1. Changes in Cardiorespiratory Fitness Following Exercise Training Prescribed Relative to Traditional Intensity Anchors and Physiological Thresholds: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data.
- Author
-
Meyler SJR, Swinton PA, Bottoms L, Dalleck LC, Hunter B, Sarzynski MA, Wellsted D, Williams CJ, and Muniz-Pumares D
- Abstract
Background: It is unknown whether there are differences in maximal oxygen uptake ( V O
2max ) response when prescribing intensity relative to traditional (TRAD) anchors or to physiological thresholds (THR)., Objectives: The present meta-analysis sought to compare: (a) mean change in V O2max , (b) proportion of individuals increasing V O2max beyond a minimum important difference (MID) and (c) response variability in V O2max between TRAD and THR., Methods: Electronic databases were searched, yielding data for 1544 individuals from 42 studies. Two datasets were created, comprising studies with a control group ('controlled' studies), and without a control group ('non-controlled' studies). A Bayesian approach with multi-level distributional models was used to separately analyse V O2max change scores from the two datasets and inferences were made using Bayes factors (BF). The MID was predefined as one metabolic equivalent (MET; 3.5 mL kg-1 min-1 )., Results: In controlled studies, mean V O2max change was greater in the THR group compared with TRAD (4.1 versus 1.8 mL kg-1 min-1 , BF > 100), with 64% of individuals in the THR group experiencing an increase in V O2max > MID, compared with 16% of individuals taking part in TRAD. Evidence indicated no difference in standard deviation of change between THR and TRAD (1.5 versus 1.7 mL kg-1 min-1 , BF = 0.55), and greater variation in exercise groups relative to non-exercising controls (1.9 versus 1.3 mL kg-1 min-1 , BF = 12.4). In non-controlled studies, mean V O2max change was greater in the THR group versus the TRAD group (4.4 versus 3.4 mL kg-1 min-1 , BF = 35.1), with no difference in standard deviation of change (3.0 versus 3.2 mL kg-1 min-1 , BF = 0.41)., Conclusion: Prescribing exercise intensity using THR approaches elicited superior mean changes in V O2max and increased the likelihood of increasing V O2max beyond the MID compared with TRAD. Researchers designing future exercise training studies should thus consider the use of THR approaches to prescribe exercise intensity where possible. Analysis comparing interventions with controls suggested the existence of intervention response heterogeneity; however, evidence was not obtained for a difference in response variability between THR and TRAD. Future primary research should be conducted with adequate power to investigate the scope of inter-individual differences in V O2max trainability, and if meaningful, the causative factors., Competing Interests: Declarations Funding No funding and financial assistance was used for this review. Conflicts of Interest Authors Samuel J. R. Meyler, Paul A. Swinton, Lindsay Bottoms, Lance C. Dalleck, Ben Hunter, Mark A. Sarzynski, David Wellsted, Camilla J. Williams and Daniel Muniz-Pumares declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review. Availability of Data and Material Datasets analysed in the current review are available upon reasonable request but are subject to permission from original authors. Ethics Approval Each study received ethical approval from their respective institutions, conformed to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and obtained written informed consent from each participant prior to commencing data collection. Author Contributions All authors: (1) made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work or to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data and (2) drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF