Search

Purpose: To evaluate and compare central corneal thickness measurements using rotating Scheimpflug camera, scanning-slit topography, and ultrasound pachymetry in virgin, healthy corneas. Design: Prospective, observational, cross-sectional study. Methods: Central corneal thickness in 157 healthy eyes of 157 patients without ocular abnormalities other than refractive errors was measured, in a sequential order, once with rotating Scheimpflug camera and scanning-slit topography and 3 times with ultrasound pachymetry as the last part of examination. All measurements were performed by a single experienced examiner. The results from scanning-slit topography are given with and without correction for “acoustic correction factor” of 0.92. Results: The average measurements of central corneal thickness by rotating Scheimpflug imaging, scanning-slit pachymetry, and ultrasound were 537.15 ± 32.98 μm, 542.06 ± 39.04 μm, and 544.07 ± 34.75 μm, respectively. The mean differences between modalities were 6.92 μm between rotating Scheimpflug and ultrasound (P < .0001), 2.01 μm between corrected scanning-slit and ultrasound (P = .204), and 4.91 μm between corrected scanning-slit and rotating Scheimpflug imaging (P = .001). According to Bland-Altman analysis, highest agreement was between ultrasonic and rotating Scheimpflug pachymetry. Conclusions: In the assessment of normal corneas, rotating Scheimpflug topography measures central corneal thickness values with higher agreement to ultrasound pachymetry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Silent sinus syndrome (SSS) is a quite rare clinical entity characterized by unilateral enophthalmos and hypoglobus secondary to thinning and inward bowing of the maxillary sinus roof in the absence of signs or symptoms of intrinsic sinonasal inflammatory disease. We present a case of a 16-year-old female with a 10-month history of facial asymmetry due to swelling of the left cheek and ptosis of the left eye with no other symptoms. Computed tomography scans and Water’s x-ray revealed an opacified left maxillary antrum with characteristic features of SSS. The patient underwent surgery and a thick maxillary sinus mucocele was found and enucleated successfully during the operation. Six-month and 2-year follow-ups after surgical treatment revealed satisfactory results and there was no need for reconstruction of the orbital floor. Although patients with SSS often initially present to ophthalmologists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and radiologists should be familiar with this phenomenon since most of these patients will be referred to dental hospitals for further treatment. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To compare the efficiency and safety of two bandage contact lenses after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).Methods: In this double-blind study, 45 patients (90 eyes) received PRK in both eyes and wore bandage contact lenses (BCLs), PureVision (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA) in one eye and PureVision2 (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA) in the other eye, randomly assigned. The medication regimen after surgery was the same for both eyes. The epithelial defect's size, conjunctival hyperemia and lens centration were graded objectively using slit-lamp biomicroscopy on days 1, 3 and 5 after surgery. Also ocular symptoms of discomfort including tearing, photophobia, foreign body sensation and visual fluctuations were assessed subjectively at each visit.Results: The mean epithelial defect size on the first day after operation was similar in eyes fitted with PureVision (30.08 ± 5.30 mm²) and PureVision2 (30.25 ± 5.72 mm2) lenses. (p = 0.79) Contact lens deposits and bulbar hyperaemia on days 1 and 3 after PRK were similar between the two eyes, but were significantly greater on day 5 for PureVision2 lenses. (p = 0.02; p = 0.04 respectively) There was no difference in contact lens decentration, and discomfort symptoms including pain, tearing, foreign body sensation, photophobia and visual fluctuations between the eyes fitted with PureVision and PureVision2. (p > 0.05) CONCLUSIONS: PureVision and PureVision2 contact lenses are equivalent as bandage lenses in important aspects such as corneal re-epithelialization and subjective comfort., although PureVision2 led to a higher incidence of contact lens deposits and conjunctival hyperemia early post-PRK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Aim: To determine the efficacy of corneal thickness parameters and corneal biomechanical properties (CBPs) in discriminating between normal and keratoconus eyes. Method: After performing a comprehensive ophthalmic examination, 50 mild to moderate keratoconus and 50 age and sex matched myopic astigmatism eyes were prospectively included in the study. The corneal topographic maps and CBP were obtained by Pentacam and Ocular response analyser, respectively. Central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), corneal thickness (CT) and percentage thickness increase (PTI) at 1, 3 and 5mm from the thinnest point and corneal volume (CV) at 3, 5, 7 and 10 centred on thinnest point, corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were recorded. Independent t-test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were done with SPSS software (version 15.0, SPSS, Inc.). Results: CCT, TCT, CT at 1, 3 and 5, CV at 3, 5, 7 and 10mm, CH and CRF were significantly lower in keratoconus eyes compared to controls (p <0.001). In addition, PTI at 1, 3 and 5mm from the thinnest point showed significantly higher values in keratoconus group. ROC analysis demonstrated good predictive accuracy for cut-off point values. However, the centrally located indices had higher predictive accuracy compared to the peripherally located indices. Conclusion: Although good sensitivity and specificity were found for the mentioned parameters, the centrally located indices had higher predictive accuracy compared to peripherally located indices. It is suggested to use a combination of corneal pachymetry together with CBP for more accurate detection of keratoconus. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]