6 results on '"Liu, Xingcai"'
Search Results
2. Understanding each other's models: an introduction and a standard representation of 16 global water models to support intercomparison, improvement, and communication.
- Author
-
Telteu, Camelia-Eliza, Müller Schmied, Hannes, Thiery, Wim, Leng, Guoyong, Burek, Peter, Liu, Xingcai, Boulange, Julien Eric Stanislas, Andersen, Lauren Seaby, Grillakis, Manolis, Gosling, Simon Newland, Satoh, Yusuke, Rakovec, Oldrich, Stacke, Tobias, Chang, Jinfeng, Wanders, Niko, Shah, Harsh Lovekumar, Trautmann, Tim, Mao, Ganquan, Hanasaki, Naota, and Koutroulis, Aristeidis
- Subjects
WATER storage ,WATER use ,HYDROLOGIC cycle ,CLIMATE change ,COMPREHENSION - Abstract
Global water models (GWMs) simulate the terrestrial water cycle on the global scale and are used to assess the impacts of climate change on freshwater systems. GWMs are developed within different modelling frameworks and consider different underlying hydrological processes, leading to varied model structures. Furthermore, the equations used to describe various processes take different forms and are generally accessible only from within the individual model codes. These factors have hindered a holistic and detailed understanding of how different models operate, yet such an understanding is crucial for explaining the results of model evaluation studies, understanding inter-model differences in their simulations, and identifying areas for future model development. This study provides a comprehensive overview of how 16 state-of-the-art GWMs are designed. We analyse water storage compartments, water flows, and human water use sectors included in models that provide simulations for the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project phase 2b (ISIMIP2b). We develop a standard writing style for the model equations to enhance model intercomparison, improvement, and communication. In this study, WaterGAP2 used the highest number of water storage compartments, 11, and CWatM used 10 compartments. Six models used six compartments, while four models (DBH, JULES-W1, Mac-PDM.20, and VIC) used the lowest number, three compartments. WaterGAP2 simulates five human water use sectors, while four models (CLM4.5, CLM5.0, LPJmL, and MPI-HM) simulate only water for the irrigation sector. We conclude that, even though hydrological processes are often based on similar equations for various processes, in the end these equations have been adjusted or models have used different values for specific parameters or specific variables. The similarities and differences found among the models analysed in this study are expected to enable us to reduce the uncertainty in multi-model ensembles, improve existing hydrological processes, and integrate new processes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Understanding each other's models: a standard representation of global water models to support improvement, intercomparison, and communication.
- Author
-
Telteu, Camelia-Eliza, Schmied, Hannes Müller, Thiery, Wim, Leng, Guoyong, Burek, Peter, Liu, Xingcai, Boulange, Julien Eric Stanislas, Andersen, Lauren Seaby, Grillakis, Manolis, Gosling, Simon Newland, Satoh, Yusuke, Rakovec, Oldrich, Stacke, Tobias, Chang, Jinfeng, Wanders, Niko, Shah, Harsh Lovekumar, Trautmann, Tim, Mao, Ganquan, Hanasaki, Naota, and Koutroulis, Aristeidis
- Subjects
WATER storage ,WATER use ,HYDROLOGIC cycle ,HYDRAULICS - Abstract
Global water models (GWMs) simulate the terrestrial water cycle, on the global scale, and are used to assess the impacts of climate change on freshwater systems. GWMs are developed within different modeling frameworks and consider different underlying hydrological processes, leading to varied model structures. Furthermore, the equations used to describe various processes take different forms and are generally accessible only from within the individual model codes. These factors have hindered a holistic and detailed understanding of how different models operate, yet such an understanding is crucial for explaining the results of model evaluation studies, understanding inter-model differences in their simulations, and identifying areas for future model development. This study provides a comprehensive overview of how state-of-the-art GWMs are designed. We analyze water storage compartments, water flows, and human water use sectors included in 16 GWMs that provide simulations for the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project phase 2b (ISIMIP2b). We develop a standard writing style for the model equations to further enhance model improvement, intercomparison, and communication. In this study, WaterGAP2 used the highest number of water storage compartments, 11, and CWatM used 10 compartments. Seven models used six compartments, while three models (JULES-W1, Mac-PDM.20, and VIC) used the lowest number, three compartments. WaterGAP2 simulates five human water use sectors, while four models (CLM4.5, CLM5.0, LPJmL, and MPI-HM) simulate only water used by humans for the irrigation sector. We conclude that even though hydrologic processes are often based on similar equations, in the end, these equations have been adjusted or have used different values for specific parameters or specific variables. Our results highlight that the predictive uncertainty of GWMs can be reduced through improvements of the existing hydrologic processes, implementation of new processes in the models, and high-quality input data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Multimodel assessments of human and climate impacts on mean annual streamflow in China.
- Author
-
Liu, Xingcai, Liu, Wenfeng, Yang, Hong, Tang, Qiuhong, Flörke, Martina, Masaki, Yoshimitsu, Müller Schmied, Hannes, Ostberg, Sebastian, Pokhrel, Yadu, Satoh, Yusuke, and Wada, Yoshihide
- Subjects
STREAMFLOW ,CLIMATOLOGY ,WATER withdrawals ,CLIMATE change ,WATER management ,ANTHROPOGEOMORPHOLOGY - Abstract
Human activities, as well as climate variability, have had increasing impacts on natural hydrological systems, particularly streamflow. However, quantitative assessments of these impacts are lacking on large scales. In this study, we use the simulations from six global hydrological models driven by three meteorological forcings to investigate direct human impact (DHI) and climate impact on streamflow in China. Results show that, in the sub-periods of 1971–1990 and 1991–2010, one-fifth to one-third of mean annual streamflow (MAF) was reduced due to DHI in northern basins, and much smaller (<4 %) MAF was reduced in southern basins. From 1971–1990 to 1991–2010, total MAF changes range from -13 % to 10 % across basins wherein the relative contributions of DHI change and climate variability show distinct spatial patterns. DHI change caused decreases in MAF in 70 % of river segments, but climate variability dominated the total MAF changes in 88 % of river segments of China. In most northern basins, climate variability results in changes of -9 % to 18 % in MAF, while DHI change results in decreases of 2 % to 8 % in MAF. In contrast with the climate variability that may increase or decrease streamflow, DHI change almost always contributes to decreases in MAF over time, with water withdrawals supposedly being the major impact on streamflow. This quantitative assessment can be a reference for attribution of streamflow changes at large scales, despite remaining uncertainty. We highlight the significant DHI in northern basins and the necessity to modulate DHI through improved water management towards a better adaptation to future climate change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Understanding each other's models: a standard representation of global water models to support intercomparison, development, and communication.
- Author
-
Telteu, Camelia Eliza, Schmied, Hannes Müller, Gosling, Simon Newland, Thiery, Wim, Pokhrel, Yadu, Grillakis, Manolis, Koutroulis, Aristeidis, Satoh, Yusuke, Wada, Yoshihide, Boulange, Julien, Seaby, Lauren Paige, Stacke, Tobias, Liu, Xingcai, Ducharne, Agnès, Leng, Guoyong, Burek, Peter, Trautmann, Tim, Schewe, Jacob, Zhao, Fang, and Menke, Inga
- Published
- 2019
6. Growing water stress in China from the past to the future: A spatially explicit assessment.
- Author
-
Liu, Xingcai, Tang, Qiuhong, Liu, Wenfeng, Veldkamp, Ted, Julien, Boulange, Liu, Junguo, Wada, Yoshihide, and Yang, Hong
- Subjects
- *
WATER supply , *WATER withdrawals , *GRID cells , *WATER use , *WATER - Abstract
Severe water stress in China has been widely reported but its time-evolution and spatial patterns are rarely assessed. In this study, we illustrate the spatial and temporal characteristics of water stress in China for the historical (1971-2010) and the future (2021-2050) periods using multimodel simulations. Three water stress indices (WSIs), i.e., the ratios of water withdrawal to locally generated runoff (WSIR), to natural streamflow (WSIQ), and to natural streamflow minus upstream consumptive water withdrawal (WSIC), are used for the assessment. At the basin level, WSIR estimates generally match the reported data and indicate severe water stress in most northern basins during the historical period. At grid cell level, the WSIs show distinct spatial patterns wherein WSIR (WSIQ) overestimate (underestimate) water stress compared to WSIC. Based on the WSIC estimates, 365 million people (one-third of the total population) was under severe water stress every year during the historical period, while WSIR and WSIQ suggest 600 and 335 million people, respectively. It indicates that different estimations of water availability can affect water stress assessment greatly. The future projections of WSIC suggest that ~500 million people (one-third of the total) will be affected by severe water stress every year. Future severe water stress will expand to nearly 40% of the total areas of China because of stiffened competitive water uses, especially in the southern basins with abundant water availability and historically little water stress. This study emphasizes the necessity of considering explicit upstream and downstream relations with respect to both water availability and water use in water stress assessment and calls more attention to the increasing water stress in China in the coming decades. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.