Possible approaches to the study of the ergonomics of machine tool design are discussed and a particular case is described in which the operation of the controls of a capstan lathe was studied, various modifications were instituted and a preliminary evaluation of one of them was attempted.
The ergonomics of metal working machine tools seems to be a most neglected area of study, particularly if one considers the size and importance of the industry. There are a number of reasons for this. Machine tool design is still very much a mechanical engineering domain with a tradition of empiricism rather than elaborate theory. Every machine tool is a development of earlier tools which served the same purpose, the new machine is just a little faster or a little more accurate than the previous one. There are no sudden breakthroughs, no completely new systems which have to be designed from scratch. Flexibility in the design of the man/machine interface is severely restricted; the display section is real rather than remote, that is, one looks at the working parts themselves rather than at some symbolic representation and the control section must be determined within the restrictions of mechanics, a control lever cannot be repositioned as easily as a switch. However, this situation is beginning to change with the introduction of hydraulic and electronic control systems, and the more elaborate and remote instrumentation made necessary by higher accuracy requirements. There would seem to be three possible procedures for the introduction of systematic ergonomics into this industry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]