s, 7th International Conference of the Hospital Infection Society, 10–13 October 2010, Liverpool, UK / Journal of Hospital Infection 76S1 (2010) S1–S90 S33 Poster Session 11 – Environmental Issues: Water, Air, Cleaning P11.01 Resistance of Acanthamoeba spp. cysts to disinfection treatments C. Coulon, A. Collignon, G. McDonnell, V. Thomas. STERIS, France; Paris 11 University, France; STERIS, United Kingdom Amoebae are known to potentially harbour bacteria that can present a threat to humans and particularly hospitalized patients. These bacteria potentially survive in amoebal cysts, as demonstrated for mycobacteria. It is thus important to evaluate the effectiveness of chemical disinfectants used for surface disinfection against amoebal cysts and trophozoites. Nine different Acanthamoeba spp. strains were grown in PYG medium before encystment. Cysts were diluted in each disinfectant tested (see below), and incubated for 10 min at appropriate temperature. After neutralization cysts were serial-diluted on E. coli lawns on NNA agar to observe re-growth, and log reductions were calculated. Actively growing trophozoites directly taken from PYG medium were evaluated using the same method. The most effective treatments were bleach 2.5%, ethanol 70% and a peracetic acid-based formulation (STERIS-20), with a minimum 4-log10 reduction, except for one strain presenting limited resistance to ethanol. Ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA) alone at 0.55%, peracetic acid alone at 0.2% and a hydrogen peroxidebased product (SporKlenz) presented good activity on all strains (4-log10 reduction) except for 1 of 9 strains with OPA (1-log10 reduction), and for 2 of 9 strains for PAA (0.2 and 0.9-log10 reduction) and SporKlenz (1.7 and 3.6-log10 reduction). Bleach 0.25%, a commercial OPA-based product and glutaraldehyde 2% presented a moderate to low activity. Products with the lowest activity were hydrogen peroxide alone at 7.5% and a commercial, 2% glutaraldehyde-based product. Importantly, glutaraldehyde had also limited efficacy against trophozoites whereas all other tested products were efficient. This study demonstrates that biocides efficacy against amoebae can vary, with known high level disinfectants that may be taken for granted as being effective presenting only limited efficacy. Further investigations are needed to better understand the activity of biocides against amoebal cysts. P11.02 Ingress and egress of pathogens from single isolation rooms M. Muzslay, G. Moore, A.P.R. Wilson. University College London Hospitals, United Kingdom Background: Source isolation can protect the isolated patient (or their roommates) against infection. Some institutions have reduced infection rates by using single isolation rooms. However, others have failed to demonstrate similar benefit. Aims: To investigate the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) to and from single isolation rooms. Methods: Conventional microbiological methods were used to recover MRSA and enterococci from the air (n = 132) and from high contact sites (n = 4257) within isolation rooms and open bay areas. The similarity between clinical and environmental isolates was determined via PFGE. Results: MRSA was recovered from 83 environmental surfaces; 49 were within isolation rooms. The environment of one isolated patient accounted for 43% of all MRSA-positive sites, yet the infective strain was not recovered from outside the room. No patient was colonized with EMRSA-15 B1 yet this strain was recovered from the environment of non-isolated patients, staff communal areas and from an isolation room occupied by an MRSA-negative patient, (previous occupant had different MRSA strain). VRE was recovered from 63 surfaces; 52 were within an isolation room. Large numbers of VR E. faecalis were recovered from the near-patient environment and, despite immobility of the patient, the ensuite toilet area. The same clone was isolated from the inner and outer door handles but not from outside the room. VS E. faecium was recovered from surfaces and the air (120CFU/m) of a 4-bedded open bay. The same clone was recovered from surfaces and the air (5 CFU/m) of an adjacent isolation room. Conclusion: Source isolation contained the infective organism(s). However, heavy airborne contamination and the persistence of MRSA within the ward environment enabled potential pathogens to spread from open bay areas to single isolation rooms via the air and the hands of healthcare workers. P11.03 Identifying opportunities to improve environmental hygiene in multiple healthcare venues P. Carling, J. Po, J. Bartley, L. Herwalt. Boston University School of Medicine, United States; Banner Estrella Medical Center, United States; ESCI, United States; University of Iowa School of Medicine, United States Background: Despite improved hand hygiene compliance and the use of active surveillance cultures to facilitate isolation practice, the impact of such interventions in various types of healthcare settings has been incomplete. Over the past several years 8 studies have documented increased risk of acquisition MRSA, VRE, C. difficile and A. baumannii from prior room occupants. In the context of recent prospective studies which have shown decreased transmission of bacterial pathogens as a direct result of improved hygienic cleaning, a broader evaluation of thoroughness of hygienic cleaning was undertaken by Environmental Hygiene Study Group hospitals. Objective: To evaluate the thoroughness of hygienic cleaning of surfaces that have a significant potential for transmitting hospitalassociated pathogens in a range of healthcare facilities and venues. Methods: A novel fluorescent targeting system was covertly used to objectively evaluate if disinfection cleaning of standardized sets of high risk objects was being performed in a manner consistent with institutional policies in a range of healthcare settings. Results: Terminal thoroughness of disinfection cleaning (TDC) in 82 hospitals was 54% and was significantly better than 16 hospital’s ORs (32%), 7 hospital’s neonatal intensive care units (36%) and 7 EMS vehicles (28%). Daily TDC in ICU isolation rooms in 7 hospitals (31%), in 4 ambulatory chemotherapy suites (26%), in 4 MD clinics (24%), in 5 dialysis units (33%) and in 5 long-term care facilities (34%) was also suboptimal (Figure). Overall the mean TDC for all sites/settings was 34% (Range = 3 to 88, 95% CI 25.2–43.0). Conclusions: Nine studies of TDC, which included >65,400 hightouch surfaces in 106 institutions and 145 venues, identified substantial opportunities for improvement in all venues, suggesting that TDC needs to be improved across a broad range of U.S. healthcare venues as part of efforts to prevent transmission of pathogens. P11.04 Optimising the recovery of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus from surfaces using direct contact plates P. Wolyniec, D.J. Malik, G. Shama. Loughborough University, United Kingdom The presence in health care environments of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) continues virtually unabated and has attracted concern from a number of quarters. Reliable methods of assessing the extent of contamination of such environments by MRSA constitute the first step in mobilizing resources to manage and contain potential threats of infection. Among the different techniques available for contamination assessment, Replicate Organism Detection and Counting (RODAC) direct contact plates