Search

Many disordered proteins conserve essential functions in the face of extensive sequence variation, making it challenging to identify the mechanisms responsible for functional selection. Here we identify the molecular mechanism of functional selection for the disordered adenovirus early gene 1A (E1A) protein. E1A competes with host factors to bind the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein, subverting cell cycle regulation. We show that two binding motifs tethered by a hypervariable disordered linker drive picomolar affinity Rb binding and host factor displacement. Compensatory changes in amino acid sequence composition and sequence length lead to conservation of optimal tethering across a large family of E1A linkers. We refer to this compensatory mechanism as conformational buffering. We also detect coevolution of the motifs and linker, which can preserve or eliminate the tethering mechanism. Conformational buffering and motif-linker coevolution explain robust functional encoding within hypervariable disordered linkers and could underlie functional selection of many disordered protein regions., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Over one hundred Mastadenovirus types infect seven orders of mammals. Virus-host coevolution may involve cospeciation, duplication, host switch and partial extinction events. We reconstruct Mastadenovirus diversification, finding that while cospeciation is dominant, the other three events are also common in Mastadenovirus evolution. Linear motifs are fast-evolving protein functional elements and key mediators of virus-host interactions, thus likely to partake in adaptive viral evolution. We study the evolution of eleven linear motifs in the Mastadenovirus E1A protein, a hub of virus-host protein-protein interactions, in the context of host diversification. The reconstruction of linear motif gain and loss events shows fast linear motif turnover, corresponding a virus-host protein-protein interaction turnover orders of magnitude faster than in model host proteomes. Evolution of E1A linear motifs is coupled, indicating functional coordination at the protein scale, yet presents motif-specific patterns suggestive of convergent evolution. We report a pervasive association between Mastadenovirus host diversification events and the evolution of E1A linear motifs. Eight of 17 host switches associate with the gain of one linear motif and the loss of four different linear motifs, while five of nine partial extinctions associate with the loss of one linear motif. The specific changes in E1A linear motifs during a host switch or a partial extinction suggest that changes in the host molecular environment lead to modulation of the interactions with the retinoblastoma protein and host transcriptional regulators. Altogether, changes in the linear motif repertoire of a viral hub protein are associated with adaptive evolution events during Mastadenovirus evolution., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

E1A is an adenoviral protein which is expressed at the early phase after viral infection and contains four conserved regions (CR1, CR2, CR3 and CR4). Our previous work suggests that E1A facilitates the formation of cyclin A-CDK2 complex and thereby enhances CDK2 activity. However, the molecular function of E1A in CDK2 activation has been unclear. Here, we studied the mechanism of enhancement of CDK2 activity by E1A, using the E1A variant forms which selectively contain CR domains. We isolated four E1A variant forms, i.e. 13S (containing CR1, CR2, CR3, CR4), 12S (CR1, CR2, CR4), 10S (CR2, CR4) and 9S (CR4), derived from HEK293 cells which express E1A. 13S promoted G2/M-phase arrest, upon CDK2 hyper-activation by co-expressing a stabilized cyclin A mutant, most strongly among those E1A variant forms. Concomitantly, the specific activity of the 13S-associated CDK2 was highest among them. 10S exhibited lower affinity for CDK2 than the 13S while the affinity for CDK2 was comparable between 13S and 12S. Nonetheless, 12S did not enhance the CDK2 specific activity. On the other hand, a mutation in CR2 domain, which is essential for binding to p107, suppressed both the binding and activation of CDK2. These results suggest that CR1 domain, in addition to CR2 domain via p107 interaction, is important for binding to CycA-CDK2 complex while CR3 domain facilitates CDK2 activation. Since the function of CR3 in cell cycle regulation has been relatively unknown, we propose the enhancement of CDK2 activity as a novel function of CR3 domain., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

E1A is the main transforming protein in mastadenoviruses. This work uses bioinformatics to extrapolate experimental knowledge from Human adenovirus serotype 5 and 12 E1A proteins to all known serotypes. A conserved domain architecture with a high degree of intrinsic disorder acts as a scaffold for multiple linear motifs with variable occurrence mediating the interaction with over fifty host proteins. While linear motifs contribute strongly to sequence conservation within intrinsically disordered E1A regions, motif repertoires can deviate significantly from those found in prototypical serotypes. Close to one hundred predicted residue-residue contacts suggest the presence of stable structure in the CR3 domain and of specific conformational ensembles involving both short- and long-range intramolecular interactions. Our computational results suggest that E1A sequence conservation and co-evolution reflect the evolutionary pressure to maintain a mainly disordered, yet non-random conformation harboring a high number of binding motifs that mediate viral hijacking of the cell machinery., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The recruitment of transcriptional cofactors by sequence-specific transcription factors challenges the basis of high affinity and selective interactions. Extending previous studies that the N-terminal activation domain (AD) of ETV5 interacts with Mediator subunit 25 (MED25), we establish that similar, aromatic-rich motifs located both in the AD and in the DNA-binding domain (DBD) of the related ETS factor ETV4 interact with MED25. These ETV4 regions bind MED25 independently, display distinct kinetics, and combine to contribute to a high-affinity interaction of full-length ETV4 with MED25. High-affinity interactions with MED25 are specific for the ETV1/4/5 subfamily as other ETS factors display weaker binding. The AD binds to a single site on MED25 and the DBD interacts with three MED25 sites, allowing for simultaneous binding of both domains in full-length ETV4. MED25 also stimulates the in vitro DNA binding activity of ETV4 by relieving autoinhibition. ETV1/4/5 factors are often overexpressed in prostate cancer and genome-wide studies in a prostate cancer cell line indicate that ETV4 and MED25 occupy enhancers that are enriched for ETS-binding sequences and are both functionally important for the transcription of genes regulated by these enhancers. AP1-motifs, which bind JUN and FOS transcription factor families, were observed in MED25-occupied regions and JUN/FOS also contact MED25; FOS strongly binds to the same MED25 site as ETV4 AD and JUN interacts with the other two MED25 sites. In summary, we describe features of the multivalent ETV4- and AP1-MED25 interactions, thereby implicating these factors in the recruitment of MED25 to transcriptional control elements., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Autoinhibition enables spatial and temporal regulation of cellular processes by coupling protein activity to surrounding conditions, often via protein partnerships or signaling pathways. We report the molecular basis of DNA-binding autoinhibition of ETS transcription factors ETV1, ETV4 and ETV5, which are often overexpressed in prostate cancer. Inhibitory elements that cooperate to repress DNA binding were identified in regions N- and C-terminal of the ETS domain. Crystal structures of these three factors revealed an α-helix in the C-terminal inhibitory domain that packs against the ETS domain and perturbs the conformation of its DNA-recognition helix. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy demonstrated that the N-terminal inhibitory domain (NID) is intrinsically disordered, yet utilizes transient intramolecular interactions with the DNA-recognition helix of the ETS domain to mediate autoinhibition. Acetylation of selected lysines within the NID activates DNA binding. This investigation revealed a distinctive mechanism for DNA-binding autoinhibition in the ETV1/4/5 subfamily involving a network of intramolecular interactions not present in other ETS factors. These distinguishing inhibitory elements provide a platform through which cellular triggers, such as protein-protein interactions or post-translational modifications, may specifically regulate the function of these oncogenic proteins., (© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.)

Human adenovirus infects terminally differentiated cells and to replicate it must induce S-phase. The chief architects that drive adenovirus-infected cells into S-phase are the E1A proteins, with 5 different isoforms expressed during infection. E1A remodels the infected cell by associating with cellular factors and modulating their activity. The C-terminus of E1A is known to bind to only a handful of proteins. We have identified a novel E1A C-terminus binding protein, Ku70 (XRCC6), which was found to bind directly within the CR4 of E1A from human adenovirus type 5. Depletion of Ku70 reduced virus growth, possibly by activating the DNA damage response pathway. Ku70 was found to localize to viral replication centers and associate with the viral genome. Ku70 was also recruited to cellular cell cycle regulated promoters following viral infection. Our study has identified, for the first time, Ku70 as a novel E1A-binding protein which affects virus life cycle., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The adenovirus E1A 243R oncoprotein targets TRRAP, a scaffold protein that assembles histone acetyltransferase (HAT) complexes, such as the NuA4/Tip60 complex which mediates transcriptional activity of the proto-oncogene MYC and helps determine the cancer cell phenotype. How E1A transforms cells through TRRAP remains obscure. We performed proteomic analysis with the N-terminal transcriptional repression domain of E1A 243R (E1A 1-80) and showed that E1A 1-80 interacts with TRRAP, p400, and three other members of the NuA4 complex - DMAP1, RUVBL1 and RUVBL2 - not previously shown to associate with E1A 243R. E1A 1-80 interacts with these NuA4 components and MYC through the E1A TRRAP-targeting domain. E1A 243R association with the NuA4 complex was demonstrated by co-immunoprecipitation and analysis with DMAP1, Tip60, and MYC. Significantly, E1A 243R promotes association of MYC/MAX with the NuA4/Tip60 complex, implicating the importance of the MYC/NuA4 pathway in cellular transformation by both MYC and E1A., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Many viruses deregulate the cell and force transcription of viral genes by competing with cellular proteins for binding to the transcriptional co-activators CREB-binding protein (CBP) and p300. Through its interactions with CBP/p300 and the retinoblastoma protein, the adenovirus (AdV) early region 1A (E1A) oncoprotein hijacks the cell cycle and, in rodents, transforms the cell; the mechanistic and structural basis for these effects remain unclear. In this study we compare the affinity of protein constructs from the E1A proteins from two adenovirus serotypes, non-oncogenic AdV5 and highly oncogenic AdV12, for binding to the nuclear receptor coactivator binding domain (NCBD) of CBP. NMR spectra show that the E1A constructs from both serotypes are intrinsically disordered in the free state and that each contains three homologous binding sites for the NCBD, one in the N-terminal region and two within conserved region 1 (CR1) of E1A. The binding sites in CR1 correspond to the motifs that bind the retinoblastoma protein and the TAZ2 domain of CBP/p300. The E1A and NCBD peptides fold synergistically upon complex formation. Binding affinities determined from NMR titrations show that, although the overall affinities for AdV5 and AdV12 E1A are comparable, there are significant differences between the two E1A serotypes in the relative strength with which their constituent interaction motifs bind to the NCBD. The individual E1A interaction motifs were unable to compete effectively with p53 for binding to the NCBD and both the N-terminal region and CR1 region of E1A are required for efficient competition with p53., (© 2016 The Protein Society.)

The small-DNA human adenovirus encodes one of the most versatile molecular hubs, the E1A protein. This protein is essential for productive viral infection in human cells and a vast amount of biologically relevant data are available on its interactions with host proteins. Up to now, however, no high-resolution structural and dynamic information on E1A is available despite its important biological role. Among the different spliced variants of E1A, two are expressed at high level in the early stage of infection. These are 243 and 289 residues isoforms. Herein, we present their NMR characterization, showing that they are both highly disordered, but also demonstrate a certain heterogeneous behavior in terms of structural and dynamic properties. Furthermore, we present the characterization of the isolated domain of the longer variant, known as CR3. This study opens the way to understanding at the molecular level how E1A functions., (© 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)

The adenovirus early region 1A (E1A) oncoprotein hijacks host cells via direct interactions with many key cellular proteins, such as KAT2B, also known as PCAF (p300/CBP associated factor). E1A binds the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) domain of KAT2B to repress its transcriptional activation. However, the molecular mechanism by which E1A inhibits the HAT activity is not known. Here we demonstrate that a short and relatively conserved N-terminal motif (cNM) in the intrinsically disordered E1A protein is crucial for KAT2B interaction, and inhibits its HAT activity through a direct competition with acetyl-CoA, but not its substrate histone H3. Molecular modeling together with a series of mutagenesis experiments suggests that the major helix of E1A cNM binds to a surface of the acetyl-CoA pocket of the KAT2B HAT domain. Moreover, transient expression of the cNM peptide is sufficient to inhibit KAT2B-specific H3 acetylation H3K14ac in vivo Together, our data define an essential motif cNM in N-terminal E1A as an acetyl-CoA entry blocker that directly associates with the entrance of acetyl-CoA binding pocket to block the HAT domain access to its cofactor., (© 2016 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.)

DYRK1A is a constitutively active protein kinase that has a critical role in growth and development which functions by regulating cell proliferation, differentiation and survival. DCAF7 (also termed WDR68 or HAN11) is a cellular binding partner of DYRK1A and also regulates signalling by the protein kinase HIPK2. DCAF7 is an evolutionarily conserved protein with a single WD40 repeat domain and has no catalytic activity. We have defined a DCAF7 binding motif of 12 amino acids in the N-terminal domain of class 1 DYRKs that is functionally conserved in DYRK1 orthologs from Xenopus, Danio rerio and the slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum. A similar sequence was essential for DCAF7 binding to HIPK2, whereas the closely related HIPK1 family member did not bind DCAF7. Immunoprecipitation and pulldown experiments identified DCAF7 as an adaptor for the association of the adenovirus E1A protein with DYRK1A and HIPK2. Furthermore, DCAF7 was required for the hyperphosphorylation of E1A in DYRK1A or HIPK2 overexpressing cells. Our results characterize DCAF7 as a substrate recruiting subunit of DYRK1A and HIPK2 and suggest that it is required for the negative effect of DYRK1A on E1A-induced oncogenic transformation.

The oncoproteins of the small DNA tumor viruses interact with a plethora of cellular regulators to commandeer control of the infected cell. During infection, adenovirus E1A deregulates cAMP signalling and repurposes it for activation of viral gene expression. We show that E1A structurally and functionally mimics a cellular A-kinase anchoring protein (AKAP). E1A interacts with and relocalizes protein kinase A (PKA) to the nucleus, likely to virus replication centres, via an interaction with the regulatory subunits of PKA. Binding to PKA requires the N-terminus of E1A, which bears striking similarity to the amphipathic α-helical domain present in cellular AKAPs. E1A also targets the same docking-dimerization domain of PKA normally bound by cellular AKAPs. In addition, the AKAP like motif within E1A could restore PKA interaction to a cellular AKAP in which its normal interaction motif was deleted. During infection, E1A successfully competes with endogenous cellular AKAPs for PKA interaction. E1A's role as a viral AKAP contributes to viral transcription, protein expression and progeny production. These data establish HAdV E1A as the first known viral AKAP. This represents a unique example of viral subversion of a crucial cellular regulatory pathway via structural mimicry of the PKA interaction domain of cellular AKAPs.

Cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate synthase (cGAS) detects intracellular DNA and signals through the adapter protein STING to initiate the antiviral response to DNA viruses. Whether DNA viruses can prevent activation of the cGAS-STING pathway remains largely unknown. Here, we identify the oncogenes of the DNA tumor viruses, including E7 from human papillomavirus (HPV) and E1A from adenovirus, as potent and specific inhibitors of the cGAS-STING pathway. We show that the LXCXE motif of these oncoproteins, which is essential for blockade of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor, is also important for antagonizing DNA sensing. E1A and E7 bind to STING, and silencing of these oncogenes in human tumor cells restores the cGAS-STING pathway. Our findings reveal a host-virus conflict that may have shaped the evolution of viral oncogenes., (Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.)

Ets transcription factors, which share the conserved Ets DNA-binding domain, number nearly 30 members in humans and are particularly involved in developmental processes. Their deregulation following changes in expression, transcriptional activity, or by chromosomal translocation plays a critical role in carcinogenesis. Ets DNA binding, selectivity, and regulation have been extensively studied; however, questions still arise regarding binding specificity outside the core GGA recognition sequence and the mode of action of Ets post-translational modifications. Here, we report the crystal structures of Etv1, Etv4, Etv5, and Fev, alone and in complex with DNA. We identify previously unrecognized features of the protein-DNA interface. Interactions with the DNA backbone account for most of the binding affinity. We describe a highly coordinated network of water molecules acting in base selection upstream of the GGAA core and the structural features that may account for discrimination against methylated cytidine residues. Unexpectedly, all proteins crystallized as disulfide-linked dimers, exhibiting a novel interface (distant to the DNA recognition helix). Homodimers of Etv1, Etv4, and Etv5 could be reduced to monomers, leading to a 40-200-fold increase in DNA binding affinity. Hence, we present the first indication of a redox-dependent regulatory mechanism that may control the activity of this subset of oncogenic Ets transcription factors., (© 2015 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.)

The immortalizing function of the human adenovirus 5 E1A oncoprotein requires efficient localization to the nucleus. In 1987, a consensus monopartite nuclear localization sequence (NLS) was identified at the C-terminus of E1A. Since that time, various experiments have suggested that other regions of E1A influence nuclear import. In addition, a novel bipartite NLS was recently predicted at the C-terminal region of E1A in silico. In this study, we used immunofluorescence microscopy and co-immunoprecipitation analysis with importin-α to verify that full nuclear localization of E1A requires the well characterized NLS spanning residues 285-289, as well as a second basic patch situated between residues 258 and 263 ((258)RVGGRRQAVECIEDLLNEPGQPLDLSCKRPRP(289)). Thus, the originally described NLS located at the C-terminus of E1A is actually a bipartite signal, which had been misidentified in the existing literature as a monopartite signal, altering our understanding of one of the oldest documented NLSs., (Crown Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The early region 1A (E1A) of human adenovirus types 2 and 5 is differentially spliced to yield five distinct mRNAs that encode different proteins. The smallest E1A RNA transcript encodes a 55 residue (55R) protein that shares only 28 amino acid residues with the other E1A proteins. Even though it is the most abundant E1A transcript at late times post-infection, little is known about the functions of this E1A isoform. In this study, we show that the E1A 55R protein interacts with, and modulates the activity of the unliganded thyroid hormone receptor (TR). We demonstrate that E1A 55R contains a signature motif known as the CoRNR box that confers interaction with the unliganded TR; this motif was originally identified in cellular corepressors. Using a system reconstituted in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which lack endogenous TR and TR coregulators, we show that E1A 55R nonetheless differs from cellular corepressors as it functions as a strong co-activator of TR-dependent transcription and that it possesses an intrinsic transcriptional activation domain. These data indicate that the E1A 55R protein functions as a transcriptional regulator.

Allostery is an intrinsic property of many globular proteins and enzymes that is indispensable for cellular regulatory and feedback mechanisms. Recent theoretical and empirical observations indicate that allostery is also manifest in intrinsically disordered proteins, which account for a substantial proportion of the proteome. Many intrinsically disordered proteins are promiscuous binders that interact with multiple partners and frequently function as molecular hubs in protein interaction networks. The adenovirus early region 1A (E1A) oncoprotein is a prime example of a molecular hub intrinsically disordered protein. E1A can induce marked epigenetic reprogramming of the cell within hours after infection, through interactions with a diverse set of partners that include key host regulators such as the general transcriptional coactivator CREB binding protein (CBP), its paralogue p300, and the retinoblastoma protein (pRb; also called RB1). Little is known about the allosteric effects at play in E1A-CBP-pRb interactions, or more generally in hub intrinsically disordered protein interaction networks. Here we used single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) to study coupled binding and folding processes in the ternary E1A system. The low concentrations used in these high-sensitivity experiments proved to be essential for these studies, which are challenging owing to a combination of E1A aggregation propensity and high-affinity binding interactions. Our data revealed that E1A-CBP-pRb interactions have either positive or negative cooperativity, depending on the available E1A interaction sites. This striking cooperativity switch enables fine-tuning of the thermodynamic accessibility of the ternary versus binary E1A complexes, and may permit a context-specific tuning of associated downstream signalling outputs. Such a modulation of allosteric interactions is probably a common mechanism in molecular hub intrinsically disordered protein function.

Orf virus-encoded protein 002 (ORFV002) inhibits NF-κB signaling pathway by decreasing the acetylation of NF-κB-p65 through interference of NF-κB p65's association with NF-κB p300. However, the precise mechanism of how ORFV002 interferes with the NF-κB p65/p300 association is still unknown. Due to similarities of the amino acid sequences of ORFV002 and the adenovirus type 12 (Ad12) E1A protein (E1A-12), we hypothesized that the N-terminal 52 amino acids of ORFV002 might play an important role in this inhibition and constructed several in-frame fusions of ORFV002 to an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) reporter, including C-terminal and N-terminal deletion mutants of ORFV002. When the N-terminus of ORFV002 was absent, the localization of ORFV002 shifted mainly from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, and it's inhibition of NF-κB transactivation was lost. NF-κB p65 Lys(310) acetylation and Ser(276) phosphorylation were detected in co-transfection experiments with NF-κB p65 and ORFV002 or its mutants with, or without, the N-terminal region. The results showed that the N-terminus of ORFV002 plays a crucial role in inhibiting both the acetylation and phosphorylation of NF-κB p65. Further investigation indicated that ORFV002 and its C-terminal deletion mutants interfered with NF-κB p65 (Ser(276)) phosphorylation induced by mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase-1 (MSK1) and the interaction between NF-κB p65 and MSK1. Since phosphorylated NF-κB p65 recruits transcriptional co-activators such as p300 and CBP, we concluded that the N-terminus of ORFV002 inhibits acetylation of NF-κB p65 by blocking phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 at Ser(276).

The adenovirus repression domain of E1A 243R at the E1A N-terminus (E1A 1-80) transcriptionally represses genes involved in differentiation and cell cycle progression. E1A 1-80 represses transcription in vitro from naked DNA templates through its interaction with p300 and TFIID. E1A 1-80 can also interact with several chromatin remodeling factors and associates with chromatin in vivo. We show here that E1A 243R and E1A 1-80 can repress transcription from a reconstituted chromatin template in vitro. Temporal analysis reveals strong repression by E1A 1-80 when added at pre-activation, activation and early transcription stages. Interestingly, E1A 1-80 can greatly enhance transcription from chromatin templates, but not from naked DNA, when added at pre-initiation complex (PIC) formation and transcription-initiation stages. These data reveal a new dimension for E1A 1-80's interface with chromatin and may reflect its interaction with key players in PIC formation, p300 and TFIID, and/or possibly a role in chromatin remodeling., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The adenovirus E1A proteins function via protein-protein interactions. By making many connections with the cellular protein network, individual modules of this virally encoded hub reprogram numerous aspects of cell function and behavior. Although many of these interactions have been thoroughly studied, those mediated by the C-terminal region of E1A are less well understood. This review focuses on how this region of E1A affects cell cycle progression, apoptosis, senescence, transformation, and conversion of cells to an epithelial state through interactions with CTBP1/2, DYRK1A/B, FOXK1/2, and importin-α. Furthermore, novel potential pathways that the C-terminus of E1A influences through these connections with the cellular interaction network are discussed.

Proteasomes represent the major non-lysosomal mechanism responsible for the degradation of proteins. Following interferon γ treatment 3 proteasome subunits are replaced producing immunoproteasomes. Adenovirus E1A interacts with components of the 20S and 26S proteasome and can affect presentation of peptides. In light of these observations we investigated the relationship of AdE1A to the immunoproteasome. AdE1A interacts with the immunoproteasome subunit, MECL1. In contrast, AdE1A binds poorly to the proteasome β2 subunit which is replaced by MECL1 in the conversion of proteasomes to immunoproteasomes. Binding sites on E1A for MECL1 correspond to the N-terminal region and conserved region 3. Furthermore, AdE1A causes down-regulation of MECL1 expression, as well as LMP2 and LMP7, induced by interferon γ treatment during Ad infections or following transient transfection. Consistent with previous reports AdE1A reduced IFNγ-stimulated STAT1 phosphorylation which appeared to be responsible for its ability to reduce expression of immunoproteasome subunits., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

To explore the effects of early region 1A (E1A) carried by superparamagnetic dextran iron oxide nanoparticles (SDION) on the radiosensitivity of human cervical cancer. The xenograft mice with cervical cancer received weekly intratumoral SDION-E1A injection and a subsequent 50-Gy irradiation. The weekly relative tumor volume and the final tumor volume were compared among different experimental groups. p53 and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)/Neu expression in final tumor tissue was detected by reverse transcription-PCR and Western blot. The relative tumor volume and the final tissue volume in the SDION-E1A group was significantly smaller than that in Sham and SDION-Vector groups at each time points after irradiation (P < 0.05). Exogenous E1A expression by SDION delivery significantly increased p53 expression, but inhibited HER-2/Neu expression in tumor tissue (P < 0.05). The intratumoral delivery of exogenous E1A carried by SDION increases p53 expression but inhibits HER-2/neu expression, and enhances the radiosensitivity of human cervical cancer in xenograft mice., ((c)2010 AACR.)

We have previously reported that adenovirus-mediated expression of preprocholecystokin (CCK) stimulates human and mouse islet cell proliferation. In follow-up studies, we became concerned that the CCK adenovirus might have been contaminated with a wild-type E1A-containing adenovirus. Here we show conclusively that the proliferative effects reported in the original paper in mouse and human islets were not due to CCK expression but rather to a contaminating E1A-expressing wild-type adenovirus. We also show, however, that CCK expression does have a proliferative effect in rat islets. We hope that our report of the steps taken to detect the wild-type virus contamination, and purification of the contributing viral stocks, will be helpful to other investigators, and that our experience will serve as a cautionary tale for use of adenovirus vectors, especially for studies on cellular replication.

The adenovirus early region 1A (E1A) oncoprotein mediates cell transformation by deregulating host cellular processes and activating viral gene expression by recruitment of cellular proteins that include cyclic-AMP response element binding (CREB) binding protein (CBP)/p300 and the retinoblastoma protein (pRb). While E1A is capable of independent interaction with CBP/p300 or pRb, simultaneous binding of both proteins is required for maximal biological activity. To obtain insights into the mechanism by which E1A hijacks the cellular transcription machinery by competing with essential transcription factors for binding to CBP/p300, we have determined the structure of the complex between the transcriptional adaptor zinc finger-2 (TAZ2) domain of CBP and the conserved region-1 (CR1) domain of E1A. The E1A CR1 domain is unstructured in the free state and upon binding folds into a local helical structure mediated by an extensive network of intermolecular hydrophobic contacts. By NMR titrations, we show that E1A efficiently competes with the N-terminal transactivation domain of p53 for binding to TAZ2 and that pRb interacts with E1A at 2 independent sites located in CR1 and CR2. We show that pRb and the CBP TAZ2 domain can bind simultaneously to the CR1 site of E1A to form a ternary complex and propose a structural model for the pRb:E1A:CBP complex on the basis of published x-ray data for homologous binary complexes. These observations reveal the molecular basis by which E1A inhibits p53-mediated transcriptional activation and provide a rationale for the efficiency of cellular transformation by the adenoviral E1A oncoprotein.

The human adenovirus type 5 (HAdV-5) E1A 13S oncoprotein is a potent regulator of gene expression and is used extensively as a model for transcriptional activation. It possesses two independent transcriptional activation domains located in the N-terminus/conserved region (CR) 1 and CR3. The protein acetyltransferase p300 was previously identified by its association with the N-terminus/CR1 portion of E1A and this association is required for oncogenic transformation by E1A. We report here that transcriptional activation by 13S E1A is inhibited by co-expression of sub-stoichiometric amounts of the smaller 12S E1A isoform, which lacks CR3. Transcriptional inhibition by E1A 12S maps to the N-terminus and correlates with the ability to bind p300/CBP, suggesting that E1A 12S is sequestering this limiting factor from 13S E1A. This is supported by the observation that the repressive effect of E1A 12S is reversed by expression of exogenous p300 or CBP, but not by a CBP mutant lacking actyltransferase activity. Furthermore, we show that transcriptional activation by 13S E1A is greatly reduced by siRNA knockdown of p300 and that CR3 binds p300 independently of the well-characterized N-terminal/CR1-binding site. Importantly, CR3 is also required to recruit p300 to the adenovirus E4 promoter during infection. These results identify a new functionally significant interaction between E1A CR3 and the p300/CBP acetyltransferases, expanding our understanding of the mechanism by which this potent transcriptional activator functions.

C-terminal binding protein (CtBP) binds to adenovirus early region 1A (AdE1A) through a highly conserved PXDLS motif close to the C terminus. We now have demonstrated that CtBP1 also interacts directly with the transcriptional activation domain (conserved region 3 [CR3]) of adenovirus type 5 E1A (Ad5E1A) and requires the integrity of the entire CR3 region for optimal binding. The interaction appears to be at least partially mediated through a sequence ((161)RRNTGDP(167)) very similar to a recently characterized novel CtBP binding motif in ZNF217 as well as other regions of CR3. Using reporter assays, we further demonstrated that CtBP1 represses Ad5E1A CR3-dependent transcriptional activation. Ad5E1A also appears to be recruited to the E-cadherin promoter through its interaction with CtBP. Significantly, Ad5E1A, CtBP1, and ZNF217 form a stable complex which requires CR3 and the PLDLS motif. It has been shown that Ad513SE1A, containing the CR3 region, is able to overcome the transcriptional repressor activity of a ZNF217 polypeptide fragment in a GAL4 reporter assay through recruitment of CtBP1. These results suggest a hitherto-unsuspected complexity in the association of Ad5E1A with CtBP, with the interaction resulting in transcriptional activation by recruitment of CR3-bound factors to CtBP1-containing complexes.

Extensive mutational/functional analysis of the transcription-repression domain encoded in the N-terminal 80 amino acids of the adenovirus E1A 243R oncoprotein suggests a model for the molecular mechanism of E1A repression: E1A accesses transcriptional co-activators such as p300 on specific promoters and then interacts with TBP to disrupt the TBP-TATA complex. In support of this model, as reported here, a basal core promoter activated by tethering p300 is repressible by E1A at the promoter level as shown by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis. Sequestration of p300 by E1A does not play a significant role, as indicated by dose-response measurements. Furthermore, when the core promoter is transcriptionally activated by tethering activation domains of several transcription factors that can recruit p300 (p65, MyoD, cMyb and TFE3), transcription is repressible by E1A. However, when the core promoter is activated by factors not known to recruit p300 (USF1 and USF2), transcription is resistant to E1A repression. Finally, tethering p300 to the non-repressible adenovirus major late promoter (MLP) renders it repressible by E1A. ChIP analysis shows that E1A occupies the repressed MLP. These findings provide support for the hypothesis that p300 can serve as a scaffold for the E1A repression domain to access specific cellular gene promoters involved in growth regulation.

The adenovirus E1A 243R oncoprotein encodes a potent transcription-repression function within the N-terminal 80 amino acids. Our proposed model of E1A repression predicts that E1A interacts with important cellular proteins on chromatin. Consistent with this idea, we report here that E1A proteins from in vivo formaldehyde cross-linked 293 cells are closely associated with chromatin even after several stringent purification steps including double isopycnic CsCl density gradient centrifugation and size exclusion chromatography. Likewise, E1A proteins expressed from virus during productive infection of HeLa cells are closely associated with chromatin starting at early times after infection. No other adenoviral proteins are necessary for E1A 243R protein to associate with chromatin. Analyses of chromatin from HeLa cells infected with adenovirus vectors expressing E1A 243R protein with deletions in different E1A functional domains indicate that sequences within the E1A N-terminal repression domain are needed for the majority of E1A's interactions with chromatin.

C-terminal binding proteins (CtBPs) are cellular corepressors that are targeted by adenovirus E1A. A conserved motif of E1A (PLDLS) interacts with an N-terminal hydrophobic cleft of CtBPs. Many cellular cofactors also interact with CtBPs through PLDLS-like motifs. E1A interaction with CtBP2 changed the composition of the CtBP2 protein complex and enhanced CtBP2 acetylation. We have identified a mutant of CtBP2 (M48A) that fails to interact with cellular cofactors while interacting normally with E1A. Other cleft mutations in CtBP2 affected interaction of both cellular cofactors and E1A. The M48A mutant did not repress the cellular E-cadherin promoter but inhibited transactivation mediated by the E1A N-terminal region through interaction with the E1A PLDLS motif. In vitro, E1A enhanced CtBP2 acetylation by p300 via a mechanism involving dissociation of acetylated CtBP2 from p300. E1A enhanced nuclear localization of CtBP1 as well as a cytoplasmically localized acetylation-deficient mutant of CtBP2 (3KR-CtBP2) through PLDLS-dependent interaction. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed presence of CtBP2 on E-cadherin and c-fos promoters. While E1A did not significantly alter targeting of CtBP2 to the E-cadherin and c-fos promoters, it dramatically enhanced promoter targeting of 3KR-CtBP2. Our results raise a possibility that E1A may gain access to cellular promoters through PLDLS-dependent interaction with CtBPs.

The adenovirus (Ad) E1A (Ad-E1A) oncoprotein mediates cell transformation, in part, by displacing E2F transcription factors from the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) tumor suppressor. In this study we determined the crystal structure of the pRb pocket domain in complex with conserved region 1 (CR1) of Ad5-E1A. The structure and accompanying biochemical studies reveal that E1A-CR1 binds at the interface of the A and B cyclin folds of the pRb pocket domain, and that both E1A-CR1 and the E2F transactivation domain use similar conserved nonpolar residues to engage overlapping sites on pRb, implicating a novel molecular mechanism for pRb inactivation by a viral oncoprotein.

E1AF was first identified as a transcription factor that binds to enhancer motifs of the adenovirus E1A gene and is thought to be a human homologue of mouse PEA3, one of the ets oncoprotein families. Here we show the effect of E1A on the gene expression and function of E1AF. E1A repressed the activity of E1AF promoter, and the N-terminal region of E1A, which is involved in the oncogenic activity of E1A, was essential for this repression. The ability as a transcription factor of E1AF, as well as those of the other PEA3 subfamily members ER81 and ERM, was also repressed by E1A via the same oncogenic domain. Furthermore, E1AF repressed the transformation activity of E1A cooperating with E1B, whereas the other ets family Ets-1 enhanced this activity. These results suggest that E1AF is one of the targets of E1A.

Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) activates the expression of melanocyte-specific markers and promotes the survival of embryonic, adult and malignant melanocytes. Although numerous MITF-dependent downstream genes have been identified, the mechanisms by which the MITF activity is coregulated remain elusive. Here we used a non-melanocytic cell line U2-OS as a model in which MITF evokes transcription of a paradigmatic MITF target tyrosinase and show that the adenoviral E1A protein represses the MITF-driven transcription in these cells. The E1A CR1 domain (which alone is insufficient to bind p300) was sufficient for repression, while the N-terminus, through which E1A binds the p300/CBP proteins and other coactivators, was unable to repress. Correspondingly, CR1 inhibited colony formation of MITF-positive, but not MITF-negative, melanoma cells. The repression by CR1 was largely independent of the PCAF-binding motif, previously recognized to be necessary for suppression of muscle-specific enhancer. Interestingly, CR1 conferred transcriptional competence to the MITF-CR1 chimera in which the MITF portion was rendered transcription-deficient. Moreover, MITF mutants defective in binding to p300/CBP in vivo still activated transcription, further supporting a p300/CBP-independent coactivation of MITF targets. MITF is amplified in a subset of melanomas and is thought to be required for sustained proliferation of malignant melanocytes. Our results suggest that understanding how CR1 represses Mitf activity may reveal a route to melanoma therapy.

Background: Nuclear import of proteins is typically mediated by their physical interaction with soluble cytosolic receptor proteins via a nuclear localization signal (NLS). A simple genetic assay to detect active NLSs based on their function in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been previously described. In that system, a chimera consisting of a modified bacterial LexA DNA binding domain and the transcriptional activation domain of the yeast Gal4 protein is fused to a candidate NLS. A functional NLS will redirect the chimeric fusion to the yeast cell nucleus and activate transcription of a reporter gene., Results: We have reengineered this nuclear import system to expand its utility and tested it using known NLS sequences from adenovirus E1A. Firstly, the vector has been reconstructed to reduce the level of chimera expression. Secondly, an irrelevant "stuffer" sequence from the E. coli maltose binding protein was used to increase the size of the chimera above the passive diffusion limit of the nuclear pore complex. The improved vector also contains an expanded multiple cloning site and a hemagglutinin epitope tag to allow confirmation of expression., Conclusion: The alterations in expression level and composition of the fusions used in this nuclear import system greatly reduce background activity in beta-galactosidase assays, improving sensitivity and allowing more quantitative analysis of NLS bearing sequences.

The N-terminal region of adenovirus E1A interacts with histone acetyl transferases (HATs) such as p300, P/CAF, and GCN5. The C-terminal region interacts with the transcriptional corepressors CtBP1 and CtBP2. The functional significance of co-recruitment of HATs and CtBPs by E1A is not well understood. In this study, we have shown that E1A enhanced acetylation of CtBP2 by recruitment of p300 to the CtBP2 complex. Additionally, E1A also displaced the histone methyltransferase G9a and the E-box repressor ZEB from the CtBP2 complex through the C-terminal CtBP-binding domain. A transcriptional activation function encoded by the E1A N-terminal region was efficiently inhibited by CtBP2 but not by a mutant with an N-terminal deletion or by a mutant deficient in interaction with E1A. Two isoforms of CtBP1 (CtBP1-L and CtBP1-S) poorly inhibited transcriptional activity of the E1A N-terminal region. Thus, the N-terminal domain of CtBP2 may contribute a unique transcriptional regulatory activity of CtBP2. Our results provide new insights by which CtBP might modulate the biochemical activities of E1A.

Adenoviral E1A is a versatile protein that can reprogram host cells for efficient viral replication. The nuclear import of E1A is mediated by a nuclear localization signal; however, whether E1A can be actively exported from the nucleus is unknown. We first reported a CRM1-dependent nuclear export signal (NES) in E1A that is conserved in the group C adenoviruses. We showed that CRM1 and E1A coimmunoprecipitated and that blockage of CRM1 function by leptomycin B or small interfering RNA resulted in the nuclear localization of E1A. Through mutational analyses, we identified an active canonical NES element within the E1A protein spanning amino acids 70-80. We further demonstrated that phosphorylation of adjacent serine (S)89 resulted in the cytoplasmic accumulation of E1A. Interestingly, coincident with the accumulation of cells in the S/G2/M phase and histone H1 phosphorylation, E1A was relocated to the cytoplasm at the late stage of the viral cycle, which was blocked by the CDC2/CDK2 inhibitor roscovitine. Importantly, titration of the progenies of the viruses in infected cells showed that the replication efficiency of the NES mutant adenovirus was up to 500-fold lower than that of the wild-type adenovirus. Collectively, our data demonstrate the existence of a NES in E1A that is modulated by the phosphorylation of the S89 residue and the NES plays a role for an efficient viral replication in the host cells.

C-terminal binding protein (CtBP) has been shown to bind to a highly conserved five-amino-acid motif (PXDLS) located very close to the C-terminus of adenovirus early region 1A proteins. It has also been demonstrated that amino acids C-terminal and N-terminal to this original proposed binding site contribute to the interaction. However, conflicting evidence has been presented to show that acetylation of an adjacent lysine residue in Ad5E1A may or may not influence binding. It has now been demonstrated here that acetylation of a lysine, equivalent to position 261 in Ad12 E1A and position 285 in Ad5E1A, in a synthetic peptide disrupts the binding to CtBP1 and CtBP2 and alters the K(i) of the peptide, indicative of a reduction in the affinity of the peptide for CtBP1 and CtBP2, but only to a rather limited extent (less than 2-fold). The solution structures of synthetic peptides equivalent to wild-type and acetylated forms of the Ad12 E1A peptide have been determined by proton NMR spectroscopy. The wild-type form of the peptide adopts a series of beta-turns over the region Val(254)-Arg(262). Within the acetylated isoform, the beta-turn conformation is less extensive, Val(260)-Arg(262) adopting a random confirmation. We conclude that secondary structure (beta-turns) and an appropriate series of amino acid side chains over an extended binding site (PXDLSXK) are necessary for recognition by CtBP, acetylation of lysine interfering with both of these features, but not to such an extent as to totally inhibit interaction. Moreover, it is possible that the beta-turn conformation at the C-terminus of AdE1A contributes to binding to alpha importin and nuclear import. Acetylation of lysine (261) could disrupt interaction through structural destabilization as well as charge neutralization and subsequent nuclear localization.

Current strategies for cancer gene therapy consist mainly of direct inhibition of tumor cell growth and activation of systemic host defense mechanisms. Conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy, even considered to be temporally suppressing tumor growth, suppress immune responses; therefore, we examined potential clinical feasibility of virus-mediated tumor destruction, which can rather enhance immunity. We showed that human tumors were more susceptible to adenoviruses (Ad) in which the E1A expression was controlled by a putative tumor promoter than normal cells, and that a replication of the Ad was greater in tumor cells than in normal cells. We also demonstrated that the intratumoral injection of the Ad bearing a tumor promoter inhibited the subsequent tumor growth in vivo. The E1A expression was detected in the tumors injected with the Ad but not in non-tumorous tissues of the same mice. The Ad modified to show the regulated E1A expression is thereby oncolytic in nature. Antitumor immune responses are initiated after the acquisition of putative tumor antigen(s) by dendritic cells (DCs); therefore, enhanced antigen presentation is a crucial step for the early phase of cell-mediated immunity. Destruction of tumors can release the tumor antigens and DCs come to recognize them thereafter. We found that the stimulation of Fas expressed on DCs with Fas ligand (FasL) did not induce apoptosis of DCs but rather enhanced the antigen presentation. Activation of DCs induced production of a number of cytokines, and we showed that the interleukin-12 family secreted from tumors could induce systemic antitumor immunity. We presume that the administration of oncolytic Ad, which can destroy local tumors and subsequently make the putative tumor antigen(s) released from the tumors, stimulation of DCs with the Fas/FasL signal pathway and secretion of DCs-derived cytokines coordinately produce synergistic antitumor effects and that a combinatory application of these procedures can be a possible therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment.

Adenovirus early gene 1A (E1A) possesses a potent transcriptional repression function within the first 80 amino acids (E1A 1-80). Our previous analysis of subdomain 1 (residues 1 to 30) revealed strong correlations between residues required for repression and for disruption of TBP-TATA complexes. Here, we report a functional analysis of subdomain 2 (48 to 60) by alanine-scanning mutagenesis. 53Ala, 54Pro, 55Glu, and 56Asp are required for repression in vitro and in vivo and for efficient interaction with p300 but not for disruption of TBP-TATA. These combined results suggest a model for E1A transcription repression. E1A through subdomains 1 and 2 uses coactivators like p300 as scaffolds to access E1A repressible promoters. At the promoter, subdomain 1 interacts with TBP to disrupt TBP-TATA and abort transcription initiation. In further support of this model, we show that E1A 1-80 bound to the p300-binding site retains the ability to interact with TBP.

The small heterodimer partner (SHP) is an atypical nuclear receptor lacking the N-terminal ligand-independent activation domain and the DNA binding domain. SHP acts as transcriptional inhibitor of a large set of nuclear receptors, among which ER, AR, CAR, RXR, GR, LXR and ERRgamma. The repression mechanism of SHP involves several actions including competition with coactivators binding on the AF-2 of nuclear receptors and recruitment of transcriptional inhibitors such as EID-1. The investigation of the structure and repression mechanism of SHP is a challenging task for a full understanding of nuclear receptor interaction pathways and functions. So far, mutational analyses in multiple populations identified loss of function mutants of SHP gene involved in mild obesity, increased birth weight and insulin levels. Furthermore, experimental mutagenesis has been exploited to characterize the interactions between SHP and the transcriptional inhibitor EID-1. With the aim of gaining insight into the structural basis of SHP repression mechanism, we modelled SHP and EID-1 structures. Docking experiments were carried out to identify the EID-1 binding surface on SHP structure. The results obtained in this study allow for the first time a unique interpretation of many experimental data available from the published literature. In addition, a fascinating hypothesis raises from the inspection of the proposed SHP structure: the presence of a potential unexpected ligand binding site, supported by recently available experimental data that may represent a breakthrough in the design and development of synthetic modulators of SHP functions.

The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) is a multicomponent E3 ubiquitin ligase that, by targeting protein substrates for 26S proteasome-mediated degradation through ubiquitination, coordinates the temporal progression of eukaryotic cells through mitosis and the subsequent G1 phase of the cell cycle. Other functions of the APC/C are, however, less well defined. Here we show that two APC/C components, APC5 and APC7, interact directly with the coactivators CBP and p300 through protein-protein interaction domains that are evolutionarily conserved in adenovirus E1A. This interaction stimulates intrinsic CBP/p300 acetyltransferase activity and potentiates CBP/p300-dependent transcription. We also show that APC5 and APC7 suppress E1A-mediated transformation in a CBP/p300-dependent manner, indicating that these components of the APC/C may be targeted during cellular transformation. Furthermore, we establish that CBP is required in APC/C function; specifically, gene ablation of CBP by RNA-mediated interference markedly reduces the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity of the APC/C and the progression of cells through mitosis. Taken together, our results define discrete roles for the APC/C-CBP/p300 complexes in growth regulation.

Expression of smooth muscle alpha-actin in growth factor-induced myofibroblasts and in differentiated vascular smooth muscle cells is transcriptionally controlled by multiple positive or negative trans-acting factors interacting with distinct cis-elements in the 5'-flanking region of the gene. Because none of the transcriptional regulators reported to date is smooth muscle cell- or myofibroblast-specific per se, the dynamic interplay among many factors interacting at specific sites along the promoter appears to be a signature feature of smooth muscle alpha-actin gene regulation in these cell types. Herein, the ability of the adenovirus E1A 12 S protein to bind and functionally inactivate specific cell regulatory factors has been exploited to identify several previously unknown coactivators of the mouse smooth muscle alpha-actin promoter in rodent fibroblasts and vascular smooth muscle cells. In transient cotransfection assays, ectopic expression of wild type E1A suppressed promoter activity in a dose- and cis-element-dependent manner. In asynchronous cells, N-terminal E1A mutants defective in CREB-binding protein (CBP) and p300 binding capacity exhibited markedly reduced inhibitory activity toward a smooth muscle alpha-actin promoter driven by a composite TEF-1-, SRF-, and Sp1/3-regulated enhancer. In synchronized cells, however, a more complex mutant E1A inhibitory pattern indicated that collaboration between CBP/p300 and the retinoblastoma family of pocket proteins was required to produce a fully functional enhancer. Cotransfection experiments conducted with Rb(-/-) fibroblasts demonstrated the necessity of pRB in augmenting smooth muscle alpha-actin enhancer/promoter activity. Physical interaction studies with the use of purified wild type and mutant E1A proteins confirmed that CBP, p300, and pRB were targets of E1A binding in nuclear extracts of vascular smooth muscle cells and/or fibroblasts. Collectively, these results suggest that a repertoire of E1A-interacting proteins, namely CBP/p300 and pRB, serve to integrate the activities of multiple trans-acting factors to control smooth muscle alpha-actin gene transcription in a cell type- and cell cycle-dependent manner.

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta)/Smads regulate a wide variety of biological responses through transcriptional regulation of target genes. Smad3 plays a key role in TGF-beta/Smad-mediated transcriptional responses. Here, we show that the proline-rich linker region of Smad3 contains a transcriptional activation domain. When the linker region is fused to a heterologous DNA-binding domain, it activates transcription. We show that the linker region physically interacts with p300. The adenovirus E1a protein, which binds to p300, inhibits the transcriptional activity of the linker region, and overexpression of p300 can rescue the linker-mediated transcriptional activation. In contrast, an adenovirus E1a mutant, which cannot bind to p300, does not inhibit the linker-mediated transcription. The native Smad3 protein lacking the linker region is unable to mediate TGF-beta transcriptional activation responses, although it can be phosphorylated by the TGF-beta receptor at the C-terminal tail and has a significantly increased ability to form a heteromeric complex with Smad4. We show further that the linker region and the C-terminal domain of Smad3 synergize for transcriptional activation in the presence of TGF-beta. Thus our findings uncover an important function of the Smad3 linker region in Smad-mediated transcriptional control.

E1AF is a member of the ETS family of transcription factors. In mammary tumors, overexpression of E1AF is associated with tumorigenesis, but E1AF protein has hardly been detected and its degradation mechanism is not yet clear. Here we show that E1AF protein is stabilized by treatment with the 26S protease inhibitor MG132. We found that E1AF was modified by ubiquitin through the C-terminal region and ubiquitinated E1AF aggregated in nuclear dots, and that the inhibition of proteasome-activated transcription from E1AF target promoters. These results suggest that E1AF is degraded via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, which has some effect on E1AF function.

Mouse adenovirus type 1 (MAV-1) early region 1A (E1A) encodes a virulence gene in viral infection of mice. To broaden our understanding of the functions of E1A in MAV-1 pathogenesis, an unbiased experimental approach, glutathione S-transferase (GST) pulldown, was used to screen for cellular proteins that interact with E1A protein. We identified mouse Sur2, a subunit of Mediator complex, as a protein that binds to MAV-1 E1A. The interaction between Sur2 and MAV-1 E1A was confirmed in virus-infected cells. Conserved region 3 (CR3) of MAV-1 E1A was mapped as the region required for Sur2-E1A interaction, as is the case for human adenovirus E1A. Although it has been proposed that human adenovirus E1A recruits the Mediator complex to transactivate transcription of viral early genes, Sur2 function in adenovirus replication has not been directly tested previously. Studies on the functions of Sur2 with mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) showed that there was a multiplicity-dependent growth defect of MAV-1 in Sur2(-/-) MEFs compared to Sur2(+/+) MEFs. Comparison of the viral DNA and viral mRNA levels in Sur2(+/+) and Sur2(-/-) MEFs confirmed that Sur2 was important for efficient viral replication. The viral replication defects in Sur2(-/-) MEFs appeared to be due at least in part to a defect in viral early gene transcription.

Despite extensive study of human adenovirus type 5 E1A, surprisingly little is known about the E1A proteins of other adenoviruses. We report here a comprehensive analysis of the sequences of 34 E1A proteins. These represent all six primate adenovirus subgroups and include all human representatives of subgroups A, C, E, and F, eight from subgroup B, nine from subgroup D, and seven simian adenovirus E1A sequences. We observed that many, but not all, functional domains identified in human adenovirus type 5 E1A are recognizably present in the other E1A proteins. Importantly, we identified highly conserved sequences without known activities or binding partners, suggesting that previously unrecognized determinants of E1A function remain to be uncovered. Overall, our analysis forms a solid foundation for future study of the activities and features of the E1A proteins of different serotypes and identifies new avenues for investigating E1A function.

We identified a bifunctional regulatory element located between nt 374 and 431 upstream of TATA box of porcine adenovirus (PAV) 3 E1A promoter. Deletion of the element dramatically reduced the steady-state level of E1A mRNA, but increased that of E1B, which lies immediately downstream of E1A. The mutant virus displayed defective replication at early times of infection, but replicated nearly as efficiently as wild-type PAV-3 at late times of infection. This defect was complemented with coinfecting wild-type virus in a mixed infection. The results indicated that the upstream activation sequences (UAS) of E1A overlap the upstream repression sequences (URS) of E1B, although both transcription units are transcribed from different promoters.

The E1A oncogene of human adenoviruses cooperates with other viral and cellular oncogenes in oncogenic transformation of primary and established cells. The N-terminal half of E1A proteins that form specific protein complexes with pRb family and p300/CBP transcriptional regulators is essential for the transforming activities of E1A. Although the C-terminal half of E1A is dispensable for the transforming activities, it negatively modulates the oncogenic activities of the N-terminal region. Mutants of E1A lacking the C-terminal half or a short C-terminal region exhibit a hyper-transforming phenotype in cooperative transformation assays with the activated ras oncogene. The E1A C-terminal region implicated in the oncogenesis-restraining activity interacts with a 48-kDa cellular phosphoprotein, CtBP, that functions as a transcriptional corepressor. It appears that the C-terminal region of E1A may suppress E1A-mediated oncogenic transformation by a dual mechanism of relieving repression cellular genes by CtBP, and also by antagonizing the oncogenic activities of the N-terminal half of E1A.