Search

Purpose: Endovascular treatment (EVT) of acute ischemic stroke can be complicated by vessel perforation. We studied the incidence and determinants of vessel perforations. In addition, we studied the association of vessel perforations with functional outcome, and the association between location of perforation on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and functional outcome, using a large EVT registry. Methods: We included all patients in the MR CLEAN Registry who underwent EVT. We used DSA to determine whether EVT was complicated by a vessel perforation. We analyzed the association with baseline clinical and interventional parameters using logistic regression models. Functional outcome was measured using the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. The association between vessel perforation and angiographic imaging features and functional outcome was studied using ordinal logistic regression models adjusted for prognostic parameters. These associations were expressed as adjusted common odds ratios (acOR). Results: Vessel perforation occurred in 74 (2.6%) of 2794 patients who underwent EVT. Female sex (aOR 2.0 (95% CI 1.2–3.2)) and distal occlusion locations (aOR 2.2 (95% CI 1.3–3.5)) were associated with increased risk of vessel perforation. Functional outcome was worse in patients with vessel perforation (acOR 0.38 (95% CI 0.23–0.63)) compared to patients without a vessel perforation. No significant association was found between location of perforation and functional outcome. Conclusion: The incidence of vessel perforation during EVT in this cohort was low, but has severe clinical consequences. Female patients and patients treated at distal occlusion locations are at higher risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The MR CLEAN-LATE trial provided evidence for the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke within the late window (after 6–24 h) in patients who were preselected based on the presence of collateral flow on CT angiography. We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes 2 years after randomisation. MR CLEAN-LATE was a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled trial conducted at 18 stroke intervention centres in the Netherlands. If endovascular treatment could be initiated within 6–24 h of symptom onset or last seen well, patients (aged 18 years or older) with an acute ischaemic stroke due to a large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation and at least some collateral flow in the affected middle cerebral artery territory on CT angiography were randomly assigned (1:1) to either endovascular treatment with best medical treatment (endovascular treatment group) or best medical treatment alone (control group). Web-based randomisation, stratified by centre, was performed with the use of permuted blocks (block size eight to 20). The researchers who collected clinical outcomes and analysed the results were masked to treatment allocation; treating physicians, local investigators, and patients were aware of the received treatment. The primary outcome of MR CLEAN-LATE was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days after randomisation. For this 2-year prespecified analysis, the primary outcome was mRS score at 2 years (minus 3 months to plus 6 months). Primary and safety analyses were performed based on the modified intention-to-treat principle, and included patients who provided (deferred) consent or died before consent could be obtained. Missing data were handled with multiple imputation by chained equations. The trial is completed and is registered at ISRCTN, ISRCTN19922220. Between Feb 2, 2018, and Jan 27, 2022, 535 patients were randomly assigned in the MR CLEAN-LATE trial, of whom 502 (94%) gave deferred consent and comprised the modified intention-to-treat population (255 in the endovascular treatment group and 247 in the control group). 261 (52%) patients were female and 241 (48%) were male. Data for mRS score at 2 years were available for 226 (89%) patients in the endovascular treatment group and for 202 (82%) patients in the control group. The median mRS score at 2 years was 4 (IQR 2–6) in the endovascular treatment group and 6 (2–6) in the control group. The endovascular treatment group demonstrated a shift towards better functional outcomes on the mRS (adjusted common odds ratio 1·41 [95% CI 1·00–1·99]; p=0·049). All-cause mortality at 2 years was 34% (87 of 255) in the endovascular treatment group and 41% (101 of 247) in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio 0·81 [95% CI 0·60–1·08]; p=0·15). Major vascular events (ie, transient ischaemic attack, ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, and cardiac events) were reported between 90 days and 2 years in 23 patients in the endovascular treatment group and 13 patients in the control group. Our results show that the effectiveness of late-window (after 6–24 h) endovascular treatment in improving clinical outcomes is sustained for up to 2 years in a population preselected based on the presence of collateral flow on CT angiography. This finding might be important for prompting further evaluations of cost-effectiveness, health-care policy development, and clinical decision making. The Dutch Organization for Health Research and Health Innovation (ZonMW), Collaboration for New Treatments of Acute Stroke Consortium, Dutch Heart Foundation, Stryker, Medtronic, Cerenovus, Health Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health, and the Netherlands Brain Foundation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The MR CLEAN NO-IV trial showed neither superiority nor noninferiority of endovascular treatment (EVT) alone compared to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT; Alteplase) before EVT in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation. Although the treatment effect is largely attributable to EVT, IVT may affect hypercoagulability during AIS., Aims: To investigate the association between activated coagulation and final infarct volume and clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale 3-6 and mortality 90 days post-EVT), and whether this effect is modified by IVT administration., Methods: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to quantify activated coagulation markers (activated coagulation factor (F) XIIa-C1 esterase inhibitor (C1inh); FXIIa-antithrombin (AT), FXIa-C1inh, FXIa-AT, FIXa-AT, FXa-AT, T-AT, FVIIa-AT) in plasma samples obtained on admission (T 0 ), 1 h post-EVT (T 1 ) and 24 h post-EVT (T 2 ). Multivariable regressions were performed to investigate the associations and effect modification., Results: In the total cohort of 116 patients, a significant increase at T 1 was seen in FIXa-AT (p = .001), FXa-AT (p < .001), T-AT (p < .001), and FVIIa-AT (p = .012), while there was a significant increase at T 2 in FXIIa-C1inh (p < .001). Similar results were seen in the IVT+EVT subgroup. The EVT alone subgroup showed a significant temporary increase at T 1 in FXa-AT (p < .001) and T-AT (p = .014). Neither the enzyme:inhibitor complexes nor the interaction with IVT were significantly associated with the outcome measures., Conclusion: Despite temporary significant increases in enzyme:inhibitor complexes in the IVT+EVT group, but not in the EVT alone group, there were no significant associations with final infarct volume and clinical outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Magdolna Nagy reports financial support was provided by Dutch Heart Foundation. Charles BLM Majoie reports a relationship with Dutch Heart Foundation that includes: funding grants. Charles BLM Majoie reports a relationship with Stryker that includes: funding grants. Charles BLM Majoie reports a relationship with Boehringer Ingelheim that includes: funding grants. Charles BLM Majoie reports a relationship with European Commission, Healthcare Evaluation Netherlands that includes: funding grants. Charles BLM Majoie reports a relationship with TWIN Foundation that includes: funding grants. Hugo ten Cate reports a relationship with Novostia that includes: consulting or advisory. Hugo ten Cate reports a relationship with Galapagos that includes: consulting or advisory. Hugo ten Cate reports a relationship with Astra Zeneca that includes: consulting or advisory. Hugo ten Cate reports a relationship with Alveron that includes: consulting or advisory. Hugo ten Cate reports a relationship with Coagulation Profile that includes: equity or stocks. Charles BLM Majoie reports a relationship with Nicolab that includes: equity or stocks. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The benefit of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion remains debated. In this study, we analyzed the cost-effectiveness of EVT alone versus intravenous alteplase before EVT in patients directly admitted to EVT-capable stroke centers from the Dutch health care payer perspective., Methods: A decision analysis was performed using a Markov model with 15-year simulated follow-up to estimate total costs, quality-adjusted life years, and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of intravenous alteplase before EVT compared with EVT alone. A hypothetical cohort of 10 000 patients with large vessel occlusion aged 70 years was run in Monte Carlo simulation. Functional outcome of each treatment was derived from pooled results of 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Uncertainty was assessed by probabilistic analyses, scenario analyses, and 1-way sensitivity analyses., Results: Using functional outcomes obtained from 6 RCTs (intention-to-treat population), intravenous alteplase before EVT resulted in 0.05 quality-adjusted life years gained at an additional $2817 compared with EVT alone, resulting in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $62 287. Probabilistic analyses showed that intravenous alteplase before EVT had a probability of 45% and 54%, respectively, of being cost-effective at the $52 500 and $84 000 thresholds. Restricting functional outcomes from our post hoc modified as-treated analysis of 6 RCTs (scenario 1), European RCTs (scenario 2), or a Dutch RCT (scenario 3), intravenous alteplase before EVT was cost-effective in 64%, 81%, and 50% of simulations at the $52 500 threshold, and 79%, 91%, and 67% of simulations at the $84 000 threshold., Conclusions: Intravenous alteplase before EVT was not cost-effective in patients with large vessel occlusion in the Netherlands at the $52 500 threshold but possibly cost-effective at the $84 000 threshold. Variable functional outcomes at 3 months based on different trial populations affected the cost-effectiveness of intravenous alteplase before EVT., Competing Interests: Drs Majoie and Roos declare to be shareholders of Nico-Lab, not involved in this study. Dr Majoie has reported grants from CardioVascular Research Netherlands (CVON)/Dutch Heart Foundation, European Commission, Stichting Toegepast Wetenschappelijk Instituut voor Neuromodulatie (TWIN) Foundation, Health Evaluation Netherlands, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Stryker (all paid to institution). Dr Coutinho is the cofounder and shareholder of TrianecT. He has received grants from Medtronic, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and AstraZeneca and is a consultant at Portola Pharmaceuticals, LLC. Dr van der Zee is a member of the supervisory board at Radiotherapeutisch Instituut Friesland. Dr Buskens is appointed by University Medical Center Groningen, has reported receiving funding from the Netherlands Heart Foundation and a Public-Private Partnership allowance from Health Holland, Care Research Netherlands and Medical Sciences (ZonMw), and Dutch Research Council (NWO) and serves as the ZonMw committee (vice) chairman. Also, Dr Buskens serves at ZuidOost Zorg and 113 Suicide prevention as a member of advisory board. Dr Uyttenboogaart has received research grants from ZonMw and Dutch Heart Foundation. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: Left atrial appendage (LAA) slow-flow may increase the risk of ischemic stroke. We studied LAA attenuation on cardiac computed tomography in patients with acute ischemic stroke., Methods and Results: We used data from a prospective cohort of patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing cardiac computed tomography during the acute stroke imaging protocol. We compared characteristics, functional outcome (modified Rankin scale: higher scores indicating worse outcome), stroke recurrence and major adverse cardiovascular events after 2-year follow-up between patients with LAA thrombus (filling defect<100 Hounsfield Unit (HU)), slow-flow (filling defect ≥100 HU) and normal filling. Of 421 patients, 31 (7%) had LAA thrombus, 69 (16%) slow-flow, and 321 (76%) normal filling. Patients with thrombus or slow-flow more often had known atrial fibrillation compared with normal filling (45%, 39%, and 9%, P <0.001). Patients with thrombus had higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale-scores compared with slow-flow and normal filling (18 [interquartile range, 9-22], 6 [interquartile range, 3-17], and 5 [interquartile range, 2-11], P <0.001). Compared with normal filling, there was no difference with slow-flow in functional outcome (median modified Rankin scale, 3 versus 2; acOR 0.8 [95% CI, 0.5-1.4]), stroke recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.3-1.9]) or major adverse cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.7-2.1]), while patients with thrombus had worse functional outcome (median modified Rankin scale, 6, acOR, 3.3 [95% CI, 1.5-7.4]). In cryptogenic stroke patients (n=156) slow-flow was associated with stroke recurrence (27% versus 6%, aHR, 4.1 [95% CI, 1.1-15.7])., Conclusions: Patients with slow-flow had similar characteristics to patients with thrombus, but had less severe strokes. Slow-flow was not significantly associated with functional outcome or major adverse cardiovascular events, but was associated with recurrent stroke in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Background: Clinicians need simple and highly predictive prognostic scores to assist practical decision-making. We aimed to develop a simple outcome prediction score applied 24 hours after anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and validate it in patients treated both with and without endovascular thrombectomy., Methods: Using the HERMES (Highly Effective Reperfusion Evaluated in Multiple Endovascular Stroke Trials) collaboration data set (n=1764), patients in the endovascular thrombectomy arm were divided randomly into a derivation cohort (n=430) and a validation cohort (n=441). From a set of candidate predictors, logistic regression modeling using forward variable selection was used to select a model that was both parsimonious and highly predictive for modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2 at 90 days. The score was validated in validation cohort, control arm (n=893), and external validation cohorts from the ESCAPE-NA1 (Efficacy and Safety of Nerinetide for the Treatment of Acute Ischaemic Stroke; n=1066) and INTERRSeCT (Identifying New Approaches to Optimize Thrombus Characterization for Predicting Early Recanalization and Reperfusion With IV Alteplase and Other Treatments Using Serial CT Angiography; n=614)., Results: In the derivation cohort, we selected 2 significant predictors of mRS ≤2 (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at 24 hours and age [β-coefficient, 0.34 and 0.06]) and derived the HERMES-24 score: age (years)/10+National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at 24 hours. The HERMES-24 score was highly predictive for mRS ≤2 (c-statistic 0.907 [95% CI, 0.879-0.935]) in the derivation cohort. In the validation cohort and the control arm, the HERMES-24 score predicts mRS ≤2 (c-statistic, 0.914 [95% CI, 0.886-0.944] and 0.909 [95% CI, 0.887-0.930]). Observed provability of mRS ≤2 ranged between 3.1% and 3.4% when HERMES-24 score ≥25, while it ranged between 90.6% and 93.0% when HERMES-24 score <10 in the derivation cohort, validation cohort, and control arm. The HERMES-24 score also showed c-statistics of 0.894 and 0.889 for mRS ≤2 in the ESCAPE-NA1 and INTERRSeCT populations., Conclusions: The post-treatment HERMES-24 score is a simple validated score that predicts a 3-month outcome after anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke regardless of intervention, which helps prognostic discussion with families on day 2., Competing Interests: Dr Brown reports consulting for B. Braun Interventional Systems, Inc, Medtronic, MicroVention, Inc, and the University of Calgary and is employed by BRIGHT Research Partners. Dr Goyal reports grants from Medtronic, Stryker, MicroVention, and Mentice; consulting for Stryker, Microvention, and Mentice; and a patent for systems and methods for acute stroke diagnosis with GE Healthcare. Dr Menon reports stock holdings in Circle Neurovascular Imaging and compensation from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Campbell reports grants from Covidien, Medtronic, and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and fellowships from the National Heart Foundation of Australia, the National Stroke Foundation of Australia, and the Royal Australasian College of Physicians. Dr Mitchell reports consulting for Stryker and MicroVention and grants from Medtronic and Stryker. Dr Jovin reports consulting for Contego Medical; grants/contracts from Medtronic and Stryker; data safety monitoring board participation with Johnson & Johnson CERENOVUS; and stock holdings in Anaconda, Basking, Freeox Biotech, Galaxy, Gravity, Kandu, Methinks, Route92, StataDX, and Vizai. Dr Saver reports consulting for Abbott Laboratories, Aeromics, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, BrainQ, BrainsGate, CSL Behring, Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems, Medtronic, MindRhythm, Roche, and Stream Medical; data safety monitoring board participation with MIVI Neuroscience; and stock holdings in Neuronics Medical and Rapid Medical. Dr Muir reports consulting for Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Daiichi Sankyo. Dr White reports consulting for MicroVention and grants from the UK National Institutes for Health Research, MicroVention, Stryker, Medtronic, and Penumbra. Dr Bracard reports grants from the French Ministry of Health; others from GE Medical Systems; and nonfinancial support from MicroVention Europe. Dr Roos reports stock holdings in Nicolab. Dr van Zwam reports grants/contracts from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Stryker, and Johnson & Johnson; employment by Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum; and data safety monitoring board participation with Philips. Dr Hill reports consulting for BrainsGate; grants/contracts from Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Medtronic MicroVention, and NoNO; end point review committee participation with Merck; employment by the University of Calgary; and a patent for Systems and Methods for Assisting in Decision-Making and Triaging for Acute Stroke Patients with Circle Neurovascular Imaging. Dr Demchuk reports consulting for Boehringer Ingelheim, HLS Therapeutics, Hoffmann-La Roche, Medtronic, Nova-Signal, and Servier; data safety monitoring board participation with Philips and Lumosa; others from Novo Nordisk AS, Pfizer, and Astra Zeneca; and stock and patent for Stroke imaging software with Circle Neurovascular Imaging. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background and Objectives: The results of the ULTRA trial showed that ultra-early and short-term treatment with tranexamic acid (TXA) does not improve clinical outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Possibly, the lack of a beneficial effect in all patients with aSAH is masked by antagonistic effects of TXA in certain subgroups. In this post hoc subgroup analysis, we investigated the effect of TXA on clinical outcome in patients with good-grade and poor-grade aSAH., Methods: The ULTRA trial was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial with blinded outcome assessment. Participants received ultra-early and short-term TXA in addition to usual care or usual care only. This post hoc subgroup analysis included only ULTRA participants with confirmed aSAH and available World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grade on admission. Patients were categorized into those with good-grade (WFNS 1-3) and poor-grade (WFNS 4-5) aSAH. The primary outcome was clinical outcome assessed by the modified Rankin scale (mRS). Odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted ORs (aORs) with 95% CIs were calculated using ordinal regression analyses. Analyses were performed using the as-treated principle. In all patients with aSAH, no significant effect modification of TXA on clinical outcome was observed for admission WFNS grade ( p = 0.10)., Results: Of the 812 ULTRA participants, 473 patients had (58%; N = 232 TXA, N = 241 usual care) good-grade and 339 (42%; N = 162 TXA, N = 176 usual care) patients had poor-grade aSAH. In patients with good-grade aSAH, the TXA group had worse clinical outcomes (OR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.94, aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.94) compared with the usual care group. In patients with poor-grade aSAH, clinical outcomes were comparable between treatment groups (OR: 1.04, 95% CI 0.70-1.55, aOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.70-1.56)., Discussion: This post hoc subgroup analysis provides another important argument against the use of TXA treatment in patients with aSAH, by showing worse clinical outcomes in patients with good-grade aSAH treated with TXA and no clinical benefit of TXA in patients with poor-grade aSAH, compared with patients treated with usual care., Trial Registration Information: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02684812; submission date February 18, 2016, first patient enrollment on July 24, 2013)., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that tranexamic acid, given for <24 hours within the first 24 hours, does not improve the 6-month outcome in good-grade or poor initial-grade aneurysmal SAH.

Importance: The benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke declines with longer time from symptom onset, but it is not known whether a similar time dependency exists for IVT followed by thrombectomy., Objective: To determine whether the benefit associated with IVT plus thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone decreases with treatment time from symptom onset., Design, Setting, and Participants: Individual participant data meta-analysis from 6 randomized clinical trials comparing IVT plus thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone. Enrollment was between January 2017 and July 2021 at 190 sites in 15 countries. All participants were eligible for IVT and thrombectomy and presented directly at thrombectomy-capable stroke centers (n = 2334). For this meta-analysis, only patients with an anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion were included (n = 2313)., Exposure: Interval from stroke symptom onset to expected administration of IVT and treatment with IVT plus thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome analysis tested whether the association between the allocated treatment (IVT plus thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone) and disability at 90 days (7-level modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]; minimal clinically important difference for the rates of mRS scores of 0-2: 1.3%) varied with times from symptom onset to expected administration of IVT., Results: In 2313 participants (1160 in IVT plus thrombectomy group vs 1153 in thrombectomy alone group; median age, 71 [IQR, 62 to 78] years; 44.3% were female), the median time from symptom onset to expected administration of IVT was 2 hours 28 minutes (IQR, 1 hour 46 minutes to 3 hours 17 minutes). There was a statistically significant interaction between the time from symptom onset to expected administration of IVT and the association of allocated treatment with functional outcomes (ratio of adjusted common odds ratio [OR] per 1-hour delay, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72 to 0.97], P = .02 for interaction). The benefit of IVT plus thrombectomy decreased with longer times from symptom onset to expected administration of IVT (adjusted common OR for a 1-step mRS score shift toward improvement, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.13 to 1.96] at 1 hour, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.49] at 2 hours, and 1.04 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.23] at 3 hours). For a mRS score of 0, 1, or 2, the predicted absolute risk difference was 9% (95% CI, 3% to 16%) at 1 hour, 5% (95% CI, 1% to 9%) at 2 hours, and 1% (95% CI, -3% to 5%) at 3 hours. After 2 hours 20 minutes, the benefit associated with IVT plus thrombectomy was not statistically significant and the point estimate crossed the null association at 3 hours 14 minutes., Conclusions and Relevance: In patients presenting at thrombectomy-capable stroke centers, the benefit associated with IVT plus thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone was time dependent and statistically significant only if the time from symptom onset to expected administration of IVT was short.