Search

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the similarities and differences between conventional concrete and the concrete material that is composed of 15 percent Novel E-waste and is of M30 grade. The Components and Procedures: Using a combination of superplasticizer, cement (53 grade PPC), fine aggregate (sieve size 4.75mm), coarse aggregate (sieve size 20mm), and water, our research was conducted using novel electronic waste with a size of 20 millimetres. This was done in accordance with the findings of the literature review. It was decided to take into account two different groupings. The experimental group, which consisted of novel E-waste concrete, was compared to the control group, which consisted of traditional concrete. In all, there are 36 samples, with 18 samples belonging to the first group and 18 samples belonging to the second group. In order to carry out the computation, a G-power of 0.8 is utilised, along with alpha and beta quality of 0.05 and 0.2, and a confidence interval of 95 percent is utilised. The independent sample T-test value is less than 0.05, which is equivalent to p=0.004. Results: One-way Using the SPSS programme, an analysis of variance was performed to determine the compressive strength of conventional concrete and Novel E-waste Concrete. Concrete that is conventional has a compressive strength value of 31.12 N/mm2 on average. The concrete made from novel electronic trash has a compressive strength of 37.86 N/mm2. A significant value of 0.000 (p<0.05) and standard deviations of 0.65 and 1.26 are shown, respectively, in this study. The conclusion is that the compressive strength of the novel E-waste concrete with the superplasticizer was somewhat lower than that of the conventional concrete. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of the research is to demonstrate that the amount of novel electronic trash that is substituted in concrete mix at a rate of twenty percent should be higher than the conventional concrete material used for the M30 grade of concrete. The Components and Procedures: As part of the Modified Concrete Mix, the following components are included: water, superplasticizer, cement (53 grade PPC), fine aggregate (sieve size 4.75mm), coarse aggregate (sieve size 20mm), and novel electronic waste with a 20mm particle size. Results: According to the findings that were described, the compressive strength of conventional concrete and Novel E-waste Concrete was revealed by using SPSS to conduct a one-way analysis of variance. Concrete that is conventional has a compressive strength value of 31.12 N/mm2 on average. There is a compressive strength of 40.34 N/mm2 for concrete made from novel electronic trash. It is possible to carry out the computation by making use of a G-power of 0.8, alpha and beta quality values of 0.05 and 0.2, and a confidence interval equivalent to 95 percent. The outcome of the T-test, together with the significant difference value having a value of 0.000 (p<0.05), with the standard deviations being 0.65 and 1.35 respectively. When compared to traditional concrete, the compressive strength of the novel E-waste concrete that contains the superplasticizer is significantly higher. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The scope of the research is to compare conventional concrete and the 10% Novel E-waste replaced concrete material of M30 grade concrete. The composition of various items present in concrete mix are segregated with Novel E-waste 20mm, superplasticizer, cement (53 grade PPC), fine aggregate (sieve size 4.75mm), coarse aggregate (sieve size 20mm), and water. In this research the main set of events are grouped in two categories. Group-1 (control group/conventional concrete) and group-2 (experimental group/Novel E-waste concrete). In this project first group has 18 samples and the Second group has 18 samples, Total samples of N=36 The analysis was performed with a G-power of 0.8, alpha and beta values set at 0.05 and 0.2 respectively, and a 95% confidence interval. The independent sample T-Test yielded a value of (p>0.05), specifically (p=0.256). The One-way ANOVA conducted using SPSS confirmed differences in the mechanical properties between conventional concrete and Novel E-waste Concrete. The average compressive strength for conventional concrete was found to be (31.12 N/mm2), while for Novel E-waste concrete it was (34.15 N/mm2). A significant difference was noted with a significance value of (p<0.05), precisely (p=0.000), and standard deviations of 0.65 and 0.79, respectively. It was determined that Novel E-waste concrete, when mixed with a superplasticizer, exhibited a lower compressive strength percentage compared to conventional concrete. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fuel injector is considered to be the heart of a vehicles fuel circulation system. They are very much important to the overall functionality and performance of any vehicle. The main principle behind the working of a fuel injector in a vehicle is spraying or dispersion of fuel into the engine. In todays technology each and every modernized vehicle consists of an ECM which is considered to be the central processing unit for the engine and it is the vehicles engine computer. This computerized control supervises the overall frequency of dispersion of fuel into the engine with specified time intervals. It also defines the timeline of the engine by calculating the efficiency and it stimulates the overall performance of the system. Certain symptoms indicate that the fuel injector is failing and losing its efficiency. Dispersion or spraying discharge of the fuel minimizes over the time. Clogging is one of the defects that happens in the injector. This clogging will in turn affect the engine performance directly or indirectly. Scale formation is also a defect in the inner bore of the nozzle of the fuel injector which occurs due to idleness. To overcome the above concerns a fuel injector relative performance tester and cleaner was developed. By utilizing this device a fuel injectors performance can be analyzed and the nozzle passage can be cleaned. This will in turn improve the performance of the engine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two phases of Ni(OH)2 viz., α-Ni(OH)2 and β-Ni(OH)2 were prepared by hydrothermal-assisted polyol process. The structural and magnetic properties are studied by employing X-ray diffraction, field emission scanning electron microscopy and vibrating sample magnetometer in the temperature range 20-300K. Both the phases show polycrystalline nature exhibiting hexagonal structure. FESEM of both phases exhibit 3D flower like morphology with nanosheets of thickness 30-60 nm. When temperature decreases from higher (300 K) to lower (20 K) both α-Ni(OH)2 and β-Ni(OH)2 systems undergo a paramagnetic to ferromagnetic transition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]