Search

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common malignancy worldwide and the third most common cause of cancer‐related death. Long‐term prognosis remains poor with treatment options frequently limited by advanced tumor stage, tumor location, or underlying liver dysfunction. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) utilizes technological advances to deliver highly precise, tumoricidal doses of radiation. There is an emerging body of literature on SABR in HCC demonstrating high rates of local control in the order of 80–90% at 3 years. SABR is associated with a low risk of radiation‐induced liver disease or decompensation in appropriately selected HCC patients with compensated liver function and is now being incorporated into guidelines as an additional treatment option. This review outlines the emerging role of SABR in the multidisciplinary management of HCC and summarizes the current evidence for its use as an alternative ablative option for early‐stage disease, as a bridge to transplant, and as palliation for advanced‐stage disease. We outline specific considerations regarding patient selection, toxicities, and response assessment. Finally, we compare current international guidelines and recommendations for the use of SABR and summarize ongoing studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is a treatment option for large vestibular schwannomas supported by an increasing evidence. A single institution retrospective review of large (>3.5cc) vestibular schwannomas treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and singlesession radiosurgery was conducted. Using serial follow up scans, a volumetric analysis of tumor volume change over time was performed. Vestibular schwannomas treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy appeared to reduce in volume significantly faster than those treated with single-session radiosurgery. Cystic lesions reduced in volume faster than solid lesions. There was no significant difference in the rates of radiological and symptomatic oedema, nor subsequent dexamethasone requirement between the two treatment modalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Re-irradiation may be considered for select patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. Treatment techniques include conformal radiotherapy employing conventional fractionation, hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), and single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Methods A pooled, population-weighted, multiple linear regression analysis of publications from 1992 to 2016 was performed to evaluate the relationships between re-irradiation technique and median overall survival (OS) and radionecrosis outcomes. Results Seventy published articles were analyzed, yielding a total of 3302 patients. Across all studies, initial treatment was external beam radiotherapy to a median dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions, with or without concurrent chemotherapy. On multivariate analysis, there was a significant correlation between OS and radiotherapy technique after adjusting for age, re-irradiation biologically equivalent dose (EQD2), interval between initial and repeat radiotherapy, and treatment volume (P <.0001). Adjusted mean OS was 12.2 months (95% CI, 11.8–12.5) after SRS, 10.1 months (95% CI, 9.7–10.5) after FSRT, and 8.9 months (95% CI, 8.4–9.4) after conventional fractionation. There was also a significant association between radionecrosis and treatment technique after adjusting for age, re-irradiation EQD2, interval, and volume (P <.0001). Radionecrosis rate was 7.1% (95% CI, 6.6–7.7) after FSRT, 6.1% (95% CI, 5.6–6.6) after SRS, and 1.1% (95% CI, 0.5–1.7) after conventional fractionation. Conclusions The published literature suggests that OS is highest after re-irradiation using SRS, followed by FSRT and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Whether this represents superiority of the treatment technique or an uncontrolled selection bias is uncertain. The risk of radionecrosis was low for all modalities overall. Re-irradiation is a feasible option in appropriately selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]