Search

Introduction HIV?positive individuals are known to be at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to the general population, partly due to an increased prevalence of some CVD risk factors, [...], : Introduction: There is paucity of data related to potential gender differences in the use of interventions to prevent and treat cardiovascular disease (CVD) among HIV?positive individuals. We investigated whether such differences exist in the observational D:A:D cohort study. Methods: Participants were followed from study enrolment until the earliest of death, six months after last visit or February 1, 2015. Initiation of CVD interventions [lipid?lowering drugs (LLDs), angiotensin?converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), anti?hypertensives, invasive cardiovascular procedures (ICPs) were investigated and Poisson regression models calculated whether rates were lower among women than men, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: Women (n = 12,955) were generally at lower CVD risk than men (n = 36,094). Overall, initiation rates of CVD interventions were lower in women than men; LLDs: incidence rate 1.28 [1.21, 1.35] vs. 2.40 [2.34, 2.46]; ACEIs: 0.88 [0.82, 0.93] vs. 1.43 [1.39, 1.48]; anti?hypertensives: 1.40 [1.33, 1.47] vs. 1.72 [1.68, 1.77] and ICPs: 0.08 [0.06, 0.10] vs. 0.30 [0.28, 0.32], and this was also true for most CVD interventions when exclusively considering periods of follow?up for which individuals were at high CVD risk. In fully adjusted models, women were less likely to receive CVD interventions than men (LLDs: relative rate 0.83 [0.78, 0.88]; ACEIs: 0.93 [0.86, 1.01]; ICPs: 0.54 [0.43, 0.68]), except for the receipt of anti?hypertensives (1.17 [1.10, 1.25]). Conclusion: The use of most CVD interventions was lower among women than men. Interventions are needed to ensure that all HIV?positive persons, particularly women, are appropriately monitored for CVD and, if required, receive appropriate CVD interventions.

Objectives: The aim was to investigate whether switching from efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EFV/F/TDF) to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/F/TAF) may improve neuropsychiatric symptoms and neurocognition., Design: Pilot, single-arm, prospective study of persons with HIV (PWH) on the efficacy and safety of switching from EFV/F/TDF to BIC/F/TAF., Methods: Participants underwent neuropsychological assessment (NPA) at switch (T0) and after 48 weeks (T1). NPA was carried out through a standardized battery of 12 tests. Neurocognitive impairment (NCI) was defined by a score of at least 1 standard deviation (SD) below the normal mean on at least two tests or ≥2 SD below on one test. Individual z scores were determined, NPZ-12 was calculated as the average of 12 test z scores and change of NPZ-12 was the outcome. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) was classified by Frascati's criteria. Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were administered. Paired-Wilcoxon and McNemar tests were used for comparisons, and logistic regression for associations with NCI changes., Results: Out of 126 participants, BAI, BDI-II, and PSQI questionnaires revealed an improvement at T1. NPA revealed NCI in 40.5% of persons at T0 and 42.1% at T1 ( P  = 0.746). Specifically, at T0, among participants with NCI, 35% improved; among those without, 26% worsened at T1; NPZ-12 score worsened at T1. 5.6% of ANI was observed at T0 and 7.9% at T1. No factor associated with these changes was found., Conclusion: Our results suggest switching from EFV/F/TDF to B/F/TAF significantly improves psychiatric symptoms and sleep quality. Neurocognitive performance remained stable, although a decline in NPZ-12 and in specific domains was observed., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: With advances in antiretroviral therapy for HIV treatment, newer drug combinations provide improved efficacy, safety, and compliance. This study evaluates switching to a regimen of doravirine (DOR), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and lamivudine (3TC) in a cohort of people living with HIV (PLWH). Methods: this Italian retrospective study included 426 PLWH who switched from rilpivirine (RPV)/TDF/emtricitabine (FTC) to DOR/3TC/TDF. The analysis focused on treatment effectiveness, safety, and metabolic and renal markers. Results: this study reports a treatment failure (defined as virological failure or discontinuation of the regimen) rate of 2.34% (95% confidence interval, 1.28-4.50%), with significant improvement in CD4 counts (+49.93 cells/µL, p < 0.001). Notably, the switch to DOR/3TC/TDF did not result in adverse metabolic effects or significant changes in renal function. Analysis of lipid profiles showed stabilization in the majority of PLWH. Conclusions: this study indicates that switching to a DOR/3TC/TDF from RPV/TDF/FTC is an effective and well-tolerated option for PLWH, with benefits in terms of maintaining viral suppression, CD4 count recovery, and metabolic health, without evidence of renal impairment. These results support the continued use of DOR/3TC/TDF as part of HIV treatment strategies and highlight the need for ongoing research to refine ART regimens for different populations.

Background: A rapid ART initiation approach can be beneficial in people with advanced HIV disease, in consideration of their high morbidity and mortality. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of rapid ART start with BIC/FTC/TAF in this setting., Methods: Pilot, single-centre, single-arm, prospective, phase IV clinical trial conducted in a tertiary Italian hospital. Thirty ART-naïve people presenting with advanced HIV-1 diagnosis (defined as the presence of an AIDS-defining event and/or CD4 cell count <200 µL), were enrolled. Main exclusion criteria were active tuberculosis, cryptococcosis and pregnant/breastfeeding women. BIC/FTC/TAF was started within 7 days from HIV diagnosis. The primary endpoint was clinical or virologic failure (VF). Immunological parameters, safety, feasibility, neurocognitive performances and patient-reported outcomes were assessed as well., Results: Over the study period, 40 (34%) of 116 patients diagnosed with HIV infection at INMI Spallanzani had advanced disease, of whom 30 (26%) were enrolled. The proportion of participants with HIV-RNA <50 cp/mL was 9/30 (30%) at week (w) 4, 19/30 (63%) at w12, 24/30 (80%) at w24, 23/30 (77%) at w36 and 27/30 (90%) at w48. Two unconfirmed VF occurred. No ART discontinuation due to toxicity or VF was observed. No ART modification was performed based on the review of genotype and no mutations for the study drugs were detected. Mean CD4 cells count changed by 133 cells/μL at BL to 309 cells/μL at w 48 and 83% of participants had a CD4 > 200 cells/µL at w 48. Two participants developed IRIS and one was diagnosed with disseminated TB and needed an ART switch., Interpretations: Our results support the feasibility, efficacy and safety of BIC/FTC/TAF as a rapid ART strategy in patients with advanced HIV disease., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Among interleukin-6 inhibitors suggested for use in COVID-19, there are few robust evidences for the efficacy of sarilumab. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of sarilumab in severe COVID-19., Methods: In this phase 3, open-labeled, randomized clinical trial, conducted at 5 Italian hospitals, adults with severe COVID-19 pneumonia (excluding mechanically ventilated) were randomized 2:1 to receive intravenous sarilumab (400 mg, repeatable after 12 h) plus standard of care (SOC) (arm A) or to continue SOC (arm B). Randomization was web-based. As post-hoc analyses, the participants were stratified according to baseline inflammatory parameters. The primary endpoint was analysed on the modified Intention-To-Treat population, including all the randomized patients who received any study treatment (sarilumab or SOC). It was time to clinical improvement of 2 points on a 7-points ordinal scale, from baseline to day 30. We used Kaplan Meier method and log-rank test to compare the primary outcome between two arms, and Cox regression stratified by clinical center and adjusted for severity of illness, to estimate the hazard ratio (HR). The trial was registered with EudraCT (2020-001390-76)., Findings: Between May 2020 and May 2021, 191 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom, excluding nine dropouts, 176 were assigned to arm A (121) and B (55). At day 30, no significant differences in the primary endpoint were found (88% [95% CI 81-94] in arm A vs 85% [74-93], HR 1.07 [0.8-1.5] in arm B; log-rank p  = 0.50). After stratifying for inflammatory parameters, arm A showed higher probability of improvement than B without statistical significance in the strata with C reactive protein (CRP) < 7 mg/dL (88% [77-96] vs 79% [63-91], HR 1.55 [0.9-2.6]; log-rank p  = 0.049) and in the strata with lymphocytes <870/mmc (90% [79-96]) vs (73% [55-89], HR 1.53 [0.9-2.7]; log-rank p  = 0.058). Overall, 39/121 (32%) AEs were reported in arm A and 14/55 (23%) in B ( p  = 0.195), while serious AEs were 22/121 (18%) and 7/55 (11%), respectively ( p  = 0.244). There were no treatment-related deaths., Interpretation: The efficacy of sarilumab in severe COVID-19 was not demonstrated both in the overall and in the stratified for severity analysis population. Exploratory analyses suggested that subsets of patients with lower CRP values or lower lymphocyte counts might have had benefit with sarilumab treatment, but this finding would require replication in other studies. The relatively low rate of concomitant corticosteroid use, could partially explain our results., Funding: This study was supported by INMI "Lazzaro Spallanzani" Ricerca Corrente Linea 1 on emerging and reemerging infections, funded by Italian Ministry of Health., Competing Interests: Andrea Antinori has served as a paid consultant to Astra-Zeneca, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Roche, Theratotecnologies and ViiV Healthcare and received research institutional grants from Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag and ViiV Healthcare, payment or honoraria from Gilead Science and ViiV Healthcare and support for attending meetings and/or travel from ViiV Healthcare and AbbVie. Marta Camici received institutional grant, support for attending meetings and/or travel and speakers' honoraria from Gilead Sciences. Stefania Cicalini reports consulting fees paid to self from ViiV Healthcare, Jansen-Cilag, Merck Sharp and Dohme and Gilead Sciences and payment or honoraria from ViiV Healthcare, Jansen-Cilag, Merck Sharp and Dohme and Gilead Sciences. Roberta Gagliardini reports payments to their institution from Gilead Sciences, speakers' honoraria/educational activities for ViiV Healthcare, Merck Sharp and Dohme and Gilead Sciences, support for attending meetings and/or travel from ViiV Healthcare and advisor for Theratechnologies, Janssen-Cilag and Gilead Sciences. Enrico Girardi reports grants from Gilead Sciences and Mylan and fees for lectures and expertise from Gilead Sciences. Marco Iannetta received research institutional grant from Gilead Sciences and personal honoraria from Biogen Italia, AIM Educational and MICOM srl. Ilaria Mastrorosa received institutional research grant and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Gilead Sciences. Annalisa Mondi received speakers' honoraria from Gilead Sciences and ViiV Healthcare and participated in advisory boards sponsored by ViiV Healthcare. Emanuele Nicastri reports grants from Sobi and Roche, payment or honoraria from Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Roche and Sobi, patents planned from Dompè and advisor for Eli Lilly and Roche. Carmela Pinnetti received personal fee for a case presentation and travel grant from Gilead Sciences and participated in an advisory board for Janssen-Cilag. Alessandra Vergori received institutional grant from Gilead Sciences, speakers’ honoraria/educational activities from Merck Sharp and Dohme, ViiV Healthcare and Janssen-Cilag and advisor for Janssen-Cilag. The other co-authors declare no conflicts of interests for this work., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background: HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) have been suggested as persistent even with effective antiretroviral therapy (ART). Aims were to evaluate HAND prevalence and associated factors, in a large cohort of people-with-HIV (PWH)., Methods: ART-treated PWH, underwent a neuropsychological examination through a battery of 12 tests exploring 5 different domains, between 2009 and 2020, were included in this cross-sectional analysis. HAND were classified according to Frascati's criteria. Participants were defined as complaining or not-complaining if a cognitive complaint was reported or not. Chi-square for trend and multivariable logistic regression were fitted., Results: Overall, 1424 PWH were enrolled during four three-years periods. HAND prevalence was 24%; among complainers (572/1424), it was 38%, higher than among not-complainers (15%). Over the study period, a decreasing HAND prevalence was found in the entire population (P < 0.001) and in complaining (P < 0.001); in not-complaining it remained stable (P = 0.182). Factors associated with HAND were older age, lower educational level, lower current CD4+ T-cell count and HCV co-infection. Compared to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, receiving dual and integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based therapies was associated with a decreased risk of HAND, as well as being tested in more recent years., Conclusions: In this large cohort of ART-treated PWH, mostly virologically suppressed, a remarkable decreasing HAND prevalence was observed. Besides HIV- and patient-related factors, the reduced risk of HAND found with dual and INSTI-based regimens along with a more recent ART initiation, could suggest a potential role of new treatment strategies in this decline, due to their greater virologic efficacy and better tolerability., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. Andrea Antinori has served as a paid consultant to and received payment or honoraria from Astra-Zeneca, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Roche, Theratotecnologies, ViiV Healthcare. Rita Bellagamba reports payment or honoraria from Merck Sharp and Dohme, and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, and Merck Sharp and Dohme. Marta Camici received institutional grant and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Gilead Sciences. Stefania Cicalini reports consulting fees paid to self from ViiV Healthcare, Jansen-Cilag, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Gilead Sciences; payment or honoraria from ViiV Healthcare, Jansen-Cilag, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and Gilead Sciences. Roberta Gagliardini reports payments to their institution from Gilead Sciences, speakers' honoraria/educational activities for ViiV Healthcare, Merck Sharp and Dohme and Gilead Sciences, support for attending meetings and/or travel from ViiV Healthcare, advisor for Theratechnologies, Janssen-Cilag and Gilead Sciences. Ilaria Mastrorosa received institutional grant and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Gilead Sciences. Carmela Pinnetti received personal fee from Gilead Sciences for a case presentation and a travel grant and served on an advisory board for Janssen-Cilag. Alessandra Vergori received institutional grant from Gilead Sciences, speakers' honoraria/educational activities for Merck Sharp and Dohme and Janssen-Cilag, advisor for Janssen-Cilag. The other co-authors declare no conflicts of interests., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Despite the successful deployment of efficacious vaccines and therapeutics, the development of novel vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 remains a major goal to increase vaccine doses availability and accessibility for lower income setting. We report here on the kinetics of Spike-specific humoral and T-cell response in young and old volunteers over 6 months follow-up after a single intramuscular administration of GRAd-COV2, a gorilla adenoviral vector-based vaccine candidate currently in phase-2 of clinical development. At all three tested vaccine dosages, Spike binding and neutralizing antibodies were induced and substantially maintained up to 3 months, to then contract at 6 months. Potent T-cell responses were readily induced and sustained throughout the study period, with only minor decline. No major differences in immune response to GRAd-COV2 vaccination were observed in the two age cohorts. In light of its favorable safety and immunogenicity, GRAd-COV2 is a valuable candidate for further clinical development and potential addition to the COVID-19 vaccine toolbox to help fighting SARS-CoV-2 pandemic., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

The emerging threat represented by SARS-CoV-2 variants, demands the development of therapies for better clinical management of COVID-19. MAD0004J08 is a potent Fc-engineered monoclonal antibody (mAb) able to neutralize in vitro all current SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VoCs) including the omicron variant even if with significantly reduced potency. Here we evaluated data obtained from the first 30 days of a phase 1 clinical study (EudraCT N.: 2020-005469-15 and ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04932850). The primary endpoint evaluated the percentage of severe adverse events. Secondary endpoints evaluated pharmacokinetic and serum neutralization titers. A single dose administration of MAD0004J08 via intramuscular (i.m.) route is safe and well tolerated, resulting in rapid serum distribution and sera neutralizing titers higher than COVID-19 convalescent and vaccinated subjects. A single dose administration of MAD0004J08 is also sufficient to effectively neutralize major SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (alpha, beta, gamma and delta). MAD0004J08 can be a major advancement in the prophylaxis and clinical management of COVID-19., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

The optimal therapeutic approach for primary HIV infection (PHI) is still debated. We aimed to compare the viroimmunological response to a four- versus a three-drug regimen, both INSTI-based, in patients with PHI. This was a monocentric, prospective, observational study including all patients diagnosed with PHI from December 2014 to April 2018. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) was started, before genotype resistance test results, with tenofovir/emtricitabine and either raltegravir plus boosted darunavir or dolutegravir. Cumulative probability of virological suppression [VS] (HIV-1 RNA< 40 cp/mL), low-level HIV-1 DNA [LL-HIVDNA] (HIV-1 DNA < 200 copies/106PBMC), and CD4/CD8 ratio ≥1 were estimated using Kaplan−Meier curves. Factors associated with the achievement of VS, LL-HIVDNA, and CD4/CD8 ≥ 1 were assessed by a Cox regression model. We enrolled 144 patients (95.8% male, median age 34 years): 110 (76%) started a four-drug-based therapy, and 34 (24%) a three-drug regimen. Both treatment groups showed a comparable high probability of achieving VS and a similar probability of reaching LL-HIVDNA and a CD4/CD8 ratio ≥1 after 48 weeks from ART initiation. Higher baseline HIV-1 RNA and HIV-1 DNA levels lowered the chance of VS, whereas a better preserved immunocompetence increased that chance. Not statistically significant factors associated with LL-HIVDNA achievement were found, whereas a higher baseline CD4/CD8 ratio predicted the achievement of immune recovery. In PHI patients, the rapid initiation of either an intensified four-drug or a standard three-drug INSTI-based regimen showed comparable responses in terms of VS, viral reservoir size, and immunological recovery.

Background: There is conflicting evidence for how HIV influences COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study was to compare characteristics at presentation and the clinical outcomes of people living with HIV (PLWH) versus HIV-negative patients (non-PLWH) hospitalized with COVID-19. Methods: Primary endpoint: time until invasive ventilation/death. Secondary endpoints: time until ventilation/death, time until symptoms resolution. Results: A total of 1647 hospitalized patients were included (43 (2.6%) PLWH, 1604 non-PLWH). PLWH were younger (55 vs. 61 years) and less likely to be with PaO2/FiO2 < 300 mmHg compared with non-PLWH. Among PLWH, nadir of CD4 was 185 (75−322) cells/μL; CD4 at COVID-19 diagnosis was 272 cells/μL (127−468) and 77% of these were virologically suppressed. The cumulative probability of invasive mechanical ventilation/death at day 15 was 4.7% (95%CI 1.2−17.3) in PLWH versus 18.9% (16.9−21.1) in non-PLWH (p = 0.023). The cumulative probability of non-invasive/invasive ventilation/death at day 15 was 20.9% (11.5−36.4) in PLWH versus 37.6% (35.1−40.2) in non-PLWH (p = 0.044). The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of invasive mechanical ventilation/death of PLWH was 0.49 (95% CI 0.12−1.96, p = 0.310) versus non-PLWH; similarly, aHR of non-invasive/invasive ventilation/death of PLWH was 1.03 (95% CI 0.53−2.00, p = 0.926). Conclusion: A less-severe presentation of COVID-19 at hospitalization was observed in PLWH compared to non-PLWH; no difference in clinical outcomes could be detected.

Safe and effective vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are essential for ending the ongoing pandemic. Although impressive progress has been made with several COVID-19 vaccines already approved, it is clear that those developed so far cannot meet the global vaccine demand alone. We describe a COVID-19 vaccine based on a replication-defective gorilla adenovirus expressing the stabilized prefusion severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein named GRAd-COV2. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of a single-dose regimen of this vaccine in healthy younger and older adults to select the appropriate dose for each age group. For this purpose, a phase 1, dose-escalation, open-labeled trial was conducted including 90 healthy participants (45 aged 18 to 55 years old and 45 aged 65 to 85 years old) who received a single intramuscular administration of GRAd-COV2 at three escalating doses. Local and systemic adverse reactions were mostly mild or moderate and of short duration, and no serious adverse events were reported. Four weeks after vaccination, seroconversion to spike protein and receptor binding domain was achieved in 43 of 44 young volunteers and in 45 of 45 older participants. Consistently, neutralizing antibodies were detected in 42 of 44 younger-age and 45 of 45 older-age volunteers. In addition, GRAd-COV2 induced a robust and T helper 1 cell (T H 1)–skewed T cell response against the spike protein in 89 of 90 participants from both age groups. Overall, the safety and immunogenicity data from the phase 1 trial support the further development of this vaccine.

Molecular investigation of primary HIV infections (PHI) is crucial to describe current dynamics of HIV transmission. Aim of the study was to investigate HIV transmission clusters (TC) in PHI referred during the years 2013-2020 to the National Institute for Infectious Diseases in Rome (INMI), that is the Lazio regional AIDS reference centre, and factors possibly associated with inclusion in TC. These were identified by phylogenetic analysis, based on population sequencing of pol ; a more in depth analysis was performed on TC of B subtype, using ultra-deep sequencing (UDS) of env . Of 270 patients diagnosed with PHI during the study period, 229 were enrolled (median follow-up 168 (IQR 96-232) weeks). Median age: 39 (IQR 32-48) years; 94.8% males, 86.5% Italians, 83.4% MSM, 56.8% carrying HIV-1 subtype B. Of them, 92.6% started early treatment within a median of 4 (IQR 2-7) days after diagnosis; median time to sustained suppression was 20 (IQR 8-32) weeks. Twenty TC (median size 3, range 2-9 individuals), including 68 patients, were identified. A diagnosis prior to 2015 was the unique factor associated with inclusion in a TC. Added value of UDS was the identification of shared quasispecies components in transmission pairs within TC.

Background: Aim was to determine the dynamics of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)- associated total HIV-1 DNA in successfully ART-treated HIV/HCV co-infected patients receiving DAA treatment and to explore possible virological hypotheses underlying the phenomenon., Methods: Longitudinal, single-centre study measuring total HIV-1 DNA before the start of DAA, at the end of treatment (EOT), and 3 months after treatment. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to assess factors associated with HIV-1 DNA increase ≥0.5 Log copies/million PBMC. Episomal 2-LTR forms, residual HIV-1 viremia and proviral DNA quasispecies evolution were also investigated., Results: 119 successfully ART-treated HIV/HCV co-infected patients were included. Median baseline HIV-1 DNA was 3.84 Log copies/million PBMC (95%CI 3.49-4.05), and no significant variation with respect to baseline was found at EOT and after 3 months of DAA termination. In 17% of cases an increase ≥0.5 Log copies/million PBMC was observed at EOT compared to baseline. HIV-1 DNA increase was independently associated with lower baseline HIV-1 DNA, longer HIV suppression, raltegravir-based ART and previous exposure to interferon/ribavirin for HCV treatment. In none of the patients with HIV-1 DNA increase, 2-LTR forms were detected at baseline, while in 2 cases 2-LTR forms were found at EOT, without association with residual HIV-1 RNA viremia. No evidence of viral evolution was observed., Conclusions: In successfully ART-treated HIV/HCV co-infected patients receiving DAA, PBMC-associated total HIV-1 DNA was quite stable over time, but some patients showed a considerable increase at EOT when compared to baseline. A significantly higher risk of HIV DNA increase was found, in presence of lower cellular HIV reservoir at baseline. Activation of replicative-competent virus generating new rounds of viral replication seems unlikely, while mobilization of cell-associated HIV from tissue reservoirs could be hypothesized.

Introduction: Chronic liver disease leads to neurocognitive impairment (NCI) and more advanced liver fibrosis is associated with greater deficits. Further, cognitive performances do not differ significantly among patients affected by diverse types of chronic liver diseases. Thus, it would be useful to have a clinical tool associated with early cognitive change applicable to the HIV-infected population with high HCV prevalence. Aim of the analysis was to assess the association between NCI and aspartate aminotransferase-platelet ratio index (APRI) or Fibrosis-4, which are non-invasive scores used to assess liver fibrosis., Materials and Methods: Single-centre, retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of cART-treated HIV-infected patients undergoing neuropsychological assessment (NPA) by a set of 14 standardized and comprehensive tests on five different domains: concentration and speed of mental processing; mental flexibility; memory, fine motor functioning; visual-spatial and constructional abilities. NPA obtained from the same patient were included, if collected while receiving different cART. Patients were classified as having NCI, if they scored >1 SD below the normative mean in at least two tests, or below >2 SD in one test. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) were classified according to Frascati's criteria, controlling for confounding comorbidities. Univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression models were carried out., Results: A total of 556 HIV-infected cART-treated patients from 2006 to 2013 were included: male 78%; IVDUs 14%; CDC stage C 31%; median CD4 nadir 200/mm(3); median current CD4 501/mm(3); undetectable HIV-RNA in 368 (67%); and HCV-positivity in 150 (29%). Frequency among score levels was for FIB-4: min-1.44=404 (73%), 1.45-3.25=118 (21%), 3.26-max=28 (5%); for APRI: min-0.5=414 (75%), 0.5-1.5=112 (20%), 1.5-max=24 (4%). Median FIB-4 and APRI were 0.98 and 0.27 in HIV+/HCV- and 1.40 and 0.50 in HIV+/HCV+ individuals, respectively. HAND was found in 176 (32%): 91 ANI, 73 MND, 12 HAD. Association of variables with NCI are shown in Table 1., Conclusions: In this large population, HAND was not associated with commonly used non-invasive liver fibrosis scores. As aetiology of cognitive dysfunction in HIV mono- and HCV co-infected patients is multifactorial and partially unknown, our results support the hypothesis of a direct or indirect effect on cognitive function of the viruses, rather than the consequence of alterations residing outside the brain.

Introduction: Central nervous system (CNS) penetration-effectiveness (CPE) rank was proposed in 2008 as an estimate of penetration of ARV regimen into the CNS, and validated as predictor of CSF HIV-1 replication. RESULTS on predictive role of CPE on neurocognitive and clinical outcome were conflicting., Materials and Methods: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of neurocognitive profile in HIV-infected cART-treated patients. All patients underwent neuropsychological (NP) assessment by standardized battery of 14 tests on 5 different domains. People were classified as having NCI if they scored >1 standard deviation (SD) below the normal mean in at least two tests, or >2 SD below in one test. Linear and logistic regression analyses were fitted using as outcome Npz8 and impaired/not impaired respectively., Results: A total of 660 HIV-infected cART-treated individuals from 2009 to 2014, contributing a total of 1003 tests (mean age 49 (IQR 43-56), male 82%; median current CD4 586/mm(3); 18% HCV infected; HIV-RNA <40 cp/mL in 84%). Current ARV regimen was 2NRTIs+1NNRTI 50.3%, 2NRTI+1PI/r in 32.6%, NRTI sparing in 11.1%. Mean CPE of current regimens was 6.6 (95% CI 6.5-6.7). As per test multivariable analysis, higher CPE values were associated to poor NP tasks (Beta=-0,09; 95% CI -0,14 -0,03; p=0.002 at multivariable linear regression). The association between higher CPE and increased NCI risk was confirmed at multivariable logistic regression, with a 1.24-fold risk of NCI occurrence for each point increase of CPE of current regimen at the time of NP testing (see Table 1). In a sensitivity analysis performed only on patients at the first NP test, the association between higher CPE and poor NP tasks and enhanced NCI risk was only marginally confirmed (Beta=-0,05; [-0,12-0,02]; p=0,19; OR 1,13 [0,95-1,34]; p=0.17). Older age, longer time from HIV diagnosis, current CD4 count <350 cell/mm(3) and lower education level were all associated to an increased risk of NCI., Conclusions: In our analysis, higher CPE rank is associated to poorly performing at NP tasking. Even if selection bias could not be excluded due to retrospective cross-sectional design, these results fitted with the direct correlation between high CPE and HIV dementia recently recorded in a large observational database. We think that CPE use to guide ART in patients neurocognitively impaired should be revised.