Search

The emergence of vaccinomics and system vaccinology represents a transformative shift in immunization strategies, advocating for personalized vaccines tailored to individual genetic and immunological profiles. Integrating insights from genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and immunology, personalized vaccines offer the promise of enhanced efficacy and safety, revolutionizing the field of vaccinology. However, the development of personalized vaccines presents multifaceted challenges, including technical, ethical, economic, and regulatory considerations. Addressing these challenges is essential to ensure equitable access and safety of personalized vaccination strategies. Despite these hurdles, the potential of personalized vaccines to optimize responses and mitigate disease burden underscores the significance of ongoing research and collaboration in advancing precision medicine in immunization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The emergence of vaccinomics and system vaccinology represents a transformative shift in immunization strategies, advocating for personalized vaccines tailored to individual genetic and immunological profiles. Integrating insights from genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and immunology, personalized vaccines offer the promise of enhanced efficacy and safety, revolutionizing the field of vaccinology. However, the development of personalized vaccines presents multifaceted challenges, including technical, ethical, economic, and regulatory considerations. Addressing these challenges is essential to ensure equitable access and safety of personalized vaccination strategies. Despite these hurdles, the potential of personalized vaccines to optimize responses and mitigate disease burden underscores the significance of ongoing research and collaboration in advancing precision medicine in immunization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Live-attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIV) offer advantages over the commonly used inactivated split influenza vaccines. However, finding the optimal balance between sufficient attenuation and immunogenicity has remained a challenge. We recently developed an alternative LAIV based on the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus with a truncated NS1 protein and lacking PA-X protein expression (NS1(1–126)-ΔPAX). This virus showed a blunted replication and elicited a strong innate immune response. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of this vaccine candidate in the porcine animal model as a pertinent in vivo system. Immunization of pigs via the nasal route with the novel NS1(1–126)-ΔPAX LAIV did not cause disease and elicited a strong mucosal immune response that completely blocked replication of the homologous challenge virus in the respiratory tract. However, we observed prolonged shedding of our vaccine candidate from the upper respiratory tract. To improve LAIV safety, we developed a novel prime/boost vaccination strategy combining primary intramuscular immunization with a haemagglutinin-encoding propagation-defective vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) replicon, followed by a secondary immunization with the NS1(1–126)-ΔPAX LAIV via the nasal route. This two-step immunization procedure significantly reduced LAIV shedding, increased the production of specific serum IgG, neutralizing antibodies, and Th1 memory cells, and resulted in sterilizing immunity against homologous virus challenge. In conclusion, our novel intramuscular prime/intranasal boost regimen interferes with virus shedding and transmission, a feature that will help combat influenza epidemics and pandemics. Author summary: Nasally administered live-attenuated influenza vaccines induce a mucosal immune response that can effectively prevent primary infection and virus shedding. However, the development of alternative live vaccine strategies must consider the balance between eliciting a robust immune response and reducing the virulence of the vaccine candidate. To address this problem, we have developed a novel prime/boost vaccination strategy consisting of an initial intramuscular immunization with a propagation-defective RNA virus vector and subsequent nasal immunization with a modified attenuated influenza virus that has lost its ability to counteract the host innate immune response. Using the porcine model, we demonstrate that this novel strategy is capable of eliciting a robust immune response both systemically and at mucosal surfaces. Importantly, intranasal infection with homologous challenge virus remained undetectable in vaccinated animals. In conclusion, our innovative vaccination regimen represents a promising strategy to control influenza disease and virus spread in both humans and livestock. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The yellow fever 17D vaccine (YF17D) is highly effective but is frequently administered to individuals with pre-existing cross-reactive immunity, potentially impacting their immune responses. Here, we investigate the impact of pre-existing flavivirus immunity induced by the tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) vaccine on the response to YF17D vaccination in 250 individuals up to 28 days post-vaccination (pv) and 22 individuals sampled one-year pv. Our findings indicate that previous TBEV vaccination does not affect the early IgM-driven neutralizing response to YF17D. However, pre-vaccination sera enhance YF17D virus infection in vitro via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). Following YF17D vaccination, TBEV-pre-vaccinated individuals develop high amounts of cross-reactive IgG antibodies with poor neutralizing capacity. In contrast, TBEV-unvaccinated individuals elicit a non-cross-reacting neutralizing response. Using YF17D envelope protein mutants displaying different epitopes, we identify quaternary dimeric epitopes as the primary target of neutralizing antibodies. Additionally, TBEV-pre-vaccination skews the IgG response towards the pan-flavivirus fusion loop epitope (FLE), capable of mediating ADE of dengue and Zika virus infections in vitro. Together, we propose that YF17D vaccination conceals the FLE in individuals without prior flavivirus exposure but favors a cross-reactive IgG response in TBEV-pre-vaccinated recipients directed to the FLE with potential to enhance dengue virus infection. Flavivirus infection or vaccination can induce cross-reactive immune responses. Here, the authors show how previous immunization with the tick-borne encephalitis virus vaccine affects the immune response to the yellow fever vaccine, suggesting that the yellow fever vaccine virus conceals epitopes shared with other flaviviruses in flavivirus-naive but not flavivirus-pre-exposed individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The yellow fever 17D vaccine (YF17D) is highly effective but is frequently administered to individuals with pre-existing cross-reactive immunity, potentially impacting their immune responses. Here, we investigate the impact of pre-existing flavivirus immunity induced by the tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) vaccine on the response to YF17D vaccination in 250 individuals up to 28 days post-vaccination (pv) and 22 individuals sampled one-year pv. Our findings indicate that previous TBEV vaccination does not affect the early IgM-driven neutralizing response to YF17D. However, pre-vaccination sera enhance YF17D virus infection in vitro via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). Following YF17D vaccination, TBEV-pre-vaccinated individuals develop high amounts of cross-reactive IgG antibodies with poor neutralizing capacity. In contrast, TBEV-unvaccinated individuals elicit a non-cross-reacting neutralizing response. Using YF17D envelope protein mutants displaying different epitopes, we identify quaternary dimeric epitopes as the primary target of neutralizing antibodies. Additionally, TBEV-pre-vaccination skews the IgG response towards the pan-flavivirus fusion loop epitope (FLE), capable of mediating ADE of dengue and Zika virus infections in vitro. Together, we propose that YF17D vaccination conceals the FLE in individuals without prior flavivirus exposure but favors a cross-reactive IgG response in TBEV-pre-vaccinated recipients directed to the FLE with potential to enhance dengue virus infection. Flavivirus infection or vaccination can induce cross-reactive immune responses. Here, the authors show how previous immunization with the tick-borne encephalitis virus vaccine affects the immune response to the yellow fever vaccine, suggesting that the yellow fever vaccine virus conceals epitopes shared with other flaviviruses in flavivirus-naive but not flavivirus-pre-exposed individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]