Search

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the management of advanced melanoma (AM). However, data on ICI effectiveness have largely been restricted to clinical trials, thereby excluding patients with co-existing malignancies. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most prevalent adult leukemia and is associated with increased risk of melanoma. CLL alters systemic immunity and can induce T-cell exhaustion, which may limit the efficacy of ICIs in patients with CLL. We, therefore, sought to examine the efficacy of ICI in patients with these co-occurring diagnoses. In this international multicenter study, a retrospective review of clinical databases identified patients with concomitant diagnoses of CLL and AM treated with ICI (US-MD Anderson Cancer Center, N = 24; US-Mayo Clinic, N = 15; AUS, N = 19). Objective response rates (ORRs), assessed by RECIST v1.1, and survival outcomes [overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)] among patients with CLL and AM were assessed. Clinical factors associated with improved ORR and survival were explored. Additionally, ORR and survival outcomes were compared between the Australian CLL/AM cohort and a control cohort of 148 Australian patients with AM alone. Between 1997 and 2020, 58 patients with concomitant CLL and AM were treated with ICI. ORRs were comparable between AUS-CLL/AM and AM control cohorts (53% versus 48%, P = 0.81). PFS and OS from ICI initiation were also comparable between cohorts. Among CLL/AM patients, a majority were untreated for their CLL (64%) at the time of ICI. Patients with prior history of chemoimmunotherapy treatment for CLL (19%) had significantly reduced ORRs, PFS, and OS. Our case series of patients with concomitant CLL and melanoma demonstrate frequent, durable clinical responses to ICI. However, those with prior chemoimmunotherapy treatment for CLL had significantly worse outcomes. We found that CLL disease course is largely unchanged by treatment with ICI. • Treatment of concomitant melanoma with ICI resulted in durable clinical responses despite concomitant CLL. • The ORR to first-line ICI was 41% and median duration of response was 18 months. • Prior treatment for CLL was associated with poor ICI-dependent outcomes, including ORRs, OS, and PFS. • Clinical benefit was achieved without exacerbation of CLL or clearly increased adverse event rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) more patients will develop severe and potentially life-threatening immune-related adverse events (irAEs). So far, predictive models for the occurrence of grade ≥3 irAEs are lacking. Therefore, we analysed associations between patient and disease characteristics, and the occurrence of grade ≥3 irAEs. Patients with cancer who were treated with anti-PD-1 (+/−anti-CTLA-4) between July 2015 and February 2020, and who were prospectively included in the MULTOMAB-trial, were eligible for this cohort study. Time to and occurrence of grade ≥3 irAEs according to CTCAE v5.0 were retrospectively registered. The associations between patient and disease characteristics and irAE occurrence were analysed using the competing risk cox-regression model of Fine and Gray. Analyses were performed separately in patients treated with monotherapy (anti-PD-1) and combination therapy (anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4). Subgroup analyses were performed in tumour types with the highest number of patients; melanoma and NSCLC. Out of 641 patients, 106 patients (17%) experienced grade ≥3 irAEs. None of the analysed factors were associated with grade ≥3 irAE occurrence in the monotherapy (n = 550) or the combination therapy (n = 91) groups, nor in the subgroup analyses. Of interest, none of the patients with NSCLC with a WHO performance status of 0 (n = 34) experienced grade ≥3 irAEs. Most common NSCLC histology types were adenocarcinoma (n = 99/55%) and squamous cell carcinoma (n = 39/22%). This study shows that patient and disease characteristics are not able to predict the occurrence of serious AEs in patients treated with ICIs. • 12% of patients receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy experienced grade ≥3 toxicities. • 44% of patients receiving anti-PD-1 + CTLA-4 therapy experienced grade ≥3 toxicities. • No clinical factor was associated with toxicities during anti-PD-1 (+CTLA4) therapy. • This was found across tumour types, as well as in melanoma and NSCLC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The incidence of dermatologic infections in patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) has not been systematically described.Objective: Identify the incidence of dermatologic infections in patients who received CPIs.Methods: Retrospective review of dermatologic infections in patients who received CPIs between 2005 and 2020 and were evaluated by dermatologists at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.Results: Of 2061 patients in the study, 1292 were actively receiving CPIs (≤ 90 days since the last dose) and 769 had previously been on CPIs (> 90 days since the last dose). The dermatologic infection rate was significantly higher in patients with active CPI treatment (17.5%) than in patients not actively being treated (8.2%; P < .0001). In patients on CPIs, 82 (36.2%), 78 (34.5%), and 48 (21.2%) had bacterial, fungal, and viral infections, respectively, and 18 (8.0%) had polymicrobial infections. Anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 monotherapy was associated with the highest risk of infection (hazard ratio, 2.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.87 to 4.60; P < .001).Limitations: Retrospective design and sample limited to patients referred to dermatology.Conclusions: Patients actively receiving CPIs are more susceptible to dermatologic infections, with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 monotherapy carrying the highest risk, suggesting that the index of suspicion for infections should be increased in these patients to minimize morbidity and optimize care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Detailed study of ophthalmic immune-related adverse events (AEs), including determination of incidence and recurrence rates, is of integral importance in cancer immunotherapy to inform management and treatment guidelines. Retrospective registry study. Patients newly diagnosed with ophthalmic immune-related AEs between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017, in the American Academy of Ophthalmology's Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry. Data were collected from electronic health records of IRIS® Registry participating ophthalmology practices. Patients with select ophthalmic immune-related AEs were identified by International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes. The primary exposure of interest was prior initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Incidence of ophthalmic immune-related AEs within 1 year after initiation of ICI therapy was determined. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were derived by comparing incidence of ophthalmic immune-related AEs after ICIs versus rates of the same ocular complications in patients not taking ICIs in the entire registry population. Rates of ophthalmic immune-related AEs in patients with a past history of ocular inflammation or other specific ophthalmic condition before initiation of ICIs were examined further. A total of 3123 patients who received anti-CTLA-4 or anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) therapy were identified, 112 of whom demonstrated an ophthalmic immune-related AE. Incidence rates for anterior uveitis, the most common ophthalmic immune-related AE, were 8209 per 100 000 for ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4), 2542 per 100 000 for nivolumab (anti-PD-1), 2451 per 100 000 for pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1), 5556 per 100 000 for ipilimumab plus nivolumab, and 3740 per 100 000 among all ICIs. Rates of ophthalmic immune-related AEs among patients receiving ICI therapy were higher compared with baseline rates in the general registry population (anterior uveitis IRR, 13.9; other uveitis IRR, 43.0; papilledema IRR, 38.3). Patients with a history of uveitis or other ocular inflammatory condition demonstrated high recurrence rates of ophthalmic immune-related AEs after initiating ICIs (up to 51.1%). For patients initiating ICI therapy, early coordination with ophthalmic subspecialist care is important because rates of ophthalmic immune-related AEs are elevated compared with ocular complication rates in the entire registry population and patients with a history of prior autoimmune ocular disease are at high risk of recurrence of ocular complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has significantly transformed the treatment landscape for advanced malignancies. These inhibitors bolster the immune system's capacity to detect and destroy cancer cells. ICIs used in cancer immunotherapy are primarily categorized into two groups: anti-PD-1/L1 and anti-CTLA-4. The application of combination ICI therapy (ICI doublets) in older patients prompts questions about their relative efficacy compared to standard therapies, particularly in comparison to younger patient cohorts. This study involved an extensive review of literature from databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Our primary aim was to assess overall survival (OS) outcomes in a cohort of older patients, specifically those aged 65 and above, undergoing treatment for advanced cancers. The treatment modalities considered included ICI doublets, ICI monotherapy (alone or in combination with non-ICI drugs), and non-ICI therapies. The study aimed to compare the OS outcomes across these different therapeutic approaches. The analysis incorporated data from 18 trials, indicating that patients treated with ICI doublets exhibited a statistically significant improvement in OS compared to the control group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–0.96; P < 0.01). The addition of CTLA-4 inhibitors did not show significant advantages over anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.83–1.02; P = 0.13). When compared to non-ICI therapies, such as chemotherapy alone, ICI doublets demonstrated improved OS outcomes (HR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.82–0.97; P < 0.01). Our findings suggest that ICI doublets may offer a modest improvement in the outcomes of older cancer patients compared to non-ICI-based treatments. Consequently, the use of ICI doublets in older patients should be considered on an individual basis, prioritizing cases where there are clear advantages over conventional therapy. This study underscores the importance of developing personalized treatment strategies for older patients, necessitating a cautious and individualized approach in medication selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Les inhibiteurs de points de contrôle immunitaire ont révolutionné la prise en charge thérapeutique de nombreux cancers permettant des gains de survie globale jamais atteints auparavant. Leur champ de prescription ne cesse de croître. Malgré leur efficacité, ces traitements sont responsables d'effets indésirables immunologiques touchant l'ensemble des organes et mimant des pathologies auto-immunes et inflammatoires connues. Non seulement ces manifestations peuvent être sévères, menacer le pronostic vital et nécessiter une prise en charge spécialisée rapide mais en plus la chronologie de leur apparition est très variable d'un cas à l'autre et leur symptomatologie initiale est souvent fruste et trompeuse. Elles peuvent également remettre en question la reprise du traitement anti-cancéreux en raison du risque de récidives. Les molécules les plus connues ciblent CTLA-4, PD-1 ou PD-L1 et les indications de ces traitements se multiplient (nouvelles tumeurs, administration adjuvante aux stades précoces, combinaisons). De plus, de nouvelles molécules sont en développement ciblant d'autres antigènes d'intérêt (LAG-3, TIM-3...). Il faut donc s'attendre à une incidence accrue d'effets indésirables immunologiques et à l'apparition de nouvelles manifestations. Le pleiotropisme des manifestations indésirables associées aux inhibiteurs de checkpoint immunitaire place l'interniste et son approche médicale transversale au poste de régulation du nécessaire réseau multidisciplinaire organisé autour de ces molécules. Cet article a pour but de faire une mise au point sur les connaissances utiles à la prise en charge des patients exposés à des toxicités immunologiques liées aux inhibiteurs de point de contrôle immunitaire. Use of checkpoint inhibitors to treat cancer was one of the most important revolution these last years and an increasing number of new types of tumors is currently under investigation with these new treatments. However, immune-related adverse events associated with these agents frequently affect various organs, mimicking auto-immune or inflammatory diseases. Some of these effects can be severe, often requiring hospitalization and specialized treatment (immunosuppression). Most known agents are ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4 antibody) nivolumab and pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1 antibodies). New molecules are now approved or in development as anti-PD-L1 antibodies, anti-LAG-3 or anti-TIM-3 antibodies, increasing the probability and new description of immune-related adverse events. With his experience in auto-immune diseases, the immunologist/internal medicine specialist has an important role in the management of these toxicities. The goal of this review is to focus on the incidence, diagnostic assessment and recommended management of the most relevant immune-related adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although a myriad of novel treatments entered the treatment paradigm for advanced melanoma, there is lack of head-to-head evidence. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to estimate each treatment's relative effectiveness and safety. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane to identify all phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a time frame from January 1, 2010 to March 11, 2019. We retrieved evidence on treatment-related grade III/IV adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Evidence was synthesised using a Bayesian fixed-effect NMA. Reference treatment was dacarbazine. In accordance with RCTs, dacarbazine was pooled with temozolomide, paclitaxel and paclitaxel plus carboplatin. To increase homogeneity of the study populations, RCTs were only included if patients were not previously treated with novel treatments. The SLR identified 28 phase III RCTs involving 14,376 patients. Nineteen and seventeen treatments were included in the effectiveness and safety NMA, respectively. For PFS, dabrafenib plus trametinib (hazard ratio [HR] PFS: 0.21) and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (HR PFS: 0.22) were identified as most favourable treatments. Both had, however, less favourable safety profiles. Five other treatments closely followed (dabrafenib [HR PFS: 0.30], nivolumab plus ipilimumab [HR PFS: 0.34], vemurafenib [HR PFS: 0.38], nivolumab [HR PFS: 0.42] and pembrolizumab [HR PFS: 0.46]). In contrast, for OS, nivolumab plus ipilimumab (HR OS: 0.39), nivolumab (HR OS: 0.46) and pembrolizumab (HR OS: 0.50) were more favourable than dabrafenib plus trametinib (HR OS: 0.55) and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (HR OS: 0.57). Our NMA identified the most effective treatment options for advanced melanoma and provided valuable insights into each novel treatment's relative effectiveness and safety. This information may facilitate evidence-based decision-making and may support the optimisation of treatment and outcomes in everyday clinical practice. • The network meta-analysis for advanced melanoma included nineteen treatment options. • For treatment-related adverse events, glycoprotein 100, ipilimumab plus glycoprotein 100 and nivolumab were most favourable. • For progression-free survival, dabrafenib plus trametinib and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib were most favourable. • The most favourable treatments for progression-free survival had less favourable safety profiles. • For overall survival, nivolumab plus ipilimumab was most favourable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metastatic melanoma (MM) is commonly treated with a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab, regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression. We conducted a population-based study including all patients with MM (except ocular melanoma) treated in Denmark with first-line combination therapy or anti-PD-1 monotherapy since January 2017. Baseline data including known prognostic characteristics were used in multivariable and propensity-matched score (PMS) analyses to assess progression-free survival (PFS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS), and overall survival (OS) according to PD-L1 expression. We identified 1341 eligible patients, with known PD-L1 status for 1081 patients (43% PD-L1 ≥ 1%, 57% PD-L1 < 1%). PD-L1 ≥ 1% was an independent positive prognostic biomarker for survival in the overall cohort (MSS: HR 0.66, CI 0.52–0.83, p < 0.001). In the PMS PD-L1 ≥ 1% cohort, combination therapy showed similar clinical outcomes to monotherapy (PFS: HR 1.41, CI 0.94–2.11, p = 0.101; MSS: HR 1.21, CI 0.70–2.11, p = 0.49; OS: HR 1.17, CI 0.68–2.00, p = 0.567). In contrast, in the PMS PD-L1 < 1% and in the PMS PD-L1 < 1% BRAF WT cohorts, combination therapy improved PFS (respectively with HR 0.70, CI 0.53–0.93, p = 0.013; and HR 0.54, CI 0.37–0.78, p = 0.001), but did not reach statistically significant improvements of MSS (HR 0.72, CI 0.50–1.02, p = 0.065; and HR 0.79, CI 0.51–1.21, p = 0.278) or OS (HR 0.78, CI 0.56–1.08, p = 0.135; and HR 0.81, CI 0.54–1.21, p = 0.305) compared to monotherapy. Our findings support previous exploratory analyses of Checkmate-067, highlighting that improved clinical outcomes with combination therapy are not established in unselected patients with high (≥1%) tumor PD-L1 expression. • PD-L1 ≥ 1% is an independent positive prognostic biomarker in metastatic melanoma • PD-L1 ≥ 1% did not derive additional benefit from anti-CTLA-4 over anti-PD-1 alone • Combination therapy demonstrated improved PFS only in patients with PD-L1 < 1% [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As a new hallmark of cancer, immune surveillance evading plays a critical role in carcinogenesis. Through modulating the immune checkpoints, immune cells in tumor microenvironment can be harnessed to battle cancer cells. In recent years, the administration of anti-CTLA or/and anti-PD-1/L1 antibody has exhibited unexpected antitumor effect in multiple types of cancer, motivating the researchers to find more potential immune checkpoints as clinical targets. A wealth of clinical trials have been done to evaluate the safety and efficacy of monotherapy or combination therapy with immune checkpoint modulators. However, there still exist problems such as low response rate and adverse events in the clinical, which in turn leads us to the basic study. The better understanding of the crosstalk between the immune cells and the cancer cells within the microenvironment may inspire us new ideas for cancer treatment. In this review, we mainly summarize the recent advances in application of immune checkpoint modulators and the combination rationales, and discuss the problems existing in the precision therapy with immune checkpoint modulators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the recent few years, significant efforts have been undertaken for the development of different immunotherapeutic approaches against cancer. In this context, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a novel class of immunotherapeutic drugs with the potential to unleash the immune system, have emerged as authentic game-changers for managing patients with various cancers, including gastrointestinal malignancies. Although the majority of gastrointestinal cancers are generally considered poorly immunogenic, basic research findings and data from clinical trials have proven that subset(s) of patients with various digestive tract cancers are highly responsive to ICI-based therapy. In this context, a better understanding on the role of various DNA repair pathway alterations, especially the evidence supporting the significant importance of DNA mismatch repair deficiencies and the efficacy of the anti-programmed cell death 1 drugs, have led to US Food and Drug Administration approval of 2 anti-programmed cell death 1 antibodies (pembrolizumab and nivolumab) for the treatment of patients with microsatellite instability. This review aims to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date summary for the role of DNA mismatch repair deficiency in cancer, and its importance in the development of ICI therapy. In addition, we provide insights into the spectrum of various genetic alterations underlying ICI resistance, together with the important influence that the tumor microenvironment plays in mediating the therapeutic response to this new class of drugs. Finally, we provide a comprehensive yet succinct glimpse into the most exciting preclinical discoveries and ongoing clinical trials in the field, highlighting bench-to-beside translational impact of this exciting area of research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evidence suggests that the human gut microbiota modulates the treatment response of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in cancer. Thus, finding predictive biomarkers in the fecal gut microbiota of patients who are less likely to respond to ICI would be valuable. This systematic review aimed to investigate the association between fecal gut microbiota composition and ICI-treatment response in patients with cancer. EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases were searched using the "Participants, Interventions, Comparisons, and Outcomes" (PICO) process to locate studies including participants with solid cancers treated with ICI intervention. The comparator was the gut microbiota, and the outcomes were oncological outcomes such as response rates and progression-free survival. Study data were synthesized qualitatively in a systematic narrative synthesis, and the risk of bias in the studies was assessed. Two reviewers screened 2092 abstracts independently, and 140 studies were read as full-text reports and assessed for eligibility. Eighteen studies were included with 775 patients with different types of solid cancers who received anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, or anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Distinct patterns were observed in the patients' fecal samples. Some bacterial species were reported to be present in responders and non-responders, while others were present only in one group. The most reported species associated with better prognosis were Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Streptococcus parasanguinis, Bacteroides caccae , and Prevotella copri. In contrast, the most reported species associated with poor prognosis were Blautia obeum and Bacteroides ovatus. Distinct microbiota features were associated with good and poor prognoses in ICI-treated patients with cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Use of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 and programmed cell death protein 1 have led to improved survival outcomes for advanced solid-tumor malignancies. This report helps the reader gain a better understanding of adverse events in patients with ovarian cancer on checkpoint inhibitor therapy. We describe 3 hypothetical case vignettes of patients with gynecologic cancer on checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy and discuss common immune-related adverse events. The typical presentation and onset of immune-related events are different from those associated with conventional chemotherapy. This report highlights the importance of early recognition and management of these events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Immunotherapy and particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors have resulted in remarkable clinical responses in patients with immunogenic tumors, although most cancers develop resistance to immunotherapy. The molecular mechanisms of tumor resistance to immunotherapy remain poorly understood. We now show that induction of the histone methyltransferase Ezh2 controls several tumor cell-intrinsic and extrinsic resistance mechanisms. Notably, T cell infiltration selectively correlated with high EZH2-PRC2 complex activity in human skin cutaneous melanoma. During anti-CTLA-4 or IL-2 immunotherapy in mice, intratumoral tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) production and T cell accumulation resulted in increased Ezh2 expression in melanoma cells, which in turn silenced their own immunogenicity and antigen presentation. Ezh2 inactivation reversed this resistance and synergized with anti-CTLA-4 and IL-2 immunotherapy to suppress melanoma growth. These anti-tumor effects depended on intratumorally accumulating interferon-γ (IFN-γ)-producing PD-1 low CD8 + T cells and PD-L1 downregulation on melanoma cells. Hence, Ezh2 serves as a molecular switch controlling melanoma escape during T cell-targeting immunotherapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, there has been dramatic expansion of the treatment armamentarium for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC), including drugs targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways. Despite these advances, patient outcomes remain suboptimal, underscoring the need for therapeutic interventions with novel mechanisms of action. The advent of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has led to significant changes in the treatment landscape for several solid malignancies. Specifically, drugs targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen (CTLA-4) pathways have demonstrated considerable clinical efficacy and gained regulatory approval as single-agent or combination therapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, aRCC, advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, urothelial cancer and Hodgkin lymphoma. In aRCC, the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab was approved in both the United States and Europe for the treatment of patients who have received prior therapy, based on improved overall survival compared with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus. Other checkpoint inhibitors, including the CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab in combination with several agents and the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab, are in various stages of clinical development in patients with aRCC. In this review, current evidence related to the clinical use of checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of patients with aRCC is discussed, including information on the frequency and management of unconventional responses and the management of immune-related adverse events. In addition, perspectives on the future use of checkpoint inhibitors are discussed, including the potential value of treatment beyond progression, the potential use in earlier lines of care or in combination with other agents, and the identification of biomarkers to guide patient selection and enable individualization of therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) has greatly improved survival for patients with advanced melanoma in recent years. Anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD1 antibodies have been approved following large Phase III trials. Immunerelated neurological toxicity of varying severity has been reported in the literature. The cumulative incidence of neurotoxicity among ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab is reported as<1% in published clinical trials. We aimed to identify the incidence of neurotoxicity in our institution across anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies, including the combination of ipilimumab with nivolumab. We also review the existing literature and propose an investigation and management algorithm. Methods: All patients with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab or the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi + nivo), managed at the Royal Marsden Hospital between September 2010 and December 2015, including patients on (published) clinical trials were included. Medical records for each patient were reviewed and information on neurotoxicity recorded. A systematic search strategy was performed to collate existing reports of neurological toxicity. Results: In total, 413 immunotherapy treatment episodes in 352 patients were included, with median follow-up of 26.7 months. Ten cases of neurotoxicity were recorded, affecting 2.8% of patients overall, ranging from grade 1 to 4, affecting both central and peripheral nervous systems. A rate of 14% was noted with ipi + nivo. Three of five patients commenced on corticosteroids responded to these. Six patients had made a full recovery at the time of reporting. A favorable radiological response was found in 7 of the 10 cases. Unusual presentations are described in detail. Conclusions: Neurological toxicity is not uncommon, and may be more frequent in patients treated with combination ipi + nivo. Patterns of presentation and response to treatment are varied. A prompt and considered approach is required to optimize outcomes in this group of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Checkpoint blockade, prevention of inhibitory signaling that limits activation or function of tumor antigen-specific T cells responses, is revolutionizing the treatment of many poor prognosis malignancies. Indeed monoclonal antibodies that modulate signaling through the inhibitory molecules CTLA-4 and PD-1 are now clinically available; however, many tumors, demonstrate minimal response suggesting the need for combinations with other therapeutic strategies. Because an inadequate frequency of activated tumor antigen-specific T cells in the tumor environment, the so-called non-inflamed phenotype, is observed in some malignancies, other rationale partners are modalities that lead to enhanced T cell activation (vaccines, cytokines, toll-like receptor agonists, and other anticancer therapies such as chemo-, radio- or targeted therapies that lead to release of antigen from tumors). This review will focus on preclinical and clinical data supporting the use of cancer vaccines with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. Preliminary preclinical data demonstrate enhanced antitumor activity although the results in human studies are less clear. Broader combinations of multiple immune modulators are now under study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immunomodulatory antibodies influence the direction and magnitude of immune responses against cancer. Significant efficacy has been demonstrated across multiple solid tumour types within clinical trials. Recent preclinical studies indicate that successful outcome relies upon mechanistic activity extending beyond simple receptor stimulation or blockade. In addition to blocking co-inhibitory signals in secondary lymphoid organs, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)-4 antibodies mediate depletion of tumour-infiltrating regulatory T cells by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). This mechanism appears to be common to other immunomodulatory antibodies including those targeting OX40 and glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related protein (GITR). If verified in the human setting, these findings have significant implications for antibody design, biomarker discovery, and the development of synergistic combinatorial therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Current developments in systemic therapies for melanoma are spectacular. Over the last 40years no one drug or combination of drugs demonstrated any impact on survival in metastatic melanoma. In contrast, in 2011 a number of new drugs will be approved. In 2011 immunomodulation with ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the ligand CTLA-4, has been approved for patients with advanced melanoma in first- and second-line treatment by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and in second-line treatment by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Also in 2011, a significant survival benefit of the combination of ipilimumab with dacarbazine compared with dacarbazine alone for first-line treatment was reported. Other monoclonal antibodies targeting T-cell ligands, such as programmed death-1 (PD-1), also show promise. Various inhibitors of v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homologue B1 (BRAF) yield high response rates in patients harbouring the BRAF-V600E mutation. A significant impact on both progression-free and overall survival was demonstrated for vemurafenib compared with dacarbazine in a phase-III trial. Approval is expected in 2011. Both drugs had only modest effects of 2–3months on median survival, so combination therapies must be explored. BRAF inhibitors in combination with mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitors show great potential. Moreover, combinations of immunomodulators and pathway inhibitors are expected to be very active, and phase-III trials are planned. Pegylated interferon-α2b was approved in 2011 on the basis of the results of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 18991 phase-III trial demonstrating a sustained impact on relapse-free survival in patients with lymph-node-positive melanoma. The efficacy of adjuvant therapy with ipilimumab is assessed in the now fully accrued EORTC18071 trial. Adjuvant trials with BRAF and MEK inhibitors are in the planning phase. Never was there a more exciting period in the world of melanoma treatment. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We concurrently examine the whole genome, transcriptome, methylome, and immune cell infiltrates in baseline tumors from 77 patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 with or without anti-CTLA-4. We show that high tumor mutation burden (TMB), neoantigen load, expression of IFNγ-related genes, programmed death ligand expression, low PSMB8 methylation (therefore high expression), and T cells in the tumor microenvironment are associated with response to immunotherapy. No specific mutation correlates with therapy response. A multivariable model combining the TMB and IFNγ-related gene expression robustly predicts response (89% sensitivity, 53% specificity, area under the curve [AUC], 0.84); tumors with high TMB and a high IFNγ signature show the best response to immunotherapy. This model validates in an independent cohort (80% sensitivity, 59% specificity, AUC, 0.79). Except for a JAK3 loss-of-function mutation, for patients who did not respond as predicted there is no obvious biological mechanism that clearly explained their outlier status, consistent with intratumor and intertumor heterogeneity in response to immunotherapy. [Display omitted] • Multiomic analysis predicts response but not resistance to immunotherapy • Nonresponders had no common mechanisms of resistance • Structural rearrangements and PSMB8 promoter methylation occurred in nonresponders • JAK3 mutation was a possible resistance mechanism in a patient predicted to respond Newell et al. used clinical features and multiomic analysis (WGS, RNAseq, immunohistochemistry, methylation) to show that IFNγ plus TMB most accurately predicted response to immunotherapy, but not resistance. No common mechanism of resistance was identified in keeping with tumor heterogeneity, and patients with clinical and molecular discordance were analyzed individually. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Immunotherapy for HCC is in its infancy compared to other malignant tumors. • Single agent ICIs failed to improve survival benefit of HCC patients. • Combination of immunotherapies with standard therapies would exert a higher effect for the treatment of HCC. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and fatal malignancies with an alarming trend all around the world. Common therapeutic approaches in the early stage of disease are surgical resection, ablation, and liver transplantation. Due to the insidious identity of HCC, the majority of the patients are diagnosed at advanced stages, where tumor spreading, or distant metastasis unfortunately have already occurred. Immunotherapeutic options have elicited a promising approach in some malignancies with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approving the first checkpoint inhibitor anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) ipilimumab for the treatment of melanoma ten years ago. In the past decade, many clinical trials have been investigating anti-CTLA-4 as well as anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapies in various solid tumors, including HCC. In this mini-review we will discuss the latest clinical data from clinical trials for immune-checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: In this study, we demonstrate that an effective immune response against prostate tumors in mouse tumor model can be elicited using a strategy that combines CTLA-4 blockade and pSLC-3P-Fc-modified tumor cell vaccine (named B16F10-SLC-3P-Fc). Treatment of B16F10-3P-bearing mice resulted in a significant reduction in tumor incidence as assessed 2 months after treatment. In vivo Ab depletion confirmed that the antitumor effect was primarily CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T lymphocytes were required for the induction of CD8+ CTL response in B16F10-SLC-3P-Fc+anti-CTLA-4 mAb-immunized mice. Moreover, mice that were cured of an established tumor were protected against a rechallenge with the same tumor for at least 4 months, suggesting the generation of memory responses. Adoptive transfer experiments further indicate that antitumor reactivity can be transferred to naïve mice by splenocytes. These findings demonstrate that this combinatorial treatment can elicit a potent anti-tumor immune response and suggest potential of this approach for treatment of prostate cancer. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Preclinical and clinical investigations currently underway are employing novel strategies for combining vaccines with conventional and experimental anticancer therapies. To date, the FDA has not approved a therapeutic cancer vaccine. However, the results of recent investigations suggest an increasing role for vaccines in new models of combination therapy for many types of cancer. This article reviews and discusses therapeutic cancer strategies that employ vaccines in combination with local radiation, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and anti-CTLA-4 mAb. Preclinical studies have shown that certain anticancer agents have immune modulatory effects that result in up-regulation of surface expression of MHC molecules, tumor-associated antigens, or Fas on malignant cells, rendering them more susceptible to immune destruction. Preliminary results of clinical studies using combination strategies have demonstrated a postvaccination antigen cascade, prolonged time to disease progression, and improved overall survival. Several larger randomized trials are ongoing, and more are required to support these findings. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Rationally sequencing and combining PD-1/L1-and MAPK-targeted therapies may overcome innate and acquired resistance. Since increased clinical benefit of MAPK inhibitors (MAPKi) is associated with previous immune checkpoint therapy, we compare the efficacies of sequential and/or combinatorial regimens in subcutaneous murine models of melanoma driven by Braf V600, Nras , or Nf1 mutations as well as colorectal and pancreatic carcinoma driven by Kras G12C. Anti-PD-1/L1 lead-in preceding MAPKi combination optimizes response durability by promoting pro-inflammatory polarization of macrophages and clonal expansion of interferon-γhi, and CD8+ cytotoxic and proliferative (versus CD4+ regulatory) T cells that highly express activation genes. Since therapeutic resistance of melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) limits patient survival, we demonstrate that sequencing anti-PD-1/L1 therapy before MAPKi combination suppresses MBM and improves mouse survival with robust T cell clonal expansion in both intracranial and extracranial metastatic sites. We propose clinically testing brief anti-PD-1/L1 (± anti-CTLA-4) dosing before MAPKi co-treatment to suppress therapeutic resistance. [Display omitted] • Prior ICT is associated with longer PFS of melanoma patients treated with MAPKi • Anti-PD-1/L1 before MAPKi combination prolongs durability of tumor regression • Targeting M2-TAMs augments and CD8+ T cells abolishes priming-associated benefit • Anti-PD1/L1 plus anti-CTLA-4 priming may further control melanoma brain metastasis Wang et al. couple in vivo preclinical therapeutic testing with temporal single-immune cell and T cell clonotype analysis to identify a sequential-combinatorial regimen and cellular effectors associated with the most durable control of tumor growth and brain metastasis. Initiating immune checkpoint therapy briefly before adding MAPK-targeted therapy may improve patient survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We analyze the transcriptome of baseline and on-therapy tumor biopsies from 101 patients with advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab (anti-PD-1) alone or combined with ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4). We find that T cell infiltration and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) signaling signatures correspond most highly with clinical response to therapy, with a reciprocal decrease in cell-cycle and WNT signaling pathways in responding biopsies. We model the interaction in 58 human cell lines, where IFN-γ in vitro exposure leads to a conserved transcriptome response unless cells have IFN-γ receptor alterations. This conserved IFN-γ transcriptome response in melanoma cells serves to amplify the antitumor immune response. Therefore, the magnitude of the antitumor T cell response and the corresponding downstream IFN-γ signaling are the main drivers of clinical response or resistance to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. • T cell-induced IFN-γ correlates the best to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy • Immune signatures increase in on-therapy patients regardless of response to therapy • ICB therapy decreases MYC and WNT signaling in patients with clinical response • IFN-γ exposure of melanoma cells leads to a conserved transcriptome signature Analyzing the transcriptome of biopsies of patients during immune checkpoint blockade therapy, Grasso et al. show that the increase of T cell infiltration and the downstream IFN-γ signaling drive clinical responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Bone sarcomas are a collection of sporadic malignancies of mesenchymal origin. The most common subtypes include osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and chordoma. Despite the use of aggressive treatment protocols consisting of extensive surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, outcomes have not significantly improved over the past few decades for osteosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma patients. In addition, chondrosarcoma and chordoma are resistant to both chemotherapy and radiation therapy. There is, therefore, an urgent need to elucidate which novel new therapies may affect bone sarcomas. Emerging checkpoint inhibitors have generated considerable attention for their clinical success in a variety of human cancers, which has led to works assessing their potential in bone sarcoma management. Here, we review the recent advances of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 blockade as well as other promising new immune checkpoint targets for their use in bone sarcoma therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

After decades of phase III trials failing to demonstrate an impact on survival of various drugs in metastatic melanoma there are finally significant advances in systemic therapies for melanoma emerging. Novel ways to modulate the immune system by monoclonal antibodies as well as various signalling pathway inhibitors are responsible for creating a whole new therapeutic landscape. For the first time it is likely that a number of new drugs with completely different mechanisms of action will be approved in the near future. The imminent candidates are the anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab, and the highly selective BRAF inhibitor PLX4032. But in each class other molecules are under development with good perspectives. Various new combinations will have to be explored and it is reasonable to expect synergies between the different classes of drugs as well as between novel molecules within the same class of drugs. Here, an overview of current developments and the most important new drugs under consideration is provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immunotherapy of metastatic melanoma consists of various approaches leading to specific or non-specific immunomodulation. The use of FDA-approved interleukin (IL)-2 alone, in combination with interferon α, and/or with various chemotherapeutic agents (biochemotherapy) is associated with significant toxicity and poor efficacy that does not improve overall survival of 96% of patients. Many studies with allogeneic and autologous vaccines have demonstrated no clinical benefit, and some randomised trials even showed a detrimental effect in the vaccine arm. The ongoing effort to develop melanoma vaccines based on dendritic cells and peptides is driven by advances in understanding antigen presentation and processing, and by new techniques of vaccine preparation, stabilisation and delivery. Several agents that have shown promising activity in metastatic melanoma including IL-21 and monoclonal antibodies targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4) or CD137 are discussed. Recent advances of intratumour gene transfer technologies and adoptive immunotherapy, which represents a promising although technically challenging direction, are also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Abstract: Novel strategies are emerging from preclinical and clinical investigations for combining vaccines with conventional and experimental anticancer therapies. Several lines of research show that combining either radiation or certain chemotherapeutic agents with vaccine can alter the phenotype of tumor cells, rendering them more susceptible to T cell-mediated killing. Furthermore, there is emerging data suggesting that an immune response elicited by vaccine may augment the antitumor effectiveness of subsequent therapies. This article reviews and discusses therapeutic cancer strategies that employ vaccines sequentially or in combination with conventional cytotoxic therapies such as local radiation, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy, or immunopotentiating therapies such as anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies. Preliminary results of clinical studies using these combination strategies have demonstrated a postvaccination antigen cascade, prolonged time to disease progression, and preliminary evidence of improved overall survival. Large randomized studies are currently underway to further investigate these findings. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]