Search

Objectives: We compared the effects of triple-site versus dual-site biventricular stimulation in candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Background: Conventional biventricular stimulation with a single right ventricular (RV) and a single left ventricular (LV) lead is associated with persistence of cardiac dyssynchrony in up to 30% of patients. Methods: This multicenter, single-blind, crossover study enrolled 40 patients (mean age 70 ± 9 years) with moderate-to-severe heart failure despite optimal drug treatment, a mean LV ejection fraction of 26 ± 11%, and permanent atrial fibrillation requiring cardiac pacing for slow ventricular rate. A cardiac resynchronization therapy device connected to 1 RV and 2 LV leads, inserted in 2 separate coronary sinus tributaries, was successfully implanted in 34 patients. After 3 months of biventricular stimulation, the patients were randomly assigned to stimulation for 3 months with either 1 RV and 2 LV leads (3-V) or to conventional stimulation with 1 RV and 1 LV lead (2-V), then crossed over for 3 months to the alternate configuration. The primary study end point was quality of ventricular resynchronization (Z ratio). Secondary end points included reverse LV remodeling, quality of life, distance covered during 6-min hall walk, and procedure-related morbidity and mortality. Data from the 6- and 9-month visits were combined to compare end points associated with 2-V versus 3-V. Results: Data eligible for protocol-defined analyses were available in 26 patients. No significant difference in Z ratio, quality of life, and 6-min hall walk was observed between 2-V and 3-V. However, a significantly higher LV ejection fraction (27 ± 11% vs. 35 ± 11%; p = 0.001) and smaller LV end-systolic volume (157 ± 69 cm3 vs. 134 ± 75 cm3; p = 0.02) and diameter (57 ± 12 mm vs. 54 ± 10 mm; p = 0.02) were observed with 3-V than with 2-V. There was a single minor procedure-related complication. Conclusions: Cardiac resynchronization therapy with 1 RV and 2 LV leads was safe and associated with significantly more LV reverse remodeling than conventional biventricular stimulation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

This study evaluated a possible placebo effect by pacemaker implantation. The study design was a 3-month multicenter, double-blind, randomized cross-over study to compare the effects of atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing with an optimal AV delay to inactive pacing in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC). Quality of life and left ventricular (LV) outflow tract obstruction were evaluated after the first study period in 40 patients assigned to inactive pacing. Data were compared with the corresponding results among the 41 subjects assigned to a first study period of active pacing. During inactive pacing, there was a significant improvement in perceived chest pain, dyspnea, and palpitations. Moreover, LV outflow tract gradient decreased from 71 +/- 32 mm Hg to 52 +/- 34 mm Hg (p = 0.04). In patients assigned to active pacing the reduction of the gradient was significantly more pronounced (70 +/- 24 mm Hg to 33 +/- 27 mm Hg; p <0.0001). The difference in gradient reduction between the groups was highly significant (p <0.00001). In the group assigned to active pacing there was also significant improvement in perceived symptoms as well as in alertness, the ability to be self-autonomous, and strenuous physical exercise. The improvements in the latter were significantly greater in those paced actively compared with patients paced inactively, whereas the changes in perceived symptoms did not differ between groups. In conclusion, pacemaker implantation had a placebo effect on objective and subjective parameters in this group of patients with obstructive HC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing reduces left ventricular (LV) outflow tract obstruction and symptoms in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC). The duration of gradient reduction, if pacing is discontinued for a prolonged period of time, is unknown. This question is addressed in the present randomized double-blind crossover study comparing continued with inactivated pacing. Ten patients, successfully paced for > or = 6 months, were randomized to continue pacing or to have their pacemakers inactivated after baseline examinations, including echo-Doppler imaging, exercise testing, and a quality-of-life questionnaire. When entering the study, the patients were in New York Heart Association functional classes I to II. After pacemaker programming, examinations were repeated at 1, 4, and 12 weeks. At the 12-week follow-up the alternate pacing mode was programmed, and the patient entered the second study arm. Premature pacemaker pacing occurred if severe clinical deterioration or a significant increase of the LV outflow tract obstruction were evident. Three patients started in the inactive mode and 7 patients in the active mode. All patients who started with the pacemaker inactivated required early reprogramming due to return of symptoms after 7, 10, and 13 days, respectively. All 7 patients who started in the active pacing mode completed the first period; however, after reprogramming to the inactive mode they required early activation after 1 to 20 days due to reappearance of intolerable subjective symptoms. The LV outflow tract gradient increased significantly after inactivation of pacing in all patients (22 +/- 21 mm Hg to 47 +/- 21 mm Hg). Thus, AV synchronous pacing effectively relieves symptoms and reduces the LV outflow tract gradient in patients with obstructive HC. This improvement, which is rapidly established with the initiation of cardiac pacing, is not persistent after cessation of pacing. Reinitialization of pacing promptly reduces the LV outflow tract obstruction and relieves symptoms to a preexisting extent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To assess the impact of biventricular pacing on quality of life over 12 months of follow-up, 76 patients in the MUSTIC trial were evaluated by 2 instruments: The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire and the Karolinska Quality of Life Questionnaire. MUSTIC is a randomized, controlled study to evaluate the effects of biventricular pacing in patients in New York Heart Association class III heart failure with intraventricular conduction delay. Following a single, blind, crossover comparison of 3 months of biventricular pacing to inactive pacing (sinus rhythm group) or ventricular-inhibited pacing (atrial fibrillation group), 85% of patients preferred and were programmed to biventricular pacing and were followed for 12 months. In parallel with clinical improvements, substantial benefits in quality of life for most broad domains of quality of life and cardiovascular symptoms were found during biventricular pacing already within the crossover phase with a maintained benefit over the 12-month follow-up. Biventricular pacing improved quality of life in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delays. The benefits were sustained over 12 months of follow-up. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: The risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is high early after myocardial infarction (MI). Current knowledge and guidelines mainly rely on results from older clinical trials and registry studies. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) alone has not been proven a reliable predictor of SCD.Objectives: This study sought to identify the incidence and additional predictors of SCD early after MI in a contemporary nationwide setting.Methods: The authors used data from SWEDEHEART, the Swedish Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Registry, and the Swedish Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Registry. Cases of MI, which had undergone coronary angiography and were discharged alive between 2009 to 2017 without a prior ICD, were followed up to 90 days. Cox regression models were used to assess associations between clinical parameters and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).Results: Among 121,379 cases, OHCA occurred in 349 (0.29%) and non-OHCA death in 2,194 (1.8%). A total of 6 variables (male sex, diabetes, estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73 m2, Killip class ≥II, new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter, and impaired LVEF [reference ≥50%] categorized as 40% to 49%, 30% to 39%, and <30%) were identified as independent predictors, were assigned points, and were grouped into 3 categories, where the incidence of OHCA ranged from 0.12% to 2.0% and non-OHCA death from 0.76% to 11.7%. Stratified by LVEF <40% alone, the incidence of OHCA was 0.20% and 0.76% and for non-OHCA death 1.1% and 4.9%.Conclusions: In this nationwide study, the incidence of OHCA within 90 days after MI was <0.3%. A total of 5 clinical parameters in addition to LVEF predicted OHCA and non-OHCA death better than LVEF alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can improve global left ventricular (LV) function. However, limited data are available on regional LV contractility at rest and during exercise. The aim of the present study was to prospectively investigate the effects of CRT on regional LV ejection fraction (EF), global LVEF, and dyssynchrony, during rest and exercise, using radionuclide angiography. A total of 32 consecutive patients with heart failure and nonischemic cardiomyopathy underwent technetium-99m radionuclide angiography with bicycle exercise immediately after CRT implantation (during spontaneous rhythm and after CRT activation) and 3 months later. The regional EF was assessed in the interventricular septum and the lateral wall (LW). Intraventricular dyssynchrony was evaluated using Fourier phase analysis. During spontaneous rhythm, the EF was severely depressed in the septum compared to in the LW. CRT improved septal EF at rest and during exercise both at baseline (p <0.001) and after 3 months (p <0.05). The basal LW EF decreased during CRT (p <0.05, both at rest and during exercise). LV dyssynchrony decreased both at baseline and during follow-up, and the global LVEF showed improvement only at 3 months (p <0.001). In conclusion, in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, CRT affects regional LV function by increasing the septal EF and reducing LW contractility, both at rest and during exercise. This was associated with an improvement in global LVEF and dyssynchrony. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

: ObjectivesWe tested the hypothesis that left ventricular (LV) pacing is superior to right ventricular (RV) apical pacing in patients undergoing atrioventricular (AV) junction ablation and pacing for permanent atrial fibrillation.: BackgroundThe potential benefit of LV over RV pacing needs to be evaluated without the confounding effect of other variables that can influence cardiac performance.: MethodsAn acute intrapatient comparison of the QRS width and echocardiographic parameters between RV versus LV pacing was performed within 24 h after ablation in 44 patients. Both modes of pacing were also compared with pre-implantation values.: ResultsCompared with RV pacing, LV pacing caused a 5.7% increase in the ejection fraction (EF) and a 16.7% decrease in the mitral regurgitation (MR) score; the QRS width was 4.8% shorter with LV pacing. Similar results were observed in patients with or without systolic dysfunction and/or native left bundle branch block, except for a greater improvement in MR in the latter group. Compared with pre-ablation measures, the EF increased by 11.2% and 17.6% with RV and LV pacing, respectively; the MR score decreased by 0% and 16.7%; and the diastolic filling time increased by 12.7% and 15.6%.: ConclusionsRhythm regularization achieved with AV junction ablation improved EF with both RV and LV pacing; LV pacing provided an additional modest but favorable hemodynamic effect, as reflected by a further increase of EF and reduction of MR. The effect seems to be equal in patients with both depressed and preserved systolic functions and in those with and without native left bundle branch block. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

To assess the impact of biventricular pacing on quality of life over 12 months of follow-up, 76 patients in the MUSTIC trial were evaluated by 2 instruments: The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire and the Karolinska Quality of Life Questionnaire. MUSTIC is a randomized, controlled study to evaluate the effects of biventricular pacing in patients in New York Heart Association class III heart failure with intraventricular conduction delay. Following a single, blind, crossover comparison of 3 months of biventricular pacing to inactive pacing (sinus rhythm group) or ventricular-inhibited pacing (atrial fibrillation group), 85% of patients preferred and were programmed to biventricular pacing and were followed for 12 months. In parallel with clinical improvements, substantial benefits in quality of life for most broad domains of quality of life and cardiovascular symptoms were found during biventricular pacing already within the crossover phase with a maintained benefit over the 12-month follow-up. Biventricular pacing improved quality of life in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delays. The benefits were sustained over 12 months of follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]