Search

Objective: The purpose of this article is to evaluate contrast-enhanced (CE) MR venography (MRV) with a blood-pool agent for detection of abdominopelvic and lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) compared with a conventional unenhanced gradient-recalled echo (GRE) MRV technique., Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was performed on 30 patients (mean age, 52.7 years; 15 men and 15 women) referred for MRV between March 2010 and November 2010 for evaluation of lower extremity or abdominopelvic DVT. All patients underwent a GRE sequence followed by a CE T1-weighted sequence with gadofosveset, a blood-pool agent. The abdominopelvic and lower extremity venous system was divided into 13 segments. The presence of acute or chronic DVT was assessed by six radiologists, as well as qualitative and quantitative assessments of each venous segment. Image acquisition and interpretation times were also tabulated., Results: The sensitivity and specificity for acute DVT were 91.0% and 99.8%, respectively, on CE MRV compared with 80.8% and 95.8%, respectively, on GRE MRV (p = 0.077 and p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity for chronic DVT were 84.4% and 98.4%, respectively, on CE MRV and 64.5% and 95.6%, respectively, on GRE MRV (p < 0.001 for both). Subjective ratings of vein visualization, signal homogeneity, and confidence pertaining to DVT diagnosis were significantly higher with the CE images (p < 0.001). The contrast-to-noise ratio for CE images was similar or significantly higher for all venous segments. Image acquisition and radiologist interpretation times on the CE studies were decreased (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Gadofosveset-enhanced MRV had equal or higher sensitivity and specificity for detection of DVT than did GRE MRV, with decreased time for image acquisition and interpretation.

Objective: The purposes of this study were to describe the spectrum of cross-sectional imaging findings of pathologically proven hepatoportal sclerosis and to compare the features of advanced and nonadvanced hepatoportal sclerosis., Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients with a histopathologic diagnosis of hepatoportal sclerosis who had concurrent MRI or CT images participated in the study. The following imaging features were assessed: presence of liver nodularity and liver lesions, portal vein patency, presence and degree of portal hypertension, liver volume, and caudate-to-right lobe ratio. These features were compared between patients who underwent transplant and those who did not., Results: The 18 patients (11 men and one boy, six women; mean age, 46.5 years) had hepatoportal sclerosis confirmed with liver biopsy (14 patients) or explant (four patients). Fourteen patients underwent contrast-enhanced MRI, and five underwent CT. The imaging findings were as follows: liver surface nodularity, five patients (all four transplant, one nontransplant) (p = 0.0016); evidence of portal hypertension, 17 patients; increased caudate-to-right lobe ratio, 16 patients; high periportal signal intensity on T2-weighted images, six patients; portal vein occlusion with cavernous transformation, five patients. The transplant patients had smaller pretransplant liver volume than did nontransplant patients (p < 0.04)., Conclusion: Hepatoportal sclerosis is characterized by caudate lobe hypertrophy and right hepatic lobe atrophy, preserved liver volume, and lack of the liver nodularity associated with portal hypertension. In advanced cases, liver nodularity and atrophy produce an imaging appearance indistinguishable from that of cirrhosis.