Search

To evaluate performances of the rapid multiplex PCR assay BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (FA-PP) for detection of bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes in sputum, endotracheal aspirate (ETA) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens. This prospective observational study was conducted in 11 French university hospitals (July to December 2018) and assessed performance of FA-PP by comparison with routine conventional methods. A total of 515 respiratory specimens were studied, including 58 sputa, 217 ETA and 240 BAL. The FA-PP detected at least one pathogen in 384 specimens, yielding an overall positivity rate of 74.6% (384/515). Of them, 353 (68.5%) specimens were positive for typical bacteria while eight atypical bacteria and 42 resistance genes were found. While identifying most bacterial pathogens isolated by culture (374/396, 94.4%), the FA-PP detected 294 additional species in 37.7% (194/515) of specimens. The FA-PP demonstrated positive percentage agreement and negative percentage agreement values of 94.4% (95% CI 91.7%–96.5%) and 96.0% (95% CI 95.5%–96.4%), respectively, when compared with culture. Of FA-PP false-negative results, 67.6% (46/68) corresponded to bacterial species not included in the panel. At the same semi-quantification level (in DNA copies/mL for FA-PP versus in CFU/mL for culture), the concordance rate was 43.4% (142/327) for culture-positive specimens with FA-PP reporting higher semi-quantification of ≥1 log 10 in 48.6% (159/327) of cases. Interestingly, 90.1% of detected bacteria with ≥106 DNA copies/mL grew significantly in culture. FA-PP is a simple and rapid molecular test that could complement routine conventional methods for improvement of diagnosis accuracy of pneumonia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• EE is associated with: 64% extra-ocular foci, 19% ICU management, 8% mortality. • EE is associated with: 49% final VA <20/400, 23% bulbar phthisis, 8% enucleation. • Initial VA, bacterial origin and vitrectomy are determinants of ocular outcomes. • We propose a management plan to improve diagnosis and medical management. To describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics of patients with endogenous endophthalmitis (EE), determine factors associated with outcome and propose a management plan for EE. Retrospective case series in two tertiary referral centers from 2010 to 2022. Sixty-four eyes of 53 patients were included. Bilateral involvement occurred for 11/53 patients (21%). Ocular symptoms were the only first manifestation of the disease in 36/53 (68%) of cases; signs of sepsis were evident in 17/53 (32%). Imaging tests detected at least one extraocular focus of infection in 34/53 patients (64%), with contrast-enhanced thoraco-abdominopelvic computed tomography showing relevant findings in 28/50 (56%) of cases. EE was microbiologically confirmed in 43/53 patients (81%); the organisms involved were: Gram-positive bacteria (19/53, 36%), Gram-negative bacteria (13/53, 25%) and Candida sp. (11/53, 21%). Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common bacteria (10/32, 31%). Blood cultures were positive in 28/53 patients (53%) and eye samples in 11/41 eyes (27%). All patients were treated with systemic antimicrobial therapy, 39/64 eyes (61%) received anti-infective intravitreal injection(s) and 17/64 eyes (27%) underwent vitrectomy. Four patients (8%) died due to uncontrolled systemic infection. Final visual acuity (VA) was < 20/400 in 28/57 eyes (49%) and ocular structural loss (bulbar phthisis or enucleation/evisceration) was reported in 18/64 eyes (28%). In multivariate analysis, initial VA was the only parameter associated with visual and/or structural loss of the eye (OR = 24.44 (4.33-228.09) and 5.44 (1.33-26.18) respectively). EE remains a severe infection with a poor ocular outcome. We propose a standard protocol to improve diagnosis and medical management. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mass indoor gatherings were banned in early 2020 to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2. We aimed to assess, under controlled conditions, whether infection rates among attendees at a large, indoor gathering event would be similar to those in non-attendees, given implementation of a comprehensive prevention strategy including antigen-screening within 3 days, medical mask wearing, and optimised ventilation.Methods: The non-inferiority, prospective, open-label, randomised, controlled SPRING trial was done on attendees at a live indoor concert held in the Accor Arena on May 29, 2021 in Paris, France. Participants, aged 18-45 years, recruited via a dedicated website, had no comorbidities, COVID-19 symptoms, or recent case contact, and had had a negative rapid antigen diagnostic test within 3 days before the concert. Participants were randomly allocated in a 2:1 ratio to the experimental group (attendees) or to the control group (non-attendees). The allocation sequence was computer-generated by means of permuted blocks of sizes three, six, or nine, with no stratification. The primary outcome measure was the number of patients who were SARS-CoV-2-positive by RT-PCR test on self-collected saliva 7 days post-gathering in the per-protocol population (non-inferiority margin <0·35%). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04872075.Findings: Between May 11 and 25, 2021, 18 845 individuals registered on the dedicated website, and 10 953 were randomly selected for a pre-enrolment on-site visit. Among 6968 who kept the appointment and were screened, 6678 participants were randomly assigned (4451 were assigned to be attendees and 2227 to be non-attendees; median age 28 years; 59% women); 88% (3917) of attendees and 87% (1947) of non-attendees complied with follow-up requirements. The day 7 RT-PCR was positive for eight of the 3917 attendees (observed incidence, 0·20%; 95% CI 0·09-0·40) and three of the 1947 non-attendees (0·15%; 0·03-0·45; absolute difference, 95% CI -0·26% to 0·28%), findings that met the non-inferiority criterion for the primary endpoint.Interpretation: Participation in a large, indoor, live gathering without physical distancing was not associated with increased SARS-CoV-2-transmission risk, provided a comprehensive preventive intervention was implemented.Funding: French Ministry of Health.Translation: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]