Back to Search Start Over

Instructional Models for Course-Based Research Experience (CRE) Teaching

Authors :
David I. Hanauer
Mark J. Graham
Rachel J. Arnold
Mary A. Ayuk
Mitchell F. Balish
Andrea R. Beyer
Kristen A. Butela
Christine A. Byrum
Catherine P. Chia
Hui-Min Chung
Kari L. Clase
Stephanie Conant
Roy J. Coomans
Tom D’Elia
Jason Diaz
Arturo Diaz
Jean A. Doty
Nicholas P. Edgington
Dustin C. Edwards
Elvira Eivazova
Christine B. Emmons
Kayla M. Fast
Emily J. Fisher
Christine L. Fleischacker
Gregory D. Frederick
Amanda C. Freise
Maria D. Gainey
Chris R. Gissendanner
Urszula P. Golebiewska
Nancy A. Guild
Heather L. Hendrickson
Christopher D. Herren
Margaret S. Hopson-Fernandes
Lee E. Hughes
Deborah Jacobs-Sera
Allison A. Johnson
Bridgette L. Kirkpatrick
Karen K. Klyczek
Ann P. Koga
Hari Kotturi
Janine LeBlanc-Straceski
Julia Y. Lee-Soety
Justin E. Leonard
Matthew D. Mastropaolo
Evan C. Merkhofer
Scott F. Michael
Jon C. Mitchell
Swarna Mohan
Denise L. Monti
Christos Noutsos
Imade Y. Nsa
Nick T. Peters
Ruth Plymale
Richard S. Pollenz
Megan L. Porter
Claire A. Rinehart
German Rosas-Acosta
Joseph F. Ross
Michael R. Rubin
Anne E. Scherer
Stephanie C. Schroeder
Christopher D. Shaffer
Amy B. Sprenkle
C. Nicole Sunnen
Sarah J. Swerdlow
Deborah Tobiason
Sara S. Tolsma
Philippos K. Tsourkas
Robert E. Ward
Vassie C. Ware
Marcie H. Warner
Jacqueline M. Washington
Kristi M. Westover
Simon J. White
JoAnn L. Whitefleet-Smith
Daniel C. Williams
Michael J. Wolyniak
Jill H. Zeilstra-Ryalls
David J. Asai
Graham F. Hatfull
Viknesh Sivanathan
Hewlett, James
Source :
CBE life sciences education, vol 21, iss 1
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2022.

Abstract

The course-based research experience (CRE) with its documented educational benefits is increasingly being implemented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. This article reports on a study that was done over a period of 3 years to explicate the instructional processes involved in teaching an undergraduate CRE. One hundred and two instructors from the established and large multi-institutional SEA-PHAGES program were surveyed for their understanding of the aims and practices of CRE teaching. This was followed by large-scale feedback sessions with the cohort of instructors at the annual SEA Faculty Meeting and subsequently with a small focus group of expert CRE instructors. Using a qualitative content analysis approach, the survey data were analyzed for the aims of inquiry instruction and pedagogical practices used to achieve these goals. The results characterize CRE inquiry teaching as involving three instructional models: 1) being a scientist and generating data; 2) teaching procedural knowledge; and 3) fostering project ownership. Each of these models is explicated and visualized in terms of the specific pedagogical practices and their relationships. The models present a complex picture of the ways in which CRE instruction is conducted on a daily basis and can inform instructors and institutions new to CRE teaching.

Details

ISSN :
19317913
Volume :
21
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f3eaf59969d3a5a4f7a68af95f9228b8
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-03-0057