Back to Search Start Over

External Beam Radiation Therapy With or Without Brachytherapy Boost in Men With Very-High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Large Multicenter International Consortium Analysis

Authors :
Sagar A. Patel
Ting Martin Ma
Jessica K. Wong
Bradley J. Stish
Robert T. Dess
Avinash Pilar
Chandana Reddy
Trude B. Wedde
Wolfgang A. Lilleby
Ryan Fiano
Gregory S. Merrick
Richard G. Stock
D. Jeffrey Demanes
Brian J. Moran
Phuoc T. Tran
Daniel J. Krauss
Eyad I. Abu-Isa
Thomas M. Pisansky
C. Richard Choo
Daniel Y. Song
Stephen Greco
Curtiland Deville
Theodore L. DeWeese
Derya Tilki
Jay P. Ciezki
R. Jeffrey Karnes
Nicholas G. Nickols
Matthew B. Rettig
Felix Y. Feng
Alejandro Berlin
Jonathan D. Tward
Brian J. Davis
Robert E. Reiter
Paul C. Boutros
Tahmineh Romero
Eric M. Horwitz
Rahul D. Tendulkar
Michael L. Steinberg
Daniel E. Spratt
Michael Xiang
Amar U. Kishan
Source :
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 115:645-653
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2023.

Abstract

Very-high-risk (VHR) prostate cancer (PC) is an aggressive subgroup with high risk of distant disease progression. Systemic treatment intensification with abiraterone or docetaxel reduces PC-specific mortality (PCSM) and distant metastasis (DM) in men receiving external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Whether prostate-directed treatment intensification with the addition of brachytherapy (BT) boost to EBRT with ADT improves outcomes in this group is unclear.This cohort study from 16 centers across 4 countries included men with VHR PC treated with either dose-escalated EBRT with ≥24 months of ADT or EBRT + BT boost with ≥12 months of ADT. VHR was defined by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria (clinical T3b-4, primary Gleason pattern 5, or ≥2 NCCN high-risk features), and results were corroborated in a subgroup of men who met Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy (STAMPEDE) trials inclusion criteria (≥2 of the following: clinical T3-4, Gleason 8-10, or PSA ≥40 ng/mL). PCSM and DM between EBRT and EBRT + BT were compared using inverse probability of treatment weight-adjusted Fine-Gray competing risk regression.Among the entire cohort, 270 underwent EBRT and 101 EBRT + BT. After a median follow-up of 7.8 years, 6.7% and 5.9% of men died of PC and 16.3% and 9.9% had DM after EBRT and EBRT + BT, respectively. There was no significant difference in PCSM (sHR, 1.47 [95% CI, 0.57-3.75]; P = .42) or DM (sHR, 0.72, [95% CI, 0.30-1.71]; P = .45) between EBRT + BT and EBRT. Results were similar within the STAMPEDE-defined VHR subgroup (PCSM: sHR, 1.67 [95% CI, 0.48-5.81]; P = .42; DM: sHR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.15-2.04]; P = .38).In this VHR PC cohort, no difference in clinically meaningful outcomes was observed between EBRT alone with ≥24 months of ADT compared with EBRT + BT with ≥12 months of ADT. Comparative analyses in men treated with intensified systemic therapy are warranted.

Details

ISSN :
03603016
Volume :
115
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....13301f04ee3b29c70d7c09ab1809fdab
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.075