Search

Intro: Published data is limited in describing clinical features and disease burden of invasive Escherichia coli disease (IED). This study characterized bacteremic and non-bacteremic IED in relation to clinical features and multidrug resistance (MDR) of causative E. coli isolates. Methods: EXPECT-2 (NCT04117113) was a multinational, hospital-based, observational study that prospectively enrolled IED patients aged ≥60 years between October 2019 and January 2021. IED was defined by a positive E. coli culture from blood (bacteremic IED), a sterile body site or urine (non-bacteremic IED) in the presence of requisite criteria of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), or quick SOFA (qSOFA). In-hospital mortality and IED-related medical encounters were assessed through 28 days following IED diagnosis. MDR was defined as acquired non-susceptibility to ≥1 antibiotic in ≥3 antimicrobial classes. Findings: The full analysis set included 193 bacteremic (80.4%) and 47 non- bacteremic (19.6%) patients. Patient demographics were balanced between bacteremic and non-bacteremic IED. The rates of patients with ≥2 SIRS criteria were comparable between bacteremic (64.8%) and non-bacteremic IED (70.2%). The rates of patients with the ≥2-point change in total SOFA score were comparable between bacteremic (62.2%) and non-bacteremic IED (53.2%). The rates of sepsis and septic shock were 75.0% and 11.4%, respectively, for bacteremic, and 83.3% and 7.1%, respectively, for non-bacteremic IED. The most common IED-related medical encounter was the emergency room both in patients with bacteremic (31.5%, [41/130]) and non-bacteremic IED (35.9%, [14/39]). Of 11 patients who died, 6 (54.5%) had bacteremic IED. Of 294 E. coli isolates with antimicrobial susceptibility testing collected from 238 patients, MDR rates were 34.7% (87/251) for bacteremic and 37.2% (16/43) for non-bacteremic isolates. Conclusion: IED manifested as severe infection, with approximately one-third of E. coli isolates displaying MDR. Bacteremic and non-bacteremic IED were characterized by similar clinical features and MDR phenotypes.

Patients with severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation face a significant dilemma in treatment options, as the yearly mortality with medical therapy and the surgical mortality for tricuspid repair or replacement are high. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for the tricuspid valve is becoming a viable option in patients, although procedural success is dependent on high-quality imaging. While transesophageal echocardiography remains the standard for tricuspid TEER procedures, intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) with three-dimensional (3D) multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) has many theoretical and practical advantages. The aim of this article was to describe the in vitro wet lab–based imaging work done to facilitate the best approach to 3D MPR ICE imaging and the procedural experience gained with 3D MPR ICE in tricuspid TEER procedures with the PASCAL device.

Background: The MITRAL (Mitral Implantation of Transcatheter Valves) trial is the first prospective trial to evaluate the safety and feasibility of balloon-expandable aortic transcatheter heart valves in patients with failed surgical bioprostheses or annuloplasty rings and severe mitral annular calcification treated with mitral valve-in-valve (MViV), valve-in-ring (MViR), or valve-in-mitral annular calcification (ViMAC)., Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate 5-year outcomes among these patients., Methods: A multicenter prospective study was conducted among patients at high surgical risk at 13 U.S. sites. Patients underwent MViV (n = 30), MViR (n = 30), or ViMAC (n = 31) and were followed annually for 5 years. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores were obtained at baseline and follow-up visits. Echocardiograms were analyzed at independent core laboratories., Results: A total of 91 patients underwent transcatheter mitral valve replacement (February 2015 to December 2017). The mean age was 74.3 ± 8.9 years. At 5-year follow-up, the lowest all-cause mortality was observed in the MViV group (21.4%), 94.7% of patients were in NYHA functional class I or II, and the mean mitral gradient was 6.6 ± 2.5 mm Hg. The MViR and ViMAC groups had higher all-cause mortality (65.5% and 67.9%), most survivors were in NYHA functional classes I and II (50% and 55.6%), and mean mitral gradients remained stable (5.8 ± 0.1 and 6.7 ± 2.5 mm Hg). Significant improvements in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores were observed when all 3 arms were pooled., Conclusions: MViV, MViR, and ViMAC procedures were associated with sustained improvement of heart failure symptoms and quality of life among survivors at 5 years. Transcatheter heart valve function remained stable in all 3 groups. Patients treated with MViV had excellent survival at 5 years, whereas survival was lower in the MViR and ViMAC groups, consistent with underlying disease severity. Patients with more residual mitral regurgitation had higher mortality., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was partially supported by an unrestricted research grant from Edwards Lifesciences. The authors had absolute control over the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, and writing of this manuscript, and they take full responsibility for the findings. Dr Guerrero has received institutional research grant support from Edwards Lifesciences; and has served as consultant for Abbott Structural Heart and Medtronic. Dr Wang is a consultant for Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Materialise, and NeoChord. She also receives research grant support from Boston Scientific assigned to her employer Henry Ford Hospital. Dr Tang is a physician proctor and consultant for Medtronic; is a consultant and physician advisory board member for Abbott Structural Heart; and is a consultant for NeoChord. Dr McCabe has received honoraria from Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Systems, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Whisenant has received consulting and speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Hahn has received speaker fees from Abbott Structural, Baylis Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Philips Healthcare; has institutional consulting contracts for which she receives no direct compensation with Abbott Structural, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Novartis; and is chief scientific officer for the echocardiography core laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-sponsored trials, for which she receives no direct industry compensation. Dr Rihal has received institutional research grant support from Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Alkhouli is on the advisory board for Philips. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate 1-year outcomes of valve-in-mitral annular calcification (ViMAC) in the MITRAL (Mitral Implantation of Transcatheter Valves) trial., Background: The MITRAL trial is the first prospective study evaluating the feasibility of ViMAC using balloon-expandable aortic transcatheter heart valves., Methods: A multicenter prospective study was conducted, enrolling high-risk surgical patients with severe mitral annular calcification and symptomatic severe mitral valve dysfunction at 13 U.S. sites., Results: Between February 2015 and December 2017, 31 patients were enrolled (median age 74.5 years [interquartile range (IQR): 71.3 to 81.0 years], 71% women, median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 6.3% [IQR: 5.0% to 8.8%], 87.1% in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV). Access was transatrial (48.4%), transseptal (48.4%), or transapical (3.2%). Technical success was 74.2%. Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) with hemodynamic compromise occurred in 3 patients (transatrial, n = 1; transseptal, n = 1; transapical, n = 1). After LVOTO occurred in the first 2 patients, pre-emptive alcohol septal ablation was implemented to decrease risk in high-risk patients. No intraprocedural deaths or conversions to open heart surgery occurred during the index procedures. All-cause mortality at 30 days was 16.7% (transatrial, 21.4%; transseptal, 6.7%; transapical, 100% [n = 1]; p = 0.33) and at 1 year was 34.5% (transatrial, 38.5%; transseptal, 26.7%; p = 0.69). At 1-year follow-up, 83.3% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II, the median mean mitral valve gradient was 6.1 mm Hg (IQR: 5.6 to 7.1 mm Hg), and all patients had ≤1+ mitral regurgitation., Conclusions: At 1 year, ViMAC was associated with symptom improvement and stable transcatheter heart valve performance. Pre-emptive alcohol septal ablation may prevent transcatheter mitral valve replacement-induced LVOTO in patients at risk. Thirty-day mortality of patients treated via transseptal access was lower than predicted by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score. Further studies are needed to evaluate safety and efficacy of ViMAC., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by an unrestricted research grant from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Guerrero has received research grant support from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Wang has served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Materialise, and HighLife Medical; and has received grant support from Boston Scientific. Dr. Salinger has served as a proctor for Boston Scientific and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Kodali has served as a consultant for Admedus, Meril Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, JenaValve, and Claret Medical; and has ownership interest in Dura Biotech, Thubrikar Aortic Valve, Microinterventional Devices, and Supira Medical. Dr. George has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, and W.L. Gore & Associates. Dr. Bapat has served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Sorin. Dr. Meduri has served as a consultant for Medtronic and Boston Scientific; and has served on the advisory board for Boston Scientific. Dr. Tang is a physician proctor for Medtronic; and is a consultant for Medtronic, Abbott Structural Heart, and W.L. Gore & Associates. Dr. Reisman has served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Feldman is an employee of Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Hahn has received speaker fees from Baylis Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic; is a consultant for Abbott Structural Heart, Edwards Lifesciences, W.L. Gore & Associates, Medtronic, Navigate, and Philips Healthcare; has received nonfinancial support from 3mensio Medical Imaging; holds equity in Navigate; and is the chief scientific officer for the Echocardiography Core Laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-sponsored trials, for which she receives no direct industry compensation. Dr. O’Neill has served as a consultant for Abiomed, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess 1-year clinical outcomes among high-risk patients with failed surgical mitral bioprostheses who underwent transseptal mitral valve-in-valve (MViV) with the SAPIEN 3 aortic transcatheter heart valve (THV) in the MITRAL (Mitral Implantation of Transcatheter Valves) trial., Background: The MITRAL trial is the first prospective study evaluating transseptal MViV with the SAPIEN 3 aortic THV in high-risk patients with failed surgical mitral bioprostheses., Methods: High-risk patients with symptomatic moderate to severe or severe mitral regurgitation (MR) or severe mitral stenosis due to failed surgical mitral bioprostheses were prospectively enrolled. The primary safety endpoint was technical success. The primary THV performance endpoint was absence of MR grade ≥2+ or mean mitral valve gradient ≥10 mm Hg (30 days and 1 year). Secondary endpoints included procedural success and all-cause mortality (30 days and 1 year)., Results: Thirty patients were enrolled between July 2016 and October 2017 (median age 77.5 years [interquartile range (IQR): 70.3 to 82.8 years], 63.3% women, median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 9.4% [IQR: 5.8% to 12.0%], 80% in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV). The technical success rate was 100%. The primary performance endpoint in survivors was achieved in 96.6% (28 of 29) at 30 days and 82.8% (24 of 29) at 1 year. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 3.3% and was unchanged at 1 year. The only death was due to airway obstruction after swallowing several pills simultaneously 29 days post-MViV. At 1-year follow-up, 89.3% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II, the median mean mitral valve gradient was 6.6 mm Hg (interquartile range: 5.5 to 8.9 mm Hg), and all patients had MR grade ≤1+., Conclusions: Transseptal MViV in high-risk patients was associated with 100% technical success, low procedural complication rates, and very low mortality at 1 year. The vast majority of patients experienced significant symptom alleviation, and THV performance remained stable at 1 year., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr. Guerrero has received research grant support from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Wang has served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences and Boston Scientific; has received research grant support from Boston Scientific assigned to her employer, Henry Ford Health; and holds equity in Encompass Technologies. Dr. Kodali has served as a consultant for Admedus, Meril Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, JenaValve, and Claret Medical; and has ownership interest in Dura Biotech, Thubrikar Aortic Valve, Micro Interventional Devices, and Supira Medical. Dr. George has served as consultant for Cardiomech, VDyne, MitreMedical, and Neptune Medical. Dr. Meduri has served as a consultant for Medtronic and Boston Scientific; and has served on the advisory board for Boston Scientific. Dr. Reisman has served as consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Hahn has received speaker fees from Baylis Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic; is a consultant for Abbott Structural, Edwards Lifesciences, Gore & Associates, Medtronic, Navigate, and Philips Healthcare; has received nonfinancial support from 3mensio; holds equity in Navigate; and is the chief scientific officer for the Echocardiography Core Laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-sponsored trials, for which she receives no direct industry compensation. Dr. O’Neill has served as a consultant for Abiomed, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Feldman is an employee of Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The authors report 1-year outcomes of high-risk patients with failed surgical annuloplasty rings undergoing transseptal mitral valve-in-ring (MViR) with the SAPIEN 3 aortic transcatheter heart valve (THV)., Background: The MITRAL (Mitral Implantation of Transcatheter Valves) trial is the first prospective study evaluating transseptal MViR with the SAPIEN 3 aortic THV in high-risk patients with failed surgical annuloplasty rings., Methods: Prospective enrollment of high-risk patients with symptomatic moderate to severe or severe mitral regurgitation (MR) or severe mitral stenosis and failed annuloplasty rings at 13 U.S. sites. The primary safety endpoint was technical success. The primary THV performance endpoint was absence of MR grade ≥2+ or mean mitral valve gradient ≥10 mm Hg (30 days and 1 year). Secondary endpoints included procedural success and all-cause mortality (30 days and 1 year)., Results: Thirty patients were enrolled between January 2016 and October 2017 (median age 71.5 years [interquartile range: 67.0 to 76.8 years], 36.7% women, median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 7.6% [interquartile range: 5.1% to 11.8%], 76.7% in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV). Technical success was 66.7% (driven primarily by need for a second valve in 6 patients). There was no intraprocedural mortality or conversion to surgery. The primary performance endpoint was achieved in 85.7% of survivors at 30 days (24 of 28) and 89.5% of patients alive at 1 year with echocardiographic data available (17 of 19). All-cause mortality at 30 days was 6.7% and at 1 year was 23.3%. Among survivors at 1-year follow-up, 84.2% were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II, the median mean mitral valve gradient was 6.0 mm Hg (interquartile range: 4.7 to 7.3 mm Hg), and all had ≤1+ MR., Conclusions: Transseptal MViR was associated with a 30-day mortality rate lower than predicted by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score. At 1 year, transseptal MViR was associated with symptom improvement and stable THV performance., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by an unrestricted research grant from Edwards Lifesciences. The authors had absolute control of the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of this paper, and take full responsibility for this report. Dr. Guerrero has received research grant support from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Wang has served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Materialise, and HighLife Medical; and has received grant support from Boston Scientific. Dr. Salinger has served as a proctor for Boston Scientific and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Kodali has served as a consultant for Admedus, Meril Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, JenaValve, and Claret Medical; and has ownership interest in Dura Biotech, Thubrikar Aortic Valve, Microinterventional Devices, and Supira Medical. Dr. Meduri has served as a consultant for Medtronic and Boston Scientific; and has served on the advisory board for Boston Scientific. Dr. Reisman has served as consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Hahn has received speaker fees from Baylis Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic; is a consultant for Abbott Structural, Edwards Lifesciences, W.L. Gore & Associates, Medtronic, Navigate, and Philips Healthcare; has received nonfinancial support from 3mensio; holds equity in Navigate; and is the chief scientific officer for the Echocardiography Core Laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-sponsored trials, for which she receives no direct industry compensation. Dr. Feldman is an employee of Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. O’Neill has served as consultant for Abiomed, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)