Search

Background: The amount of mandibular protrusion is a key factor in optimizing the efficacy of mandibular advancement device (MAD) therapy in an individual patient diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea. This process is called titration and is generally based on resolution of subjective symptoms like snoring and/or daytime sleepiness as a function of protrusion. An objective approach uses a remotely controlled mandibular positioner (RCMP) during a full-night polysomnography (PSG), in analogy with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration. More recently, the feasibility of RCMP use during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) titration was reported., Methods: This randomized crossover trial will compare DISE-assisted titration to PSG-guided titration, as well as with the conventional subjective titration method. The primary outcome is the actual mandibular protrusive position found to be the most optimal for each tested titration procedure. Furthermore, the therapeutic efficacy will be compared among the different titration modalities using level 1 sleep studies., Discussion: Currently, the optimal titration of MAD therapy is most often based on 'trial and error'. The conventional method relies on subjective improvement in symptoms, although this may not provide the most accurate indicator for efficient titration. Therefore, relying on objective criteria in the titration process should be advantageous. In analogy with CPAP, titration of the most optimal mandibular protrusion could be performed using RCMP during an overnight titration PSG. Recently, it was shown that titration under direct visualization of upper airway patency and collapsibility is feasible using the RCMP during DISE. However, no clinical results for such a procedure are as yet available. This study is the first to compare the most optimal mandibular protrusive position according to three titration procedures, as well as to compare the therapeutic efficacy of these titration methods., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03716648 . Registered on 23 October 2018.

Background: Assessment of the overall therapeutic effectiveness of oral appliance therapy can only be realized through objectively measured compliance. The aims of this study were to assess objectively measured compliance during oral appliance therapy at 1-year follow-up and to compare these data with self-reported use., Methods: Fifty-one eligible patients were enrolled in this 1-year prospective clinical study (men, 61%; mean age, 49 ± 10 years; apnea-hypopnea index, 18.0 ± 11.9 events/h sleep; BMI, 26.6 ± 4.1 kg/m²). Objective compliance during oral appliance therapy at 1-year follow-up was assessed with a microsensor thermometer. Subjective compliance was assessed by self-report. Patients with a mean objectively measured use of ≥ 4 h/night on 70% of nights monitored were considered regular users. The mean disease alleviation was calculated as a measure of overall therapeutic effectiveness., Results: High agreement between objective and subjective compliance data at 1-year follow-up was reported (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9), showing a mean subjective overestimation of 30 min (95% CI, -3.1 to 1.9; P = .02). The discontinuation rate at 1-year follow-up was 9.8%. The objective mean use rate was 6.4 ± 1.7 h/night at 1-year follow-up in continuing users, with a regular use rate of 83%. The mean disease alleviation was 54.9%., Conclusions: This study is the first to our knowledge to report the 1-year results of objectively measured compliance during oral appliance therapy. In addition, a high agreement between objective and subjective compliance data were reported, with a mean subjective overestimation of 30 min., Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01284881; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.