Search

Background. Peri-operative interventional radiotherapy (POIRT) entails tumor resection, catheter implantation in the same surgery, and irradiation within the peri-operative period. It allows for maximal tumor burden reduction, better tumor bed identification, more flexible implant geometry, highly conformal irradiation, and treatment delay minimization. We reviewed the published local control, survival, toxicity, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes with POIRT for head and neck cancers (HNCs) in primary and re-irradiation settings. Materials and Methods. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and other databases, supplemented by bibliography scanning and hand-searching, yielded 107 titles. Fifteen unique articles were eligible, five of which were merged with more updated studies. Of the ten remaining studies, four reported on primary POIRT, and seven reported on reirradiation POIRT. Given data heterogeneity, only qualitative synthesis was performed. Results. Primary POIRT in early tongue cancer results in 6-year recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of 92% for both; in advanced HNCs, the 9-year RFS and OS rates are 52% and 55%. Grade 1–2 toxicity is very common; grade 3–4 toxicity is rare, but grade 5 toxicity has been reported. POIRT re-irradiation for recurrent HNCs results in 5y RFS and OS rates of 37–55% and 17–50%; better outcomes are achieved with gross total resection (GTR). QOL data are lacking. Conclusions. Primary POIRT is safe and effective in early tongue cancers; its use in other HNC sites, especially in advanced disease, requires careful consideration. Re-irradiation POIRT is most effective and safe when combined with GTR; toxicity is significant and may be limited by careful case selection, implant planning and execution, use of smaller fraction sizes, and adherence to homogeneity constraints. Study Registration Number. PROSPERO Registry Number CRD42024548294. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hearing outcomes of two cases of growing sporadic vestibular schwannoma, resected via a translabyrinthine approach with simultaneous cochlear implantation are reported. After gross total resection and anatomical preservation of the facial and cochlear nerve, the integrity of the cochlear nerve--on an electrophysiological level--was evaluated using the intracochlear test electrode of the Auditory Nerve Test System. After confirming electrically-evoked auditory brainstem recordings, cochlear implantation and hearing rehabilitation were performed as per the single-sided deafness protocol. This report describes the audiological outcome with respect to speech understanding in quiet and noise, localization of sounds as well as phoneme discrimination up to one year after surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the long-term hearing outcome after translabyrinthine resection of tumors within the internal auditory canal (IAC) with simultaneous cochlear implantation (CI)., Study Design: Prospective study., Setting: Tertiary referral center., Patients: Thirty-seven patients with tumors of the IAC undergoing translabyrinthine tumor surgery as a first-line therapy., Interventions: Intraoperatively, electrically evoked auditory brainstem response audiometry (eABR) was performed in all patients to assess cochlear nerve (CN) integrity. In case of preserved CN function after tumor removal, CI was subsequently performed. Postoperatively, patients were regularly followed up to evaluate pure-tone hearing as well as speech recognition with a monosyllabic word comprehension test., Main Outcome Measures: Postoperative hearing thresholds and word recognition scores., Results: Of 37 included patients, 22 (59.46%) had positive eABR responses after tumor removal. Twenty-one of these underwent simultaneous CI directly after tumor surgery and were followed-up for 24.24 ± 19.83 months after surgery. Hearing of these patients significantly improved from 73.87 ± 21.40 dB preoperatively to a mean pure-tone average of 41.56 ± 18.87 dB 1 year (p = 0.0008) and 34.58 ± 2.92 dB 3 years after surgery (p = 0.0157). Speech recognition significantly recovered from 13.33 ± 25.41% to 58.93 ± 27.61% 1 year (p = 0.0012) and 51.67 ± 28.58% 3 years postoperatively (p = 0.0164)., Conclusions: Regardless of tumor histopathology, CI is an effective option to restore patients' hearing after translabyrinthine tumor surgery. After CI, patients hearing can be restored over a long-term period of a minimum of 3 years post-surgery. Furthermore, eABR proves to be a practical tool to evaluate CN function and screen for patients eligible for CI., Competing Interests: Sources of support and disclosure of funding: C.A. received a research grant by MED-EL. All other authors report no conflict of interest. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors., (Copyright © 2024, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.)

Objective: To examine patient characteristics that impact serial observation adherence among vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients., Study Design: Retrospective chart review., Setting: Single tertiary care center., Methods: We selected for VS patients from 201 to 2020 who elected for serial observation as initial management. Patients under 18, with previous management, bilateral or intralabyrinthine VS, and neurofibromatosis type 2 were excluded. Demographics, tumor characteristics, and follow-up status were extracted. Single and multiple logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristics impacting follow-up., Results: We identified 507 VS patients who chose serial observation as initial management. Most were female (56.0%), white (73.0%), and married (72.8%). The mean age was 59.3 and most had private insurance (56.4%). Median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 2.00. Mean pure tone audiometry (PTA) average was 41.7 Hz. Average tumor size was 9.04 mm. Of 507 patients, 358 (70.6%) returned for at least one follow-up. On multiple logistic regression analysis, patients with private insurance (odds ratio [OR]: 0.39, confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-0.68; P = .001), racial minority background (OR: 0.54, CI: 0.35-0.83; P = .005), worse PTA averages (OR: 0.99, CI: 0.98-1.00; P = .044), and older age at diagnosis (OR: 0.97, CI: 0.95-1.00; P = .038) were less likely to follow-up., Conclusion: Private health insurance, racial minority background, worse PTA average, and older age were associated with decreased follow-up among adult VS patients electing serial observation. Patients with these characteristics may require additional support to ensure serial observation adherence., (© 2024 American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.)

Purpose: To evaluate the predictive factors of tumor growth in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) managed with the wait-and-scan approach., Methods: The data of 31 patients diagnosed with intracanalicular VS and followed for > 5 years were retrospectively analyzed. VS was diagnosed according to MRI findings and tumor growth was monitored. Tumor growth was defined as an increase of 2 mm or more in the maximal tumor diameter. The association between the initial tumor size and shape and tumor growth was assessed., Results: Tumor growth was observed in 16 of 31 patients (51.6%) over a mean follow-up duration of 7.3 years. The initial tumor size was not statistically correlated with tumor growth. However, fusiform or cylindrical tumors exhibited higher growth rates than oval or round tumors. Additionally, a significant correlation was observed between cerebellopontine angle extension and tumor shape., Conclusion: In this study, 51.6% of the patients with intracanalicular VS who were managed with the wait-and-scan strategy over a follow-up period of > 5 years showed tumor growth. Tumor shape, especially fusiform or cylindrical shape, was found to be a significant predictor of tumor growth., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are often associated with debilitating hearing loss. Therefore, preservation and rehabilitation of hearing have become major therapeutic goals of VS management. Recently, cochlear implantation (CI) has been established as an effective treatment option for VS-associated hearing loss. Nevertheless, the integrity and proper function of the cochlear nerve must be evaluated before conducting CI to ensure optimal CI outcomes. Various methods to determine cochlear nerve integrity and functionality have emerged in the last few years. Of these, the use of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response audiometry (eABR) in particular has been proven to be a meaningful tool for monitoring cochlear nerve health during VS surgery. Here, the cochlear nerve can be electrically stimulated using an intracochlear test electrode before, during, and after tumor extirpation. Subsequently, the resulting brainstem responses can be measured and interpreted accordingly to obtain direct information on the cochlear nerve function. This allows for continuous monitoring of cochlear nerve function throughout the course of VS surgery and aids in the decision-making for CI candidacy. Finally, in the case of preserved brainstem responses, CI can be performed instantly after VS extirpation. This simultaneous approach offers several advantages over two-staged procedures and has been shown to be an efficient and safe procedure for restoring hearing after VS removal., (© 2024. The Author(s).)