Search

Background: Left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder embolization is an infrequent but serious complication., Objectives: We aim to describe timing, management and clinical outcomes of device embolization in a multi-center registry., Methods: Patient characteristics, imaging findings and procedure and follow-up data were collected retrospectively. Device embolizations were categorized according to 1) timing 2) management and 3) clinical outcomes., Results: Sixty-seven centers contributed data. Device embolization occurred in 108 patients. In 70.4 % of cases, it happened within the first 24 h of the procedure. The device was purposefully left in the LA and the aorta in two (1.9 %) patients, an initial percutaneous retrieval was attempted in 81 (75.0 %) and surgery without prior percutaneous retrieval attempt was performed in 23 (21.3 %) patients. Two patients died before a retrieval attempt could be made. In 28/81 (34.6 %) patients with an initial percutaneous retrieval attempt a second, additional attempt was performed, which was associated with a high mortality (death in patients with one attempt: 2.9 % vs. second attempt: 21.4 %, p < 0.001). The primary outcome (bailout surgery, cardiogenic shock, stroke, TIA, and/or death) occurred in 47 (43.5 %) patients. Other major complications related to device embolization occurred in 21 (19.4 %) patients., Conclusions: The majority of device embolizations after LAA closure occurs early. A percutaneous approach is often the preferred method for a first rescue attempt. Major adverse event rates, including death, are high particularly if the first retrieval attempt was unsuccessful., Condensed Abstract: This dedicated multicenter registry examined timing, management, and clinical outcome of device embolization. Early embolization (70.4 %) was most frequent. As a first rescue attempt, percutaneous retrieval was preferred in 75.0 %, followed by surgical removal (21.3 %). In patients with a second retrieval attempt a higher mortality (death first attempt: 2.9 % vs. death second attempt: 24.1 %, p < 0.001) was observed. Mortality (10.2 %) and the major complication rate after device embolization were high., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest A. Aminian is a consultant and proctor for Boston Scientific and Abbott. I. Akin received lecture and proctoring fees from Boston Scientific for the Watchman Okkluder. J. Lund discloses a clinical advisor (proctor) role in LAAC (Abbott) and lecture fees (Abbott, Boston scientific). E. Guerios serves as proctor for LAA closure for Abbott and Lifetech Scientific. N. Amabile has received proctoring and consulting fees from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific. C. Skurk has received proctor honoraria from Boston Scientific and speaker fees from Boston Scientific and Lifetech Scientific. J. Harvey is proctor for Abiomed, Boston Scientific and Medtronic and part of the Speaker's bureau for Abiomed, Boston Scientific and Medtronic. He also is part of the advisory board for Avail, Boston Scientific and Medtronic. H. Sievert has received study honoraria to institution, travel expenses and consulting fees from 4tech Cardio, Abbott, Ablative Solutions, Adona Medical, Akura Medical, Ancora Heart, Append Medical, Axon, Bavaria Medizin Technologie GmbH, Bioventrix, Boston Scientific, Cardiac Dimensions, Cardiac Success, Cardimed, Cardionovum, Celonova, Contego, Coramaze, Croivalve, CSL Behring LLC, CVRx, Dinova, Edwards, Endobar, Endologix, Endomatic, Esperion Therapeutics, Inc., Hangzhou Nuomao Medtech, Holistick Medical, Intershunt, Intervene, K2, Laminar, Lifetech, Magenta, Maquet Getinge Group, Metavention, Mitralix, Mokita, Neurotronic, NXT Biomedical, Occlutech, Recor, Renal Guard, Shifamed, Terumo, Trisol, Vascular Dynamics, Vectorious Medtech, Venus, Venock, Vivasure Medical, Vvital Biomed and Whiteswell. M. Kühne received personal fees from Bayer, Böhringer Ingelheim, Pfizer BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Johnson & Johnson, and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., as well as grants from Bayer, Pfizer, Boston Scientific, BMS, Biotronik, and Daiichi Sankyo. S. Sabir is part of the Boston Scientific WATCHMAN advisory board. J. Kim has received proctoring fees from Abbott Vascular. M. Montorfano received consultant fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Kardia. M. Ancona received consultant fees from Abbott. Relevant research funding went to Vanderbilt University Medical Center from Boston Scientific, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Medtronic and Atricure, where C. Ellis is practicing. He also reseves a consultant and advisor fee from Abbott Medical, Atricure, Boston Scientific, Medtronic. L. Nombela-Franco is proctor for Abbott Vascular and has received lectures fees from Boston Scientific. A. Natale has received speaker honoraria from Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, St. Jude Medical, Biotronik, and Medtronic. He also is a consultant for Biosense Webster, St. Jude Medical, and Janssen. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Today, endovascular treatment (EVT) is the therapy of choice for strokes due to acute large vessel occlusion, irrespective of prior thrombolysis. This necessitates fast, coordinated multi-specialty collaboration. Currently, in most countries, the number of physicians and centres with expertise in EVT is limited. Thus, only a small proportion of eligible patients receive this potentially life-saving therapy, often after significant delays. Hence, there is an unmet need to train a sufficient number of physicians and centres in acute stroke intervention in order to allow widespread and timely access to EVT., Aim: To provide multi-specialty training guidelines for competency, accreditation and certification of centres and physicians in EVT for acute large vessel occlusion strokes., Material and Methods: The World Federation for Interventional Stroke Treatment (WIST) consists of experts in the field of endovascular stroke treatment. This interdisciplinary working group developed competency - rather than time-based - guidelines for operator training, taking into consideration trainees' previous skillsets and experience. Existing training concepts from mostly single specialty organizations were analysed and incorporated., Results: The WIST establishes an individualized approach to acquiring clinical knowledge and procedural skills to meet the competency requirements for certification of interventionalists of various disciplines and stroke centres in EVT. WIST guidelines encourage acquisition of skills using innovative training methods such as structured supervised high-fidelity simulation and procedural performance on human perfused cadaveric models., Conclusions: WIST multispecialty guidelines outline competency and quality standards for physicians and centres to perform safe and effective EVT. The role of quality control and quality assurance is highlighted., Summary: The World Federation for Interventional Stroke Treatment (WIST) establishes an individualized approach to acquiring clinical knowledge and procedural skills to meet the competency requirements for certification of interventionalists of various disciplines and stroke centres in endovascular treatment (EVT). WIST guidelines encourage acquisition of skills using innovative training methods such as structured supervised high-fidelity simulation and procedural performance on human perfused cadaveric models. WIST multispecialty guidelines outline competency and quality standards for physicians and centers to perform safe and effective EVT. The role of quality control and quality assurance is highlighted., Simultaneous Publication: The WIST 2023 Guidelines are published simultaneously in Europe (Adv Interv Cardiol 2023)., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest in relation to this manuscript., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Comprehensive metrics that provide a measure of dietary patterns at global and national levels are needed to inform and assess the effectiveness of policy actions that promote sustainable healthy diets. In 2019, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization reported 16 guiding principles of sustainable healthy diets, but it is still unknown how these principles are considered in dietary metrics. This scoping review aimed to explore how principles of sustainable healthy diets are considered in dietary metrics used worldwide. Forty-eight food-based, investigator-defined dietary pattern metrics assessing diet quality in free-living, healthy populations at the individual or household level were assessed against the 16 guiding principles of sustainable healthy diets, which was used as a theoretical framework. A strong adherence of the metrics to health-related guiding principles was found. Metrics had a weak adherence to principles related to environmental and sociocultural aspects of diets, except for the principle related to diets being culturally appropriate. No existing dietary metric captures all principles of sustainable healthy diets. Notably, the significance food processing, environmental, and sociocultural aspects of diets are generally understated. This likely reflects the lack of focus on these aspects in current dietary guidelines, which highlights the importance of including these emerging topics in future dietary recommendations. The absence of quantitative metrics that comprehensively measure sustainable healthy diets limits the body of evidence that would otherwise inform national and international guideline developments. Our findings can help grow the quantity and quality of the body of evidence available to inform policy activities to realize 2030 Sustainable Development Goals of multiple United Nations. Adv Nutr 2022;x:xx., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ablation of the right-sided greater splanchnic nerve (GSN) can reduce excessive splanchnic vasoconstriction, potentially improving the handling of volume shifts in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess a novel catheter procedure of right-sided GSN ablation to treat HFpEF: splanchnic ablation for volume management., Methods: This trial included 11 HFpEF patients (8 women, age 70 ± 8 years) with New York Heart Association functional class II or III symptoms, ejection fraction ≥50%, and elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at rest or with exercise. After splanchnic ablation for volume management, follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months included 6-minute walk test, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), and echocardiography., Results: There were no device-related adverse cardiac events or clinical sequelae following right GSN ablation through 12 months. Patients experienced clinical improvements by 1 month that were sustained through 12 months. KCCQ score improved from baseline median 48 (IQR: 35-52) to 65 (IQR: 58-77) at 1 month and 80 (IQR: 77-88) at 12 months (P &lt; 0.05). The 6-minute walk test distance increased from baseline 292 ± 82 m to 341 ± 88 m at 1 month and 359 ± 75 m at 12 months (P &lt; 0.05). The NT-proBNP decreased from a baseline mean of 1,292 ± 1,186 pg/mL to 1,202 ± 797 pg/mL (P = 0.585) at 1 month, to 472 ± 226 pg/mL (P = 0.028) at 6 months, and to 379 ± 165 pg/mL (P = 0.039) at 12 months., Conclusions: In this open-label, single-arm feasibility study, right-sided GSN ablation was safe and improved mostly subjective clinical metrics in patients with HFpEF over 12 months. (Endovascular GSN Ablation in Subjects With HFpEF; NCT04287946)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by Axon Therapies. Dr Fudim was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (K23HL151744), the American Heart Association (20IPA35310955), Mario Family Award, Duke Chair’s Award, Translating Duke Health Award, Bayer, Bodyport and BTG Specialty Pharmaceuticals; and has received consulting fees from Abbott, Audicor, AxonTherapies, Bodyguide, Bodyport, Boston Scientific, CVRx, Daxor, Edwards LifeSciences, Feldschuh Foundation, Fire1, Gradient, Intershunt, NXT Biomedical, Pharmacosmos, PreHealth, Splendo, Vironix, Viscardia, and Zoll. Dr Reddy has served as a consultant to and holds stock options in Axon Therapies related to this work; has served as a consultant for Abbott, Biosense-Webster, BioTel Heart, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiofocus, Cardionomic, CoreMap, EBR, Fire1, Gore and Associates, HRT, Impulse Dynamics, Medtronic, Philips, and Pulse Biosciences; has served as a consultant for and has equity in Ablacon, Acutus Medical, Affera, Apama Medical, APN Health, Aquaheart, Atacor, Autonomix, Backbeat, BioSig, Cardiac Implants, CardiaCare, CardioNXT/AFTx, Circa Scientific, Corvia Medical, Dinova-Hangzhou DiNovA EP Technology, East End Medical, EPD, Epix Therapeutics, EpiEP, Eximo, Farapulse, Intershunt, Javelin Lld, Kardium, Keystone Heart, LuxMed, Medlumics, Middlepeak, Nuvera, Restore Medical, and Sirona Medical; and has equity in Manual Surgical Sciences, Newpace, Surecor, Valcare and Vizaramed unrelated to this work. Dr Burkhoff has received consulting fees from Axon Therapies. Dr Shah has received research grants from the National Institutes of Health (U54 HL160273, R01 HL107577, R01 HL127028, R01 HL140731, R01 HL149423), Actelion, AstraZeneca, Corvia, Novartis, and Pfizer; and has received consulting fees from Abbott, Actelion, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Aria CV, Axon Therapies, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiora, Coridea, CVRx, Cyclerion, Cytokinetics, Edwards Lifesciences, Eidos, Eisai, Imara, Impulse Dynamics, Intellia, Ionis, Ironwood, Lilly, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Prothena, Regeneron, Rivus, Sanofi, Shifamed, Tenax, Tenaya, and United Therapeutics. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Endovascular baroreflex amplification with the MobiusHD, a self-expanding stent-like device that is implanted in the internal carotid artery, was designed to reduce the sympathetic overactivity that contributes to progressive heart failure with reduced ejection fraction., Methods: Symptomatic patients (New York Heart Association class III) with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤40%) despite guideline directed medical therapy and n-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels ≥400 pg/mL in whom carotid ultrasound and computed tomographic angiography demonstrated absence of carotid plaque were enrolled. Baseline and follow-up measures included 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score (KCCQ OSS), and repeat biomarkers and transthoracic echocardiography., Results: Twenty-nine patients underwent device implantation. The mean age was 60.6 ± 11.4 years, and all had New York Heart Association class III symptoms. Mean KCCQ OSS was 41.4 ± 12.7, mean 6MWD was 216.0 ± 43.7 m, median NT-proBNP was 1005.9 pg/mL (894, 1294), and mean LVEF was 34.7 ± 2.9%. All device implantations were successful. Two patients died (161 days and 195 days) and one stroke occurred (170 days) during follow-up. For the 17 patients with 12-month follow-up, mean KCCQ OSS improved by 17.4 ± 9.1 points, mean 6MWD increased by 97.6 ± 51.1 meters, a mean 28.4% reduction from the baseline NT-proBNP concentration was found, and mean LVEF improved by 5.6% ± 2.9 (paired data)., Conclusion: Endovascular baroreflex amplification with the MobiusHD device was safe and effected positive changes in quality of life, exercise capacity, and LVEF, consistent with observed reductions in NT-proBNP levels., Competing Interests: Dr. H. Sievert has received institutional honoraria, travel expenses, and consulting fees from 4tech Cardio, Abbott, Ablative Solutions, Ancora Heart, Append Medical, Bavaria Medizin Technologie GmbH, Bioventrix, Boston Scientific, Carag, CardiacDimensions, Cardimed, Celonova, Comed B.V., Contego, CVRx, Dinova, Edwards Lifesciences, Endologix, Hemoteq, Hangzhou Nuomao Medtech, Holistick Medical, Lifetech, Maquet Getinge Group, Medtronic, Mokita, Occlutech, Recor, RenalGuard, Terumo, Vascular Dynamics, Vectorious Medtech, Venus, Venock, and Vivasure Medical. Dr. Januzzi is a Trustee of the American College of Cardiology, a Board member of Imbria Pharmaceuticals, has received grant support from 10.13039/100014386Abbott Diagnostics, Applied Therapeutics, Innolife, Jana Care, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Prevencio and Roche Diagnostics, consulting income from Abbott, Janssen, Novartis, Prevencio, and Roche Diagnostics, and participates in clinical endpoint committees/data safety monitoring boards for Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, CVRx, Janssen, MyoKardia, Takeda, and Vifor. Dr. Lindenfeld receives grant funding from 10.13039/100004325AstraZeneca, NovoNordisk, and Volumetrix and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Abbott, Alleviant, Boston Scientific, Boehringer Ingelheim, CVRx, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Merck, TegoSense, Vascular Dynamics, and V-Wave. Dr. Rothmann is an employee of Vascular Dynamics. Dr. Stone has received speaker honoraria from Medtronic, Pulnovo, Infraredx; has served as a consultant to Valfix, TherOx, Robocath, HeartFlow, Ablative Solutions, Vectorious, Miracor, Neovasc, Abiomed, Ancora, Elucid Bio, Occlutech, CorFlow, Apollo Therapeutics, Impulse Dynamics, Vascular Dynamics, Shockwave, V-Wave, Cardiomech, Gore, Amgen; and has equity/options from Ancora, Cagent, Applied Therapeutics, Biostar family of funds, SpectraWave, Orchestra Biomed, Aria, Cardiac Success, Valfix, Xenter. Dr. Stone’s daughter is an employee at Medtronic. Institutional disclosure: Dr. Stone’s employer, Mount Sinai Hospital, receives research support from 10.13039/100000046Abbott, Abiomed, Bioventrix, 10.13039/100016476Cardiovascular Systems Inc, Phillips, 10.13039/100007497Biosense-Webster, Shockwave, Vascular Dynamics, and V-wave. All other authors have nothing to disclose., (© 2022 The Author(s).)

Objective: To examine the outcomes of percutaneous closure of large atrial septal defects (ASDs) (≥25 mm)., Background: Data on long-term results after closure of large ASDs are limited., Methods: We reviewed the records of 275 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter closure of large (≥25 mm) ASDs from January 1999 until December 2016 in our center. The most common indication for closure was a large left-to-right shunt. Follow-up (FU) was performed at regular intervals thereafter. Results after closure of ASDs with diameters of 25-30 mm, >30-35 mm and >35 mm were compared., Results: Percutaneous closure was technically successful in 99.6%. Mean FU time was 4.8 years (0-15.5 years). Peri-operative (30-day) adverse events occurred in 20.4% and included death in 0.7% (one unrelated to the procedure and one of unknown cause), device erosion in 0.7%, device embolization in 2.9%, pericardial effusion in 5.5%, air embolism in 0.4%, new onset atrial fibrillation in 10.5%, transient supraventricular tachycardia in 0.4% and fever in 0.7%. Late (>30 days after the procedure) atrial fibrillation occurred in 5.8%. There was one device erosion >15 years after the implantation treated successfully surgically. Complete defect closure was achieved in 95.6%., Conclusion: Device closure of large ASDs is feasible, safe and effective with high technical success and low risk of serious periprocedural complications. Nevertheless, in very large defects (>40 mm), both options, surgery and percutaneous closure should be considered. Device or procedural long-term adverse events are rare., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Study honoraria to institution, travel expenses, consulting fees(2) < 25. 000 €: 4tech Cardio, Abbott, Ablative Solutions, Ancora Heart, Append Medical, Axon, Bavaria Medizin Technologie GmbH, Bioventrix, Boston Scientific, Carag, Cardiac Dimensions, Cardiac Success, Cardimed, Celonova, Contego, Coramaze, Croivalve, CVRx, Dinova, Edwards, Endobar, Endologix, Endomatic, Hangzhou Nuomao Medtech, Holistick Medical, Intershunt, Intervene, K2, Lifetech, Magenta, Maquet Getinge Group, Medtronic, Metavention, Mitralix, Mokita, NXT Biomedical, Occlutech, Recor, Renal Guard, Terumo, Trisol, Vascular Dynamics, Vectorious Medtech, Venus, Venock, Vivasure Medical, Vvital Biomed, Whiteswell., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: As transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) replacement is increasingly used in patients with longer life expectancy, a sizable proportion will require redo TAV replacement (TAVR). The unique configuration of balloon-expandable TAV (bTAV) vs a self-expanding TAV (sTAV) potentially affects TAV-in-TAV outcome., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to better inform prosthesis selection, TAV-in-TAV outcomes were assessed according to the type of initial and subsequent TAV., Methods: Patients from the Redo-TAVR registry were analyzed using propensity weighting according to their initial valve type (bTAV [n = 115] vs sTAV [n = 106]) and subsequent valve type (bTAV [n = 130] vs sTAV [n = 91])., Results: Patients with failed bTAVs presented later (vs sTAV) (4.9 ± 2.1 years vs 3.7 ± 2.3 years; P < 0.001), with smaller effective orifice area (1.0 ± 0.7 cm 2 vs 1.3 ± 0.8 cm 2 ; P = 0.018) and less frequent dominant regurgitation (16.2% vs 47.3%; P < 0.001). Mortality at 30 days was 2.3% (TAV-in-bTAV) vs 0% (TAV-in-sTAV) (P = 0.499) and 1.7% (bTAV-in-TAV) vs 1.0% (sTAV-in-TAV) (P = 0.612); procedural safety was 72.6% (TAV-in-bTAV) vs 71.2% (TAV-in-sTAV) (P = 0.817) and 73.2% (bTAV-in-TAV) vs 76.5% (sTAV-in-TAV) (P = 0.590). Device success was similar according to initial valve type but higher with subsequent sTAV vs bTAV (77.2% vs 64.3%; P = 0.045), primarily because of lower residual gradients (10.3 mm Hg [8.9-11.7 mm Hg] vs 15.2 mm Hg [13.2-17.1 mm Hg]; P < 0.001). Residual regurgitation (moderate or greater) was similar after bTAV-in-TAV and sTAV-in-TAV (5.7%) and nominally higher after TAV-in-bTAV (9.1%) vs TAV-in-sTAV (4.4%) (P = 0.176)., Conclusions: In selected patients, no association was observed between TAV type and redo TAVR safety or mortality, yet subsequent sTAV was associated with higher device success because of lower redo gradients. These findings are preliminary, and more data are needed to guide valve choice for redo TAVR., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Webb is a consultant to and has received research funding from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, and Boston Scientific. Dr Kim is a proctor for and has received speaker fees from Boston Scientific, Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Abdel-Wahab has received speaker honoraria and/or consultancy fees to the hospital on his behalf from Boston Scientific and Medtronic. Dr Barbanti is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences; and is an advisory board member for Biotronik. Dr Søndergaard has received consulting fees and institutional research grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Symetis. Dr Redwood is a proctor for and has received lecture fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Hamm is an advisory board member for Medtronic. Dr Sinning has received speaker honoraria and research grants from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Sathananthan is a consultant to Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Schofer has received speaker fees and travel compensation from Boston Scientific; and has received travel compensation from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott/St. Jude Medical. Dr Andreas is a proctor, consultant, and speaker for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and Medtronic; and has received institutional grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, and LSI. Dr Guerrero has received research grant support from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Castriota is a proctor for Medtronic and Boston Scientific. Dr Nazif is a consultant for or has received honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Biotrace, and Baylis Medical; and is a consultant for and holds equity in Venus Medtech. Dr Pilgrim has received research grants from Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Biotronik; and has received speaker fees from Boston Scientific and Biotronik. Dr Babaliaros is a consultant to Edwards Lifesciences; and holds equity in Transmural Systems. Dr Van Mieghem has received institutional research grants and consulting fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Daiichi Sankyo, and PulseCath; and has received institutional research grant support from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Latib has received institutional research and grant support from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Edwards Lifesciences; and has received personal consulting honoraria from Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Hildick-Smith is a proctor and adviser for Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Left atrial appendage closure aims to eliminate the stasis component of Virchow triad by eliminating a cul-de-sac that favors thrombosis, particularly when atrial contractility becomes inefficient, such as in atrial fibrillation. Left atrial appendage closure devices have a common objective of sealing the appendage completely, with device stability and avoidance of device thrombosis. Two main device designs have been used to perform left atrial appendage closure: those that use a pacifier design (lobe + disk) and those that use a plug (single lobe) design. This review highlights the potential features and benefits of the single-lobe devices., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been associated with embolic strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs). Catheter closure of PFO is effective in preventing recurrent events. Residual shunts and procedure or device related complications can occur, including atrial fibrillation and thrombus formation. This study examines the initial experience with a new PFO closure device, the IrisFIT PFO-Occluder (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China)., Methods: 95 patients with indications for PFO closure underwent percutaneous closure with the IrisFIT PFO-Occluder. The primary endpoint was the rate of accurate device placement with no/small residual shunt at 3 or 6 months follow-up. All patients underwent transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after 1 to 6 months. In case of a residual shunt, an additional TEE was performed after 12 months. Clinical follow-up was performed up to a mean of 33.1 ± 3.6 months., Results: The device was successfully implanted in 95 (100%) patients with no relevant procedural complications. At final TEE follow-up (7.6 ± 3.9 months) the effective closure rate was 96.8% with 1 moderate and 2 large residual shunts. There were 8 cases of new onset atrial fibrillation and 2 TIAs. There were no cases of device embolization or erosion., Conclusion: The IrisFIT occluder is a new PFO closure device with several advantages compared to other devices. In this small study cohort, technical success rate, closure rate and adverse event rate were comparable to other devices. The rate of new onset atrial fibrillation was higher in comparison to other studies and warrants further investigation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Kolja Sievert: none. Jiangtao Yu: BBraun, Boston Scientific, LifeTech. Stefan Bertog: none. Marius Hornung: none. Ralph Stephan von Bardeleben: none. Sameer Gafoor: none. Markus Reinartz: none. Predrag Matic: none. Ilona Hofmann: none. Iris Grunwald: none. Nalan Schnelle: none. Horst Sievert: 4tech Cardio, Abbott, Ablative Solutions, Ancora Heart, Bavaria Medizin Technologie GmbH, Bioventrix, Boston Scientific, Carag, Cardiac Dimensions, Celonova, Cibiem, CGuard, Comed B.V., Contego, CVRx, Edwards, Endologix, Hemoteq, InspireMD, Lifetech, Maquet Getinge Group, Medtronic, Mitralign, Nuomao Medtech, Occlutech, pfm Medical, Recor, Renal Guard, Rox Medical, Terumo, Vascular Dynamics, Vivasure Medical, Venus, Veryan., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Stroke remains an important risk during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Though the use of the double-filter Sentinel cerebral protection system (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) may lower the stroke risk, the deployment of this device requires manipulation within the aortic arch and cranial arch vessels potentially causing dislodgment of atherosclerotic debris in the process thereby possibly offsetting its benefit with regards to reducing cerebral embolization. Apart from patient selection, minimizing maneuvering during deployment may improve the safety of device deployment. In this context, we illustrate a case using three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) - overlay to facilitate Sentinel cerebral protection system deployment during TAVI. Emphasis in this case rests on demonstration of how aforementioned periprocedural imaging may facilitate negotiation of anatomical variants and avoid inadvertent cannulation of an anomalous left vertebral artery originating from the aortic arch. Imaging guidance with this concept may minimize device manipulation and reduce the risk of cerebral embolization. Further systematic evaluation is needed to demonstrate whether this approach improves clinical outcomes., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Renal sympathetic denervation using conventional non-irrigated radiofrequency catheters has potential technical shortcomings, including limited penetration depth and incomplete circumferential nerve damage, potentially impacting therapeutic efficacy. Against this background, second generation multi-electrode, radiofrequency and ultrasound renal denervation systems have been developed to provide more consistent circumferential nerve ablation. Irrigated catheters may allow deeper penetration while minimizing arterial injury. In this context, catheter-based chemical denervation, with selective infusion of alcohol, a potent neurolytic agent, into the perivascular space, may minimize endothelial, intimal and medial injury while providing circumferential neurolysis. Animal studies demonstrate pronounced renal norepinephrine level reductions and consistent renal nerve injury after perivascular alcohol infusion using the Peregrine Catheter. Early clinical studies demonstrated significant blood pressure reductions and a reasonable safety profile. Randomized sham-controlled trials (NCT03503773, NCT02910414) are underway to examine whether the aforementioned theoretical advantages of alcohol-medicated denervation with the Peregrine System™ Kit translate into clinical benefits., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe baseline characteristics, and periprocedural and mid-term outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve interventions post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and examine their clinical benefit., Background: The optimal management of residual mitral regurgitation (MR) post-TAVR is challenging., Methods: This was an international registry of 23 TAVR centers., Results: In total, 106 of 24,178 patients (0.43%) underwent mitral interventions post-TAVR (100 staged, 6 concomitant), most commonly percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (PMVR). The median interval post-TAVR was 164 days. Mean age was 79.5 ± 7.2 years, MR was >moderate in 97.2%, technical success was 99.1%, and 30-day device success rate was 88.7%. There were 18 periprocedural complications (16.9%) including 4 deaths. During a median follow-up of 464 days, the cumulative risk for 3-year mortality was 29.0%. MR grade and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class improved dramatically; at 1 year, MR was moderate or less in 90.9% of patients (mild or less in 69.1%), and 85.9% of patients were in NYHA functional class I/II. Staged PMVR was associated with lower mortality versus medical treatment (57.5% vs. 30.8%) in a propensity-matched cohort (n = 156), but this was not statistically significant (hazard ratio: 1.75; p = 0.05)., Conclusions: For patients who continue to have significant MR, remain symptomatic post-TAVR, and are anatomically suitable for transcatheter interventions, these interventions are feasible, safe, and associated with significant improvement in MR grade and NYHA functional class. These results apply mainly to PMVR. A staged PMVR strategy was associated with markedly lower mortality, but this was not statistically significant. (Transcatheter Treatment for Combined Aortic and Mitral Valve Disease. The Aortic+Mitral TRAnsCatheter Valve Registry [AMTRAC]; NCT04031274)., Competing Interests: Author Disclosures Dr. Barbanti has received consultant fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. De Backer has received research grants and consultant fees from Abbott and Boston Scientific. Dr. Sievert has received institutional honoraria, travel expenses, and consulting fees from 4tech Cardio, Abbott, Ablative Solutions, Ancora Heart, Append Medical, Bavaria Medizin Technologie GmbH, Bioventrix, Boston Scientific, Carag, CardiacDimensions, Cardimed, Celonova, Comed B.V., Contego, CVRx, Dinova, Edwards Lifesciences, Endologix, Hemoteq, Hangzhou Nuomao Medtech, Holistick Medical, Lifetech, Maquet Getinge Group, Medtronic, Mokita, Occlutech, Recor, RenalGuard, Terumo, Vascular Dynamics, Vectorious Medtech, Venus, Venock, and Vivasure Medical. Dr. Grasso has been a proctor for Abbott Vascular. Dr. Andreas has been a proctor for Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences; and has received advisory board fees from Medtronic. Dr. Guerrero has received research grant support from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Van Mieghem has received research grant support from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, PulseCath BV, and Daiichi-Sankyo; and advisory fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Ancora, Medtronic, PulseCath BV, and Daiichi-Sankyo. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical and clinical success of acute stroke interventions performed in our interventional cardiology center., Background: Dedicated interventional stroke centers remain limited. Interventional cardiologists have established networks of catheterization laboratories and the necessary infrastructure to provide around the clock interventional therapy. These networks may also provide the currently lacking universal rapid access to prompt stroke intervention., Methods: Between July 2012 and July 2018, 70 consecutive patients underwent acute stroke intervention for large-vessel occlusions. Seventeen patients (24%) had tandem or multiple vessel occlusions. The majority (n = 63, 90%) were admitted via our local stroke unit, and 7 (10%) patients were transferred from other regional referral centers., Results: In 43 (61%) patients, systemic fibrinolytic therapy was started after baseline imaging. Mean time between symptom onset and arrival to the cath lab was 138 min; mean door-to-vascular access time was 64 min; mean time between cath lab activation and its operational readiness was 13 min. In all cases, access to supra-aortic vessels was achieved. Mean time between femoral arterial puncture and lesion crossing was 26 min. Stent implantation for extracranial stenosis or dissection was performed in 14 (20%) cases. Thrombectomy of intracranial occlusions was done with a stent retriever (n = 64, 91%) or an aspiration system (n = 14, 20%). In 20 (28%) cases, a combination of techniques was used. Recanalization was technically successful (Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction flow grade 2b or 3) in 65 (93%) patients. The 30-day mortality was 18% (n = 13). Favorable clinical outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2, was achieved in 61% at 3-month follow-up., Conclusions: Acute stroke interventions can be performed safely and with high technical and clinical success by experienced interventional cardiologists., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: A large, prospective international registry was developed to evaluate the initial clinical applications of transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) with different devices., Background: TTVI for native tricuspid valve dysfunction has been emerging during the last few years as an alternative therapeutic option to serve a large high-risk population of patients with severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (TR)., Methods: The TriValve Registry included 312 high-risk patients with severe TR (76.4 ± 8.5 years of age; 57% female; EuroSCORE II 9 ± 8%) at 18 centers. Interventions included repair at the level of the leaflets (MitraClip, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California; PASCAL Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California), annulus (Cardioband, Edwards Lifesciences; TriCinch, 4tech, Galway, Ireland; Trialign, Mitraling, Tewksbury, Massachusetts), or coaptation (FORMA, Edwards Lifesciences) and replacement (Caval Implants, NaviGate, NaviGate Cardiac Structures, Lake Forest, California). Clinical outcomes were prospectively determined during mid-term follow-up., Results: A total of 108 patients (34.6%) had prior left heart valve intervention (84 surgical and 24 transcatheter, respectively). TR etiology was functional in 93%, and mean annular diameter was 46.9 ± 9 mm. In 75% of patients the regurgitant jet was central (vena contracta 1.1 ± 0.5; effective regurgitant orifice area 0.78 ± 0.6 cm 2 ). Pre-procedural systolic pulmonary artery pressure was 41 ± 14.8 mm Hg. Implanted devices included: MitraClip in 210 cases, Trialign in 18 cases, TriCinch first generation in 14 cases, caval valve implantation in 30 cases, FORMA in 24 cases, Cardioband in 13 cases, NaviGate in 6 cases, and PASCAL in 1. In 64% of the cases, TTVI was performed as a stand-alone procedure. Procedural success (defined as the device successfully implanted and residual TR ≤2+) was 72.8%. Greater coaptation depth (odds ratio: 24.1; p = 0.002) was an independent predictor of reduced device success. Thirty-day mortality was 3.6% and was significantly lower among patients with procedural success (1.9% vs. 6.9%; p = 0.04); Actuarial survival at 1.5 years was 82.8 ± 4% and was significantly higher among patients who had procedural success achieved., Conclusions: TTVI is feasible with different technologies, has a reasonable overall procedural success rate, and is associated with low mortality and significant clinical improvement. Mid-term survival is favorable in this high-risk population. Greater coaptation depth is associated with reduced procedural success, which is an independent predictor of mortality., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We here report the first European experience with the novel LAmbre left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder, a self-expanding device consisting of an umbrella and a cover connected by a central waist., Methods and Results: A total of 60 patients (74.4 ± 8.3 years; 66.7% men; CHA2DS2-VASc: 4.0 ± 1.6, HAS-BLED score: 3.2 ± 1.3) with atrial fibrillation and contraindications to oral anticoagulation underwent left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with the LAmbre device at two German centers between November 2013 and September 2015. Device success defined as correct placement of the device was achieved in all patients (100%). Resizing of the device was necessary in 3 (5%) patients. Device-related complications included 2 (3.3%) pericardial effusions on day 8 and 33 after the index procedure requiring pericardiocentesis. Transesophageal echocardiography at 6 months showed complete sealing of the LAA (residual jet flow of <5 mm) in 51/54 (94.4%) patients. No device-related thrombus was documented. At 12 months transient ischemic attack was observed in 1 patient (1.6%) and minor bleeding in 3 patients (5%)., Conclusions: Although minimizing procedure-related complications remains challenging, LAAO with the LAmbre showed high device success and good mid-term performance regarding prevention of stroke and bleeding., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To present a versatile large animal model for endoscopic stricture repair using autologous urothelial cells., Materials and Methods: 12 male minipigs were used. An artificial stricture model was established using suture-ligation, thermo-coagulation and internal urethrotomy. A vesicostomy served for urinary diversion. Stricture formation was confirmed radiologically and histologically. Autologous urothelial cells were harvested from bladder washings, cultivated and labeled. Internal urethrotomy was done in all, and the cultivated cells were injected into the urethrotomy wound. All animals were sacrificed after 4 or 8 weeks. Immunohistology was done to confirm the presence of autologous urothelial cells within the reconstituted urethra., Results: Stricture formation was verified with all three methods. Histologically, no significant differences in the severity of stricture development could be observed with regard to the method used. The autologous urothelial cells in the area of the urethrotomy could be detected in the urothelium and the corpus spongiosum until 8 weeks after re-implantation., Conclusions: We created a reliable and reproducible porcine model for artificial urethral strictures. Autologous urothelial cells can be implanted into an artificial stricture after urethrotomy. These cells retain their epithelial phenotype and are integrated in the resident urothelium. Further comparative studies are needed to ultimately determine a superior efficacy of this novel approach., (Copyright © 2011 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Objective pain assessment that is not subject to influences from either cultural or comprehension issues is desirable. Analysis of heart rate variability has been proposed as a potential method. This pilot study aimed to assess the performance of the PhysioDoloris™ analgesia monitor which calculates an Analgesia Nociception Index derived from heart rate variability. It was compared with visual analogical pain scores., Methods: Forty-five parturients who requested epidural analgesia were recruited. Simultaneous couplets of pain scores and Analgesia Nociception Index values were recorded every 5 min regardless of the presence or absence of uterine contractions. The relationship between indices was characterized, and a cut-off value of Analgesia Nociception Index corresponding to a visual analogical score >30 (range 0-100) was used to determine the positive and negative predictive value of the Analgesia Nociception Index., Results: There was a negative linear relationship between visual analogical pain scores and Analgesia Nociception Index values regardless of the presence of uterine contractions (regression coefficient ± SEM=-0.18 ± 0.032 for entire dataset). Uterine contraction significantly reduced the Analgesia Nociception Index (P<0.0001). Using a visual analogical pain score >30 to define a painful sensation, the lower 95% confidence limit for the Analgesia Nociception Index score was 49., Conclusion: The Analgesia Nociception Index has an inverse linear relationship with visual analogical pain scores. Further studies are necessary to confirm the results of this pilot study and to look at the influence of epidural analgesia on the Analgesia Nociception Index., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In the present study a total of 224 specimens of the synanthropic house fly (Musca domestica) were caught in a pig-pen of an organic farmer in Dormagen (Germany). The flies were examined for their potential as a carrier of metazoan parasites. On the exoskeletons and in the intestines of the flies the eggs and/or larvae of four endoparasite nematode species of domestic pigs (Ascaris suum, Strongyloides ransomi, Metastrongylus sp., undetermined Strongylida) were isolated. Also one ectoparasite species, the hog louse (Haematopinus suis), was detected on the exoskeleton of one fly. The analysis of the pig faeces as potential source revealed many eggs and larvae of nematodes. A high number of A. suum eggs (62.0% of all found nematode eggs), many eggs of strongylid nematodes (21.0%), some eggs of S. ransomi and few eggs of Trichuris suis were detected. However Metastrongylus sp. could not be identified in the faeces. Further laboratory experiments verified the potential of the house fly as a transmitter of the pig parasites A. suum and T. suis. In the intestines of 59 flies (49.2%) from 120 experimentally used house flies, nematode eggs of both nematode species were detected. The present study clearly demonstrates the potential of the house fly as a vector of metazoan pig parasites.

Objective: Despite increasing acceptance of laparoscopy in pediatric urology, few published data are available on laparoscopic heminephroureterectomy in patients with duplex kidney anomalies. In the present study, we report our own experiences with this technique., Patients and Methods: From August 2003 to January 2006, five laparoscopic heminephroureterectomies were performed in four girls with a mean age of 41 (9-67) months. In all cases, a non-functioning upper pole with an obstructive (n=4) or refluxing (n=1) megaureter was found. The upper pole was resected laparoscopically en bloc with the megaureter using three to four trocars., Results: Mean follow-up was 42.4 (+/-7.9) months. All procedures were performed successfully without conversion to open surgery with a mean operative time of 190 (170-210)min. Blood loss was minimal and no intraoperative complications occurred. Despite chronic inflammation in the resected specimens, the patients showed no clinical signs of infection postoperatively. The average length of hospital stay was 5.6 (4-7) days. All patients were followed using duplex sonography., Conclusions: These data demonstrate that, even in infants, laparoscopic heminephroureterectomy is feasible and associated with minimal morbidity, a better cosmetic result and a shorter hospital stay compared to open surgery. The main disadvantage of the laparoscopic approach is a longer operative time. Laparoscopic heminephroureterectomy is a technically demanding procedure and should be performed only in specialized centers.

Background: Activated clotting time (ACT) is currently used to monitor high concentrations of heparin anticoagulation. A new instrument, the Hemochron Jr Signature device, has been specifically designed to measure ACT in low-range heparin plasma concentrations (ACT-LR). The purpose of this study was to compare ACT-LR with anti-Xa activity in patients receiving low-dose i.v. heparin during vascular surgery., Methods: Thirty patients, undergoing arterial vascular surgery, were included in the study and received unfractionated heparin (initial dose 50 u kg(-1)). One hundred and thirty-two pairs of blood samples were simultaneously collected during surgery to determine ACT-LR and anti-Xa activity. Pearson correlation, Kappa test, ROC curve and a specific clinical interpretation of the correlation were performed., Results: ACT-LR ranged from 68 to 380 s, anti-Xa activity from 0 to 1.45 u ml(-1). We observed a strong correlation between anti-Xa activity and ACT-LR (r(2)=0.87; P<0.0001). Accuracy of ACT-LR was good for anti-Xa activity up to 0.6 u ml(-1) (Kappa, 0.94; accuracy, 97%) and 0.8 u ml(-1) (Kappa, 0.79; accuracy, 90%), and poor for anti-Xa activity above 1 u ml(-1) (Kappa, 0.59). A clinical interpretation of the correlation graph found 98% of measured ACT-LR values to be accurate., Conclusion: Hemochron Jr Signature provides measurements of ACT-LR, which are accurate for monitoring heparin anticoagulation at anti-Xa activity below 0.8 u ml(-1).