Back to Search Start Over

Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up With the Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Device IrisFIT (Lifetech) in Patients With Stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack, or Other Thromboembolic Events.

Authors :
Sievert, Kolja
Yu, Jiangtao
Bertog, Stefan
Hornung, Marius
von Bardeleben, Ralph Stephan
Gafoor, Sameer
Reinartz, Markus
Matic, Predrag
Hofmann, Ilona
Grunwald, Iris
Schnelle, Nalan
Sievert, Horst
Source :
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. Sep2021, Vol. 30, p72-75. 4p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>A patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been associated with embolic strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs). Catheter closure of PFO is effective in preventing recurrent events. Residual shunts and procedure or device related complications can occur, including atrial fibrillation and thrombus formation. This study examines the initial experience with a new PFO closure device, the IrisFIT PFO-Occluder (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China).<bold>Methods: </bold>95 patients with indications for PFO closure underwent percutaneous closure with the IrisFIT PFO-Occluder. The primary endpoint was the rate of accurate device placement with no/small residual shunt at 3 or 6 months follow-up. All patients underwent transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after 1 to 6 months. In case of a residual shunt, an additional TEE was performed after 12 months. Clinical follow-up was performed up to a mean of 33.1 ± 3.6 months.<bold>Results: </bold>The device was successfully implanted in 95 (100%) patients with no relevant procedural complications. At final TEE follow-up (7.6 ± 3.9 months) the effective closure rate was 96.8% with 1 moderate and 2 large residual shunts. There were 8 cases of new onset atrial fibrillation and 2 TIAs. There were no cases of device embolization or erosion.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>The IrisFIT occluder is a new PFO closure device with several advantages compared to other devices. In this small study cohort, technical success rate, closure rate and adverse event rate were comparable to other devices. The rate of new onset atrial fibrillation was higher in comparison to other studies and warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15538389
Volume :
30
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
151978819
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2020.09.031