Back to Search Start Over

Transcatheter Closure of Large Atrial Septal Defects in Adults.

Authors :
Malzahn L
Bertog S
Sievert K
Reinhartz M
Schnelle N
Grunwald I
Franke J
Gafoor SA
Jovanovic B
Vogel A
Ilioska-Damkoehler P
Galeru N
Sievert H
Source :
Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions [Cardiovasc Revasc Med] 2022 Sep; Vol. 42, pp. 28-33. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 24.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Objective: To examine the outcomes of percutaneous closure of large atrial septal defects (ASDs) (≥25 mm).<br />Background: Data on long-term results after closure of large ASDs are limited.<br />Methods: We reviewed the records of 275 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter closure of large (≥25 mm) ASDs from January 1999 until December 2016 in our center. The most common indication for closure was a large left-to-right shunt. Follow-up (FU) was performed at regular intervals thereafter. Results after closure of ASDs with diameters of 25-30 mm, >30-35 mm and >35 mm were compared.<br />Results: Percutaneous closure was technically successful in 99.6%. Mean FU time was 4.8 years (0-15.5 years). Peri-operative (30-day) adverse events occurred in 20.4% and included death in 0.7% (one unrelated to the procedure and one of unknown cause), device erosion in 0.7%, device embolization in 2.9%, pericardial effusion in 5.5%, air embolism in 0.4%, new onset atrial fibrillation in 10.5%, transient supraventricular tachycardia in 0.4% and fever in 0.7%. Late (>30 days after the procedure) atrial fibrillation occurred in 5.8%. There was one device erosion >15 years after the implantation treated successfully surgically. Complete defect closure was achieved in 95.6%.<br />Conclusion: Device closure of large ASDs is feasible, safe and effective with high technical success and low risk of serious periprocedural complications. Nevertheless, in very large defects (>40 mm), both options, surgery and percutaneous closure should be considered. Device or procedural long-term adverse events are rare.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Study honoraria to institution, travel expenses, consulting fees(2) < 25. 000 €: 4tech Cardio, Abbott, Ablative Solutions, Ancora Heart, Append Medical, Axon, Bavaria Medizin Technologie GmbH, Bioventrix, Boston Scientific, Carag, Cardiac Dimensions, Cardiac Success, Cardimed, Celonova, Contego, Coramaze, Croivalve, CVRx, Dinova, Edwards, Endobar, Endologix, Endomatic, Hangzhou Nuomao Medtech, Holistick Medical, Intershunt, Intervene, K2, Lifetech, Magenta, Maquet Getinge Group, Medtronic, Metavention, Mitralix, Mokita, NXT Biomedical, Occlutech, Recor, Renal Guard, Terumo, Trisol, Vascular Dynamics, Vectorious Medtech, Venus, Venock, Vivasure Medical, Vvital Biomed, Whiteswell.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1878-0938
Volume :
42
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35443925
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2022.03.016