summary Patients with higher genomic classifier scores were found to have more metastatic lymph node involvement on prostate-specific membrane antigen imaging.

Recent data and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines suggest that high-risk prostate cancer (cT3-4, Gleason score ≥8, or prostate-specific antigen [PSA]20 ng/mL) is a heterogenous group in terms of long-term patient outcomes. We sought to determine whether subclassification of high-risk prostate cancer based on clinical factors correlates with genomic markers of risk.We identified 3220 patients with NCCN unfavorable intermediate-risk (n = 2000) or high-risk (n = 1220) prostate cancer from a prospective multi-institutional registry cohort. We defined the following subclassification of high-risk prostate cancer based on previously published data: favorable high risk (cT1c, Gleason 6, and PSA20 ng/mL or cT1c, Gleason 4 + 4 = 8, PSA10 ng/mL); very high risk (cT3b-T4 or primary Gleason pattern 5); and standard high risk (all others with cT3a, Gleason score ≥8, or PSA20 ng/mL). We used a set of 33 previously developed genomic classifiers, including Decipher, to determine whether high-risk genomic features correlate with clinical subclasses of high-risk prostate cancer.Among those with favorable high-risk, standard high-risk, and very high-risk prostate cancer, 50.4%, 64.2%, and 81.6% had a high-risk Decipher score, respectively (P.001). Among 32 other genomic signatures, 29 had a similar trend of increasing risk scores across the 3 subclasses of high-risk disease (P.05 after correction for multiple hypothesis testing). Patients in the 3 subclasses of high-risk disease had a median of 4, 6, and 13 high-risk signatures, respectively. In comparison, among those with unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, 38.2% had a high-risk Decipher score, and the median number of high-risk signatures was 3.Although NCCN guidelines currently use a 2-tiered system for high-risk prostate cancer, genomic markers of risk correlate with the clinically validated subclassification of high-risk prostate cancer into favorable high-risk, standard high-risk, and very high-risk disease, further confirming the prognostic utility of this 3-tiered stratification.

Interstitial brachytherapy is one of several curative therapeutic options for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. In this review, we summarize all available randomized data to support the optimal use of prostate brachytherapy. Evidence from completed randomized controlled trials is the focus of this review with a presentation also of important ongoing trials. Gaps in knowledge are identified where future investigation may be fruitful with intent to inspire well-designed prospective studies with standardized treatment that focuses on improving oncological outcomes, reducing morbidity, or maintaining quality of life.

Background Bladder-sparing trimodality therapy (TMT) is an alternative to radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), and biomarkers to inform therapy selection are needed. Objective To evaluate the prognostic value of immune and stromal signatures in MIBC treated with TMT. Design, setting, and participants We used a clinical-grade platform to perform transcriptome-wide gene expression profiling of primary tumors from 136 MIBC patients treated with TMT at a single institution. We observed 60 overall survival events at 5 yr, and median follow-up time for patients without an event was 5.0 yr (interquartile range 3.1, 5.0). Expression data from another cohort of 223 MIBC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and RC were also analyzed. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Molecular subtype, immune, and stromal signatures were evaluated for associations with disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) in TMT patients, and in patients treated with NAC and RC. Results and limitations Gene expression profiling of TMT cases identified luminal (N = 40), luminal-infiltrated (N = 26), basal (N = 54), and claudin-low (N = 16) subtypes. Signatures of T-cell activation and interferon gamma signaling were associated with improved DSS in the TMT cohort (hazard ratio 0.30 [0.14–0.65], p = 0.002 for T cells), but not in the NAC and RC cohort. Conversely, a stromal signature was associated with worse DSS in the NAC and RC cohort (p = 0.006), but not in the TMT cohort. This study is limited by its retrospective nature. Conclusions Higher immune infiltration in MIBC is associated with improved DSS after TMT, whereas higher stromal infiltration is associated with shorter DSS after NAC and RC. Additional studies should be conducted to determine whether gene expression profiling can predict treatment response. Patient summary We used gene expression profiling to study the association between tumor microenvironment and outcomes following bladder preservation therapy for invasive bladder cancer. We found that outcomes varied with immune and stromal signatures within the tumor. We conclude that gene expression profiling has potential to guide treatment decisions in bladder cancer.

Objective To identify locations of recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients with PSMA-PET imaging for biochemical recurrence following RP with PSA ≤2.0 ng/mL and assessed if the recurrent disease was within standard radiation target volumes. We compared patient and clinical variables between men with recurrences covered by standard salvage radiation fields and those with recurrences outside of standard fields. Results We identified 125 patients for study inclusion. The median PSA at imaging was 0.40 ng/mL (interquartile range 0.28-0.63). PSMA-avid disease was found in 66 patients (53%). Of these, 25 patients (38%) had PSMA-avid lesions found outside of the pelvis, 33 (50%) had lesions confined to the pelvic lymph nodes and prostate bed, and 8 (12%) men had PSMA-avid recurrence only in the prostate bed. Salvage radiation including standard Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) pelvic nodal volumes would not cover PSMA-avid nodal disease in 38 men (30%). PSA at the time of imaging was statistically associated with having PSMA-avid disease outside of standard nodal fields (P Conclusion The 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET detects disease in a majority of patients with PSA ≤2.0 following RP. Nearly one-third of men had PSMA-avid disease that would be missed by standard radiation fields. This imaging modality may dramatically impact the design and use of post-RP salvage radiotherapy.

Objective To evaluate the impact of staging 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging on radiotherapy (RT) dose and volumes in patients with prostate cancer. Methods Forty-five patients (89% high or very high risk by NCCN criteria) who underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging prior to definitive treatment for prostate cancer between December 2015 and December 2016 were included. Locations of 68Ga-PSMA-11-avid lesions were compared to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus pelvic nodal volumes (clinical target volume [CTV]); coverage of lesions outside the consensus CTV was considered a major change, while dose-escalation to lesions within the consensus CTV was considered a minor change. Results All patients had 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET uptake in the prostate. Twenty-five patients (56%) had N1/M1a disease on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET scan, of whom 21 (47%) were previously N0. Six patients (13%) had bone metastases on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET scan, of whom 4 had prior negative bone scans. Eight patients (18%) had lymph node metastases outside the consensus CTV. Twelve patients (27%) received a RT boost to nodes within the consensus CTV. Six patients (13%) had limited bone metastases treated with focal RT. Overall PSMA PET imaging resulted in major and/or minor changes to RT plans in 24 patients (53%). Conclusion 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging resulted in RT changes in 53% of patients. Prospective investigation is needed to evaluate the clinical benefit of RT changes based on staging 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging.

BackgroundEnzalutamide is an antiandrogen used to treat both metastatic and nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Here we present results from a phase 2 trial designed to determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of adding enzalutamide to standard androgen deprivation therapy with radiation therapy in high-risk localized or regional, nonmetastatic patients with prostate cancer.Methods and materialsEnrollment criteria included at least 2 of the following: stage cT3a/b, prostate specific antigen (PSA) ≥20 ng/mL, Gleason grade 8 to 10, ≥33% core involvement on biopsy, or pelvic lymph node involvement on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with metastatic disease were excluded. All patients received 24 months of leuprolide and enzalutamide, and 5 weeks of intensity modulated radiation therapy followed by a brachytherapy boost. Adverse events (AE), PSA, testosterone, and basic laboratory tests were then followed for up to 36 months. Primary outcomes were safety and tolerability and PSA complete response rate (PSA-CR, defined as PSA ≤0.3). Secondary outcomes included time to biochemical recurrence (BCR; nadir+2 ng/mL).ResultsSixteen patients were enrolled; 2 were ineligible and 3 withdrew before starting treatment. Median age at enrollment was 69.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 11.5). Median treatment duration was 24.0 months (IQR 11.9). Median follow-up time was 35.5 months (IQR 11.2), and 9 of 11 (81.8%) patients completed the 36 months of follow-up. One of 11 (9%) patients had grade 4 AE (seizure), and no grade 5 AE were reported. Four of 11 (36.4%) patients had grade 3 AE, such as erectile dysfunction and hot flashes. All patients achieved PSA-CR, and median time to PSA-CR was 4.2 months (IQR 1.4). At 24 months follow-up, 0 of 11 (0%) patients had a biochemical recurrence. At 36 months, 1 of 9 (11.1%) patient had a biochemical recurrence. Of note, this patient did not complete the full 24 months of enzalutamide and leuprolide due to AEs.ConclusionsEnzalutamide in combination with standard androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy was well-tolerated and effective warranting further study in a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) To validate the association between body composition and all-cause mortality in men treated with radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer (PCa). Secondarily, to integrate body composition as a factor to help classify patients by risk of all-cause mortality. MATERIALS/METHODS All participants of NRG/RTOG 9406 and NRG/RTOG 0126 with archived computed tomography that extended cranially to include the L4-L5 interface were included. Muscle mass and muscle density were estimated by measuring the cross-sectional area and average attenuation of the paired psoas muscles on a single slice at the level of L4-L5. Bone density was estimated by measuring the average attenuation of the vertebral body cancellous bone on a single slice at mid-L5. Adipose tissue density was estimated by measuring the average attenuation of the subcutaneous adipose tissue on a single slice at L4-L5. Survival analyses, including Cox proportional hazards models, were performed to assess the relationship between body composition variables and all-cause mortality. Recursive partitioning (RPA) was utilized to create a classification tree to classify NRG/RTOG 0126 participants by risk of death, and the discriminant ability of the classification model was validated using the NRG/RTOG 9406 data set. RESULTS Data from 2,066 men was included in this study (864 from NRG/RTOG 9406 and 1,202 from NRG/RTOG 0126). A total of 648 men died in the follow-up period and 51 (7.9%) were due to PCa. Psoas area, psoas density, and vertebral body density were individually associated with overall survival. In the final multivariable model, psoas area, comorbidity score, and age were associated with overall survival (Table). The RPA yielded a classification tree with 4 prognostic groups determined by age, comorbidity, and psoas cross-sectional area. When the RPA classification was applied to the NRG/RTOG 9406 validation set the discriminant ability was preserved (P < 0.001 groupwise log-rank). CONCLUSION The results of this study strongly support that body composition is related to all-cause mortality in men with localized PCa, with most deaths due to causes other than PCa. The inclusion of psoas cross-sectional area in the RPA classification tree suggests that body composition provides additive information to age and comorbidity status for mortality prediction. This study also confirms the feasibility of performing body composition analysis using archived CT scans using NRG Oncology clinical trial data sets. These methods can be applied to other NRG Oncology data sets to further explore how body composition is related to patient outcomes.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Recent evidence has suggested metastatic cancer represents a disease spectrum rather than a binary state and metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) such as radiation may improve outcomes in some individuals with oligometastatic disease. Within metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) several definitions categorize patients into low and high-volume disease. We assess these definitions, association with clinical outcome, and their mutational landscapes. MATERIALS/METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients with biochemically recurrent (BCR) or mCSPC who had undergone somatic next-generation sequencing (n = 294). Patients were classified by low and high-volume disease per CHAARTED criteria, STAMPEDE criteria, oligo- or polymetastatic ≤ 3 vs > 3 and ≤ 5 vs > 5 metastases (mets). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for time to development of castrate-resistant prostate cancer (tdCRPC) for each definition and compared using log rank test. Pearson's χ2 of Fischer's exact test determined differences in driver mutations. RESULTS Patients were classified with four different definitions as follows: CHAARTED low (53.1%) vs high volume (31.3%); STAMPEDE low (49.7%) vs high burden (35.4%); oligometastatic ≤ 3 (47.3%) vs > 3 (37.4%); and, ≤ 5 (54.1%) vs > 5 (30.6%). Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 52.3 months (mos). Median tdCRPC was not reached in patients with BCR; 85.4 vs 17.3 mos for CHAARTED low vs high, respectively; 99.3 vs 15.7 mos for STAMPEDE low vs high, respectively; 101.4 vs 15.7 mos for ≤ 3 vs > 3 mets respectively; and, 86.4 vs 15.4 mos for ≤ 5 vs > 5 mets respectively (P < 0.001 for all definitions). The frequency of mutations in WNT and cell cycle genes increased across the spectrum from BCR to highest volume of disease in all definitions. TP53 mutation frequency increased across the spectrum in the oligometastatic definitions (Table 1). CONCLUSION The spectrum of mCSPC disease biology is generally confirmed across four different definitions of disease burden for tdCRPC and genomics. For purposes of implementing MDT, a practical approach including an enumeration-centric definition integrated with genomics may be best. Future work will involve examining these various definitions and genomics in de novo and metachronous subsets.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Emerging data suggest that metastasis is a spectrum of disease burden rather than part of a binary state. Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) such as radiation might improve outcomes in individuals with oligometastatic disease. Prospective data of MDT for metachronous oligometastatic or oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa) have been limited to single arm or small phase 2 randomized studies. We report an individual patient data meta-analysis to characterize the safety and clinical benefit of MDT in oligorecurrent PCa. MATERIALS/METHODS Individual patient data was submitted from trials published or in conference proceedings by January 2020. Included were single- or multi-arm prospective trials including only patients with recurrent prostate cancer and ≤5 sites of extracranial disease undergoing MDT (surgery or radiotherapy). We hypothesized that MDT improves ADT-free survival. ADT-free survival was analyzed as the primary outcome and biochemical relapse-free survival as secondary outcome. If hazard ratios (HR) were not constant across the different trials, we calculated standardized survival curves, analyzing the trials separately and pooling the adjusted log HR weighted by sample size. The following covariates were examined with the interaction test: PSA doubling time and localization of disease (nodal vs extra-nodal). RESULTS We identified 4 trials with published results, 2 single arm and 2 randomized trials, representing in total 174 patients (MDT: 72%, active surveillance (AS): 28%). Patient characteristics differed with respect to imaging at inclusion (conventional vs molecular imaging), PSA doubling time and localization of disease (nodal vs extra-nodal). Non-proportional hazards were detected for ADT-free survival but not for biochemical relapse-free survival. ADT-free survival is improved with MDT over AS (HR: 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 - 0.94, P = 0.03) across all covariates, as well as biochemical relapse-free survival (HR: 0.44, 95% CI 0.29 - 0.67, P < 0.01). Grade 2 and 3 toxicity were observed in 3% and 2%, respectively, of patients treated with MDT. CONCLUSION MDT improves both biochemical relapse-free and ADT-free survival as compared to active surveillance with low rates of grade 2 or higher toxicity.

Purpose/objective(s) To conduct the first global individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomized trials to assess the impact of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) use and duration with definitive radiotherapy (RT) in localized prostate cancer. Materials/methods The MARCAP Consortium was formed from international trial groups (NRG/RTOG, EORTC, TROG, DART/GICOR, and ICORG). IPD for 10,131 patients enrolled across 11 RT trials were available for three pre-specified meta-analyses: addition of ADT to RT (5 trials; n = 4736), addition of long-term adjuvant ADT (12-30 months) to short-term ADT (4 trials; n = 3674), and addition of longer neoadjuvant ADT (3-7 months) to short-term ADT (3 trials; n = 2213). The primary endpoint of all meta-analyses was overall survival (OS), with metastasis-free survival (MFS) as a secondary endpoint. Interaction tests between treatment and receipt of dose-escalated RT (≥74 Gy in 2 Gy fractions) were performed. Results After a median follow-up of 12.0 years, the addition of ADT to RT improved 12-year OS (absolute 7.2%, HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.8-0.95) and 12-year MFS (absolute 8.3%, HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.92). After a median follow-up of 10.9 years, prolongation of adjuvant ADT improved 12-year OS (absolute 6.3%, HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.94) and 12-year MFS (absolute 6.3%, HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.90). After a median follow-up of 10.3 years, prolongation of neoadjuvant ADT was not associated with a significant benefit in any endpoint (MFS HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.83-1.09; OS HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82-1.09). On subgroup analysis, there was no evidence of a treatment effect interaction between RT dose and ADT use (OS P-interaction 0.59) or adjuvant ADT prolongation (OS P-interaction 0.13). In the setting of dose-escalated RT, adjuvant ADT prolongation significantly improved OS (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.92). Conclusion This study represents the strongest evidence to support ADT use and prolongation of adjuvant ADT to at least 18 months in localized prostate cancer in conjunction with definitive RT. The relative benefit of ADT use and adjuvant ADT prolongation was consistent irrespective of RT dose-escalation. In contrast, prolongation of neoadjuvant ADT beyond 2 months did not improve survival outcomes and should not routinely be employed.

Background While the addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is known to improve overall survival (OS) in Gleason 8–10 (Grade Group 4–5) prostate cancer (PCa), it has been hypothesized that Gleason 9–10 disease, which is less differentiated than Gleason 8 disease, may be less sensitive to ADT. Objective To examine the association between ADT and OS for Gleason 8 versus Gleason 9–10 PCa. Design, setting, and participants A retrospective cohort study of 20 139 men from the National Cancer Database with localized or locally advanced, Gleason 8–10 PCa who received EBRT. Data were collected from 2004 to 2012. Intervention ADT. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the association between ADT and OS. Results and limitations Overall, 9509 (78%) of the 12 160 men with Gleason 8 disease and 6908 (87%) of the 7979 men with Gleason 9–10 disease received ADT. On multivariable analysis, ADT was associated with a significant improvement in OS for Gleason 8 patients (adjusted hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.70–0.87, p Conclusions In contrast to the significant survival advantage of ADT for Gleason 8 disease, our results suggest that Gleason 9–10 disease derives less survival benefit from ADT and that a higher Gleason score predicts lesser benefit. Consideration should be given to treatment intensification for Gleason 9–10 patients through enrollment in clinical trials or potentially adding novel antiandrogens or docetaxel, which have shown efficacy in both castration-resistant and castration-sensitive settings. Patient summary In this study, we examined the effect of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for Gleason 8 (Grade Group 4) versus Gleason 9–10 (Grade Group 5) prostate cancer. We found that Gleason 9–10 disease may derive a smaller survival benefit from ADT than Gleason 8 disease.

Summary Although muscle-invasive bladder cancer is commonly treated with radical cystectomy, a standard alternative is bladder preservation therapy, consisting of maximum transurethral bladder tumour resection followed by radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy. Although no successfully completed randomised comparisons are available, the two treatment paradigms seem to have similar long-term outcomes; however, clinicopathologic parameters can be insufficient to provide clear guidance in the selection of one treatment over the other. Recent advances in the molecular understanding of bladder cancer have led to the identification of new predictive biomarkers that ultimately might help guide the tailored selection of therapy on the basis of the intrinsic biology of the tumour. In this Review, we discuss the existing evidence for molecular alterations and genomic signatures as prognostic or predictive biomarkers for bladder preservation therapy. If validated in prospective clinical trials, such biomarkers could enable the identification of subgroups of patients who are more likely to benefit from one treatment over another, and guide the use of combination therapies that include other modalities, such as immunotherapy, which might act synergistically with radiotherapy.

Background Intermediate clinical endpoints (ICEs) prognostic for overall survival (OS) are needed for men receiving postprostatectomy radiation therapy (PORT) to improve clinical trial design. Objective To identify a potential ICE for men receiving PORT. Design, setting, and participants We performed an institutional review board–approved multi-institutional retrospective study of 566 men consecutively treated with PORT at tertiary care centers from 1986 to 2013. The median follow-up was 8.2 yr. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Biochemical failure (BF), distant metastases (DM), and castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) were evaluated for correlation with OS and assessed as time-dependent variables in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model and in landmark analyses at 1, 3, 5, and 7 yr after PORT. Cross-validated concordance ( c ) indices were used to assess model discrimination. Results and limitations OS at 1, 3, 5, and 7 yr after PORT was 98%, 95%, 90%, and 82%, respectively. In a time-varying model controlling for clinical and pathologic variables, BF (hazard ratio [HR] 2.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45–3.71; p p p c index when adjusting for baseline covariates (0.78), with 5-yr DM also providing the greatest increase in discriminatory power over a model only including baseline covariates. These findings require validation in prospective randomized data. Conclusions While limited by the retrospective nature of the data, 5-yr DM is associated with lower OS following PORT, outperforming the prognostic capability of BF and CRPC at 1, 3, 5, or 7 yr after treatment. Confirmation of this ICE as a surrogate for OS is needed from randomized trial data so that it can be incorporated into future clinical trial design. Patient summary We assessed potential intermediate clinical endpoints prognostic for overall survival in a cohort of men receiving radiotherapy after prostatectomy. We identified the development of metastatic disease within 5 yr after treatment as the strongest predictor of overall survival.

Disease progression following salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for prostate cancer (PC) is common, and the time to biochemical recurrence (BCR) is heterogeneous.To describe the temporal distribution and clinical impact of BCR following SRT and model outcomes using patient age and time to BCR from SRT.A retrospective multi-institutional study included 547 consecutive men with lymph node-negative PC receiving SRT from 1985 to 2013. The median follow-up after SRT was 8.4 yr. Intervention All men received SRT with three-dimensional or intensity-modulated RT.BCR was defined as a rise in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥0.2ng/ml above the PSA nadir followed by a sequentially equal or higher value. Additional outcomes included distant metastasis (DM), PC-specific mortality (PCSM), and overall mortality (OM). Cox proportional hazards models, a landmark analysis, and comparison of c-indices were used. Cumulative incidence curves were estimated from a Fine and Gray regression model.The estimated 10-yr cumulative incidence of BCR was 60%. Of the 274 men experiencing BCR, 149 (54%) had BCR within 18 mo of SRT. BCR ≤18 mo after SRT was associated with a higher risk of DM (hazard ratio [HR] 7.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.91-11.3; p0.001), PCSM (HR 12.3, 95% CI 5.95-25.2; p0.001), and OM (HR 2.85, 95% CI 1.94-4.17; p0.001). We provide a model to estimate the cumulative incidence of DM and PCSM using age and time to BCR. The retrospective nature of our analysis limits our findings.A strikingly large proportion of men experience early BCR following SRT and are at higher risk of DM and PCSM. Novel predictive biomarkers are needed to identify men harboring micrometastatic disease to avoid potentially futile local therapies or allow for intensification of systemic therapies.Many men will develop biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after salvage radiotherapy. Men with biochemical recurrence within 18 mo of salvage radiotherapy constitute a cohort at higher risk of distant metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality.

Purpose/objective(s) Guideline and clinical adoption of new radiotherapeutic approaches commonly requires 5-10 years of follow-up in randomized trials to ensure long-term safety. This is resource intensive and slows the pace of advancement. We hypothesized that the relative risk (RR) of radiation-induced gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity would remain similar or decrease overtime with long-term follow-up. Materials/methods PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for randomized trials evaluating changes in radiotherapy (RT; hypofractionation, dose escalation, change in field size) for localized prostate cancer published between 1970 and 2020. Yearly toxicity estimates were digitally extracted for GI and GU toxicity. Short- and long-term toxicity were defined as toxicity arising in years 1-3 and 5-10 post-RT, respectively. RR differences of toxicity between trial arms were calculated, and differences between short- and long-term relative risk measures of toxicity were compared using paired sample Wilcoxon signed-rank tests weighted by trial size. Results Median follow-up was 6 years (range 3-16) of the included 29 trials (n = 18,069 men). Of trials that reported risk group (67%), 90% of patients had intermediate and high-risk disease, and 57% of patients received ADT. There was no evidence of an increase in the RR of any grade of GI or GU toxicity with follow-up beyond 3 years. The mean RR point estimate of short- vs long-term GI and GU toxicity consistently decreased over time, which was represented by negative values for all grades. Mean differences (late RR - early RR) for grade 1, 2+ and 3+ GI toxicity were (-0.12, P Conclusion While toxicity events may continue to occur over time, the relative difference at later time points is similar or lower compared to early time points. Thus, our data does not support concerns for very late relative increases in radiation-induced toxicity. Physician reported toxicity assessed up to 3 years post-treatment is likely sufficient to establish safety following alternative radiotherapy dose/fractionation schedules and target volumes in prostate cancer.

Purpose/Objective(s) Standard clinicopathologic variables including T-category, Gleason grade, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) guide the management of localized prostate cancer. The prognostic and predictive performance of these variables has been assessed primarily in retrospective cohorts without standardized quality assurance. Given the substantial heterogeneity in oncologic outcomes for men with localized prostate cancer, we hypothesized that standard clinicopathologic variables have inherent limitations. We therefore sought to assess their performance in a meta-analysis of 10 phase III randomized trials. Materials/Methods Individual patient data was obtained from 10 radiotherapy-related RCTs (NRG/RTOG 9202, 9408, 9413, 9910, 0126; EORTC 22863, 22961, 22991; DART 01/05 GICOR, and Ottawa 0101). The cohort was split 2:1 into training and validation cohorts. In the training set, multivariable cox regression and random forest models were developed. Concordance indices (c-indices) and bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals were calculated for models based on age, performance status, T-category, Gleason score, and PSA. Interactions with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) treatment effects were also tested. Endpoints included distant metastasis (DM), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 10,535 patients were included. The training cohort (n = 7382) was used to develop an optimized clinicopathologic model. Using the locked-model in the validation cohort (n = 3153), the 10-year c-index was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.66-0.74), 0.61 (0.59-0.63), and 0.61 (0.59 – 0.63), for 10-year DM, MFS, and OS, respectively. Similar results were obtained using random forest models. In trials testing the addition of short-term (ST) ADT, or those testing the addition of long-term (LT) ADT, there was no evidence of treatment effect modification by any variable for any endpoint (all P-interaction > 0.05). There was, however, significant heterogeneity in the absolute benefit derived from ADT intensification; the empirical 10-year absolute DM risk reduction with LT ADT over ST ADT ranged from 4.1% to 18.0% depending on modelled baseline risk. Conclusion In this large cohort with long-term follow-up and trial-level quality assurance, models based on standard clinicopathologic variables had limitations in accurately estimating prognosis. The proportional benefit of ADT use was consistent, but the absolute magnitude of benefit varied greatly by predicted baseline risk of DM. Incorporation of genomic prognostic information into risk stratification to better estimate absolute ADT benefit are needed and ongoing (NCT04513717).

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Decipher is a prognostic 22-gene genomic classifier (GC) prospectively validated post-prostatectomy. Herein, we validate the performance of the GC in pre-treatment biopsy samples within the context of three randomized phase III high-risk definitive radiotherapy trials. MATERIALS/METHODS Following a pre-specified and approved CTEP-CCSC analysis plan (NRG-GU-TS006), we obtained all available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from biopsy specimens from the NRG biobank from patients enrolled on NRG/RTOG 9202, 9413, and 9902 phase III randomized trials. After central review, the highest-grade tumors were profiled on clinical-grade whole-transcriptome arrays and GC scores were obtained. The primary objective was to validate the independent prognostic ability of GC for distant metastases (DM), and secondary was prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and overall survival (OS), with Cox multivariable analyses (MVA). RESULTS GC scores were obtained on 385 samples (n = 90 on 9202, n = 172 on 9413, and n = 123 on 9902), of which 265 passed microarray quality control (69%) and had a median follow-up of 11 years (interquartile range, 9, 13). On MVA, the GC (per 0.1 unit) was independently associated with DM (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11-1.39), PCSM (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.13-1.43), and OS (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.20) after adjusting for age, PSA, Gleason score, cT-stage, trial, and randomized treatment arm. For categorical GC, on MVA, GC score ≥ 0.45 (representing the intermediate and high GC categories) had worse DM (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.25-3.80), PCSM (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.31-4.16), and OS (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.03-2.04) outcomes as compared to those with low GC. Cumulative incidence of distant-metastasis at 10-years was 29% (95% CI 20-38%) for intermediate/high GC vs 13% (95% CI 7-18%) for low GC. For the subset with GC > 0.85, the threshold for inclusion in the intensification study of NRG GU009 (PREDICT-RT), at 5-years and 10-years DM was 29% (95% CI 7-52%) and 41% (95% CI 17-66%). GC had similar prognostic ability in patients receiving short-term or long-term androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). CONCLUSION This is the first validation of any gene expression biomarker on pre-treatment biopsy samples from prospective randomized trials and demonstrates an independent association of GC score with DM, PCSM, and OS. High-risk prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease state and GC can improve risk stratification to help personalize shared decision-making. NRG-GU009/PREDICT-RT will further determine the optimal therapy based on GC score. NCT04513717.

Background Decipher is a validated genomic classifier developed to determine the biological potential for metastasis after radical prostatectomy (RP). Objective To evaluate the ability of biopsy Decipher to predict metastasis and Prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) in primarily intermediate- to high-risk patients treated with RP or radiation therapy (RT). Design, setting, and participants Two hundred and thirty-five patients treated with either RP ( n =105) or RT±androgen deprivation therapy ( n =130) with available genomic expression profiles generated from diagnostic biopsy specimens from seven tertiary referral centers. The highest-grade core was sampled and Decipher was calculated based on a locked random forest model. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Metastasis and PCSM were the primary and secondary outcomes of the study, respectively. Cox analysis and c-index were used to evaluate the performance of Decipher. Results and limitations With a median follow-up of 6 yr among censored patients, 34 patients developed metastases and 11 died of prostate cancer. On multivariable analysis, biopsy Decipher remained a significant predictor of metastasis (hazard ratio: 1.37 per 10% increase in score, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06–1.78, p =0.018) after adjusting for clinical variables. For predicting metastasis 5-yr post-biopsy, Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score had a c-index of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.50–0.69), while Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment plus biopsy Decipher had a c-index of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.60–0.82). National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk group had a c-index of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.53–0.77), while National Comprehensive Cancer Network plus biopsy Decipher had a c-index of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.66–0.82). Biopsy Decipher was a significant predictor of PCSM (hazard ratio: 1.57 per 10% increase in score, 95% CI: 1.03–2.48, p =0.037), with a 5-yr PCSM rate of 0%, 0%, and 9.4% for Decipher low, intermediate, and high, respectively. Conclusions Biopsy Decipher predicted metastasis and PCSM from diagnostic biopsy specimens of primarily intermediate- and high-risk men treated with first-line RT or RP. Patient summary Biopsy Decipher predicted metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality risk from diagnostic biopsy specimens.

Purpose To compare the tumor control and toxicity in men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with either external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or EBRT plus low-dose-rate brachytherapy (combo-RT). Methods and Materials Between 1995 and 2012, 579 men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with either EBRT (n = 388) or combo-RT (n = 191). Outcomes assessed included biochemical recurrence–free survival (bRFS), distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS), and cumulative incidence of genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal toxicity. Favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk subgroups were analyzed. Results Median followup was 7.5 years. Combo-RT group had improved 10-year bRFS compared with EBRT (91.7% vs. 75.4%, p = 0.014). On multivariable analysis, combo-RT (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval: 0.25, 0.92; p = 0.03) was associated with improved bRFS. Combo-RT had significantly improved bRFS compared with EBRT in the unfavorable subgroup (p = 0.02) but not in the favorable subgroup (p = 0.37). DMFS was similar within the entire cohort and by risk group. Combo-RT was associated with an increased rate in the 6-year cumulative incidence of Grade 3 GU toxicity (hazard ratio, 3.48; 95% confidence interval: 1.1, 11.1; p = 0.026); however, 57% of Grade 3 GU toxicity was resolved, 29% had partial improvement, and only 1 patient had persistent Grade 3 GU toxicity. Conclusions In intermediate-risk prostate cancer, combo-RT improved bRFS but not DMFS and increased Grade 3 GU toxicity. The bRFS benefit was limited to unfavorable intermediate-risk patients.

In 2012, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, despite evidence that Black men are at a higher risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). We evaluated whether Black men of potentially screening-eligible age (55-69 years) are at a disproportionally high risk of poor outcomes.The SEER database was used to study 390 259 men diagnosed with prostate cancer in the United States between 2004 and 2011. Multivariable logistic regression modeled the association between Black race and stage of presentation, while Fine-Gray competing risks regression modeled the association between Black race and PCSM, both as a function of screening eligibility (age 55-69 years versus not).Black men were more likely to present with metastatic disease (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.65; 1.58-1.72; P 0.001) and were at a higher risk of PCSM (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 1.36; 1.27-1.46; P 0.001) compared to non-Black men. There were significant interactions between race and PSA-screening eligibility such that Black patients experienced more disproportionate rates of metastatic disease (AOR 1.76; 1.65-1.87 versus 1.55; 1.47-1.65; Pinteraction 0.001) and PCSM (AHR 1.53; 1.37-1.70 versus 1.25; 1.14-1.37; Pinteraction = 0.01) in the potentially PSA-screening eligible group than in the group not eligible for screening.Racial disparities in prostate cancer outcome among Black men are significantly worse in PSA-screening eligible populations. These results raise the possibility that Black men could be disproportionately impacted by recommendations to end PSA screening in the United States and suggest that Black race should be included in the updated USPSTF PSA screening guidelines.

Prostate tumors with TP53 gene mutations are molecularly heterogenous, and the presence of TP53 gene mutations has been linked to inferior outcomes. We developed an RNA-based gene signature that detects underlying TP53 gene mutations and identifies wild-type prostate tumors that are analogous to TP53-mutant tumors.Using genomic expression profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas, we developed a mutation signature score to predict prostatic tumors with a molecular fingerprint similar to tumors with TP53 mutations. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve assessed model accuracy in predicting TP53 mutations, and Cox regression models measured association between the signature and progression-free survival and metastasis-free survival (MFS).The TP53 signature score achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84 in the training and 0.82 in the validation cohorts for predicting an underlying mutation. In three retrospective cohorts, a high score was prognostic for poor 5-year MFS: 46% versus 81% (hazard ratio [HR], 3.05; P .0001; Johns Hopkins University cohort), 64% versus 83% (HR, 2.77; P .0001; Mayo Clinic cohort), and 71% versus 97% (HR, 6.8; P = .0001; Brigham and Women's Hospital cohort). The signature also identified TP53 wild-type tumors molecularly analogous to TP53 mutant tumors, wherein high signature score correlated with worse 5-year MFS (50% vs. 82%; HR, 3.05; P .0001).This novel mutational signature predicted tumors with TP53 mutations, identified TP53 wild-type tumors analogous to mutant tumors, and was independently associated with poor MFS. This signature can therefore be used to strengthen existing clinical risk-stratification tools.

Purpose To determine whether a dose-response relationship exists for salvage radiation therapy (RT) of biochemical failure after prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Methods and Materials Individual data from 1108 patients who underwent salvage RT at 10 academic centers were pooled. The cohort was enriched for selection criteria more likely associated with tumor recurrence in the prostate bed (margin positive and pre-RT prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level of ≤2.0 ng/mL) and without the confounding of planned androgen suppression. The cumulative incidence of biochemical failure and distant metastasis over time was computed, and competing risks hazard regression models were used to investigate the association between potential predictors and these outcomes. The association of radiation dose with outcomes was the primary focus. Results With a 65.2-month follow-up duration, the 5- and 10-year estimates of freedom from post-RT biochemical failure (PSA level >0.2 ng/mL and rising) was 63.5% and 49.8%, respectively, and the cumulative incidence of distant metastasis was 12.4% by 10 years. A Gleason score of ≥7, higher pre-RT PSA level, extraprostatic tumor extension, and seminal vesicle invasion were associated with worse biochemical failure and distant metastasis outcomes. A salvage radiation dose of ≥66.0 Gy was associated with a reduced cumulative incidence of biochemical failure, but not of distant metastasis. Conclusions The use of salvage radiation doses of ≥66.0 Gy are supported by evidence presented in the present multicenter pooled analysis of individual patient data. The observational reporting method, limited sample size, few distant metastasis events, modest follow-up duration, and elective use of salvage therapy might have diminished the opportunity to identify an association between the radiation dose and this endpoint.