Search

Objective: We endeavored to create a comprehensive course in global surgery involving multinational exchange., Design: The course involved 2 weeks of didactics, 2 weeks of clinical rotations in a low-resource setting and 1 week for a capstone project. We evaluated our success through knowledge tests, surveys of the students, and surveys of our Zimbabwean hosts., Setting: The didactic portions were held in Sweden, and the clinical portion was primarily in Harare with hospitals affiliated with the University of Zimbabwe., Participants: Final year medical students from Lund University in Sweden, Harvard Medical School in the USA and the University of Zimbabwe all participated in didactics in Sweden. The Swedish and American students then traveled to Zimbabwe for clinical work. The Zimbabwean students remained in Sweden for a clinical experience., Results: The course has been taught for 3 consecutive years and is an established part of the curriculum at Lund University, with regular participation from Harvard Medical School and the University of Zimbabwe. Participants report significant improvements in their physical exam skills and their appreciation of the needs of underserved populations, as well as confidence with global surgical concepts. Our Zimbabwean hosts thought the visitors integrated well into the clinical teams, added value to their own students' experience and believe that the exchange should continue despite the burden associated with hosting visiting students., Conclusions: Here we detail the development of a course in global surgery for medical students that integrates didactic as well as clinical experiences in a low-resource setting. The course includes a true multilateral exchange with students from Sweden, the United States and Zimbabwe participating regularly. We hope that this course might serve as a model for other medical schools looking to establish courses in this burgeoning field., (Copyright © 2018 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Billions of people are without access to surgical care, in part because of the inequitable distribution of the surgical workforce. Drawing on recently collected data for the number of surgeons, anaesthesiologists, and obstetricians worldwide, we sought to show their global maldistribution by identifying thresholds of surgical workforce densities, and by calculating the number of additional providers needed to reach those thresholds., Methods: From the WHO Global Surgical Workforce Database, national data for the number of specialist surgeons, anaesthesiologists, and obstetricians per 100 000 population (density) were compared with the number of maternal deaths per 100 000 live births (maternal mortality ratio; MMR) in WHO member countries. A regression line was fit between density of specialist surgeons, anaesthesiologists, and obstetricians and the logarithm of MMR, and we explored the correlation for an upper and a lower density threshold. Based on previous estimates of the global volume of surgical procedures, a global average productivity per specialist was derived. We then multiplied the average productivity with the derived upper and lower threshold densities, and compared these numbers to previously estimated global need of surgical procedures (4664 procedures per 100 000 population). Finally, the numbers of additional providers needed to reach the thresholds in countries with a density below the respective threshold were calculated., Findings: Each 10-unit increase in density of surgeons, anaesthesiologists, and obstetricians, corresponded to a 13·1% decrease in MMR (95% CI 11·3-14·8). We saw particularly steep improvements in MMR from 0 to roughly 20 per 100 000 population. Above roughly 40 per 100 000 population, higher density was associated with relatively smaller improvements in MMR. These arbitrary thresholds of 20 and 40 specialists per 100 000 corresponded with a volume of surgery of 2917 and 5834 procedures per 100 000 population, respectively, and were symmetrically distributed around the estimated global need of 4664 surgical procedures per 100 000 population. Our density thresholds are slightly higher than the current average in lower-middle income countries (16 per 100 000) and upper-middle-income countries (38 per 100 000), respectively. To reach the threshold of at least 20 per 100 000 in each country today, another 440 231 (IQR 438 900-443 245) providers would be needed. To reach 40 per 100 000, 1 110 610 (IQR 1 095 376-1 183 525) providers would be needed., Interpretation: Assuming uniform productivity, a global surgical workforce between 20 and 40 per 100 000 would suffice to provide the world's missing surgical procedures. We concede that causality cannot be implied, but our results suggest that countries with a workforce density above certain thresholds have better health outcomes. Although the thresholds cannot be interpreted as a minimum standard, they are useful to characterise the global surgical workforce and its deficits. Such thresholds could also be used as markers for health system capacity., Funding: None., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)