Search

Your search keyword '"Mary A. Ayuk"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Author "Mary A. Ayuk" Publication Year Range Last 3 years
3 results on '"Mary A. Ayuk"'

1. Models of classroom assessment for course-based research experiences

Author

David I. Hanauer, Tong Zhang, Mark J. Graham, Sandra D. Adams, Yesmi Patricia Ahumada-Santos, Richard M. Alvey, Mauricio S. Antunes, Mary A. Ayuk, María Elena Báez-Flores, Christa T. Bancroft, Tonya C. Bates, Meghan J. Bechman, Elizabeth Behr, Andrea R. Beyer, Rebecca L. Bortz, Dane M. Bowder, Laura A. Briggs, Victoria Brown-Kennerly, Michael A. Buckholt, Sharon K. Bullock, Kristen A. Butela, Christine A. Byrum, Steven M. Caruso, Catherine P. Chia, Rebecca A. Chong, Hui-Min Chung, Kari L. Clase, Sean T. Coleman, D. Parks Collins, Stephanie B. Conant, Brett M. Condon, Pamela L. Connerly, Bernadette J. Connors, Jennifer E. Cook-Easterwood, Katie E. Crump, Tom D’Elia, Megan K. Dennis, Linda C. DeVeaux, Lautaro Diacovich, Iain Duffy, Nicholas P. Edgington, Dustin C. Edwards, Tenny O. G. Egwuatu, Elvira R. Eivazova, Patricia C. Fallest-Strobl, Christy L. Fillman, Ann M. Findley, Emily Fisher, Matthew R. Fisher, Marie P. Fogarty, Amanda C. Freise, Victoria J. Frost, Maria D. Gainey, Amaya M. Garcia Costas, Atenea A. Garza, Hannah E. Gavin, Raffaella Ghittoni, Bryan Gibb, Urszula P. Golebiewska, Anna S. Grinath, Susan M. R. Gurney, Rebekah F. Hare, Steven G. Heninger, John M. Hinz, Lee E. Hughes, Pradeepa Jayachandran, Kristen C. Johnson, Allison A. Johnson, Michelle Kanther, Margaret Kenna, Bridgette L. Kirkpatrick, Karen K. Klyczek, Kathryn P. Kohl, Michael Kuchka, Amber J. LaPeruta, Julia Y. Lee-Soety, Lynn O. Lewis, Heather M. Lindberg, Jaclyn A. Madden, Sergei A. Markov, Matthew D. Mastropaolo, Vinayak Mathur, Sean P. McClory, Evan C. Merkhofer, Julie A. Merkle, Scott F. Michael, Jon C. Mitchell, Sally D. Molloy, Denise L. Monti, María Alejandra Mussi, Holly Nance, Fernando E. Nieto-Fernandez, Jillian C. Nissen, Imade Y. Nsa, Mary G. O’Donnell, Shallee T. Page, Andrea Panagakis, Jesús Ricardo Parra-Unda, Tara A. Pelletier, Tiara G. Perez Morales, Nick T. Peters, Vipaporn Phuntumart, Richard S. Pollenz, Mary L. Preuss, David P. Puthoff, Muideen K. Raifu, Nathan S. Reyna, Claire A. Rinehart, Jessica M. Rocheleau, Ombeline Rossier, Adam D. Rudner, Elizabeth E. Rueschhoff, Amy Ryan, Sanghamitra Saha, Christopher D. Shaffer, Mary Ann V. Smith, Amy B. Sprenkle, Christy L. Strong, C. Nicole Sunnen, Brian P. Tarbox, Louise Temple, Kara R. Thoemke, Michael A. Thomas, Deborah M. Tobiason, Sara S. Tolsma, Julie Torruellas Garcia, Megan S. Valentine, Edwin Vazquez, Robert E. Ward, Catherine M. Ward, Vassie C. Ware, Marcie H. Warner, Jacqueline M. Washington, Daniel E. Westholm, Keith A. Wheaton, Beth M. Wilkes, Elizabeth C. Williams, William H. Biederman, Steven G. Cresawn, Danielle M. Heller, Deborah Jacobs-Sera, Graham F. Hatfull, David J. Asai, and Viknesh Sivanathan

Subjects
course-based research experience (CURE), science education, assessment, intergrated research and education community (iREC), grading, Education (General), L7-991
Abstract

Course-based research pedagogy involves positioning students as contributors to authentic research projects as part of an engaging educational experience that promotes their learning and persistence in science. To develop a model for assessing and grading students engaged in this type of learning experience, the assessment aims and practices of a community of experienced course-based research instructors were collected and analyzed. This approach defines four aims of course-based research assessment—(1) Assessing Laboratory Work and Scientific Thinking; (2) Evaluating Mastery of Concepts, Quantitative Thinking and Skills; (3) Appraising Forms of Scientific Communication; and (4) Metacognition of Learning—along with a set of practices for each aim. These aims and practices of assessment were then integrated with previously developed models of course-based research instruction to reveal an assessment program in which instructors provide extensive feedback to support productive student engagement in research while grading those aspects of research that are necessary for the student to succeed. Assessment conducted in this way delicately balances the need to facilitate students’ ongoing research with the requirement of a final grade without undercutting the important aims of a CRE education.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Complete Genome Sequences of Mycobacteriophages SynergyX, Abinghost, Bananafish, and Delton

Author

Laricca Y, London, Mary A, Ayuk, Amia C, Black, Laraine, Cheung, Delandra M, Robinson, D'nai N, Thomas, Marcie H, Warner, Adrian D, Allen, Somiranjan, Ghosh, Ayele, Gugssa, Hemayet, Ullah, Glory B, Bassey, Lourds M, Fernando, Madison M, Moore, Jerome J, Oliver, Esohe G, Irabor, Swagota D, Roy, Benedict K, Quagraine, Michael, Smith, Winston A, Anderson, and Courtney J, Robinson

Abstract

Four lytic mycobacteriophages, namely, SynergyX, Abinghost, Bananafish, and Delton, were isolated from soil in Washington, DC, using the bacterial host Mycobacterium smegmatis mc

Published
2022

3. Instructional Models for Course-Based Research Experience (CRE) Teaching

Author

David I. Hanauer, Mark J. Graham, Rachel J. Arnold, Mary A. Ayuk, Mitchell F. Balish, Andrea R. Beyer, Kristen A. Butela, Christine A. Byrum, Catherine P. Chia, Hui-Min Chung, Kari L. Clase, Stephanie Conant, Roy J. Coomans, Tom D’Elia, Jason Diaz, Arturo Diaz, Jean A. Doty, Nicholas P. Edgington, Dustin C. Edwards, Elvira Eivazova, Christine B. Emmons, Kayla M. Fast, Emily J. Fisher, Christine L. Fleischacker, Gregory D. Frederick, Amanda C. Freise, Maria D. Gainey, Chris R. Gissendanner, Urszula P. Golebiewska, Nancy A. Guild, Heather L. Hendrickson, Christopher D. Herren, Margaret S. Hopson-Fernandes, Lee E. Hughes, Deborah Jacobs-Sera, Allison A. Johnson, Bridgette L. Kirkpatrick, Karen K. Klyczek, Ann P. Koga, Hari Kotturi, Janine LeBlanc-Straceski, Julia Y. Lee-Soety, Justin E. Leonard, Matthew D. Mastropaolo, Evan C. Merkhofer, Scott F. Michael, Jon C. Mitchell, Swarna Mohan, Denise L. Monti, Christos Noutsos, Imade Y. Nsa, Nick T. Peters, Ruth Plymale, Richard S. Pollenz, Megan L. Porter, Claire A. Rinehart, German Rosas-Acosta, Joseph F. Ross, Michael R. Rubin, Anne E. Scherer, Stephanie C. Schroeder, Christopher D. Shaffer, Amy B. Sprenkle, C. Nicole Sunnen, Sarah J. Swerdlow, Deborah Tobiason, Sara S. Tolsma, Philippos K. Tsourkas, Robert E. Ward, Vassie C. Ware, Marcie H. Warner, Jacqueline M. Washington, Kristi M. Westover, Simon J. White, JoAnn L. Whitefleet-Smith, Daniel C. Williams, Michael J. Wolyniak, Jill H. Zeilstra-Ryalls, David J. Asai, Graham F. Hatfull, Viknesh Sivanathan, and Hewlett, James

Subjects
Models, Educational, Teaching, Faculty, General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Education, Quality Education, Engineering, Models, Humans, Educational, Students, Curriculum and Pedagogy, Mathematics
Abstract

The course-based research experience (CRE) with its documented educational benefits is increasingly being implemented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. This article reports on a study that was done over a period of 3 years to explicate the instructional processes involved in teaching an undergraduate CRE. One hundred and two instructors from the established and large multi-institutional SEA-PHAGES program were surveyed for their understanding of the aims and practices of CRE teaching. This was followed by large-scale feedback sessions with the cohort of instructors at the annual SEA Faculty Meeting and subsequently with a small focus group of expert CRE instructors. Using a qualitative content analysis approach, the survey data were analyzed for the aims of inquiry instruction and pedagogical practices used to achieve these goals. The results characterize CRE inquiry teaching as involving three instructional models: 1) being a scientist and generating data; 2) teaching procedural knowledge; and 3) fostering project ownership. Each of these models is explicated and visualized in terms of the specific pedagogical practices and their relationships. The models present a complex picture of the ways in which CRE instruction is conducted on a daily basis and can inform instructors and institutions new to CRE teaching.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results