Search

Background: Whether ticagrelor may reduce periprocedural myocardial necrosis after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with and without chronic clopidogrel therapy is unclear., Objectives: This study sought to compare ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in patients with and without chronic clopidogrel therapy before undergoing elective PCI., Methods: In this prespecified analysis of the ALPHEUS (Assessment of Loading With the P2Y12 Inhibitor Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel to Halt Ischemic Events in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Stenting) trial, patients were defined as clopidogrel(+) and clopidogrel(-) according to the presence and absence of clopidogrel treatment for ≥7 days before PCI, respectively. The primary endpoint was the composite of PCI-related myocardial infarction and major injury as defined by the third and fourth universal definition 48 hours after PCI., Results: A total of 1,882 patients were included, 805 (42.7%) of whom were clopidogrel(+). These patients were older, had more comorbidities, and had more frequent features of complex PCI. The primary endpoint was less frequently present in clopidogrel(-) compared to clopidogrel(+) patients (32.8% vs 40.0%; OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.60-0.88), but no significant differences were reported for the risk of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or transient ischemic attack at 48 hours or 30 days. Ticagrelor did not reduce periprocedural myocardial necrosis or the risk of adverse outcomes, and there was no significant interaction regarding the presence of chronic clopidogrel treatment., Conclusions: Clopidogrel-naive patients presented less periprocedural complications compared to clopidogrel(+) patients, a difference related to a lower risk profile and less complex PCI. The absence of clopidogrel at baseline did not affect the absence of a difference between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in terms of PCI-related complications supporting the use of clopidogrel as the standard of care in elective PCI in patients with or without chronic clopidogrel treatment., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This trial was led by the Allies in Cardiovascular Trials Initiatives and Organized Networks (ACTION) Study Group, an Academic Research Organization based at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital in Paris, France. It was sponsored by Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and was funded by an unrestricted grant from AstraZeneca. AstraZeneca was not involved in the data collection, analysis, or in the writing of the manuscript. The Steering Committee oversaw the conduct of the trial in collaboration with representatives of the study sponsor. The trial was monitored by an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board. Data were collected and analyzed according to the predefined statistical analysis plan by academic statisticians of the ACTION group. Drs Silvain and Montalescot had full access to the data and final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. There was no medical writing support. Dr Manzo-Silberman has received consulting fees from Bayer, Organon, and Exeltis; has received lecture fees from Bayer, BMS, Exeltis Organon, and Terumo; and has served on the adjudication board for a study for Biotronik. Dr Beygui has received consulting and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Medtronic, Biosensors, Boston Scientific; and has received institutional research grants from Medtronic, Biosensors, Acist, and Boston Scientific. Dr Cayla has received speaker or congress fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Abbott, Bayer, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Microport CRM, Pfizer, and Sanofi; and has received research grants/consultant fees/lectures fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Abbott, Bayer, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Microport CRM, Pfizer, and Sanofi. Dr Rangé has received speaker and/or consulting fees from Abbott, Biotronik, and Microport. Dr Motovska has received consulting, speaker, investigator and advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Idorsia. Dr Zeitouni has received research grants from Federation Française de Cardiologie and Institut Servier; and has received honoraria from BMS/Pfizer, Bayer, AstraZeneca, and Novo Nordisk. Dr Vicaut has received consulting or speaker fees from Abbott, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Edwards Lifesciences, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Novartis. Dr Montalescot has received consulting or speaker fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Axis, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Cell Prothera, CSL Behring, Idorsia, Leo-Pharma, Lilly, Medtronic, Novartis, Pfizer, Quantum Genomics, Sanofi, and Terumo. Dr Silvain has received consulting and lecture or travel support from AstraZeneca, Bayer HealthCare SAS, Biotronik, Sanofi Aventis France, Abbott Medical France, SAS, and Zoll; and is a stockholder of 4P-Pharma. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is an established, guideline-endorsed treatment for severe aortic stenosis. Precise sizing of the balloon-expandable Myval transcatheter heart valve (THV) series with the aortic annulus is facilitated by increasing its diameter in 1·5 mm increments, compared with the usual 3 mm increments in valve size. The LANDMARK trial aimed to show non-inferiority of the Myval THV series compared with the contemporary THVs Sapien Series (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) or Evolut Series (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA)., Methods: In this prospective, multinational, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial across 31 hospitals in 16 countries (Germany, France, Sweden, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, New Zealand, Portugal, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia, Estonia, and Brazil), 768 participants with severe symptomatic native aortic stenosis were randomly assigned (1:1) to the Myval THV or a contemporary THV. Eligibility was primarily decided by the heart team in accordance with 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines. As per the criteria of the third Valve Academic Research Consortium, the primary endpoint at 30 days was a composite of all-cause mortality, all stroke, bleeding (types 3 and 4), acute kidney injury (stages 2-4), major vascular complications, moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation, and conduction system disturbances resulting in a permanent pacemaker implantation. Non-inferiority of the study device was tested in the intention-to-treat population using a non-inferiority margin of 10·44% and assuming an event rate of 26·10%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04275726, and EudraCT, 2020-000137-40, and is closed to new participants., Findings: Between Jan 6, 2021, and Dec 5, 2023, 768 participants with severe symptomatic native aortic stenosis were randomly assigned, 384 to the Myval THV and 384 to a contemporary THV. 369 (48%) participants had their sex recorded as female, and 399 (52%) as male. The mean age of participants was 80·0 years (SD 5·7) for those treated with the Myval THV and 80·4 years (5·4) for those treated with a contemporary THV. Median Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores were the same in both groups (Myval 2·6% [IQR 1·7-4·0] vs contemporary 2·6% [1·7-4·0]). The primary endpoint showed non-inferiority of the Myval (25%) compared with contemporary THV (27%), with a risk difference of -2·3% (one-sided upper 95% CI 3·8, p non-inferiority <0·0001). No significant difference was seen in individual components of the primary composite endpoint., Interpretation: In individuals with severe symptomatic native aortic stenosis, the Myval THV met its primary endpoint at 30 days., Funding: Meril Life Sciences., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests NvR reports grant funding and personal fees from Abbott; grants from Philips, Biotronik, and Medtronic; and personal fees from MicroPort, Bayer, and RainMed Medical outside the submitted work. IJA-S reports being a proctor for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Meril Life Sciences. AIj reports consulting fees from Meril Life Sciences, Medtronic, Angiocare, Keystone Heart, PulseCath, Salveo, Abbott, Philips, Fysicon, Cardiawave, Pi Medical, and Svelte. DU reports lecture and educational event fees from Medtronic; a lecture fee from and being a proctor for Meril Life Sciences; and being a member of the Medtronic EMEA surgical advisory board. RSH reports grant funding from Bayer; and speaker fees from Amgen, Novartis, and Abbott outside the submitted work. MW reports institutional research funding from Emboline, Meril Life Sciences, Edwards Lifesciences, and TransAortic Medical. MPa reports honoraria from Boston Scientific, Philips, and Abbott. OA reports research grants and lecture fees from and being a proctor for Abbott; and advisory board participation for and support for attending meetings from Meril Life Sciences. W-KK reports honoraria or consultancy fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Meril Life Sciences, and Hi-D Imaging; and participation on an advisory board or data and safety monitoring board for Abbott and Boston Scientific. JR reports being a consultant with Medtronic and Qatma; being a proctor for Medtronic; and travel support for attending meetings from Meril Life Sciences, Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific. AT reports a grant from the Fukuda Foundation for Medical Technology. SG reports honoraria or consultancy fees from Biosensors. PWS reports consultancy fees from SMT, Novartis, Meril Life Sciences, Xeltis, and Philips. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Fasting before coronary procedures is currently recommended to reduce complications despite the lack of scientific evidence., Objectives: The TONIC (Comparison Between Fasting and No Fasting Before Interventional Coronary Intervention on the Occurrence of Adverse Events) noninferiority trial investigated the safety and comfort of a nonfasting strategy (ad libitum food and drinks) vs traditional fasting (>6 hours for solid food and liquids) before coronary procedures., Methods: In this monocentric, prospective, single-blind randomized controlled trial, 739 patients undergoing coronary procedures were included and randomized to a fasting or a nonfasting strategy. Emergency procedures were excluded. The primary endpoint was a composite of vasovagal reaction, hypoglycemia (defined by blood sugar ≤0.7 g/L), and isolated nausea and/or vomiting. Noninferiority margin was 4%. Secondary endpoints were contrast-induced nephropathy and patients' satisfaction., Results: Among the 739 procedures (697 elective and 42 semiurgent), 517 angiographies, and 222 angioplasties (including complex and high-risk procedures) were performed. The primary endpoint occurred in 30 of 365 nonfasting patients (8.2%) vs 37 of 374 fasting patients (9.9%), demonstrating noninferiority (absolute between-group difference, -1.7%; 1-sided 95% CI upper limit: 1.8%). No food-related adverse event occurred, and contrast-related acute kidney injuries were similar between groups. Overall, procedure satisfaction and perceived pain were similar in both groups, but nonfasting patients reported less hunger and thirst (P < 0.01). In case of redo coronary procedures, most patients (79%) would choose a nonfasting strategy., Conclusions: The TONIC randomized trial demonstrates the noninferiority of a nonfasting strategy to the usual fasting strategy for coronary procedures regarding safety, while improving patients' comfort., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The study’s sponsor was Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (Délégation à la Recherche Clinique et à l'Innovation). The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The CARDIO-ARSIF registry has been continuously collecting comprehensive data on coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed in the 36 catheterization laboratories across the Île-de-France region since 2000. Over the period from 2003 to 2022, this registry has recorded information from more than 330,000 patients, encompassing more than one million procedures. Among these procedures, 58% consisted of coronary angiography, 13% were percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), and the remaining 28% were PCI performed on an ad-hoc basis. This extensive dataset serves as a valuable resource for both qualitative and quantitative assessments of practices and the relevance of procedures in the field of coronary invasive cardiology. The results of these analyses undergo annual validation by a dedicated scientific committee and are shared with the teams of investigators. The exploitation of this data has led to scientific publications, with one notable finding being a consistent reduction in the radiation doses received by patients, regardless of the type of procedure., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: The benefit related to the use of preprocedural computed tomography angiography (CCTA) on top of periprocedural echocardiography to plan percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) procedures is still unclear., Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate the impact of preprocedural CCTA on LAAC procedural success., Methods: In the investigator-initiated SWISS-APERO (Comparison of Amplatzer Amulet and Watchman Device in Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Closure) trial, patients undergoing echocardiography-guided LAAC were randomly assigned to receive the Amulet (Abbott) or Watchman 2.5/FLX (Boston Scientific) device across 8 European centers. According to the study protocol ongoing at the time of the procedure, the first operators had (CCTA unblinded group) or did not have (CCTA blinded group) access to preprocedural CCTA images. In this post hoc analysis, we compared blinded vs unblinded procedures in terms of procedural success defined as complete left atrial appendage occlusion as evaluated at the end of LAAC (short-term) or at the 45-day follow-up (long-term) without procedural-related complications., Results: Among 219 LAACs preceded by CCTA, 92 (42.1%) and 127 (57.9%) were assigned to the CCTA unblinded and blinded group, respectively. After adjusting for confounders, operator unblinding to preprocedural CCTA remained associated with a higher rate of short-term procedural success (93.5% vs 81.1%; P = 0.009; adjusted OR: 2.76; 95% CI: 1.05-7.29; P = 0.040) and long-term procedural success (83.7% vs 72.4%; P = 0.050; adjusted OR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.03-4.35; P = 0.041)., Conclusions: In a prospective multicenter cohort of clinically indicated echocardiography-guided LAACs, unblinding of the first operators to preprocedural CCTA images was independently associated with a higher rate of both short- and long-term procedural success. Further studies are needed to better evaluate the impact of preprocedural CCTA on clinical outcomes., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Aminian has been a proctor and consultant for Abbott and Boston Scientific. Dr Meneveau has received grants and personal fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Bayer HealthCare, BMS-Pfizer, and Medtronic; and has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Siemens, and Terumo outside the submitted work. Dr De Marco has been a proctor and consultant for Abbott and Boston Scientific. Dr Gräni has received funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation, InnoSuisse, CAIM, and GAMBIT foundation outside the submitted work. Dr Teiger has received personal fees from Abbott for proctoring. Dr Iriart has been a proctor and consultant for Abbott and Boston Scientific. Dr Vranckx has received personal fees from Pfizer-Bristol Meyers Squibb Alliance, CSL Behring, and Daiichi Sankyo outside the submitted work. Dr Fischer has received research grants from Medtronic (beyond Swift, Swift Direct), Stryker, Rapid Medical, Penumbra, and Phenox (Distal); has been a consultant for Medtronic, Stryker, and CSL Behring (fees paid to institution); and has participated in an advisory board for Alexion/Portola and Boehringer Ingelheim (fees paid to institution). Dr Bedogni has been a proctor for Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic; and has been a consultant for Terumo and Meril. Dr Valgimigli has received grants and/or personal fees from AstraZeneca, Terumo, Alvimedica/CID, Abbott Vascular, Daiichi Sankyo, Opsens, Bayer, CoreFLOW, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Universität Basel Department Klinische Forschung, Vifor, Bristol Myers Squibb SA, iVascular, and Medscape. Dr Räber has received research grants to the institution by Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Infraredx, Heartflow, Sanofi, and Regeneron; and has received speaker/consultation fees from Abbott Vascular, Amgen, AstraZeneca, CSL Behring, Canon, Occlutech, Sanofi, and Vifor. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Using French transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) registries linked with the nationwide administrative databases, the study compared the rates of long-term mortality, bleeding, and ischemic events after TAVR in patients requiring oral anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)., Background: The choice of optimal drug for anticoagulation after TAVR remains debated., Methods: Data from the France-TAVI and FRANCE-2 registries were linked to the French national health single-payer claims database, from 2010 to 2017. Propensity score matching was used to reduce treatment-selection bias. Two primary endpoints were death from any cause (efficacy) and major bleeding (safety)., Results: A total of 24,581 patients who underwent TAVR were included and 8,962 (36.4%) were treated with OAC. Among anticoagulated patients, 2,180 (24.3%) were on DOACs. After propensity matching, at 3 years, mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.67; P < 0.005) and major bleeding including hemorrhagic stroke (HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.17-2.29; P < 0.005) were lower in patients on DOACs compared with those on VKAs. The rates of ischemic stroke (HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 0.81-2.15; P = 0.27) and acute coronary syndrome (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.68-1.99; P = 0.57) did not differ among groups., Conclusions: In these large multicenter French TAVR registries with an exhaustive clinical follow-up, the long-term mortality and major bleeding were lower with DOACs than VKAs at discharge. The present study supports preferential use of DOACs rather than VKAs in patients requiring oral anticoagulation therapy after TAVR., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work is supported by the French Government, managed by the National Research Agency under the program “Investissements d’avenir” with the reference ANR-16-RHUS-0003. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Backgrounds: Data on optimal antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing stenting of the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) are limited., Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS trial, a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled trial, comparing the experimental strategy (1-month dual anti-platelet therapy [DAPT] followed by 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy) with the reference regimen (12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin monotherapy) in relation to stenting of the proximal LAD. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death or new Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) and key secondary safety endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding at two years., Results: Among 15,845 patients included in the analysis, 3823 (23.9%) patients underwent stenting of the proximal LAD, while 12,022 (75.2%) did not. In the proximal LAD stenting group, there was no significant difference in the risk of the primary endpoint between the two antiplatelet strategies (3.38% vs. 3.93%; hazard ratio [HR]:0.86; 95% CI:0.62-1.20; P interaction  = 0.951). However, the risk of any MI (2.63% vs. 3.88%; HR:0.68; 95% CI:0.47-0.97; P interaction  = 0.015) and any revascularization (7.84% vs. 9.94%; HR:0.78; 95% CI:0.63-0.97; P interaction  = 0.058) was significantly lower in the experimental strategy group, while demonstrating a similar risk of BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding between the two antiplatelet strategies (1.93% vs. 1.99%; HR:0.98; 95% CI:0.62-1.54; P interaction  = 0.981)., Conclusions: The present study showed patients having stenting to the proximal LAD could potentially benefit from the experimental strategy with lower ischaemic events without a trade-off in major bleeding at two years., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Hara reports grant from Japanese Circulation Society and Fukuda Foundation for Medical Technology, outside the submitted work; Dr. de Winter reports unrestricted educational research grant from Astra Zeneca for Acadamic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands, outside the submitted work; Dr. Hamm reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work; Dr. Steg reports grants and personal fees from Bayer/Janssen, grants and personal fees from Merck, grants and personal fees from Sanofi, grants and personal fees from Amarin, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Regeneron, personal fees from Lilly, personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Servier, outside the submitted work; Dr. Windecker reports research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, BMS, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Johnson& Johnson, Medtronic, Querbet, Polares, Sanofi, Terumo, Sinomed, outside the submitted work. He serves as unpaid member of the steering/excecutive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, BMS, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Polares, Sinomed, V-Wave and Xeltis, but has not received personal payments by any pharmaceutical company or device manufacturer. He is also member of the steering/excecutive committee group of several investigated-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr. Vranckx reports personal fees from Astra Zeneca, personal fees from The Medicines Company, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Bayer Health Care, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees from Terumo, personal fees from CLS Bhering, outside the submitted work; Dr. Valgimigli reports grants and personal fees from Abbott, personal fees from Chiesi, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees from Amgen, grants and personal fees from Terumo, personal fees from Alvimedica, grants from Medicure, grants and personal fees from Astrazeneca, personal fees from Biosensors, personal fees from Idorsia, outside the submitted work; Dr. Serruys reports personal fees from Abbott Laboratories, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Biotrinik, personal fees from GLG Research, personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Sino Medical Sciences Technology, personal fees from Société Europa Digital Publishing, personal fees from Stentys France, personal fees from Svelte Medical Systems, personal fees from Philips/Volcano, personal fees from Qualimed, personal fees from Xeltis, outside the submitted work; All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Evaluation of reendothelialization with a new thin struts cobalt chromium alloy stent coated with a nano-layer of Polyzene™-F (PzF) in a rabbit iliac artery model., Methods: Fifteen stented external rabbit iliac arteries were harvested at Day 7 for electron microscopy analysis following Cobra PzF stents implantation to assess reendothelialization and compare to historical data. Ten additional rabbits were used to assess time course of reendothelialization at 3 and 5 days., Results: At Day 7, almost complete coverage of endothelial cells was observed with a coverage of 99.54 ± 0.25% of the stented area. No thrombus area was noted. At Day 3, more than half of examined pieces was reendothelialized and reached 78.30 ± 3.7% at Day 5 (p < .01 between each group). All stents were well expanded against the arterial wall and no struts were mal-apposed., Conclusions: Reendothelialization was rapid and complete at Day 7. This is the fastest reendothelization process after stenting in this model. No stent occlusion was observed., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest LM is consultant (modest) for CeloNova. MB is employee at CeloNova. The other authors have nothing to disclose. This work was supported by a research grant from CeloNova., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The VIVA (Valve in Valve) trial was designed to systematically and prospectively collect data regarding the use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with failing surgical aortic bioprostheses at high-risk for reoperation., Background: Surgical aortic valve replacement has been the standard of care in symptomatic patients with aortic valve disease. However, bioprosthetic valves degenerate over time, requiring redo surgery., Methods: VIVA is an international, observational, single-arm, postmarket study conducted at 23 sites that enrolled 202 patients with symptomatic degeneration of an aortic bioprosthesis eligible for elective treatment with a CoreValve or Evolut R self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve., Results: Patients were elderly (mean age 79.9 years), 47.5% were men, and they had a mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 6.6%. Although 41.8% of patients had surgical bioprostheses with labeled size ≤21 mm, valve hemodynamic parameters were markedly improved from baseline (mean aortic valve gradient 35.0 ± 16.3 mm Hg) to discharge (17.5 ± 8.6 mm Hg) and were sustained at 1 year (15.5 ± 7.5 mm Hg). At 1 year, total aortic regurgitation greater than mild was measured in 1.1% of patients. Clinical outcomes at 30 days demonstrated low mortality (2.5%), no disabling strokes, a 0.5% rate of acute kidney injury, and an 8.0% rate of new pacemaker implantation. At 1 year, the mortality rate remained low (8.8%), with 1 disabling stroke (0.6%). Five patients (2.5%) experienced coronary artery obstructions, 3 during and 1 immediately after the procedure and 1 several months later., Conclusions: Degenerated surgical bioprostheses can be safely treated with the CoreValve or Evolut R platform using the catheter-based valve-in-valve procedure. Excellent 1-year clinical and hemodynamic outcomes were achieved in this real-world patient population. (CoreValve VIVA Study Evaluation of the Clinical Outcomes of CoreValve in Degenerative Surgical Aortic Bioprosthesis; NCT02209298)., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Limited studies reported the rate and clinical impact of peridevice leaks (PDL) after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC)., Methods: All consecutive patients with a nonvalvular atrial fibrillation admitted for LAAC between November 2011 and October 2016 were prospectively enrolled. The follow-up included clinical, transesophageal echocardiography, and/or cardiac computed tomography angiogram (CCTA). PDL was defined by the presence of contrast within the left atrial appendage on CCTA, and Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) included stroke, device-related thrombosis, and cardiovascular death., Results: Overall, 77 patients (mean CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score = 4.4 ± 1.5 and mean HAS-BLED = 3.4 ± 1.1) were implanted using Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (n = 24), Amulet (n = 37), or Watchman devices (n = 16). Indications were stroke recurrence despite adequate oral anticoagulation (OAC, n = 6) or contraindication to long-term OAC (n = 71). From 3-month to 12-month CCTA follow-up, the PDL rate decreased from 68.5% to 56.7% (P = 0.02), without any difference between the various devices. Patients with PDL were more often in permanent atrial fibrillation, and had a larger landing zone diameter, a lower ratio of device compression, and a more frequent off-axis position of the device. A device compression ratio < 10% was the only parameter associated with PDL occurrence. During follow-up (median 236 days) the MACE rate was 9.1%, with no statistically significant difference between patients with vs without PDL (12% vs 4.3%, P = 0.3)., Conclusions: The PDL rate detected by CCTA after LAAC was high, especially in cases with a low device compression ratio (< 10%), but decreased over time. The incidence of MACE was quantitatively greater with PDL, but the difference was not statistically significant. Larger studies are needed to determine the clinical importance of PDL., (Copyright © 2018 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Elderly patients regularly receive bare-metal stents (BMS) instead of drug-eluting stents (DES) to shorten the duration of double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between these two types of stents with a short duration of DAPT in such patients., Methods: In this randomised single-blind trial, we recruited patients from 44 centres in nine countries. Patients were eligible if they were aged 75 years or older; had stable angina, silent ischaemia, or an acute coronary syndrome; and had at least one coronary artery with a stenosis of at least 70% (≥50% for the left main stem) deemed eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Exclusion criteria were indication for myocardial revascularisation by coronary artery bypass grafting; inability to tolerate, obtain, or comply with DAPT; requirement for additional surgery; non-cardiac comorbidities with a life expectancy of less than 1 year; previous haemorrhagic stroke; allergy to aspirin or P2Y 12 inhibitors; contraindication to P2Y 12 inhibitors; and silent ischaemia of less than 10% of the left myocardium with a fractional flow reserve of 0·80 or higher. After the intended duration of DAPT was recorded (1 month for patients with stable presentation and 6 months for those with unstable presentation), patients were randomly allocated (1:1) by a central computer system (blocking used with randomly selected block sizes [two, four, eight, or 16]; stratified by site and antiplatelet agent) to either a DES or similar BMS in a single-blind fashion (ie, patients were masked), but those assessing outcomes were masked. The primary outcome was to compare major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (ie, a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation) between groups at 1 year in the intention-to-treat population, assessed at 30 days, 180 days, and 1 year. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02099617., Findings: Between May 21, 2014, and April 16, 2016, we randomly assigned 1200 patients (596 [50%] to the DES group and 604 [50%] to the BMS group). The primary endpoint occurred in 68 (12%) patients in the DES group and 98 (16%) in the BMS group (relative risk [RR] 0·71 [95% CI 0·52-0·94]; p=0·02). Bleeding complications (26 [5%] in the DES group vs 29 [5%] in the BMS group; RR 0·90 [0·51-1·54]; p=0·68) and stent thrombosis (three [1%] vs eight [1%]; RR 0·38 [0·00-1·48]; p=0·13) at 1 year were infrequent in both groups., Interpretation: Among elderly patients who have PCI, a DES and a short duration of DAPT are better than BMS and a similar duration of DAPT with respect to the occurrence of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation. A strategy of combination of a DES to reduce the risk of subsequent repeat revascularisations with a short BMS-like DAPT regimen to reduce the risk of bleeding event is an attractive option for elderly patients who have PCI., Funding: Boston Scientific., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is associated with a poor prognosis with the proposed mechanism of sudden cardiac death in the majority of patients being pulseless electrical activity. However, the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) indications in CA patients are unclear. We performed a detailed evaluation of our CA population undergoing ICD implantation and assessed appropriate ICD therapy and survival predictors., Methods: We included consecutive patients from June 2008 to November 2014 in five centers. ICDs were systematically interrogated and clinical data recorded during follow-up., Results: Forty-five patients (35 males, mean age 66±12years) with CA who underwent ICD implantation (84.4% primary prevention) were included. CA types were hereditary transthyretin in 27 patients (60%), light chain (AL) in 12 (27%) and senile in 6 (13%). After a mean follow-up of 17±14months, 12 patients (27%) had at least 1 appropriate ICD therapy occurring after 4.7±6.6months. Patients with or without ICD therapy had no significant differences in baseline characteristics, amyloidosis type, LVEF, and type of prevention although there was a trend towards a better 2D global longitudinal strain in patients with ICD therapy (P=0.08). Over the follow-up, 12 patients died (27%) and 6 underwent cardiac transplantation (13%). From multivariate analysis a worse prognosis was associated with higher NT-proBNP level (>6800pg/mL, HR=5.5[1.7-17.8]) and AL type (HR=4.9[1.5-16.3])., Conclusions: Appropriate ICD therapies are common (27%) in CA patients. No specific strong VA predictor could be identified. However, patients with advanced heart disease, especially with AL-CA, display a poorer outcome., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The development of new onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is common and may be associated with an adverse prognosis. This study seeks to identify incidence, predictors, and impact of NOAF post-TAVI., Methods: From the multicenter study of the French national transcatheter aortic valve implantation registry, FRANCE 2, a total of 1959 patients with sinus rhythm prior to TAVI were enrolled into this study. The incidence of post-TAVI NOAF, predictors of development of NOAF and impact on 30-day and 1-year-mortalities were assessed., Results: Of the 1959 TAVI patients (mean-age: 82.6 ± 7.5 years, mean-logistic-EuroSCORE: 21.8 ± 14.3), 149 (7.6%) developed NOAF with the remaining 1810 (92.4%) control patients demonstrating no evidence of AF as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC). Advanced age and major and life-threatening bleeding were independent predictors of NOAF (95% CI: 0.93-0.99; p=0.006, 95% CI: 1.58-4.00; p<0.001, 95% CI: 1.09-3.75; p=0.025, respectively). A trend towards a higher incidence of major and life-threatening bleeding was observed in the patients undergoing TAVI via the transapical (TA)-approach compared with the transfemoral (TF)-approach. Both 30-day and cumulative 1-year-mortalities were significantly higher in patients with NOAF compared to patients without NOAF (3.0% vs. 7.4%; p=0.005, 9.1% vs. 20.8%; p<0.001, respectively). In addition, NOAF was an independent predictor of 30-day and 1-year-mortalities (HR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.06-4.41; p=0.033, HR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.42-3.15; p<0.001, respectively)., Conclusion: Advanced age and major and life-threatening bleeding were independently associated with increased incidence of NOAF, which itself was an independent predictor of 30-day and 1-year-mortalities. With regards to the various transcatheter approaches, a trend towards a higher incidence of major and life-threatening bleeding was observed only with the TA-approach., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of transcarotid transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)., Background: Many candidates for TAVR have challenging vascular anatomy that precludes transfemoral access. Transcarotid arterial access may be an option for such patients., Methods: The French Transcarotid TAVR Registry is a voluntary database that prospectively collected patient demographics, procedural characteristics, and clinical outcomes among patients undergoing transcarotid TAVR. Outcomes are reported according to the updated Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria., Results: Among 96 patients undergoing transcarotid TAVR at 3 French sites (2009 to 2013), the mean age and Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality were 79.4 ± 9.2 years and 7.1 ± 4.1%, respectively. Successful carotid artery access was achieved in all patients. The Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) (n = 89; 92.7%) and Edwards SAPIEN valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) (n = 7; 7.3%) were used. Procedural complications included: valve embolization (3.1%), requirement for a second valve (3.1%), and tamponade (4.2%). There were no major bleeds or major vascular complications related to the access site. There were 3 (3.1%) procedural deaths and 6 (6.3%) deaths at 30 days. The 1-year mortality rate was 16.7%. There were 3 (3.1%) cases of Valve Academic Research Consortium-defined in-hospital stroke (n = 0) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) (n = 3). None of these patients achieved the criteria for stroke and none manifested new ischemic lesions on cerebral computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. At 30 days, a further 3 TIAs were observed, giving an overall stroke/TIA rate of 6.3%., Conclusions: Transcarotid vascular access for TAVR is feasible and is associated with encouraging short- and medium-term clinical outcomes. Prospective studies are required to ascertain if transcarotid TAVR yields equivalent results to other nonfemoral vascular access routes., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with pre-existing atrial fibrillation (AF) and of patients who presented with new-onset AF after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)., Background: Little is known regarding the impact of AF after TAVI., Methods: The FRANCE-2 registry included all patients undergoing TAVI (N = 3,933) in France in 2010 and 2011. New-onset AF was defined as the occurrence of AF post-procedure in a patient with no documented history of AF., Results: AF was documented before TAVI in 25.8% of patients. New-onset AF was observed in 174 patients after TAVI among patients without a history of pre-existing AF (6.0%). At 1 year, the rates of all-cause death (26.5 vs. 16.6%, respectively; p < 0.001) and cardiovascular death (11.5 vs. 7.8%, respectively; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients with pre-existing AF compared with those without AF. Rehospitalization for worsening heart failure and New York Heart Association functional class was also higher in patients with pre-existing AF versus those without, resulting in a higher rate of combined efficacy endpoint in this group (p < 0.001). A history of stroke, surgical (nontransfemoral) approach, cardiological, and hemorrhagic procedure-related events were all independently related to the occurrence of new-onset post-procedural AF. New-onset AF in patients without pre-existing AF was associated with a higher rate of combined safety endpoint at 30 days (p < 0.001) and a higher rate of both all-cause death and combined efficacy endpoint at 1 year (p = 0.003 and p = 0.02, respectively)., Conclusions: Pre-existing and new-onset AF are both associated with higher mortality and morbidity after TAVI., (Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Few data are available on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in nonagenarians. In a large prospective registry on pPCI for STEMI we compared the demographics, procedural and in-hospital outcomes between nonagenarians (age ≥ 90 years) and patients aged < 90 years., Methods and Results: We included 26,157 consecutive patients with pPCI in the Greater Paris Area region between 2003 and 2011. Of these, 418 (1.6%) were ≥ 90 years old. Nonagenarians (versus patients < 90 years) were more likely to be female (62.3% versus 22.5%, p < 0.0001), nonsmokers (81.6% versus 36.7%, p < 0.0001), in cardiogenic shock (Killip IV) upon admission (10.5% versus 4.8%, p < 0.001), and had significant co-morbidities. Over two-thirds of patients underwent procedures via the radial artery (61% versus 72.1%, p = 0.007). Both groups had high and similar angiographic success rates (98.1% versus 98.7%, p = 0.33). Drug-eluting stents were used less often in nonagenarians (4.4% versus 16.7%, p < 0.0001). Hospital mortality was significantly much higher in patients over 90 years old (24.9% versus 5.1%, p < 0.001) in univariate analysis. After adjustment for sex, cardiogenic shock, diabetes, triple vessel disease, drug-eluting stent use and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors use, mortality remains higher in nonagenarian patients (OR: 4.31; 95% CI: 3.26-5.71, p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: In a real-world setting, we found important demographic differences in nonagenarian compared to younger patients. Despite achieving a high rate of reperfusion with pPCI using mainly radial access, similar to that achieved in younger patients, hospital mortality was higher in nonagenarians., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Environmental parameters have been reported to be triggers of acute myocardial infarction (MI). However, the individual role of each parameter is unknown. We quantified the respective association of climate parameters, influenza epidemics and air pollutants with the onset of ST elevation MI (STEMI) in Paris and the surrounding small ring., Methods: Data from the CARDIO-ARSIF registry (Paris and small ring STEMI population), Météo France (Climate), GROG (Influenza epidemic) and AIRPARIF (Air Pollution) were analyzed. The association between short-term exposure (1 day lag time) to environmental parameters and STEMI occurrence was quantified by time series modeling of daily STEMI count data, using Poisson regression with generalized additive models., Results: Between 2003 and 2008, 11,987 <24H STEMI confirmed by angiography were adjudicated. There was a 5.0% excess relative risk (ERR) of STEMI per 10°C decrease in maximal temperature (95% CI 2.1% to 7.8%: p=0.001) and an 8.9% ERR (95% CI 3.2% to 14.9%: p=0.002) during an influenza epidemic after adjustment on week-days and holidays. Associations were consistent when short-term exposure varied from 2 to 7 days. Associations between lower temperatures and STEMI were stronger in magnitude when influenza epidemic was present. Short-term exposure to climatic parameters or pollutants was not associated with STEMI., Conclusions: The present population based registry of STEMI suggests that short-term exposure to lower temperature and influenza epidemic is associated with a significant excess relative risk of STEMI. Subjects at risk for MI may benefit from specific protections against cold temperature and influenza infection., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The prognostic value of previous pulmonary oedema (PO) has not been thoroughly investigated in a large-cohort of TAVI-patients. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of previous clinical history of acute PO in severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)., Methods: Data were analyzed for 3195 patients enrolled in the French national TAVI registry, FRANCE 2. We compared the clinical outcome of enrolled patients divided broadly into three groups according to the frequency of previous acute PO episode; group 1: no-episode, group 2: single-episode, and group 3: multiple-episodes within the year preceding TAVI., Results: Of the 3195 patients (mean age: 82.7 ± 7.2 years, mean logistic-EuroSCORE: 21.8 ± 14.3) with TAVI, 1880 (58.8%) had no-episode, 937 (29.3%) had single-episode, and 378 (11.9%) had multiple-episode. Both 30-day and cumulative 1-year mortality increased significantly across the 3 groups (7.7% vs. 9.2% vs. 15.9%; p<0.001, 14.0% vs. 19.4% vs. 24.1%; p<0.001, respectively). In addition, single-PO was not independently associated with an increased mortality at 30-day and 1-year compared to no-PO (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.75-1.30; p=0.923, HR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.94-1.39; p=0.173, respectively). In contrast multiple-PO was independently associated with an increased risk of both 30-day and cumulative 1-year mortality (HR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.10-2.01; p=0.012, HR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.01-1.66; p=0.043, respectively)., Conclusion: Multiple-PO, but not single, within the year preceding the index procedure is independently associated with increased mortality at short- and mid-term follow up after TAVI., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence, impact, and predictors of cerebrovascular events (CVEs) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)., Background: Several issues remain unresolved post-TAVR, including CVEs., Methods: The FRANCE-2 (French Aortic Nation CoreValve and Edwards-2) registry prospectively included all patients who underwent TAVR in France and Monaco from January 2010 to October 2011. A total of 3,191 patients were analyzed. Six-month follow-up data were obtained. Events were adjudicated according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-1 definition., Results: Of the cohort, 3.98% experienced a CVE: 55% were major strokes, 14.5% minor strokes, and 30.5% transient ischemic attacks. The mean delay for CVE occurrence was 2 days (interquartile range: 0 to 7 days) with 48.5% of CVEs occurring within 2 days. There was no statistically significant difference in CVE rate with regard to the type of valve (p = 0.899) and the access route (p = 0.128). Patients with a CVE more frequently had new-onset paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (13.6% vs. 7.6%; p = 0.015). During follow-up, the unadjusted mortality rate was higher in patients with a CVE (26% vs. 16.5%; p = 0.002). By multivariate analysis, only advanced age (odds ratio: 1.05; 95% confidence interval: 1.02 to 1.08; p = 0.02) and having 2 valves implanted (odds ratio: 3.13; 95 confidence interval: 1.40 to 7.05; p = 0.006) were associated with a significant risk of CVEs., Conclusions: CVEs occur frequently after TAVR and are associated with an increased mortality rate. No difference exists in the CVE rate when exploring the type of valve or the access route. Advanced age and multiple valves implanted during the same procedure are predictors of CVE., (Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although transcatheter aortic valve implantation has been developing as an alternative treatment in elderly patients with high surgical risk, age-specific differences in clinical outcome have not been fully validated., Methods: Data were analyzed for 2,254 patients at least 80 years old who were enrolled between January 2010 and October 2011 in the French national transcatheter aortic valve implantation registry, FRANCE-2. Procedural and clinical outcomes defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria were compared among subjects in three age groups: 80 to 84 years (n = 867), 85 to 89 years (n = 1,064), and at least 90 years (n = 349; range, 90 to 101 years)., Results: The self-expandable prosthesis was implanted in 710 patients, and the balloon-expandable prosthesis was implanted in 1,544 patients. No differences were observed in rates of procedural success, Valve Academic Research Consortium-defined complications, and length of hospitalization among groups. Cumulative 30-day mortalities did not change among the three groups (80 to 84 years, 10.3% versus 85 to 89 years, 9.5% versus ≥ 90 years, 11.2%; p = 0.53). Cumulative 1-year mortalities also showed no statistical differences, although the mortality rate was higher in patients 85 to 89 years old and at least 90 years old compared with those 80 to 84 years old (19.8% versus 26.1% versus 27.7%; p = 0.16). After adjustment for differential baseline characteristics and potential confounders, patient age (85 to 89 years and ≥ 90 years compared with 80 to 84 years) was not associated with increasing risk of 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.92, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.66 to 1.27, 0.83 to 1.94; p = 0.38, 0.28, respectively) and 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.16, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.90 to 1.49, 0.97 to 1.89; p = 0.25, 0.073, respectively)., Conclusions: This study revealed acceptable clinical results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation even in very elderly populations., (Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is growing evidence that transradial (TRI) as compared to transfemoral (TFI) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with improved clinical outcome driven by less hemorrhagic complications, in particular in STEMI patients receiving aggressive antithrombotic treatment. Feasibility rate of TRI in STEMI patients has not yet been evaluated., Methods/results: Four-hundred seventy-five consecutive STEMI patients (<12h) without cardiogenic shock were prospectively screened for this all-comer single-centre registry between January 2008 and August 2010. Nine patients were excluded for a priori ineligibility for TRI (forearm shunt for dialysis, prior TRI failure). In the 466 patients enrolled, the operator's opinion about ease of radial puncture was assessed in 4 categories, based on radial pulse quality. Operators were advised not to attempt TRI if ease of puncture was judged "probably difficult/impossible". In case of puncture failure the operator switched immediately to TFI. The mean age of patients was 61 ± 14 (range 27-94) years. Seventy-three percent were men, 17% had diabetes. Nine percent had previous PCI. Glycoprotein inhibitors were used in 70%, and thrombectomy was performed in 70% of patients. PCI was performed using 6F and 5F guiding catheters. Procedural success rate was 98.2% (TIMI flow ≥ 2). In 4.1% (n=19) of patients the operator judged ease of radial puncture "probably difficult/impossible" and no TRI attempt was performed (primary TFI). In the 447 patients with TRI attempt, TRI failure requiring switch to TFI (secondary TFI) was necessary in 22 patients (4.7% of total) following radial puncture failure (n=15), dissection of the radial artery (n=1), prohibitive tortuosities or stenosis of the upper limb axis (n=2), or non-selective position or lack of stability of the guiding catheter (n=2). After the start of the angioplasty procedure, switch from TR to TF was not necessary in any patient. In total, the overall feasibility rate of TRI was 91.2%. Independent predictors of final TFI were age ≥ 80 years (adjusted OR: 2.37; 95% CI:1.05-5.34, p=0.037), body weight<60 kg (adjusted OR: 2.84; 95% CI:1.22-6.59, p=0.015); and previous PCI (adjusted OR: 3.42; 95% CI:1.40-8.37, p=0.007); female gender was borderline significant (adjusted OR:2.10; 95% CI:0.97-4.54, p=0.059)., Conclusion: In STEMI patients without cardiogenic shock and without a priori indication for TFI, PCI can be performed via the radial artery in more than 90% of cases with high procedural success rate. Operator's judgement of eligibility for TRI based on radial pulse quality is predictive of successful TRI in 95% of cases. TR failure is significantly more common in the elderly and in patients with low body weight., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to assess whether the volume of contrast media (CM) influences the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)., Background: The volume of CM has been shown to be associated with increasing risk of AKI; however, in a high-risk elderly TAVI population, the predictive value and optimal threshold of CM dose on AKI remain uncertain., Methods: Data of 415 consecutive transfemoral TAVI patients (age 83.6 ± 6.8 years, logistic EuroSCORE 23.0 ± 12.2%) were analyzed. AKI was defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. Based on a previous formula, the ratio of CM to serum creatinine (SCr) and body weight (BW) (CM × SCr/BW) was calculated as defining the degree of CM use. The association between CM dose and incidence of AKI, as well as predictive factors and prognosis of AKI, were investigated., Results: AKI occurred in 63 patients (15.2%). Cumulative 1-year mortality showed significant differences between the AKI and non-AKI groups (47.9% vs. 15.7%, p < 0.001). Mean CM × SCr/BW ratio was higher in the AKI group than in the non-AKI group (4.1 ± 2.9 vs. 2.9 ± 1.6, p < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, CM × SCr/BW per 1.0 increase, ejection fraction <40%, and transfusion were associated with the occurrence of AKI (odds ratio [OR]: 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 1.20; p = 0.017, OR: 3.01; 95% CI: 1.49 to 5.00; p = 0.001, OR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.54 to 6.15; p = 0.001, respectively). A threshold value of CM × SCr/BW for predicting AKI was statistically identified as 2.7., Conclusions: Although mechanisms of AKI following TAVI are multifactorial, the present study identified a relationship between CM dose increment and high prevalence of AKI. Therapeutic efforts not to exceed the threshold value may reduce the risk of AKI., (Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To compare magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for the assessment of myocardial infarction (MI) after alcohol septal ablation (ASA)., Methods: Ten patients (mean age, 60 years ± 16) were examined with both MDCT and 1.5-T MR imaging performed 10 minutes after injection, within 3 days after ASA. Half of them had a temporary pacemaker (PM) during MDCT examination. Global image quality (IQ) and localization of MI were noticed on both MDCT and MR images. Volumes of MI, contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) were also calculated. ASA effectiveness was evaluated by echocardiography immediately and 3 months after procedure., Results: Global IQ was considered adequate for both procedures. In 8 patients, MI reached the basal part of the septum on both MDCT and MR images. The 2 remaining patients exhibited sparing of the basal septum on MDCT and MR images. Volumes of MI were within the same range with the 2 techniques (MDCT: 22.1 ± 8.8 mL; MR imaging: 23.8 ± 9.4 mL) and correlated well each other (R(2)=0.85, p<0.002). The 2 patients with sparing of the basal interventricular septum had persistent gradient on echocardiography 3 months after ASA, suggesting failure of the procedure. The volumes of MI didn't correlate with the reduction of pressure gradient on echocardiography 3 months after ASA (R(2)=0.02, p<0.05)., Conclusions: Evaluation of post ASA MI is feasible with MDCT by comparison with MR imaging. MDCT might serve as an alternative imaging method in case of PM implantation., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of the Genous™ endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) capturing stent in conjunction with HmG-CoA-reductase inhibitors (statins) to stimulate EPC recruitment, in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions., Methods and Results: The HEALING IIB study was a multi-center, prospective trial, including 100 patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was late luminal loss by QCA at 6-month follow-up (FU). Although statin therapy increased relative EPC levels by 5.6-fold, the angiographic outcome at 6 month FU was not improved in patients with an overall in-stent late luminal loss of 0.76±0.50 mm. The composite major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate was 9.4%, whereas 6.3% clinically justified target lesion revascularizations (TLRs) were observed. 2 Patients died within the first 30 days after stent implantation due to angiographically verified in-stent thrombosis. At 12 month FU, MACE and TLR increased to 15.6% and 11.5% respectively and stabilized until 24 month FU. 18 Month angiographic FU showed a significant decrease in late luminal loss (0.67±0.54, 11.8% reduction or 10% by matched serial analysis, P=0.001)., Conclusion: The HEALING IIB study suggests that statin therapy in combination with the EPC capture stent does not contribute to a reduction of in-stent restenosis formation for the treatment of de novo coronary artery disease. Although concomitant statin therapy was able to stimulate EPC recruitment, it did not improve the angiographic outcome of the bio-engineered EPC capture stent. Remarkably, angiographic late loss was significantly reduced between 6 and 18 months., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction has traditionally been supported by unfractionated heparin, which has never been directly compared with a new anticoagulant using consistent anticoagulation and similar antiplatelet strategies in both groups. We compared traditional heparin treatment with intravenous enoxaparin in primary PCI., Methods: In a randomised open-label trial, patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive an intravenous bolus of 0·5 mg/kg of enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin before primary PCI. Wherever possible, medical teams travelling in mobile intensive care units (ambulances) selected, randomly assigned (using an interactive voice response system at the central randomisation centre), and treated patients. Patients who had received any anticoagulant before randomisation were excluded. Patients and caregivers were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was 30-day incidence of death, complication of myocardial infarction, procedure failure, or major bleeding. The main secondary endpoint was the composite of death, recurrent acute coronary syndrome, or urgent revascularisation. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00718471., Findings: 910 patients were assigned to treatment with enoxaparin (n=450) or unfractionated heparin (n=460). The primary endpoint occurred in 126 (28%) patients after anticoagulation with enoxaparin versus 155 (34%) patients on unfractionated heparin (relative risk [RR] 0·83, 95% CI 0·68-1·01, p=0·06). The incidence of death (enoxaparin, 17 [4%] vs heparin, 29 [6%] patients; p=0·08), complication of myocardial infarction (20 [4%] vs 29 [6%]; p=0·21), procedure failure (100 [26%] vs 109 [28%]; p=0·61), and major bleeding (20 [5%] vs 22 [5%]; p=0·79) did not differ between groups. Enoxaparin resulted in a significantly reduced rate of the main secondary endpoint (30 [7%] vs 52 [11%] patients; RR 0·59, 95% CI 0·38-0·91, p=0·015). Death, complication of myocardial infarction, or major bleeding (46 [10%] vs 69 [15%] patients; p=0·03), death or complication of myocardial infarction (35 [8%] vs 57 [12%]; p=0·02), and death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularisation (23 [5%] vs 39 [8%]; p=0·04) were all reduced with enoxaparin., Interpretation: Intravenous enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin significantly reduced clinical ischaemic outcomes without differences in bleeding and procedural success. Therefore, enoxaparin provided an improvement in net clinical benefit in patients undergoing primary PCI., Funding: Direction de la Recherche Clinique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris; Sanofi-Aventis., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to demonstrate the noninferiority of endothelial progenitor cell capturing stents (ECS) relative to drug-eluting stents (DES) regarding target lesion failure (TLF) and the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion repeat revascularization within 1 year., Background: A "pro-healing" approach for prevention of in-stent restenosis is theoretically favorable over the use of cytotoxic/cytostatic drugs released from DES to treat coronary artery disease. Promoting accelerated endothelialization of the stent, ECS have shown promising results in studies with patients carrying noncomplex lesions., Methods: We undertook an international, clinical trial in 26 centers planning to randomize 1,300 patients with stable coronary artery disease and with a high risk of restenosis between treatment, with either ECS or DES. After a routine review with 50% of the patients enrolled, early cessation of the trial was recommended by the data and safety monitoring board when TLF in the ECS population was higher and treatment of new patients with an ECS would be unreasonable., Results: At 1 year evaluating 304 patients receiving ECS and 318 receiving DES, TLF occurred in 17.4% of the ECS-treated patients and in 7.0% of the DES-treated patients (p = 0.98 for noninferiority)., Conclusions: Within 1 year, inhibition of intimal hyperplasia by the ECS is not sufficiently strong to compete with DES in terms of restenosis prevention in patients/lesions with a high risk of restenosis. Furthermore, long-term follow-up is pivotal to fully appreciate the clinical value of ECS, including the effect on late intimal hyperplasia regression., (Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of the CYPHER (Cordis, Johnson and Johnson, Bridgewater, New Jersey) sirolimus-eluting coronary stent (SES) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)., Background: Concern over the safety of drug-eluting stents implanted during PCI for STEMI remains, and long-term follow-up from randomized trials are necessary. TYPHOON (Trial to assess the use of the cYPHer sirolimus-eluting stent in acute myocardial infarction treated with ballOON angioplasty) randomized 712 patients with STEMI treated by primary PCI to receive either SES (n = 355) or bare-metal stents (BMS) (n = 357). The primary end point, target vessel failure at 1 year, was significantly lower in the SES group than in the BMS group (7.3% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.004) with no increase in adverse events., Methods: A 4-year follow-up was performed. Complete data were available in 501 patients (70%), and the survival status is known in 580 patients (81%)., Results: Freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 4 years was significantly better in the SES group (92.4% vs. 85.1%; p = 0.002); there were no significant differences in freedom from cardiac death (97.6% and 95.9%; p = 0.37) or freedom from repeat myocardial infarction (94.8% and 95.6%; p = 0.85) between the SES and BMS groups. No difference in definite/probable stent thrombosis was noted at 4 years (SES: 4.4%, BMS: 4.8%, p = 0.83). In the 580 patients with known survival status at 4 years, the all-cause death rate was 5.8% in the SES and 7.0% in the BMS group (p = 0.61)., Conclusions: In the 70% of patients with complete follow-up at 4 years, SES demonstrated sustained efficacy to reduce TLR with no difference in death, repeat myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis. (The Study to Assess AMI Treated With Balloon Angioplasty [TYPHOON]; NCT00232830)., (Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Coronary vasomotor responses to sympathetic stimulation vary with endothelial-layer integrity or presence of atherosclerosis. Our study objective was to assess the effects of phenylephrine-induced alpha-adrenergic stimulation on coronary vasomotion in heart transplant recipients with and without graft atherosclerosis., Methods: Intracoronary phenylephrine (alpha(1)-selective agonist) was injected in 6 control subjects, 9 recipients with angiographically normal coronary arteries and 8 recipients with mild or moderate atherosclerosis. Coronary flow velocity was measured using a Doppler guide-wire. The diameters of 3 epicardial segments of the left coronary artery and coronary blood flow and resistance were assessed at baseline, after infusion of increasing acetylcholine doses (10(-7) and 10(-6) mol/liter) and after phenylephrine (150- to 200-microg bolus). Systemic and coronary hemodynamic parameters were measured immediately after acetylcholine and 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 15 minutes after phenylephrine., Results: Phenylephrine induced similar significant increases in rate pressure product in the 3 groups. Acetylcholine induced epicardial vasodilation in controls and vasoconstriction in transplant recipients. Phenylephrine induced epicardial vasodilation in controls and in angiographically normal recipients; subsequent vasoconstriction occurred in this last group. In the recipients with angiographic abnormalities, sustained vasoconstriction occurred. At peak phenylephrine effect, coronary blood flow (CBF) increased significantly (p < 0.001 vs baseline) in all 3 groups. Coronary resistance decreased in the 3 groups but the decrease was smaller in the recipients with angiographic abnormalities (p < 0.05 vs controls)., Conclusions: In heart transplant patients, graft atherosclerosis unmasks the direct coronary vasoconstricting effects of pharmacologic alpha-adrenergic stimulation.

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of selective B1-receptor stimulation with des-Arg9-bradykinin on coronary vasomotion in transplanted and non-transplanted patients., Background: Bradykinin B1-receptors have been identified on endothelial and smooth muscle cells in human coronary arteries in vitro; however, their physiologic role in the coronary circulation is unknown., Methods: Twelve heart transplant patients were compared with 10 control subjects at 3.2 +/- 2.2 months after surgery. Coronary flow velocity was measured using guide-wire Doppler. The diameter of 3 epicardial segments of the left coronary artery and coronary blood flow were assessed at baseline, immediately after infusions of increasing doses of des-arginine(Arg9)-bradykinin at estimated coronary blood concentrations of 5.4 x 10(-9), 5.4 x 10(-8), 5.4 x 10(-7) and 1.6 x 10(-6) mol/liter, and of acetylcholine at 10(-8), 10(-7) and 10(-6) mol/liter)., Results: Des-Arg9-bradykinin induced a similar decrease in all measured epicardial diameters in both groups and no change in coronary blood flow. Vasoconstriction was significant only at the 2 highest concentrations: -6 +/- 9% (p < 0.01) and -7 +/- 11% (p < 0.01) in control subjects, and -8 +/- 8% (p < 0.001) and -9 +/- 11% (p < 0.001) in heart transplant patients. Acetylcholine induced significant epicardial vasodilation in control subjects and vasoconstriction in transplant patients. The presence of allograft rejection did not modify the responses to des-Arg9-bradykinin with regard to both conductance and resistance vessels., Conclusions: Kinin B1-receptors exist and can be stimulated in humans. The vasoconstrictive action on epicardial coronary arteries of des-Arg(9)-bradykinin in humans argues for a predominant action of B1-receptor stimulation at the level of smooth muscle cells.