Search

Objective: To develop a shortened form of the Young Adult Alcohol Problems Screening Test1 (YAAPST; original length = 27 items) using a novel combinatorial approach. Participants: 489 college freshmen, half of whom were above average risk for alcohol use disorder based upon family history, attending a large, Midwestern University followed prospectively for 16–17 years across 7 measurement occasions (waves). Methods: Using an exhaustive combinatorial approach, we evaluated all possible combinations of questions and questionnaire length. Each candidate short-form was evaluated using part-whole correlations, alpha coefficients, and polyserial correlations with DSM-III criteria. Results: The 12-item scale, the Brief-YAAPST, was chosen as the best candidate short-form as this scale had the fewest items while maintaining strong reliability and validity. Conclusions: Complete enumeration optimization effectively produced a 12-item short form with minimal loss of reliability and validity making the Brief-YAAPST a desirable assessment alternative when there are concerns about participant or client burden. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most researchers have estimated the edge weights for relative importance networks using a well-established measure of general dominance for multiple regression. This approach has several desirable properties including edge weights that represent R2 contributions, in-degree centralities that correspond to R2 for each item when using other items as predictors, and strong replicability. We endorse the continued use of relative importance networks and believe they have a valuable role in network psychometrics. However, to improve their utility, we introduce a modified approach that uses best-subsets regression as a preceding step to select an appropriate subset of predictors for each item. The benefits of this modification include: (a) computation time savings that can enable larger relative importance networks to be estimated, (b) a principled approach to edge selection that can significantly improve specificity, (c) the provision of a signed network if desired, (d) the potential use of the best-subsets regression approach for estimating Gaussian graphical models, and (e) possible generalization to best-subsets logistic regression for Ising models. We describe, evaluate, and demonstrate the proposed approach and discuss its strengths and limitations. The standard approach for fitting a relative importance network is to take each node of the network in turn as the dependent variable and run an all-possible-subsets regression using all of the other nodes as independent variables. With this approach, nodes are included as variables in the regression models even if they have little or no explanatory value. We propose a modification of the standard approach whereby best-subsets regression is used to select subsets of independent variables prior to running the all-possible-subsets regressions that estimate the relative importance network. The results of a simulation study showed that this modified approach leads to better recovery of the population-model relative importance network structure. The practical value of the modified approach is that a more parsimonious and interpretable network is obtained [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The modularity index (Q) is an important criterion for many community detection heuristics used in network psychometrics and its subareas (e.g., exploratory graph analysis). Some heuristics seek to directly maximize Q, whereas others, such as the walktrap algorithm, only use the modularity index post hoc to determine the number of communities. Researchers in network psychometrics have typically not employed methods that are guaranteed to find a partition that maximizes Q, perhaps because of the complexity of the underlying mathematical programming problem. In this paper, for networks of the size commonly encountered in network psychometrics, we explore the utility of finding the partition that maximizes Q via formulation and solution of a clique partitioning problem (CPP). A key benefit of the CPP is that the number of communities is naturally determined by its solution and, therefore, need not be prespecified in advance. The results of two simulation studies comparing maximization of Q to two other methods that seek to maximize modularity (fast greedy and Louvain), as well as one popular method that does not (walktrap algorithm), provide interesting insights as to the relative performances of the methods with respect to identification of the correct number of communities and the recovery of underlying community structure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Ising model has received significant attention in network psychometrics during the past decade. A popular estimation procedure is IsingFit, which uses nodewise l1-regularized logistic regression along with the extended Bayesian information criterion to establish the edge weights for the network. In this paper, we report the results of a simulation study comparing IsingFit to two alternative approaches: (1) a nonregularized nodewise stepwise logistic regression method, and (2) a recently proposed global l1-regularized logistic regression method that estimates all edge weights in a single stage, thus circumventing the need for nodewise estimation. MATLAB scripts for the methods are provided as supplemental material. The global l1-regularized logistic regression method generally provided greater accuracy and sensitivity than IsingFit, at the expense of lower specificity and much greater computation time. The stepwise approach showed considerable promise. Relative to the l1-regularized approaches, the stepwise method provided better average specificity for all experimental conditions, as well as comparable accuracy and sensitivity at the largest sample size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Error variance in structural models is often specified as a conditional variance associated with a manifest variable or as a regression path from a standardized error variance. This paper describes scenarios in which specification of both terms is useful: (1) Corrections for attenuation in single indicator factor models; (2) Tests of the equality in the proportion of explained variance across multiple dependent variables in regression models; (3) Factor models with two indicators; and (4) Tests of invariance in the proportion of measurement error variance across occasions in growth curve models. Examples of such models using both simulated and real-world data are presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]