FARADAY's paper "On Argument" was read in August 1818 to a semiphilosophical, semi-social group of young members of the Royal Institution to which he belonged. It was entered by his hand into a kind of record book containing the proceedings of the group. This book was in the private possession of one of the members of the group who left London, and was later, in 1890, presented to the Royal Institution, according to his will. This explains why "On Argument" was not even mentioned in H. Bence-Jones's Life of Faraday of 1870. It is not for me to explain how such an interesting paper escaped publication before now. I am most grateful to the Royal Institution for the permission to publish it, and especially to their Librarian, Mr. K. D. C. Vernon, who drew my attention to it. In this paper Faraday speaks of attributing foolish or improper opinions to, and of making unwarrantable assertions about one's opponent; and he stresses that he has in mind definite experiences of his own. It may therefore be relevant to mention an example, and I therefore decided also to publish, by way of preamble to the paper, a remarkable though yet unpublished letter from G. Moll to Faraday dated 25 April 1831. This letter is in the possession of the Institute of Electrical Engineers, to which I am indebted for permission to publish it. G. Moll of Utrecht was a personal friend of Davy and of Faraday. He was famous as a chemist and as the (anonymous) author of the remarkable On the Alleged Decline of Science in England (which is a comment on C. Babbage's famous The Decline of Science in England and was edited and published by Faraday in 1831). Moll's letter accompanied the manuscript of that book. It contains a comment on Dr. J. A. Paris' Life of Davy, and a description of an attempt of a group of French philosophers to suppress Davy's criticism of Lavoisier. Moll protested against the lack of any reference to this incident in Paris' book. It is interesting to note that the silence still prevails. Only John Davy, in his Life of his brother, referred to this incident, though rather evasively; he discussed it in a little more detail in his Fragmentary Remains of Sir Humphrey Davy. But none of the later biographers of Davy or Faraday refer to this incident and Moll's letter was ignored until now. For my own part I see no reason for concealing the failings of the great men of the