Search

Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) reduces secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) in heart failure and impacts survival in selected patients as demonstrated in the COAPT (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation) trial. However, long-term outcome data after M-TEER under real-world conditions are lacking. This study sought to assess long-term efficacy and survival after M-TEER in a large real-world registry. We analyzed patients with significant secondary MR undergoing M-TEER from the EuroSMR (European Registry of Transcatheter Repair for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation) registry. Long-term MR reduction, functional outcomes, survival rate, and predictors for all-cause mortality were assessed. In this study, 1,628 patients undergoing M-TEER (mean age 73.8 years, mean EuroSCORE II [European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II] 6.9%, 86.6% NYHA functional class ≥III) with available long-term data were included. Five-year survival was 35.0%. Long-term MR reduction (MR grade ≤2+: baseline 4.1%, discharge 92.2%, 5-year follow-up 85.5%; P < 0.001) and functional improvement (NYHA ≤II: baseline 13.4%, 5-year follow-up 60.1%; P < 0.001) was observed. The degree of residual MR was associated with 5-year survival (residual MR grade ≤1+: 38.6%; 2+: 30.5%; ≥3+: 22.6%; P < 0.001). Independent predictors for 5-year all-cause mortality post–M-TEER included age, renal function, residual MR, NYHA functional class, left ventricular ejection-fraction, and COAPT trial eligibility (P < 0.01 for all). This extensive multicenter registry underscores the long-term efficacy of M-TEER in real-world clinical practice and identifies predictors for long-term survival. These findings contribute valuable insights for optimizing patient selection in routine clinical interventions. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reducing mitral regurgitation (MR) during mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) may come at the cost of increased mitral valve gradient (MVG). The combined impact of residual MR and MVG on clinical outcomes after M-TEER is unknown. This study sought to evaluate the impact of postprocedure MR and MVG on clinical outcomes after M-TEER. EXPANDed is a pooled, patient-level cohort of the EXPAND (A Contemporary, Prospective Study Evaluating Real-world Experience of Performance and Safety for the Next Generation of MitraClip Devices) and EXPAND G4 studies, which were designed to evaluate real-world safety and effectiveness of the third- and fourth-generation MitraClip TEER Systems. Subjects were categorized by echocardiographic core laboratory (ECL) assessments into 4 groups according to 30-day MR grade and mean MVG: 1) MR ≤1+/MVG <5 mm Hg; 2) MR ≤1+/MVG ≥5 mm Hg; 3) MR ≥2+/MVG <5 mm Hg; and 4) MR ≥2+/MVG ≥5 mm Hg. A total of 1,723 subjects had evaluable echocardiograms at 30 days: 72% had MR ≤1+/MVG <5 mm Hg, 18% had MR ≤1+/MVG ≥5 mm Hg, 7% had MR ≥2+/MVG <5 mm Hg, and 3% had MR ≥2+/MVG ≥5 mm Hg. MR≤1+ was sustained through 1 year in 93% of patients who achieved 30-day MR≤1+. MVG decreased from 30 days to 1 year in subjects with MVG ≥5 mm Hg (6.7 ± 4.0 to 5.5 ± 2.5 mm Hg MR ≤1+/MVG ≥5 mm Hg and 6.5 ± 1.5 to 5.5 ± 1.7 mm Hg MR ≥2+/MVG ≥5 mm Hg). One-year rates of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization were lower for subjects who achieved MR ≤1+ at 30 days, regardless of MVG. Reduction of MR to mild or less after M-TEER with the latest-generation MitraClip systems was associated with clinical benefit regardless of MVG. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is a guideline-recommended treatment option for patients with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR). Outcomes with the PASCAL system in a post-market setting have not been established. The authors report 30-day and 1-year outcomes from the MiCLASP (Transcatheter Repair of Mitral Regurgitation with Edwards PASCAL Transcatheter Valve Repair System) European post-market clinical follow-up study. Patients with symptomatic, clinically significant MR were prospectively enrolled. The primary safety endpoint was clinical events committee–adjudicated 30-day composite major adverse event rate and the primary effectiveness endpoint was echocardiographic core laboratory–assessed MR severity at discharge compared with baseline. Clinical, echocardiographic, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes were assessed at 1 year. A total of 544 patients were enrolled (59% functional MR, 30% degenerative MR). The 30-day composite major adverse event rate was 6.8%. MR reduction was significant from baseline to discharge and sustained at 1 year with 98% of patients achieving MR ≤2+ and 82.6% MR ≤1+ (all P < 0.001 vs baseline). One-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for survival was 87.3%, and freedom from heart failure hospitalization was 84.3%. Significant functional and quality-of-life improvements were observed at 1 year, including 71.6% in NYHA functional class I/II, 14.4-point increase in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score, and 24.2-m improvement in 6-minute walk distance (all P < 0.001 vs baseline). One-year outcomes of this large cohort from the MiCLASP study demonstrate continued safety and effectiveness of M-TEER with the PASCAL system in a post-market setting. Results demonstrate high survival and freedom from heart failure hospitalization, significant and sustained MR reduction, and improvements in symptoms, functional capacity, and quality of life. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The CLASP IID (Edwards PASCAL TrAnScatheter Valve RePair System Pivotal Clinical) trial is the first randomized controlled trial comparing the PASCAL system and the MitraClip system in prohibitive risk patients with significant symptomatic degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR). This study sought to report primary and secondary endpoints and 1-year outcomes for the full cohort of the CLASP IID trial. Prohibitive-risk patients with 3+/4+ DMR were randomized 2:1 (PASCAL:MitraClip). The 1-year assessments included secondary effectiveness endpoints (mitral regurgitation [MR] ≤2+ and MR ≤1+), and clinical, echocardiographic, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes. Primary safety (30-day composite major adverse events [MAEs]) and effectiveness (6-month MR ≤2+) endpoints were assessed for the full cohort. A total of 300 patients were randomized (PASCAL: n = 204; MitraClip: n = 96). At 1 year, differences in survival, freedom from heart failure hospitalization, and MAE were nonsignificant (P > 0.05 for all). Noninferiority of the PASCAL system compared with the MitraClip system persisted for the primary endpoints in the full cohort (for PASCAL vs MitraClip, the 30-day MAE rates were 4.6% vs 5.4% with a rate difference of −0.8% and 95% upper confidence bound of 4.6%. The 6-month MR ≤2+ rates were 97.9% vs 95.7% with a rate difference of 2.2% and 95% lower confidence bound (LCB) of −2.5%, respectively). Noninferiority was met for the secondary effectiveness endpoints at 1 year (MR ≤2+ rates for PASCAL vs MitraClip were 95.8% vs 93.8% with a rate difference of 2.1% and 95% LCB of −4.1%. The MR ≤1+ rates were 77.1% vs 71.3% with a rate difference of 5.8% and 95% LCB of −5.3%, respectively). Significant improvements in functional classification and quality of life were sustained in both groups (P < 0.05 for all vs baseline). The CLASP IID trial full cohort met primary and secondary noninferiority endpoints, and at 1 year, the PASCAL system demonstrated high survival, significant MR reduction, and sustained improvements in functional and quality-of-life outcomes. Results affirm the PASCAL system as a beneficial therapy for prohibitive-surgical-risk patients with significant symptomatic DMR. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The fourth-generation mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) device introduced an improved clip deployment sequence, independent leaflet grasping, and 2 wider clip sizes to tailor the treatment of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) for a broad range of anatomies. The 30-day safety and effectiveness of the fourth-generation M-TEER device were previously demonstrated. The aim of this study was to evaluate 1-year outcomes in a contemporary, real-world cohort of subjects treated with the MitraClip G4 system. EXPAND G4 is an ongoing prospective, multicenter, international, single-arm study that enrolled subjects with primary and secondary MR. One-year outcomes included MR severity (echocardiographic core laboratory assessed), heart failure hospitalization, all-cause mortality, functional capacity (NYHA functional class), and quality of life (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire). A total of 1,164 subjects underwent M-TEER from 2020 to 2022. At 1 year, there was a durable reduction in MR to mild or less in 92.6% and to none or trace in 44.2% (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). Few subjects had major adverse events through 1 year (<2% for myocardial infarction, surgical reintervention, or single-leaflet device attachment). The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization were 12.3% and 16.9%. Significant improvements in functional capacity (NYHA functional class I or II in 82%; P < 0.0001 vs baseline) and quality of life (18.5-point Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score improvement; P < 0.0001) were observed. M-TEER with the fourth-generation M-TEER device was safe and effective at 1 year, with durable reductions in MR severity to ≤1+ in more than 90% of patients and concomitant improvements in functional status and quality of life. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anatomical and clinical criteria to define mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) "unsuitability" have been proposed on the basis of a Heart Valve Collaboratory consensus opinion from physician experience with early-generation TEER devices but lacked an evidence-based approach. The aim of this study was to explore the spectrum of TEER suitability using echocardiographic and clinical outcomes from the EXPAND G4 real-world postapproval study. EXPAND G4 is a global, prospective, multicenter, single-arm study that enrolled 1,164 subjects with mitral regurgitation (MR) treated with the MitraClip G4 System. Three groups were defined using the Heart Valve Collaboratory TEER unsuitability criteria: 1) risk of stenosis (RoS); 2) risk of inadequate MR reduction (RoIR); and 3) subjects with baseline moderate or less MR (MMR). A TEER-suitable (TS) group was defined by the absence of these characteristics. Endpoints included independent core laboratory–assessed echocardiographic characteristics, procedural outcomes, MR reduction, NYHA functional class, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score, and major adverse events through 30 days. Subjects in the RoS (n = 56), RoIR (n = 54), MMR (n = 326), and TS (n = 303) groups had high 30-day MR reduction rates (≤1+: RoS 97%, MMR 93%, and TS 91%; ≤2+: RoIR 94%). Thirty-day improvements in functional capacity (NYHA functional class I or II at 30 days vs baseline: RoS 94% vs 29%, RoIR 88% vs 30%, MMR 79% vs 26%, and TS 83% vs 33%) and quality of life (change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score: RoS +27 ± 26, RoIR +16 ± 26, MMR +19 ± 26, and TS +19 ± 24) were safely achieved in all groups, with low major adverse events (<3%) and all-cause mortality (RoS 1.8%, RoIR 0%, MMR 1.5%, and TS 1.3%). Patients previously deemed TEER unsuitable can be safely and effectively treated with the mitral TEER fourth-generation device. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The fourth-generation MitraClip G4 System builds on the previous NTR/XTR system with additional wider clip sizes (NTW and XTW), an independent grasping feature, and an improved clip deployment sequence. The primary objective of this study was to assess the safety and performance of the MitraClip G4 System within a contemporary real-world setting. EXPAND G4 is a prospective, multicenter, international, single-arm, postapproval study that enrolled patients with primary (degenerative) mitral regurgitation (MR) and secondary (functional) MR at 60 centers. Follow-up of the full cohort has been conducted through 30 days. Echocardiograms were analyzed by an echocardiography core laboratory. Study outcomes included MR severity, functional capacity measured by NYHA functional class, quality of life measured using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, major adverse event rates, and all-cause mortality. In EXPAND G4, 1,141 subjects with primary MR and secondary MR were treated from March 2021 to February 2022. Implantation and acute procedural success rates were 98.0% and 96.2%, respectively, with a mean of 1.4 ± 0.6 clips implanted per subject. MR was significantly reduced at 30 days compared with baseline (98% achieved MR ≤ 2+, and 91% achieved MR ≤ 1+; P < 0.0001). Functional capacity and quality of life were substantially improved, with 83% of patients achieving NYHA functional class I or II. Likewise, an 18-point improvement was observed in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire summary scores compared with baseline. The composite major adverse event rate was 2.7%, and the all-cause death rate was 1.3% at 30 days. This study demonstrates for the first time the effectiveness and safety of MitraClip G4 System at 30 days in a cohort of >1,000 patients with MR in a contemporary, real-world setting. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • Imaging specialists have a key role during structural heart intervention. • Imaging specialists are exposed to high doses of X-ray radiation. • Imaging specialists should therefore be protected and monitored. • Imaging specialists must be educated on radiation safety regarding ALARA principles. • Structural procedural rooms should be adapted to shield the team maximally. Structural heart interventions are steadily increasing, and the majority requires echocardiographic guidance. As a result, imaging specialists are exposed to the harmful effects of scattered ionizing radiation. This X-ray exposure must be quantified, its potential consequences should be monitored by occupational medicine and the "as low as reasonably achievable" principles of radioprotection should be optimized (including increasing the distance, decreasing the duration, using shielding radiation and providing safety training for the imaging specialist). The spatial organization of and shielding provision in the procedural rooms should be designed to optimize radioprotection for all team members. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The third-generation MitraClip NTR/XTR transcatheter edge-to-edge repair system was introduced to assist in leaflet grasping with the longer clip arms of MitraClip XTR and to improve ease of use with the modified delivery catheter. The EXPAND study evaluated contemporary real-world outcomes in subjects with mitral regurgitation (MR) treated with the third-generation MitraClip NTR/XTR transcatheter edge-to-edge repair system. EXPAND is a prospective, multicenter, international, single-arm study that enrolled patients with primary MR and secondary MR at 57 centers. Follow-up was conducted through 12 months. Echocardiograms were analyzed by an echocardiographic core laboratories. Study outcomes included: MR severity, functional capacity measured by New York Heart Association functional class, quality of life measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, heart failure hospitalizations, all-cause mortality. 1,041 patients were enrolled from April 2018 through March 2019, of which 50.5% had primary or mixed etiology. Implant success was 98.9%; 1.5 ± 0.6 clips were implanted per subject. Significant MR reduction from baseline (≥MR 3+: 56.0%) to 30 days (≤MR 1+:88.8%) was maintained through 1 year (MR ≤1+: 89.2%). A total of 84.5% and 93.0% of subjects in primary MR and secondary MR, respectively, had ≤1+ MR at 1 year. Significant improvements were observed in clinical outcomes (New York Heart Association functional class I/II in 80.3%, +21.6 improvement in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score) at 1 year. All-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalizations at 1 year were 14.9% and 18.9%, respectively, which was significantly lower than previous studies. The study demonstrates treatment with the third-generation system resulted in substantial reduction of MR in a contemporary real-world practice, compared with the results of earlier EVEREST and COAPT trials.(The MitraClip® EXPAND Study of the Next Generation of MitraClip® Devices [EXPAND]; NCT03502811) [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Secondary (functional) tricuspid regurgitation (sTR) is common in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR). Because combined valvular heart disease affects long-term survival, in comparison with isolated MR or tricuspid regurgitation, it is essential to offer patients adequate treatment. Despite considerable experience, no conclusive data are yet available on the prognostic impact of concomitant tricuspid valve surgery at the time of mitral valve surgery. Emerging transcatheter treatments offer the opportunity to treat both conditions (MR and sTR) simultaneously or in a stepwise fashion. This review provides a clinical overview on available data regarding the rationale for treatment of sTR in patients with relevant MR undergoing mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, focusing on clinical and anatomical selection criteria. [Display omitted] • Concomitant MR and TR involve a high clinical and prognostic burden. • Isolated M-TEER, concomitant approach and wait-and-see strategy can be considered. • Ipc-PH, RV-PA coupling, and an atrial-predominant phenotype may suggest considering concomitant strategy. • Further research should evaluate optimal management strategy for patients with combined disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is a progressive disease with characteristic pathophysiological changes that may influence prognosis. Although the staging of SMR patients suffering from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) according to extramitral cardiac involvement has prognostic value in medically treated patients, such data are so far lacking for edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER). This study sought to classify M-TEER patients into disease stages based on the phenotype of extramitral cardiac involvement and to assess its impact on symptomatic and survival outcomes. Based on echocardiographic and clinical assessment, patients were assigned to 1 of the following HFrEF-SMR groups: left ventricular involvement (Stage 1), left atrial involvement (Stage 2), right ventricular volume/pressure overload (Stage 3), or biventricular failure (Stage 4). A Cox regression model was implemented to investigate the impact of HFrEF-SMR stages on 2-year all-cause mortality. The symptomatic outcome was assessed with New York Heart Association functional class at follow-up. Among a total of 849 eligible patients who underwent M-TEER for relevant SMR from 2008 until 2019, 9.5% (n = 81) presented with left ventricular involvement, 46% (n = 393) with left atrial involvement, 15% (n = 129) with right ventricular pressure/volume overload, and 29% (n = 246) with biventricular failure. An increase in HFrEF-SMR stage was associated with increased 2-year all-cause mortality after M-TEER (HR: 1.39; CI: 1.23-1.58; P < 0.01). Furthermore, higher HFrEF-SMR stages were associated with significantly less symptomatic improvement at follow-up. The classification of M-TEER patients into HFrEF-SMR stages according to extramitral cardiac involvement provides prognostic value in terms of postinterventional survival and symptomatic improvement. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Severe symptomatic degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) has a poor prognosis in the absence of treatment, and new transcatheter options are emerging. The CLASP IID (Edwards PASCAL Transcatheter Valve Repair System Pivotal Clinical Trial) randomized trial (NCT03706833) is the first to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the PASCAL system compared with the MitraClip system in patients with significant symptomatic DMR. This report presents the primary safety and effectiveness endpoints for the trial. Patients with 3+ or 4+ DMR at prohibitive surgical risk were assessed by a central screening committee and randomized 2:1 (PASCAL:MitraClip). Study oversight also included an echocardiography core laboratory and a clinical events committee. The primary safety endpoint was the composite major adverse event rate at 30 days. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the proportion of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+ at 6 months. A prespecified interim analysis in 180 patients demonstrated noninferiority of the PASCAL system vs the MitraClip system for the primary safety and effectiveness endpoints of major adverse event rate (3.4% vs 4.8%) and MR ≤2+ (96.5% vs 96.8%), respectively. Functional and quality-of-life outcomes significantly improved in both groups (P < 0.05). The proportion of patients with MR ≤1+ was durable in the PASCAL group from discharge to 6 months (PASCAL, 87.2% and 83.7% [ P = 0.317 vs discharge]; MitraClip, 88.5% and 71.2% [ P = 0.003 vs discharge]). The CLASP IID trial demonstrated safety and effectiveness of the PASCAL system and met noninferiority endpoints, expanding transcatheter treatment options for prohibitive surgical risk patients with significant symptomatic DMR. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to report the midterm outcomes at 1 year in the expanded first-in-human experience with the transfemoral EVOQUE system (Edwards Lifesciences) for tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Untreated TR is associated with excess mortality and morbidity. The first-in-human experience with the EVOQUE tricuspid valve replacement system reported favorable 30-day outcomes with no mortality in a compassionate use population. Twenty-seven patients with severe TR were treated with the EVOQUE system in a compassionate use experience at 7 centers between May 2019 and July 2020. All patients had clinical right-sided heart failure (HF) and were deemed inoperable and unsuitable for transcatheter edge-to-edge repair by the institutional heart teams. The clinical outcomes collected included all-cause mortality, symptom status, TR severity, HF hospitalization, and major adverse cardiovascular events. At baseline, all patients (age: 77 ± 8 years, 89% female) were at high surgical risk (mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score: 8.6% ± 5.5%), with 89% New York Heart Association functional class III/IV. TR was predominantly functional in etiology (19/27, 70%). At 1 year, mortality was 7% (2/27), 70% of patients were New York Heart Association functional class I/II, and 96% and 87% of patients had a TR grade ≤2+ and ≤1+, respectively. Between 30 days and 1 year, 2 patients experienced HF hospitalizations, and 1 patient required a new pacemaker implantation. In this early, compassionate use experience, the transfemoral transcatheter EVOQUE tricuspid valve replacement system demonstrated durable efficacy, persistent improvement in symptom status, and low rates of mortality and HF hospitalizations at a 1-year follow-up. Further studies are underway to validate its efficacy. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to assess 30-day outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with the MitraClip XTR for significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR), relative to baseline coaptation gap sizes (CGS). Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair using the MitraClip NT for patients with significant TR is safe and efficacious; the utility of the MitraClip XTR is unknown. Patients with significant, symptomatic TR treated at a single site between April 2018 and December 2019, with consent and with complete data, were included (n = 50). Baseline and 30-day echocardiograms were assessed by an echocardiography core laboratory. Patients were divided into 3 subgroups on the basis of site-assessed CGS: subgroup I (< 7 mm), subgroup II (7 to 10 mm), and subgroup III (>10 mm). Technical success of the MitraClip XTR implantation was 100% (88% in the septal-anterior position) using a median of 2 clips (interquartile range: 1 to 2). At 30 days, single-leaflet detachment was noted in 3 patients (6%), with no instances of device embolization. TR was reduced by 1 grade in subgroup I and by 2 grades in subgroups II and III. New York Heart Association functional class was reduced by 1 class in all 3 subgroups. The 6-min walk distance increased in subgroup I (+115 m; p = 0.014) and subgroup II (+31.5 m; p = 0.028) but not subgroup III (+50 m; p = 0.999). A CGS of ≤8.4 mm was predictive of a reduction to moderate or less TR. MitraClip XTR implantation is a safe, effective treatment for a wider range of CGS in patients with symptomatic, significant TR than prior device iterations. All patients showed improvement in New York Heart Association functional class, and those with CGS <10 mm also experienced improved functional capacity. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this observational first-in-human experience was to investigate the feasibility and safety of the EVOQUE tricuspid valve replacement system and its impact on short-term clinical outcomes. Transcatheter tricuspid intervention is a promising option for selected patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Although transcatheter leaflet repair is an option for some, transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) may be applicable to a broader population. Twenty-five patients with severe TR underwent EVOQUE TTVR in a compassionate-use experience. The primary outcome was technical success, with NYHA (NYHA) functional class, TR grade, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events assessed at 30-day follow-up. All patients (mean age 76 ± 3 years, 88% women) were at high surgical risk (mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score 9.1 ± 2.3%), with 96% in NYHA functional class III or IV. TR etiology was predominantly functional, with mean tricuspid annular diameter of 44.8 ± 7.8 mm and mean tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion of 16 ± 2 mm. Technical success was 92%, with no intraprocedural mortality or conversion to surgery. At 30-day follow-up, mortality was 0%, 76% of patients were in NYHA functional class I or II, and TR grade was ≤2+ in 96%. Major bleeding occurred in 3 patients (12%), 2 patients (8%) required pacemaker implantation, and 1 patient (4%) required dialysis. This first-in-human experience evaluating EVOQUE TTVR demonstrated high technical success, acceptable safety, and significant clinical improvement. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm durability and safety and the impact on long-term clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Surgical mitral valve reintervention is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and repeat repair is not always feasible. We examine the clinical outcomes of the NeoChord procedure after failed conventional mitral valve repair. A total of 312 patients were treated with the NeoChord repair procedure between January 2014 and December 2018 at 5 European centers. Clinical and echocardiographic data were reviewed to identify patients who had a prior surgical mitral valve repair procedure. The primary endpoint (Patient Success) was a composite of placement of at least 2 neochordae and end-procedure mitral valve regurgitation (MR) ≤ mild, freedom from death, stroke, structural or functional procedure failure (MR > moderate), procedure or device-related unplanned procedures, cardiac-related rehospitalization, or worsening NYHA functional class at 1 and 2-year FU. Fifteen (15) patients were identified who required reoperation for failed surgical mitral valve repair. Mean time-to-reoperation was 2.7 years (2.2-6.1). Median intensive care unit stay was 24 hours and median hospitalization time was 7 days (6-8). No in-hospital deaths were observed. At discharge, mitral regurgitation was ≤ mild in 13 patients (86.7%). Patient success and freedom from more than mild MR were 92.3 ± 7.4% and 83.9 ± 10.4% at 1 and 2-year follow-up respectively. One high-risk patient presented with severe recurrent MR and died during surgical reintervention due to an acute aortic dissection. Selected patients can be successfully treated with the NeoChord procedure after failed surgical mitral valve repair. These results support a wider adoption of the NeoChord procedure as a first-line minimally invasive, alternative therapy to treat failed mitral valve repair. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: The number of percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral regurgitation (MR) valve repairs with MitraClip® implantations increased exponentially in recent years. Studies have suggested an obesity survival paradox in patients with cardiovascular diseases. We investigated the influence of obesity on adverse in-hospital outcomes in patients with MitraClip® implantation.Methods and Results: We analyzed data on characteristics of patients and in-hospital outcomes for all percutaneous mitral valve repairs using the edge-to-edge MitraClip®-technique in Germany 2011-2015 stratified for obesity vs. normal-weight/over-weight. The nationwide inpatient sample comprised 13,563 inpatients undergoing MitraClip® implantations. Among them, 1017 (7.5%) patients were coded with obesity. Obese patients were younger (75 vs.77 years,P < 0.001), more often female (45.4% vs.39.5%,P < 0.001), had more often heart failure (87.1% vs.79.2%,P < 0.001) and renal insufficiency (67.0% vs.56.4%,P < 0.001). Obese and non-obese patients were comparable regarding major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and in-hospital death. The combined endpoint of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR), mechanical ventilation and death was more often reached in non-obese than in obese patients with a trend towards significance (20.6%vs.18.2%,P = 0.066). Obesity was an independent predictor of reduced events regarding the combined endpoint of CPR, mechanical ventilation and death (OR 0.75, 95%CI 0.64-0.89,P < 0.001), but not for reduced in-hospital mortality (P = 0.355) or reduced MACCE rate (P = 0.108). Obesity class III was associated with an elevated risk for pulmonary embolism (OR 5.66, 95%CI 1.35-23.77,P = 0.018).Conclusions: We observed an obesity paradox regarding the combined endpoint of CPR, mechanical ventilation and in-hospital death in patients undergoing MitraClip® implantation, but our results failed to confirm an impact of obesity on in-hospital survival or MACCE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the characteristics, procedural courses, and outcomes of patients presenting with concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in the TriValve (Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapies) and TRAMI (Transcatheter Mitral Valve Interventions) registries. Transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge valve repair (TMVR) has been shown to be successful in patients with severe MR. Lately, edge-to-edge repair has also emerged as a possible treatment for severe TR in patients at high risk for cardiac surgery. In patients with both severe MR and TR, the yield of concomitant transcatheter mitral and tricuspid valve repair (TMTVR) for patients at high surgical risk is unknown. The characteristics, procedural data, and 1-year outcomes of all patients in the international multicenter TriValve registry and the German multicenter TRAMI registry, who presented with both severe MR and TR, were retrospectively compared. Patients in TRAMI (n = 106) underwent isolated TMVR, while those in TriValve (n = 122) additionally underwent concurrent TMTVR in compassionate and/or off-label use. All 228 patients (mean age 77 ± 8 years, 44.3% women) presented with significant dyspnea at baseline (New York Heart Association functional class III or IV in 93.9%), without any differences in the rates of pulmonary hypertension and chronic pulmonary disease. The proportion of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <30% was higher in the TMVR group (34.9% vs. 18.0%; p < 0.001), while patients in the TMTVR group had lower glomerular filtration rates. At discharge, MR was comparably reduced in both groups. At 1 year, overall all-cause mortality was 34.0% in the TMVR group and 16.4% in the TMTVR group (p = 0.035, Cox regression). On multivariate analysis, TMTVR was associated with a 2-fold lower mortality rate (hazard ratio: 0.52; p = 0.02). The rate of patients in New York Heart Association functional class ≤II at 1 year did not differ (69.4% vs. 67.0%; p = 0.54). Concurrent TMTVR was associated with a higher 1-year survival rate compared with isolated TMVR in patients with both MR and TR. Further randomized trials are needed to confirm these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis is a major clinical application of echocardiography. The widely employed continuity equation requires determination of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area. We aimed at testing whether direct area measurement in a volume data set is superior to conventional calculation from the LVOT diameter. Methods: We performed LVOT measurement in 20 normal subjects and 83 patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis with a transthoracic real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (3D-TTE) technique in two systolic frames. The off-line 3D-evaluation allows full choice of section planes within the acquired volume data set. The aortic valve area was calculated from systolic LVOT areas. These results were compared to area values obtained by M-mode LVOT-diameters (area=π ⁎ (d /2)2). In addition, the calculated aortic valve orifices were compared to invasive measurements or direct planimetry in the transthoracic or transesophageal examination. Results: Two independent observers found a reduction in LVOT area during systole (p <0.001). Often a more ellipsoid-like shaped LVOT resulted at end-systole which was shown by a reduction (p <0.001) of the LVOT longitudinal to oblique axis ratio. 3D-TTE determination of aortic valve orifice areas (mean difference: −0.04±0.09 cm2) showed a lesser deviation from the invasively or planimetrically measured areas than conventionally calculated LVOT areas (mean difference: −0.1±0.1 cm2) using the continuity equation (p <0.001). Conclusions: The tested transthoracic 3D-echocardiography technique offers non-invasive measurement of the LVOT and aortic valve area based on the continuity equation during systole and thus improves accuracy and, additionally, agreement of aortic valvular area determination with invasive and direct measurements. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Percutaneous transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in cryptogenic stroke or TIA is an alternative to medical therapy especially in patients with atrial septal aneurysm (ASA). The differences in time to complete occlusion for various closure devices in PFO alone and PFO plus ASA are of natural interest. Methods and results: Between January, 1st 1998 and November, 30th 2006 percutaneous PFO closure was performed in 357 patients with a history of ≥1 paradoxical embolism using three different devices: Amplatzer PFO-(n =199), Starflex-(n =48) and Helex Occluder (n =110). All patients were assigned to a post-interventional protocol with contrast-enhanced transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) at 1 and 6 months and every 6 to 12 months in case of incomplete closure. Definite closure was confirmed in at least two consecutive TOE studies. The closure time curves between the three devices were significantly different (p =0.0072). Devices of 25 mm or less had a better occlusion rate. The difference between the closure time curves of PFO and PFO+ASA concerning each device type was significant for Helex (p =0.006) and Starflex (p =0.030). In regard to the occlusion time for large devices Helex succeeded later than Amplatzer and Starflex (p =0.0029). Concerning the cumulative follow up period of 1265 patient years the recurrence/re-event rate of cerebral and peripheral thromboembolic events was 0.7% per patient year. No relation to residual PFO shunting or to thrombus formation was seen. There were no peri-interventional technical complications. In five patients of the Starflex group thrombi were detected in the four week TOE controls. Conclusion: The closure rate is dependent on occluder size and type plus the occurrence of an atrial septum aneurysm. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is known to be associated with poor quality of life and increased risk of death when left untreated. We sought to report the 1-year clinical outcomes of subjects treated by tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) with the TriClip system (Abbott Cardiovascular) in a contemporary real-world setting. The bRIGHT (An Observational Real-World Study Evaluating Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation Patients Treated With the Abbott TriClip Device) postapproval study is a prospective, single-arm, open-label, multicenter postmarket registry conducted at 26 sites in Europe, with central event adjudication and echocardiographic core-laboratory assessment. Enrolled subjects (n = 511) were elderly (79 ± 7 years) with significant comorbidities. A total of 88% had baseline massive or torrential TR, and 80% of subjects were in NYHA functional class III/IV. TR was reduced to moderate or less in 81% at 1 year. Significant improvements in NYHA functional class (21% to 75% I/II, P < 0.0001) and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score (19 ± 26-point improvement, P <0.0001) were observed at 1 year. One-year mortality was significantly lower in subjects who achieved moderate or lower TR at 30 days; however, there was no difference in mortality among subjects who achieved moderate, mild, or trace TR at 30 days. In addition to TR reduction at 30 days, baseline serum creatinine and baseline right ventricular tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (RV TAPSE) were independently associated with mortality at 1 year (OR: 2.169; 95% CI: 1.494-3.147; P < 0.0001; OR: 0.636; 95% CI: 0.415-0.974; P = 0.0375). Mortality was not associated with baseline TR grade or with center volume. Tricuspid TEER using the TriClip system was safe and effective through 1 year for subjects with significant TR and advanced disease in a diverse real-world population. (An Observational Real-world Study Evaluating Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation Patients Treated With the Abbott TriClip Device [bRIGHT]; NCT04483089) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates with limited treatment options. We report the one-year outcomes of the Cardioband™ Tricuspid Valve Reconstruction System in the treatment of severe functional TR in 30 patients enrolled in the TRI-REPAIR study. Between October 2016 and July 2017, 30 patients were enrolled in this single-arm, multicenter, prospective study. Patients were diagnosed with severe, symptomatic TR in the absence of untreated left-heart disease and deemed inoperable because of unacceptable risk for open-heart surgery by the local heart team. Clinical, functional, and echocardiographic data were prospectively collected before and up to one year post-procedure. An independent core lab assessed all echocardiographic data and an independent clinical event committee adjudicated the safety events. Mean patient age was 75 years, 73% were females, 23% had ischemic heart disease, and 93% had atrial fibrillation. At baseline, 83% were in NYHA Class III-IV, 63% had edema, and LVEF was 58%. Technical success was 100%. Through one year, one patient had a reintervention and exited the study. Five patients died of which one was device-related. Between baseline and one year (paired analyses), echocardiography showed average reductions of annular septolateral diameter of 16% (44mm vs. 37mm; p<0.0001), PISA EROA of 49% (0.73cm2 vs. 0.37cm2, p=0.0037), and mean vena contracta of 30% (1.2cm vs. 0.9cm, p=0.0046). Clinical assessment showed that at one year 78% of patients were in NYHA Class I-II (p=0.0003). Six minute walk distance improved by 42m (p=0.0525). Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score improved by 19 points (p=0.0009). Edema was absent in 70% of the patients. These results show that the Cardioband tricuspid system performs as intended and appears to be safe in patients with symptomatic and severe functional TR. At one year, significant reduction of TR through a sustained decrease of annular dimensions, improvements in heart failure symptoms, quality of life, and exercise capacity were observed. Further studies are warranted to validate these initial promising results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The regulatory landscape for device-based heart failure (HF) therapies has seen a major shift in the last 7 years. In 2013, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration released guidance for early feasibility and first-in-human studies, thereby encouraging device innovation, and in 2016 the U.S. Congress authorized the Breakthrough Devices Program to expedite access for Americans to innovative devices indicated for diagnosis and treatment of serious illnesses, such as HF. Since December 2016, there has been an increase in the number of HF devices for which manufacturers are seeking approval through the breakthrough designation pathway. This has led to a rapid uptake in the development and evaluation of device-based HF therapies. This article reviews the current and future landscape of device therapies for chronic HF and associated comorbidities and the regulatory environment that is driving current and future innovation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the TRILUMINATE Pivotal (Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Treated with the Tricuspid Valve Repair System Pivotal), tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) reduced tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and improved health status compared with medical therapy alone with no benefit on heart failure hospitalizations or survival. The purpose of this study was to better understand the health status benefits of T-TEER within the TRILUMINATE Pivotal trial. TRILUMINATE randomized patients with severe TR to T-TEER (n = 175) or medical therapy (n = 175). Health status was assessed at baseline and at 1, 6, and 12 months with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) (range 0-100; higher = better), which was compared between treatment groups using mixed effects linear regression. Alive and well was defined as KCCQ overall summary score ≥60 and no decline from baseline of >10 points at 1 year. Compared with medical therapy, T-TEER significantly improved health status at 1 month (mean between-group difference in KCCQ overall summary score 9.4 points; 95% CI: 5.3-13.4 points), with a small additional improvement at 1 year (mean between-group difference 10.4 points; 95% CI: 6.3-14.6 points). T-TEER patients were more likely to be alive and well at 1 year (T-TEER vs medical therapy: 74.8% vs 45.9%; P < 0.001), with a number needed to treat of 3.5. Interaction analyses demonstrated that the benefit of T-TEER diminished as baseline KCCQ overall summary score increased (P int < 0.001). Exploratory analyses suggested that much of the health status benefit of T-TEER could be explained by TR reduction and that improvement in health status after T-TEER was strongly correlated with reduced 1-year mortality and heart failure hospitalization. T-TEER with the TriClip system resulted in substantial and sustained health status improvement in patients with severe TR compared with medical therapy alone. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is known to be associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The authors sought to study the acute outcomes of subjects treated by tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with the TriClip system (Abbott) in a contemporary, real-world setting. The bRIGHT (An Observational Real-World Study Evaluating Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation Patients Treated With the Abbott TriClip™ Device) postapproval study is a prospective, single-arm, open-label, multicenter, postmarket registry conducted at 26 sites in Europe. Echocardiographic assessment was performed at a core laboratory. Enrolled subjects were elderly (79 ± 7 years of age) with significant comorbidities. Eighty-eight percent had baseline massive or torrential TR, and 80% of subjects were in NYHA functional class III or IV. Successful device implantation occurred in 99% of subjects, and TR was reduced to ≤moderate at 30 days in 77%. Associated significant improvements in NYHA functional class (I/II, 20% to 79%; P < 0.0001) and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score (19 ± 23 points improvement; P < 0.0001) were observed at 30 days. With baseline TR grade removed as a variable, smaller right atrial volume and smaller tethering distance at baseline were independent predictors of TR reduction to ≤moderate at discharge (OR: 0.679; 95% CI: 0.537-0.858; P = 0.0012; OR: 0.722; 95% CI: 0.564-0.924; P = 0.0097). Fourteen subjects (2.5%) experienced a major adverse event at 30 days. Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair was found to be safe and effective in treating significant TR in a diverse, real-world population. (An Observational Real-World Study Evaluating Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation Patients Treated With the Abbott TriClip™ Device [bRIGHT]; NCT04483089) [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is common in patients with heart failure and constitutes an independent risk factor for adverse prognosis besides NYHA-class. The predictive value of dyspnea reduction after transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) on outcome has not been investigated up to now. We enrolled 627 consecutive patients (47.0% female, 57.4% functional MR; median follow-up 486 days[IQR 157/961]; survival status available in 96.8%; symptoms assessed in n = 556 at baseline / n = 406 at 1 month) treated with isolated percutaneous mitral valve edge-to-edge repair in our center from 06/2010–03/2018 (exclusion of combined forms of TMVr) in a monocentric retrospective analysis. Survival was 97.6% at discharge, 73.9% after 1, 54.5% after 3, 37.6% after 5 and 21.7% after 7-years. Before TMVr, NYHA-classes III/IV were found in 89.0%. Of these, 74.7% reported symptomatic relief (reduction in NYHA-class) one month after procedure (NYHA class recorded in 406 patients at 30 days). NYHA-classes III/IV were documented in 37.2% (p < 0.001) at 30 days and in 36.6% (p < 0.001) at 1 year without significant changes between the follow-ups. Dyspnea reduction was accompanied by significantly improved long-term survival (1 year, 89.1 vs 71.2%, p = 0.001, 2 years: 75.5 vs 58.7%, p = 0.039) and was identified as an independent predictor for lower mortality (1-year HR for increased mortality by missing symptomatic improvement 2.94 [95%CI 1.53–5.65], p = 0.001; long-term HR 1.95 [95%CI 1.29–2.94], p = 0.001) independently in both etiologies of MR. TMVr by edge-to-edge therapy enables early and sustainable symptomatic improvement in nearly 75% of the symptomatic patients. The simple assessment of postinterventional changes in NYHA-class might serve as an independent predictor for mid- and long-term prognosis in both FMR and DMR. [Display omitted] • Mitral regurgitation is an well-established risk factor for adverse prognosis in HF. • interventional therapy enables sustainable symptomatic improvement in nearly 75%. • Postprocedural change in NYHA-class might be a tool predict prognosis after TMVr. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been associated with embolic strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs). Catheter closure of PFO is effective in preventing recurrent events. Residual shunts and procedure or device related complications can occur, including atrial fibrillation and thrombus formation. This study examines the initial experience with a new PFO closure device, the IrisFIT PFO-Occluder (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China).Methods: 95 patients with indications for PFO closure underwent percutaneous closure with the IrisFIT PFO-Occluder. The primary endpoint was the rate of accurate device placement with no/small residual shunt at 3 or 6 months follow-up. All patients underwent transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after 1 to 6 months. In case of a residual shunt, an additional TEE was performed after 12 months. Clinical follow-up was performed up to a mean of 33.1 ± 3.6 months.Results: The device was successfully implanted in 95 (100%) patients with no relevant procedural complications. At final TEE follow-up (7.6 ± 3.9 months) the effective closure rate was 96.8% with 1 moderate and 2 large residual shunts. There were 8 cases of new onset atrial fibrillation and 2 TIAs. There were no cases of device embolization or erosion.Conclusion: The IrisFIT occluder is a new PFO closure device with several advantages compared to other devices. In this small study cohort, technical success rate, closure rate and adverse event rate were comparable to other devices. The rate of new onset atrial fibrillation was higher in comparison to other studies and warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]