Search

Aim Methods Results Conclusions Transbronchial cryobiopsies are increasingly used for the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD), but there is a lack of published information on the features of specific ILD in cryobiopsies. Here we attempt to provide pathological guidelines for separating usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (FHP) and connective tissue disease‐associated ILD (CTD–ILD) in cryobiopsies.We examined 120 cryobiopsies from patients with multidisciplinary discussion (MDD)‐established CTD–ILD and compared them to a prior series of 121 biopsies from patients with MDD‐established IPF or FHP.A non‐specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern alone was seen in 36 of 120 (30%) CTD–ILD, three of 83 (3.6%) FHP and two of 38 (5.2%) IPF cases, statistically favouring a diagnosis of CTD–ILD. The combination of NSIP + OP was present in 29 of 120 (24%) CTD–ILD, two of 83 (2.4%) FHP and none of 38 (0%) IPF cases, favouring a diagnosis of CTD–ILD. A UIP pattern, defined as fibroblast foci plus any of patchy old fibrosis/fibrosis with architectural distortion/honeycombing, was identified in 28 of 120 (23%) CTD–ILD, 45 of 83 (54%) FHP and 27 of 38 (71%) IPF cases and supported a diagnosis of FHP or IPF. The number of lymphoid aggregates/mm2 and fibroblast foci/mm2 was not different in IPF, CTD–ILD or FHP cases with a UIP pattern. Interstitial giant cells supported a diagnosis of FHP or CTD–ILD over IPF, but were infrequent.In the correct clinical/radiological context the pathological findings of NSIP, and particularly NSIP plus OP, favour a diagnosis of CTD–ILD in a cryobiopsy, but CTD–ILD with a UIP pattern, FHP with a UIP pattern and IPF generally cannot be distinguished. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) affects the subpleural lung but is considered to spare small airways. Micro–computed tomography (micro-CT) studies demonstrated small airway reduction in end-stage IPF explanted lungs, raising questions about small airway involvement in early-stage disease. Endobronchial optical coherence tomography (EB-OCT) is a volumetric imaging modality that detects microscopic features from subpleural to proximal airways. Objectives: In this study, EB-OCT was used to evaluate small airways in early IPF and control subjects in vivo. Methods: EB-OCT was performed in 12 subjects with IPF and 5 control subjects (matched by age, sex, smoking history, height, and body mass index). Subjects with IPF had early disease with mild restriction (FVC: 83.5% predicted), which was diagnosed per current guidelines and confirmed by surgical biopsy. EB-OCT volumetric imaging was acquired bronchoscopically in multiple, distinct, bilateral lung locations (total: 97 sites). IPF imaging sites were classified by severity into affected (all criteria for usual interstitial pneumonia present) and less affected (some but not all criteria for usual interstitial pneumonia present). Bronchiole count and small airway stereology metrics were measured for each EB-OCT imaging site. Measurements and Main Results: Compared with the number of bronchioles in control subjects (mean = 11.2/cm3; SD = 6.2), there was significant bronchiole reduction in subjects with IPF (42% loss; mean = 6.5/cm3; SD = 3.4; P = 0.0039), including in IPF affected (48% loss; mean: 5.8/cm3; SD: 2.8; P < 0.00001) and IPF less affected (33% loss; mean: 7.5/cm3; SD: 4.1; P = 0.024) sites. Stereology metrics showed that IPF-affected small airways were significantly larger, more distorted, and more irregular than in IPF-less affected sites and control subjects. IPF less affected and control airways were statistically indistinguishable for all stereology parameters (P = 0.36–1.0). Conclusions: EB-OCT demonstrated marked bronchiolar loss in early IPF (between 30% and 50%), even in areas minimally affected by disease, compared with matched control subjects. These findings support small airway disease as a feature of early IPF, providing novel insight into pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) is a newly recognised clinical phenotype of interstitial lung diseases in the 2022 interstitial pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) guidelines. This category is based entirely on clinical and radiological factors, and the background histopathology is unknown. Our objective was to investigate the histopathological characteristics of PPF and to examine the correlation between usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and prognosis in this new disease type. We hypothesised that the presence of UIP‐like fibrosis predicts patients' survival in PPF cases. Methods and results: We selected 201 cases fulfilling the clinical criteria of PPF from case archives. Cases diagnosed as IPF by a multidisciplinary team were excluded. Whole slide images were evaluated by three pathologists who were blinded to clinical and radiological data. We measured areas of UIP‐like fibrosis and calculated what percentage of the total lesion area they occupied. The presence of focal UIP‐like fibrosis amounting to 10% or more of the lesion area was seen in 148 (73.6%), 168 (83.6%) and 165 (82.1%) cases for each pathologist, respectively. Agreement of the recognition of UIP‐like fibrosis in PPF cases was above κ = 0.6 between all pairs. Survival analysis showed that the presence of focal UIP‐like fibrosis correlated with worsened survival under all parameters tested (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The presence of UIP‐like fibrosis is a core pathological feature of clinical PPF, and its presence within diseased areas is associated with poorer prognosis. This study highlights the importance of considering the presence of focal UIP‐like fibrosis in the evaluation and management of PPF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Recently, the diagnosis and follow-up of numerous pulmonary diseases such as pneumothorax, pneumonia, and pleural effusion were easily by use of conventional ultrasound, and the maximum usefulness of transthoracic ultrasonography (TUS) in pulmonary diseases especially diffuse parenchymal lung disease has not been detected yet. This study was conducted to determine the value of transthoracic ultrasonography in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Moreover, the viable correlations of the ultrasound findings with the functional and radiological findings of ILDs had been assessed. Results TUS diagnosis was positive in 73 cases, there was a substantial variation between the two groups classified according to ultrasonographic diagnosis regarding age and smoking history (p = 0.003 and 0.013 respectively). All the patients with usual interstitial pneumonia (n = 42) and Indeterminate UIP (n = 49) had positive ultra-sonographic findings [p = 0.041 and 0.001 accordingly]. Regarding pulmonary function tests, there was a considerable variance between both groups regarding FVC, PEF, FEF25-75, FEV1/VC (p = 0.037, 0.029, 0.015, and 0.000 accordingly). The most positive US diagnosis areas were upper lateral, lateral basal, and interscapular areas. There was a weak negative correlation between TUS diagnosis and FVC [r = − 0.25, p = 0.026]. Conclusion We concluded the great significant value of TUS in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with interstitial lung diseases. It had an extremely thoughtful role in the diagnosis of ILD by detection of multiple B-lines distribution emerging from pleura and extending in the entire lung surface. The use of TUS in early detection and follow-up of ILDs reduced the cost.

Background: Recently, the diagnosis and follow-up of numerous pulmonary diseases such as pneumothorax, pneumonia, and pleural effusion were easily by use of conventional ultrasound, and the maximum usefulness of transthoracic ultrasonography (TUS) in pulmonary diseases especially diffuse parenchymal lung disease has not been detected yet. This study was conducted to determine the value of transthoracic ultrasonography in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Moreover, the viable correlations of the ultrasound findings with the functional and radiological findings of ILDs had been assessed. Results: TUS diagnosis was positive in 73 cases, there was a substantial variation between the two groups classified according to ultrasonographic diagnosis regarding age and smoking history (p = 0.003 and 0.013 respectively). All the patients with usual interstitial pneumonia (n = 42) and Indeterminate UIP (n = 49) had positive ultra-sonographic findings [p = 0.041 and 0.001 accordingly]. Regarding pulmonary function tests, there was a considerable variance between both groups regarding FVC, PEF, FEF25-75, FEV1/VC (p = 0.037, 0.029, 0.015, and 0.000 accordingly). The most positive US diagnosis areas were upper lateral, lateral basal, and interscapular areas. There was a weak negative correlation between TUS diagnosis and FVC [r = − 0.25, p = 0.026]. Conclusion: We concluded the great significant value of TUS in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with interstitial lung diseases. It had an extremely thoughtful role in the diagnosis of ILD by detection of multiple B-lines distribution emerging from pleura and extending in the entire lung surface. The use of TUS in early detection and follow-up of ILDs reduced the cost. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with acute exacerbation of lung fibrosis with usual interstitial pneumonia (EUIP) pattern are at increased risk for ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and mortality when exposed to mechanical ventilation (MV). Yet, lack of a mechanical model describing UIP-lung deformation during MV represents a research gap. Aim of this study was to develop a constitutive mathematical model for UIP-lung deformation during lung protective MV based on the stress–strain behavior and the specific elastance of patients with EUIP as compared to that of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and healthy lung. Partitioned lung and chest wall mechanics were assessed for patients with EUIP and primary ARDS (1:1 matched based on body mass index and PaO2/FiO2 ratio) during a PEEP trial performed within 24 h from intubation. Patient's stress–strain curve and the lung specific elastance were computed and compared with those of healthy lungs, derived from literature. Respiratory mechanics were used to fit a novel mathematical model of the lung describing mechanical-inflation-induced lung parenchyma deformation, differentiating the contributions of elastin and collagen, the main components of lung extracellular matrix. Five patients with EUIP and 5 matched with primary ARDS were included and analyzed. Global strain was not different at low PEEP between the groups. Overall specific elastance was significantly higher in EUIP as compared to ARDS (28.9 [22.8–33.2] cmH2O versus 11.4 [10.3–14.6] cmH2O, respectively). Compared to ARDS and healthy lung, the stress/strain curve of EUIP showed a steeper increase, crossing the VILI threshold stress risk for strain values greater than 0.55. The contribution of elastin was prevalent at lower strains, while the contribution of collagen was prevalent at large strains. The stress/strain curve for collagen showed an upward shift passing from ARDS and healthy lungs to EUIP lungs. During MV, patients with EUIP showed different respiratory mechanics, stress–strain curve and specific elastance as compared to ARDS patients and healthy subjects and may experience VILI even when protective MV is applied. According to our mathematical model of lung deformation during mechanical inflation, the elastic response of UIP-lung is peculiar and different from ARDS. Our data suggest that patients with EUIP experience VILI with ventilatory setting that are lung-protective for patients with ARDS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common pulmonary complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), causing significant morbidity and mortality. Optimal treatment for RA-ILD is not yet well defined. Reliable prognostic indicators are largely byproducts of prior ILD progression, including low or decreasing forced vital capacity and extensive or worsening fibrosis on imaging. In the absence of validated tools to predict treatment response, decisions about whether to initiate or augment treatment are instead based on clinical judgment. In general, treatment should be initiated in patients who are symptomatic, progressing, or at high risk of poor outcomes. Retrospective data suggest that mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and rituximab are likely effective therapies for RA-ILD. Abatacept is also emerging as a potential first-line treatment option for patients with RA-ILD. Further, recent data demonstrate that immunosuppression may be beneficial even in patients with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern on imaging, suggesting that immunosuppression should be considered irrespective of imaging pattern. Recent randomized controlled trials have shown that antifibrotic medications, such as nintedanib and likely pirfenidone, slow forced vital capacity decline in RA-ILD. Consideration can be given to antifibrotic initiation in patients progressing despite immunosuppression, particularly in patients with a UIP pattern. Future research directions include developing tools to predict which patients will remain stable from patients who will progress, discriminating patients who will respond to treatment from nonresponders, and developing algorithms for starting immunosuppression, antifibrotics, or both as first-line therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Computed tomography (CT) enables noninvasive diagnosis of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), but enhanced image analyses are needed to overcome the limitations of visual assessment. Objectives: Apply multiple instance learning (MIL) to develop an explainable deep learning algorithm for prediction of UIP from CT and validate its performance in independent cohorts. Methods: We trained an MIL algorithm using a pooled dataset (n = 2,143) and tested it in three independent populations: data from a prior publication (n = 127), a single-institution clinical cohort (n = 239), and a national registry of patients with pulmonary fibrosis (n = 979). We tested UIP classification performance using receiver operating characteristic analysis, with histologic UIP as ground truth. Cox proportional hazards and linear mixed-effects models were used to examine associations between MIL predictions and survival or longitudinal FVC. Measurements and Main Results: In two cohorts with biopsy data, MIL improved accuracy for histologic UIP (area under the curve, 0.77 [n = 127] and 0.79 [n = 239]) compared with visual assessment (area under the curve, 0.65 and 0.71). In cohorts with survival data, MIL-UIP classifications were significant for mortality (n = 239, mortality to April 2021: unadjusted hazard ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.96–4.91; P < 0.001; and n = 979, mortality to July 2022: unadjusted hazard ratio, 3.64; 95% CI, 2.66–4.97; P < 0.001). Individuals classified as UIP positive by the algorithm had a significantly greater annual decline in FVC than those classified as UIP negative (−88 ml/yr vs. −45 ml/yr; n = 979; P < 0.01), adjusting for extent of lung fibrosis. Conclusions: Computerized assessment using MIL identifies clinically significant features of UIP on CT. Such a method could improve confidence in radiologic assessment of patients with interstitial lung disease, potentially enabling earlier and more precise diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias (IIPs) are a heterogeneous group of the broader category of Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILDs), pathologically characterized by the distortion of lung parenchyma by interstitial inflammation and/or fibrosis. The American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) international multidisciplinary consensus classification of the IIPs was published in 2002 and then updated in 2013, with the authors emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis of IIPs. The histological evaluation of IIPs is challenging, and different types of IIPs are classically associated with specific histopathological patterns. However, morphological overlaps can be observed, and the same histopathological features can be seen in totally different clinical settings. Therefore, the pathologist's aim is to recognize the pathologic–morphologic pattern of disease in this clinical setting, and only after multi-disciplinary evaluation, if there is concordance between clinical and radiological findings, a definitive diagnosis of specific IIP can be established, allowing the optimal clinical–therapeutic management of the patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pulmonary diseases are among the most common complications of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, leading to significant morbidity and mortality in this population. As HIV-infected patients become older on successful antiretroviral therapy (ART), epidemiological data support a greater risk of noninfectious lung disorders associated with age, like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), lung cancer, pulmonary hypertension, and a previously unrecognized increased incidence of pulmonary fibrosis. We present a 68-year-old male patient with features of interstitial lung disease and histopathological appearance of coexistence of organizing pneumonia (OP) and usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is the most prevalent form of interstitial lung disease, which presents as usual interstitial pneumonia on histopathology and imaging. It leads to significant lung scarring, damage, and fibrosis and is associated with a high degree of mortality, repeated hospital admissions, and oxygen dependence. Many complications are associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, which further increases the morbidity of patients. High-resolution computed tomography chest is the imaging modality of choice for usual interstitial pneumonia tracking its progression, evaluating treatment response, and detecting potential complications. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (reference number: IEC INT/2023/Study-1256). Departmental computed tomography report database from November 2017 to June 2018 was reviewed and scans with imaging features consistent with the ‘usual interstitial pneumonia’ pattern were identified. Total sampling method was used and two independent radiologists, blinded to the patient's clinical information, reviewed the high- resolution computed tomography chest scans to assess for imaging features of usual interstitial pneumonia and associated complications. Results: There were 65 patients reported as unusual interstitial pneumonia pattern. Emphysema and pneumothorax were identified in four (6.15%) and one (1.53%) scans, respectively. Two (3.08%) scans showed features of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Ten (15.38%) scans exhibited findings consistent with co-existent or superimposed pulmonary infection. Additionally, features of lung malignancy were identified in high-resolution computed tomography scans of five (7.69%) patients. Conclusions: This study sheds light on imaging manifestations of usual interstitial pneumoniacomplications, aiding radiologists and pulmonologists in earlier diagnosis and improved patient management.

Histopathologic criteria of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)/idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) were defined over the years and endorsed by leading organizations decades after Dr. Averill A. Liebow first coined the term UIP in the 1960s as a distinct pathologic pattern of fibrotic interstitial lung disease. Novel technology and recent research on interstitial lung diseases with genetic component shed light on molecular pathogenesis of UIP/IPF. Two antifibrotic agents introduced in the mid-2010s opened a new era of therapeutic approaches to UIP/IPF, albeit contentious issues regarding their efficacy, side effects, and costs. Recently, the concept of progressive pulmonary fibrosis was introduced to acknowledge additional types of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases with the clinical and pathologic phenotypes comparable to those of UIP/IPF. Likewise, some authors have proposed a paradigm shift by considering UIP as a stand-alone diagnostic entity to encompass other fibrosing interstitial lung diseases that manifest a relentless progression as in IPF. These trends signal a pendulum moving toward the tendency of lumping diagnoses, which poses a risk of obscuring potentially important information crucial to both clinical and research purposes. Recent advances in whole slide imaging for digital pathology and artificial intelligence technology could offer an unprecedented opportunity to enhance histopathologic evaluation of interstitial lung diseases. However, current clinical practice trends of moving away from surgical lung biopsies in interstitial lung disease patients may become a limiting factor in this endeavor as it would be difficult to build a large histopathologic database with correlative clinical data required for artificial intelligence models.

Because chest CT scan has largely supplanted surgical lung biopsy for diagnosing most cases of interstitial lung disease (ILD), tools to standardize CT scan interpretation are urgently needed. Does a deep learning (DL)-based classifier for usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) derived using CT scan features accurately discriminate radiologist-determined visual UIP? A retrospective cohort study was performed. Chest CT scans acquired in individuals with and without ILD were drawn from a variety of public and private data sources. Using radiologist-determined visual UIP as ground truth, a convolutional neural network was used to learn discrete CT scan features of UIP, with outputs used to predict the likelihood of UIP using a linear support vector machine. Test performance characteristics were assessed in an independent performance cohort and multicenter ILD clinical cohort. Transplant-free survival was compared between UIP classification approaches using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazards regression. A total of 2,907 chest CT scans were included in the training (n = 1,934), validation (n = 408), and performance (n = 565) data sets. The prevalence of radiologist-determined visual UIP was 12.4% and 37.1% in the performance and ILD clinical cohorts, respectively. The DL-based UIP classifier predicted visual UIP in the performance cohort with sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 86%, respectively, and in the multicenter ILD clinical cohort with 81% and 77%, respectively. DL-based and visual UIP classification similarly discriminated survival, and outcomes were consistent among cases with positive DL-based UIP classification irrespective of visual classification. A DL-based classifier for UIP demonstrated good test performance across a wide range of UIP prevalence and similarly discriminated survival when compared with radiologist-determined UIP. This automated tool could efficiently screen for UIP in patients undergoing chest CT scan and identify a high-risk phenotype among those with known ILD. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Radiologic pattern has been shown to predict survival in patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease. The additional prognostic value of fibrosis extent by quantitative computed tomography (CT) is unknown. Objectives: We hypothesized that fibrosis extent provides information beyond visually assessed CT pattern that is useful for outcome prediction. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of chest CT, demographics, longitudinal pulmonary function, and transplantation-free survival among participants in the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. CT pattern was classified visually according to the 2018 usual interstitial pneumonia criteria. Extent of fibrosis was objectively quantified using data-driven textural analysis. We used Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards and linear mixed-effects models to evaluate the relationships between CT-derived metrics and outcomes. Results: Visual assessment and quantitative analysis were performed on 979 enrollment CT scans. Linear mixed-effect modeling showed that greater baseline fibrosis extent was significantly associated with the annual rate of decline in forced vital capacity. In multivariable models that included CT pattern and fibrosis extent, quantitative fibrosis extent was strongly associated with transplantation-free survival independent of CT pattern (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.04--1.05; P,0.001; C statistic = 0.73). Conclusions: The extent of lung fibrosis by quantitative CT is a strong predictor of physiologic progression and survival, independent of visually assessed CT pattern. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We proposed the term "UIPAF" to define patients with Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) associated with only one domain of the classification called "Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features" (IPAF). The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical presentation and prognosis of UIPAF patients, compared with two cohorts, composed of IPAF and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients, respectively. Methods: The patients were enrolled as IPAF, UIPAF, or IPF based on clinical, serological, and radiological data and evaluated by a multidisciplinary team. Results: We enrolled 110 patients with IPF, 69 UIPAF, and 123 IPAF subjects. UIPAF patients were similar to IPAF regarding autoimmune features, except for the prevalence of Rheumatoid Factor in UIPAF and anti-SSA in IPAF. A similar proportion of the two cohorts progressed toward a specific autoimmune disease (SAD), with differences in the kind of SAD developed. The real-life management and prognosis of UIPAF patients proved to be almost identical to IPF. Conclusions: UIPAF shared with IPAF similar autoimmune features, suggesting the opportunity to be considered IPAF, excluding the morphological domain by the classification. However, the real-life management and prognosis of UIPAF are similar to IPF. These data suggest a possible modification in the therapeutic management of UIPAF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-interstitial lung disease is challenging. • Abatacept seems to be an effective therapy, regardless of the radiological pattern. • Early administration of abatacept may prevent progression of the disease. To compare the effectiveness of abatacept (ABA) in Rheumatoid Arthritis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease (RA-ILD) according to the radiological patterns of usual (UIP) or non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). From an observational longitudinal multicentre study of 263 RA-ILD patients treated with ABA, those with UIP or NSIP were selected. Lung function, chest high resolution computerised tomography (HRCT) and dyspnoea were recorded and compared in both groups from baseline to the end of follow-up (progression definitions: improvement or worsening >10% of FVC or DLCO, changes in HRCT extension and 1-point change in the mMRC scale, respectively). Differences between final and baseline visits were calculated as the average difference (95% CI) through mixed effects models regression. We studied 190 patients with UIP (n=106) and NSIP (n=84). General features were similar in both groups except for older age, positive rheumatoid factor, and previous sulfasalazine therapy, which were more frequent in patients with UIP. ILD duration up to ABA initiation was relatively short: median 16 [4-50] and 11 [2-36] months (p=0.36) in UIP and NSIP, respectively. Mean baseline FVC and DLCO were 82% and 63% in UIP and 89% and 65% in NSIP, respectively. Both parameters remained stable during 24 months with ABA. HRCT lesions and dyspnoea improved/stabilized in 73.1% and 90.5% and 72.9% and 94.6% of UIP and NSIP patterns, respectively. ABA seems equally effective in stabilizing dyspnoea, lung function and radiological impairment in both UIP and NSIP patterns of RA-ILD. Early administration of ABA may prevent RA-ILD progression, regardless of the radiological pattern. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The inhalation of hard metal may produce various respiratory manifestations including upper respiratory tract irritation, asthma, hypersensitivity pneumonia (HP), and a particular form of interstitial lung disease. Co is the main cause of the adverse health outcomes in hard metal workers. A particular form of interstitial lung disease, called hard metal lung disease (HMLD) includes giant cell interstitial pneumonia (GIP) and pulmonary fibrosis. Clinical and radiologic features of GIP resemble those of HP. In patients with HMLD, pulmonary fibrosis showing usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern is found. It is unclear that GIP progresses to severe fibrosis showing UIP pattern if the exposure to hard metal is not stopped. Follow-up CT scans suggest that GIP dose not progress to fibrosis showing UIP pattern. GIP and hard metal induced pulmonary fibrosis may be two different representations resulting from exposure to hard metal. Under current diagnostic criteria, both GIP and pulmonary fibrosis with UIP pattern are included.Cobalt exposure can occur inhalation, ingestion, and dermal routes. There is knowledge regarding the importance of cobalt ions skin absorption in relation to absorption via the respiratory tract in cobalt exposure. Co ions skin absorption can be considered as the reason that cases of hard metal workers’ asthma and HMLD occur more often at the wet area than at the dry area.

Introduction: The new diagnostic guidelines for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) did not rule out the possibility of combining the radiological patterns of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and probable UIP, given the similar management and diagnostic capacity. However, the prognostic implications of these patterns have not been fully elucidated, with different studies showing heterogeneous results. We applied the new criteria to a retrospective series of patients with IPF, assessing survival based on radiological patterns, findings, and their extension. Methods: Two thoracic radiologists reviewed high-resolution computed tomography images taken at diagnosis in 146 patients with IPF, describing the radiological findings and patterns. The association of each radiological finding and radiological patterns with two-year mortality was analysed. Results: The two-year mortality rate was 40.2% in IPF patients with an UIP radiological pattern versus 7.1% in those with probable UIP. Compared to the UIP pattern, probable UIP was protective against mortality, even after adjusting for age, sex, pulmonary function, and extent of fibrosis (hazard ratio (HR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06–0.99). Receiving antifibrotic treatment was also a protective factor (HR 0.51, 95%CI 0.27–0.98). Honeycombing (HR 3.62, 95%CI 1.27–10.32), an acute exacerbation pattern (HR 4.07, 95%CI 1.84–8.96), and the overall extent of fibrosis (HR 1.04, 95%CI 1.02–1.06) were predictors of mortality. Conclusions: In our series, two-year mortality was higher in patients with IPF who presented a radiological pattern of UIP versus probable UIP on the initial scan. Honeycombing, an acute exacerbation pattern, and a greater overall extent of fibrosis were also predictors of increased mortality. The prognostic differences between the radiological pattern of UIP and probable UIP in our series would support maintaining them as two differentiated patterns.

Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias (IIPs) are a heterogeneous group of the broader category of Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILDs), pathologically characterized by the distortion of lung parenchyma by interstitial inflammation and/or fibrosis. The American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) international multidisciplinary consensus classification of the IIPs was published in 2002 and then updated in 2013, with the authors emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis of IIPs. The histological evaluation of IIPs is challenging, and different types of IIPs are classically associated with specific histopathological patterns. However, morphological overlaps can be observed, and the same histopathological features can be seen in totally different clinical settings. Therefore, the pathologist’s aim is to recognize the pathologic–morphologic pattern of disease in this clinical setting, and only after multi-disciplinary evaluation, if there is concordance between clinical and radiological findings, a definitive diagnosis of specific IIP can be established, allowing the optimal clinical–therapeutic management of the patient.

Background: We proposed the term “UIPAF” to define patients with Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) associated with only one domain of the classification called “Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features” (IPAF). The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical presentation and prognosis of UIPAF patients, compared with two cohorts, composed of IPAF and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients, respectively. Methods: The patients were enrolled as IPAF, UIPAF, or IPF based on clinical, serological, and radiological data and evaluated by a multidisciplinary team. Results: We enrolled 110 patients with IPF, 69 UIPAF, and 123 IPAF subjects. UIPAF patients were similar to IPAF regarding autoimmune features, except for the prevalence of Rheumatoid Factor in UIPAF and anti-SSA in IPAF. A similar proportion of the two cohorts progressed toward a specific autoimmune disease (SAD), with differences in the kind of SAD developed. The real-life management and prognosis of UIPAF patients proved to be almost identical to IPF. Conclusions: UIPAF shared with IPAF similar autoimmune features, suggesting the opportunity to be considered IPAF, excluding the morphological domain by the classification. However, the real-life management and prognosis of UIPAF are similar to IPF. These data suggest a possible modification in the therapeutic management of UIPAF.

Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) a fibrosing pneumonia is associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, chronic autoimmune disease (AID), or hypersensitivity pneumonia. Oxygen radicals, due to tobacco smoke, can damage DNA and might upregulate PARP1. Cytosolic DNA from dying pneumocytes activate cytosolic GMP-AMP-synthase–stimulator of interferon genes (cGAS-STING) pathway and TREX1. Prolonged inflammation induces senescence, which might be inhibited by phagocytosis, eliminating nuclear debris. We aimed to evaluate activation of cGAS-STING-TREX1 pathway in UIP, and if phagocytosis and anti-phagocytosis might counteract inflammation. 44 cases of UIP with IPF or AID were studied for the expression of cGAS, pSTING, TREX1 and PARP1. LAMP1 and Rab7 expression served as phagocytosis markers. CD47 protecting phagocytosis and p16 to identify senescent cells were also studied. Epithelial cells in remodeled areas and macrophages expressed cGAS-pSTING, TREX1; epithelia but not macrophages stained for PARP1. Myofibroblasts, endothelia, and bronchial/bronchiolar epithelial cells were all negative except early myofibroblastic foci expressing cGAS. Type II pneumocytes expressed cGAS and PARP1, but less pSTING. TREX1 although expressed was not activated. Macrophages and many regenerating epithelial cells expressed LAMP1 and Rab7. CD47, the 'don't-eat-me-signal', was expressed by macrophages and epithelial cells including senescence cells within the remodeled areas. The cGAS-STING pathway is activated in macrophages and epithelial cells within remodeled areas. LikelyTREX1 because not activated cannot sufficiently degrade DNA fragments. PARP1 activation points to smoking-induced oxygen radical release, prolonging inflammation and leading to fibrosis. By expressing CD47 epithelial cells within remodeled areas protect themselves from being eliminated by phagocytosis. • cGAS-STING pathway is activated in macrophages and epithelia within remodeled areas of UIP of different etiologies. • The enzyme TREX1 likely cannot degrade DNA fragments because it is not activated. • PARP1 activated in regenerating epithelia indicate oxygen radical release and contribute to fibrosis. • The don't-eat me signal CD47 prevents senescence cells from being eliminated by phagocytosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The majority of connective tissue diseases (CTDs) are multisystem disorders that are often heterogeneous in their presentation and do not have a single laboratory, histologic, or radiologic feature that is defined as the gold standard to support a specific diagnosis. Given this challenging situation, the diagnosis of CTD is a process that requires the synthesis of multidisciplinary data which may include patient clinical symptoms, serologic evaluation, laboratory testing, and imaging. Pulmonary manifestations of connective tissue disease include interstitial lung disease as well as multicompartmental manifestations. These CT imaging patterns and features of specific diseases will be discussed in this article., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale : Fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis is a debilitating interstitial lung disease driven by incompletely understood immune mechanisms. Objectives : To elucidate immune aberrations in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in single-cell resolution. Methods : Single-cell 5' RNA sequencing was conducted on peripheral blood mononuclear cells and bronchoalveolar lavage cells obtained from 45 patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, 63 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, 4 non-fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and 36 healthy controls in the United States and Mexico. Analyses included differential gene expression (Seurat), transcription factor activity imputation (DoRothEA-VIPER), and trajectory analyses (Monocle3/Velocyto-scVelo-CellRank). Measurements and Main Results : Overall, 501,534 peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 110 patients and controls and 88,336 bronchoalveolar lavage cells from 19 patients were profiled. Compared to controls, fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis has elevated classical monocytes (adjusted-p=2.5e-3) and are enriched in CCL3 hi /CCL4 hi and S100A hi classical monocytes (adjusted-p<2.2e-16). Trajectory analyses demonstrate that S100A hi classical monocytes differentiate into SPP1 hi lung macrophages associated with fibrosis. Compared to both controls and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis patient cells are significantly enriched in GZM hi cytotoxic T cells. These cells exhibit transcription factor activities indicative of TGFβ and TNFα/NFκB pathways. These results are publicly available at https://ildimmunecellatlas.org. Conclusions : Single-cell transcriptomics of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis patients uncovered novel immune perturbations, including previously undescribed increases in GZM hi cytotoxic CD4+ and CD8+ T cells - reflecting this disease's unique inflammatory T-cell driven nature - as well as increased S100A hi and CCL3 hi /CCL4 hi classical monocytes also observed in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Both cell populations may guide the development of new biomarkers and therapeutic interventions.

Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) is a radiographic term, which has recently undergone clarification of definition with creation of 3 subtypes. ILA is defined as incidental identification of computed tomography abnormalities in a patient who is not suspected of having an interstitial lung disease (ILD). A subset of ILA may progress to clinically significant ILD and is associated with morbidities not related to progression such as an increased incidence of sepsis-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ILA has been associated with an increased incidence of treatment-related complications in patients with lung cancer. Information on corresponding histology is limited; knowledge gaps exist concerning optimal patient management., Competing Interests: Disclosure No conflicts of interest relevant to the content of the article; Unrelated conflicts: AbbVie (advisory board and consultant on MET testing in lung cancer); Astra-Zeneca (advisory board related to Her2 therapy in lung cancer)., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society/Japanese Respiratory Society/Asociación Latinoamericana de Tórax 2018 clinical practice guideline and 2022 update provide recommendations to define and diagnose idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in patients with newly diagnosed interstitial lung disease. The guideline emphasizes recognition of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and probable UIP patterns of fibrosis on high-resolution CT, which can obviate the need for surgical lung biopsy and allow timely initiation of antifibrotic pharmacotherapy citing a high correlation with UIP on histopathology. This article reviews the recent 2022 IPF clinical practice guideline with a focus on the imaging updates., Competing Interests: Disclosure M.B. Carroll: no disclosure, J.P. Kanne Consultant, Calyx.ai, M.D, Maritin Rother: no disclosure., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The new diagnostic guidelines for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) did not rule out the possibility of combining the radiological patterns of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and probable UIP, given the similar management and diagnostic capacity. However, the prognostic implications of these patterns have not been fully elucidated, with different studies showing heterogeneous results. We applied the new criteria to a retrospective series of patients with IPF, assessing survival based on radiological patterns, findings, and their extension., Methods: Two thoracic radiologists reviewed high-resolution computed tomography images taken at diagnosis in 146 patients with IPF, describing the radiological findings and patterns. The association of each radiological finding and radiological patterns with two-year mortality was analysed., Results: The two-year mortality rate was 40.2% in IPF patients with an UIP radiological pattern versus 7.1% in those with probable UIP. Compared to the UIP pattern, probable UIP was protective against mortality, even after adjusting for age, sex, pulmonary function, and extent of fibrosis (hazard ratio (HR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.99). Receiving antifibrotic treatment was also a protective factor (HR 0.51, 95%CI 0.27-0.98). Honeycombing (HR 3.62, 95%CI 1.27-10.32), an acute exacerbation pattern (HR 4.07, 95%CI 1.84-8.96), and the overall extent of fibrosis (HR 1.04, 95%CI 1.02-1.06) were predictors of mortality., Conclusions: In our series, two-year mortality was higher in patients with IPF who presented a radiological pattern of UIP versus probable UIP on the initial scan. Honeycombing, an acute exacerbation pattern, and a greater overall extent of fibrosis were also predictors of increased mortality. The prognostic differences between the radiological pattern of UIP and probable UIP in our series would support maintaining them as two differentiated patterns., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors.)

While idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most common type of fibrotic lung disease, there are numerous other causes of pulmonary fibrosis that are often characterized by lung injury and inflammation. Although often gradually progressive and responsive to immune modulation, some cases may progress rapidly with reduced survival rates (similar to IPF) and with imaging features that overlap with IPF, including usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)-pattern disease characterized by peripheral and basilar predominant reticulation, honeycombing, and traction bronchiectasis or bronchiolectasis. Recently, the term progressive pulmonary fibrosis has been used to describe non-IPF lung disease that over the course of a year demonstrates clinical, physiologic, and/or radiologic progression and may be treated with antifibrotic therapy. As such, appropriate categorization of the patient with fibrosis has implications for therapy and prognosis and may be facilitated by considering the following categories: ( a ) radiologic UIP pattern and IPF diagnosis, ( b ) radiologic UIP pattern and non-IPF diagnosis, and ( c ) radiologic non-UIP pattern and non-IPF diagnosis. By noting increasing fibrosis, the radiologist contributes to the selection of patients in which therapy with antifibrotics can improve survival. As the radiologist may be first to identify developing fibrosis and overall progression, this article reviews imaging features of pulmonary fibrosis and their significance in non-IPF-pattern fibrosis, progressive pulmonary fibrosis, and implications for therapy. Keywords: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis, Thin-Section CT, Usual Interstitial Pneumonia © RSNA, 2024.

BACKGROUND. Changes in lung parenchyma elasticity in usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) may increase the risk for complications after percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) of the lung. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to investigate the association of UIP findings on CT with complications after PTNB, including pneumothorax, pneumothorax requiring chest tube insertion, and hemoptysis. METHODS. This retrospective single-center study included 4187 patients (mean age, 63.8 ± 11.9 [SD] years; 2513 men, 1674 women) who underwent PTNB between January 2010 and December 2015. Patients were categorized into a UIP group and non-UIP group by review of preprocedural CT. In the UIP group, procedural CT images were reviewed to assess for traversal of UIP findings by needle. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify associations between the UIP group and needle traversal with postbiopsy complications, controlling for a range of patient, lesion, and procedural characteristics. RESULTS. The UIP and non-UIP groups included 148 and 4039 patients, respectively; in the UIP group, traversal of UIP findings by needle was observed in 53 patients and not observed in 95 patients. The UIP group, in comparison with the non-UIP group, had a higher frequency of pneumothorax (35.1% vs 17.9%, p < .001) and pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement (6.1% vs 1.5%, p = .001) and lower frequency of hemoptysis (2.0% vs 6.1%, p = .03). In multivariable analyses, the UIP group with traversal of UIP findings by needle, relative to the non-UIP group, showed independent associations with pneumothorax (OR, 5.25; 95% CI, 2.94-9.37; p < .001) and pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement (OR, 9.55; 95% CI, 3.74-24.38; p < .001). The UIP group without traversal of UIP findings by needle, relative to the non-UIP group, was not independently associated with pneumothorax (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.71-1.97; p = .51) or pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.25-4.72; p = .92). The UIP group, with or without traversal of UIP findings by needle, was not independently associated with hemoptysis. No patient experienced air embolism or procedure-related death. CONCLUSION. Needle traversal of UIP findings is a risk factor for pneumothorax and pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement after PTNB. CLINICAL IMPACT. When performing PTNB in patients with UIP, radiologists should plan a needle trajectory that does not traverse UIP findings, when possible.

Histopathologic criteria of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)/idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) were defined over the years and endorsed by leading organizations decades after Dr. Averill A. Liebow first coined the term UIP in the 1960s as a distinct pathologic pattern of fibrotic interstitial lung disease. Novel technology and recent research on interstitial lung diseases with genetic component shed light on molecular pathogenesis of UIP/IPF. Two antifibrotic agents introduced in the mid-2010s opened a new era of therapeutic approaches to UIP/IPF, albeit contentious issues regarding their efficacy, side effects, and costs. Recently, the concept of progressive pulmonary fibrosis was introduced to acknowledge additional types of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases with the clinical and pathologic phenotypes comparable to those of UIP/IPF. Likewise, some authors have proposed a paradigm shift by considering UIP as a stand-alone diagnostic entity to encompass other fibrosing interstitial lung diseases that manifest a relentless progression as in IPF. These trends signal a pendulum moving toward the tendency of lumping diagnoses, which poses a risk of obscuring potentially important information crucial to both clinical and research purposes. Recent advances in whole slide imaging for digital pathology and artificial intelligence technology could offer an unprecedented opportunity to enhance histopathologic evaluation of interstitial lung diseases. However, current clinical practice trends of moving away from surgical lung biopsies in interstitial lung disease patients may become a limiting factor in this endeavor as it would be difficult to build a large histopathologic database with correlative clinical data required for artificial intelligence models.