1. Substantive Representation: Investigating the Impact of the Voting Right and of Descriptive Representation on the Substantive Representation of Women in the Belgian Lower House during the 20th Century.
- Author
-
Celis, Karen
- Subjects
- *
WOMEN in politics , *SOCIAL groups ,BELGIAN politics & government - Abstract
The paper will present results of a research on the substantive representation of women in the Belgian Lower House during the 20th century. The aim of this research consists in learning more about the practice of substantive representation of a social group. The underlying hypotheses is that a ‘higher’ level of descriptive political representation results in a ‘higher’ level of substantive representation. More particularly, the research deals with the impact of women’s suffrage and of female MPs on the substantive representation of women. Although the empirical part of this investigation is of an historical nature and focuses on women, it relates to broader contemporary debates on the political inclusion of social groups such as immigrants. The research deals with the assumption, often present in societal as well as in political debates, that franchise, on the one hand, and MPs sharing the ‘identity’ of those whom they represent, on the other hand, have a positive impact on the extent to which social groups are represented. This research is embedded in a tradition of both theoretical investigation and empirical research on the link between ‘standing for’ and ‘acting for’. The first aim of the paper is to provide for an introductory picture of the political representation of women’s interests during a politically important parliamentary debate: the budget debates. The substantive representation of women, i.e. the act of taking care of women’s needs and interests, is defined through three criteria: 1) a situation that is bad for or unjust to women is discussed; 2) a suggestion to improve the situation of women is formulated; or 3) a right for women is claimed. Notwithstanding the paper’s final focus, firstly the evolution of the defence of women’s interests will be described and, secondly, we will verify whether changes are due to the direct impact of female MPs or coincide with the appearance of female voters. The three time periods researched are: 1) 1900 - 1929: a homogeneous male parliament; 2) 1930 - 1948: a few women in parliament but no female electorate; 3) 1949 - 1980: a growing number of female parliamentarians (significant increase from 1974 on) and a female electorate. In each time period the points of interest are: 1) which women receive political attention; 2) which topics are dealt with; and 3) what is the aim of the intervention (to merely improve the situation of women or to establish equality between men and women). Subsequently the question will be: do the right to vote and descriptive representatives result in a ‘better’ or ‘higher level of’ substantive representation? An increased diversity of groups of women receiving political attention, of women’s interests addressed and of feminist projects tackled could be seen as an indicator for a more elaborated form of substantive representation of women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2004
- Full Text
- View/download PDF