Search

Abstract: Background: Management of point-of-care testing (POCT) continues to present challenges. The use of site inspections by POCT coordinators has been a mainstay for maintaining regulatory compliance in POCT although this process is labor intensive. Improvements in device design and the use of POCT data management systems have improved the ability of hospitals to manage POCT programs. Given these developments, using regular site inspections to ensure regulatory compliance of POCT may be less relevant than in the past. Methods: We implemented an expanded POCT site inspection checklist modeled after the requirements of the Joint Commission. The checklist included categories not specifically related to POCT such as the environment of care and safety. Results: The average number of deficiencies per site in 2011 was 2.37 (range 0–10) out of a possible 42. Only 18% of site inspections produced no citations. In contrast in 2010 the average number of deficiencies per site was 3.17 (out of a possible 32) and only 8.7% of sites had no citations. The difference in the number of deficiencies per site was significant (t-test two tailed p=0.04). The most frequently cited deficiencies (24.2%) related to safety followed by maintenance of proper procedures and documentation of competency assessment. Conclusions: Despite improvements in many POCT devices and data management systems, regular site inspections are still required to identify regulatory deficiencies and improve testing quality. The use of an expanded site inspection checklist will identify many areas for improvement that are not specifically related to POCT alone. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

A review of the literature and analysis of the National Inpatient Sample Database was performed to describe the trends in vaginal birth after cesarean availability in the United States and the factors associated with changing use. Vaginal birth after cesarean increased after the first National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference on Cesarean Childbirth in 1981. It increased from 3% to a maximum rate of 28.3% in 1996. Despite studies reporting stable success rates of approximately 70% and low complication rates (<1%), concerns about patient safety and physician liability have led to more restrictive policies and a decrease in vaginal birth after cesarean use. The current rate is approximately 8.5%, and decreased rates have been noted for all age and ethnic groups. There is decreased use of vaginal birth after cesarean as the result of concerns about patient safety and physician liability, which has resulted in decreased availability. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Introduction: The Content of Prenatal Care report of the US Preventative Health Service (USPHS) Expert Panel established an important benchmark when published in 1989, but has not been significantly updated since that time. Methods: The literature since 1989 is reviewed to assess which recommendations have been validated and/or implemented. Additionally, new findings that support the recommendations put forth or expand the scope of prenatal care outlined in the 1989 report are examined and discussed. Results: The USPHS recommendation of a reduced prenatal visit schedule has support, and new content for the preconception visit has been identified, although this preconception visit has not been validated or widely implemented. Conclusions: We identified new opportunities and initiatives for the content of prenatal care, particularly improvement in the electronic medical record, attention to multidisciplinary approaches to patient education and improved patient literacy, and an extended maternal life span approach, including postgestation visits. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: The California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative (CPQCC) was formed to seek perinatal care improvements by creating a confidential multi-institutional database to identify topics for quality improvement (QI). We aimed to evaluate this approach by assessing antenatal steroid administration before preterm (24 to 33 weeks of gestation) delivery. We hypothesized that mean performance would improve and the number of centers performing below the lowest quartile of the baseline year would decrease. Study design: In 1998, a statewide QI cycle targeting antenatal steroid use was announced, calling for the evaluation of the 1998 baseline data, dissemination of recommended interventions using member-developed educational materials, and presentations to California neonatologists in 1999–2000. Postintervention data were assessed for the year 2001 and publicly released in 2003. A total of 25 centers voluntarily participated in the intervention. Results: Antenatal steroid administration rate increased from 76% of 1524 infants in 1998 to 86% of 1475 infants in 2001 (P < .001). In 2001, 23 of 25 hospitals exceeded the 1998 lower-quartile cutoff point of 69.3%. Conclusions: Regional collaborations represent an effective strategy for improving the quality of perinatal care. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Proposes a general model whereby up to 10 levels of signaling by G-protein-coupled receptors can be present based on the influences of desensitization and genetic variation on coupling. Expression of four receptors in Chinese hamster fibroblasts at equivalent levels; Relative effects of genetic modifications and those of short term agonist-promoted desensitization on receptor function.

Universal access to contraception benefits society: unintended pregnancies, maternal mortality, preterm birth, abortions, and obesity would be reduced by increasing access to affordable contraception. Women should be able to choose when and whether to use contraception, choose which method to use, and have ready access to their chosen method. State and national government should support unrestricted access to all contraceptives. As obstetrician-gynecologists, we have a critical mandate, based on principle and mission, to step up with leadership on this vital medical and public health issue, to improve the lives of women, their families, and society. The field of Obstetrics and Gynecology must provide the leadership for moving forward. The American Gynecological and Obstetrical Society (AGOS), representing academic and public policy leaders from across all disciplines of Obstetrics and Gynecology, is well positioned to serve as a unifying organization, focused on developing a strong unified advocacy voice to fight for accessible contraception for all in the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Under value-based payment programs, patient-reported experiences and outcomes can impact hospital and physician revenue. To enable obstetrical providers to improve the childbirth experience, a framework for understanding what women expect and desire during childbirth is needed.Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify key predictors of childbirth hospital satisfaction with the use of the Childbirth Experiences Survey.Study Design: This study builds on a larger effort that used Patient-Reported Outcomes Management Information System methods to develop a childbirth-specific preliminary patient-reported experiences and outcomes item bank. These efforts led to the development of an antepartum and postpartum survey (Childbirth Experiences Survey Parts 1 and 2). All phases of the study were conducted with the participation of a community-based research team. We conducted a prospective observational study using national survey response panels that was organized through Nielsen to identify women's antepartum values and preferences for childbirth (Childbirth Experiences Survey Part 1). Eligible participants were pregnant women in the United States (English or Spanish speaking) who were ≥18 years old and ≥20 weeks pregnant. Women were recontacted and invited to participate in a postpartum follow-up survey to collect information about their childbirth patient-reported experiences and outcomes, which included childbirth satisfaction (Childbirth Experiences Survey Part 2). In bivariate analyses, we tested whether predisposing conditions (eg, patient characteristics or previous experiences), values and preferences, patient-reported experiences and outcomes, and the "gaps" between values and preferences and patient-reported experiences and outcomes were predictors of women's satisfaction with hospital childbirth services. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to examine the simultaneous effect of predictors on hospital satisfaction, which were adjusted for key predisposing conditions.Results: From 500 women who anticipated a vaginal delivery at the time of the antepartum survey, who labored before delivery, and who answered the postpartum survey, key findings included the following responses: (1) the strongest predictors of women's satisfaction with hospital childbirth services were items in the domains of staff communication, compassion, empathy, and respect, and (2) 23 childbirth-specific patient-reported experiences and outcomes were identified. Examples of these patient-reported experiences and outcomes (such as being told about progress in labor and being involved in decisions regarding labor pain management) appeared especially relevant to women who experienced childbirth. A final model that predicted women's satisfaction with hospital childbirth services included a total of 8 items that could be optimized by doctors, midwives, and hospitals. These included the patient's report of how well she coped with labor pain, whether the hospital provided adequate space and food for their support person, and whether she received practical support for feeding the newborn infant.Conclusion: This study identified 23 childbirth-specific patient-reported experiences and outcomes that were predictors of childbirth hospital satisfaction. The implementation of the Childbirth Experiences Survey Parts 1 and 2 in a multihospital setting may lead to the development of childbirth hospital performance measures and strategies for improvement of the childbirth experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Providers perceive current obstetric quality measures as imperfect and insufficient. Our organizations convened a "Quality Measures in High-Risk Pregnancies Workshop." The goals were to (1) review the current landscape regarding quality measures in obstetric conditions with increased risk for adverse maternal or fetal outcomes, (2) evaluate the available evidence for management of common obstetric conditions to identify those that may drive the highest impact on outcomes, quality, and value, (3) propose measures for high-risk obstetric conditions that reflect enhanced quality and efficiency, and (4) identify current research gaps, improve methods of data collection, and recommend means of change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heath care measurement and evaluation is an integral piece of the health care system. The creation and assessment of care performance metrics are important and relevant for the obstetric community including both clinicians and patients. Careful deliberation is required to create a measurement system that results in optimal care for women and families. This article reviews the current approaches to measuring quality in obstetrics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of the study was to describe the resources and activities associated with childbirth services. Study Design: We adapted models for assessing the quality of healthcare to generate a conceptual framework hypothesizing that childbirth hospital resources and activities contributed to maternal and neonatal outcomes. We used this framework to guide development of a survey, which we administered by telephone to hospital labor and delivery nurse managers in California. We describe the findings by hospital type (ie, integrated delivery system [IDS], teaching, and other [community] hospitals). Results: Of 248 nonmilitary childbirth hospitals in California, 239 (96%)responded; 187 community, 27 teaching, and 25 IDS hospitals reported. The context of services varied across hospital types, with community hospitals more likely to have for-profit ownership, be in a rural or isolated location, and have fewer annual deliveries per hospital. Results included the findings of the following: (1) 24 hour anesthesia availability in 50% of community vs 100% of IDS and teaching hospitals (P < .001); (2) 24 hour in-house labor and delivery physician coverage in 5% of community vs 100% of IDS and 48% of teaching hospitals (P < .001); (3) 24 hour blood bank availability in 88% of community vs 96% of IDS and 100% of teaching hospitals (P = .092); (4) adult subspecialty intensive care unit availability in 33% of community vs 36% of IDS and 82% of teaching hospitals (P < .001); (5) ability to perform emergency cesarean delivery in 30 minutes 100% of the time in 56% of community vs 100% of IDS and 85% of teaching hospitals (P < .001); (6) pediatric care available both day and night in 54% of community vs 63% of IDS vs 76% of teaching hospitals (P = .087); and (7) no neonatal intensive care unit in 44% of community vs 12% of IDS and 4% of teaching hospitals (P < .001). Conclusion: Childbirth services varied widely across California hospitals. Cognizance of this variation and linkage of these data to childbirth outcomes should assist in the identification of key resources and activities that optimize the hospital environment for pregnant women and set the groundwork for identifying criteria for the provision of maternal risk-appropriate care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We sought to determine the impact of the laborist staffing model on cesarean rates and maternal morbidity in California community hospitals.Study Design: This is a cross-sectional study comparing cesarean rates, vaginal birth after cesarean rates, composite maternal morbidity, and severe maternal morbidity for laboring women in California community hospitals with and without laborists. We conducted interviews with nurse managers to obtain data regarding hospital policies, practices, and the presence of laborists, and linked this information with patient-level hospital discharge data for all deliveries in 2012.Results: Of 248 childbirth hospitals, 239 (96.4%) participated; 182 community hospitals were studied, and these hospitals provided 221,247 deliveries for analysis. Hospitals with laborists (n = 43, 23.6%) were busier, had more clinical resources, and cared for higher-risk patients. There was no difference in the unadjusted primary cesarean rate for laborist vs nonlaborist hospitals (11.3% vs 11.7%; P = .382) but there was a higher maternal composite morbidity rate (14.4% vs 12.0%; P = .0006). After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, there were no differences in laborist vs nonlaborist hospitals for any of the specified outcomes. Hospitals with laborists had higher attempted trial of labor after cesarean rates, and lower repeat cesarean rates (90.9% vs 95.9%; P < .0001). However, among women attempting trial of labor after cesarean, there was no difference in the vaginal birth after cesarean success rate.Conclusion: We were unable to demonstrate differences in cesarean and maternal childbirth complication rates in community hospitals with and without laborists. Further efforts are needed to understand how the laborist staffing model contributes to neonatal outcomes, cost and efficiency of care, and patient and physician satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Measures of maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity have risen in the United States, sparking national interest regarding hospitals' ability to provide maternal risk-appropriate care. We examined the extent to which hospitals could be classified by increasingly sophisticated maternal levels of care. Study Design: We performed a cross-sectional survey to identify hospital-specific resources and classify hospitals by criteria for basic, intermediate, and regional maternal levels of care in all nonmilitary childbirth hospitals in California. We measured hospital compliance with maternal level of care criteria that were produced via consensus based on professional standards at 2 regional summits funded by the March of Dimes through a cooperative agreement with the Community Perinatal Network in 2007 (California Perinatal Summit on Risk-Appropriate Care). Results: The response rate was 96% (239 of 248 hospitals). Only 82 hospitals (34%) were classifiable under these criteria (35 basic, 42 intermediate, and 5 regional) because most (157 [66%]) did not meet the required set of basic criteria. The unmet criteria preventing assignment into the basic category included the ability to perform a cesarean delivery within 30 minutes 100% of the time (only 64% met), pediatrician availability day and night (only 56% met), and radiology department ultrasound capability within 12 hours (only 83% met). Only 29 of classified hospitals (35%) had a nursery or neonatal intensive care unit level that matched the maternal level of care, and for most remaining hospitals (52 of 53), the neonatal intensive care unit level was higher than the maternal care level. Conclusion: Childbirth services varied widely across California hospitals, and most hospitals did not fit easily into proposed levels. Cognizance of this existing variation is critical to determining the optimal configuration of services for basic, intermediate, and regional maternal levels of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background We evaluated the effectiveness of an expanded point-of-care (POCT) site inspection checklist over an extended 8-y period. Methods A retrospective review of site inspection deficiency reports in a large academic medical center from 2010 to 2017 (year to date). Results There was a significant decrease in the number of cited deficiencies per site/inspection from 2010 (3.17) to 2017 (0.27) ( p < 0.001). The percentage of sites without deficiencies steadily increased from 2010 (8.7%) to 2017 (80.7%) ( p < 0.001). The most common citation was documentation of competency assessment followed by results documentation and annual procedure review. Conclusions Regular inspections of sites performing POCT are necessary to maintain regulatory compliance. Over time significant improvements in compliance are achievable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a childbirth composite morbidity indicator for monitoring childbirth morbidity at hospital and regional levels in California. Study Design Study data were obtained from the 2005 linked maternal and neonatal discharge dataset for California hospitals. The study population was limited to laboring women with singleton, term (≥37 weeks' gestation), inborn, and live births. Women with and without pregnancy complications were stratified into high- and low-risk groups. The composite outcome was defined as any significant morbidity of the mother or newborn infant during the childbirth admission. Submeasures for maternal and neonatal composite morbidity and for severe maternal morbidity were examined with both aggregate and hospital-level analyses. Results Of 377,869 eligible deliveries, 120,218 (31.8%) were categorized as high risk and 257,651 (68.2%) were categorized as low risk. High-risk women had higher morbidity rates for all comparisons. The mean childbirth composite morbidity rate was 21% overall: 28% for high-risk women and 18% for low-risk women. For high- and low-risk strata, the rates of maternal complications were 18% and 13%, and the rates of severe maternal morbidity were 1.4% and 0.5%, respectively. There was substantial variation across hospitals for all measures. Conclusion The childbirth composite morbidity rate is designed to report childbirth complication rates that combine maternal and neonatal morbidity. This measure and its submeasures met the criteria for quality indicator evaluation as specified by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and can be used for benchmarking or for monitoring childbirth outcomes at regional levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Cesarean delivery rates are on the rise in many countries, including the United States. There is mounting evidence that cesarean delivery is associated with adverse reproductive outcomes in subsequent pregnancies. The purpose of this article is to review those outcomes in a well-defined cohort of pregnant women. Study Design: In a cohort of primigravid women from the Danish National Birth Cohort with known baseline exposure characteristics, we stratified women by method of first delivery, vaginal or cesarean, and evaluated for appearance of adverse reproductive events in subsequent pregnancies. Results: After adjusting for age, body mass index, alcohol, smoking, and socioeconomic status, women who underwent cesarean delivery at first birth were at increased risk in their subsequent pregnancy for anemia (odds ratio [OR], 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3–3.4), placental abruption (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.5–3.6), uterine rupture (OR, 268; 95% CI, 65.6–999), and hysterectomy (OR, 28.8; 95% CI, 3.1–263.8). Conclusion: Women who deliver their first baby with a cesarean are at increased risk of adverse reproductive outcomes in subsequent pregnancies and should be counseled accordingly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]