Search

Deconstruction of a bicyclic tetrahydroquinoline-6-carboxylic acid scaffold into aminosalicylic acids yielded dual MCL-1/BCL-xL inhibitors from an MCL-1 selective lead.

Introduction: The chromatin factor BRD9 is a genetic dependency in some cancers, often referred to as SMARCB1-perturbed cancers. Two types of genetic alterations result in SMARCB1 perturbation: SS18-SSX gene fusion and SMARCB1 loss-of-function mutations. In synovial sarcoma, a rare and aggressive soft tissue malignancy comprising approximately 10% of all soft tissue sarcomas, the presence of the SS18-SSX fusion gene drives the disruption of SMARCB1 function and leads to a synthetic lethal dependence on BRD9. In SMARCB1-null solid tumors, for example malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRT), poorly differentiated chordomas, and epithelioid sarcomas, the absence of SMARCB1 protein results in a similar BRD9 dependence. Thus, in SMARCB1-perturbed cancers, including synovial sarcoma and SMARCB1-null cancers, degradation of BRD9 is hypothesized to result in an anticancer effect. CFT8634 is an orally bioavailable heterobifunctional degrader that induces ternary complex formation with BRD9 and an E3 ligase, leading to the ubiquitination of BRD9 and its subsequent degradation by the proteasome. Results: Here we describe the chemical structure of CFT8634 and an overview of the medicinal chemistry path leading to its discovery. In vitro, CFT8634 promotes rapid, potent, deep, and selective degradation of BRD9 with a half-maximal degradation concentration (DC50) of 2 nM in a synovial sarcoma cell line. In long-term growth assays, CFT8634 is effective at impairing cell growth in a concentration-dependent manner specifically in SMARCB1-perturbed contexts. In vivo, oral dosing of CFT8634 in xenograft models of SMARCB1-perturbed cancers leads to robust and dose-dependent degradation of BRD9, which translates to significant and dose-dependent inhibition of tumor growth in preclinical xenograft models. Conclusion: The preclinical data presented herein support the clinical development of CFT8634 for the treatment of synovial sarcoma and SMARCB1-null tumors. Citation Format: Katrina L. Jackson, Roman V. Agafonov, Mark W. Carlson, Prasoon Chaturvedi, David Cocozziello, Kyle Cole, Richard Deibler, Scott J. Eron, Andrew Good, Ashley A. Hart, Minsheng He, Christina S. Henderson, Hongwei Huang, Marta Isasa, R. Jason Kirby, Linda Lee, Michelle Mahler, Moses Moustakim, Christopher G. Nasveschuk, Michael Palmer, Laura L. Poling, Roy M. Pollock, Matthew Schnaderbeck, Stan Spence, Gesine K. Veits, Jeremy L. Yap, Ning Yin, Rhamy Zeid, Adam S. Crystal, Andrew J. Phillips, Stewart L. Fisher. The discovery and characterization of CFT8634: A potent and selective degrader of BRD9 for the treatment of SMARCB1-perturbed cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr ND09.

The BRAF kinase is a critical node in the MAPK signaling pathway and is mutated in approximately 8% of human cancers including melanoma (~60%), thyroid (~60%), and lung adenocarcinoma (~10%). The most common mutation in BRAF is V600E (Class I), occurring in half of malignant melanomas. This mutation hyperactivates ERK and signals as a RAF inhibitor-sensitive monomer. BRAF inhibitors including vemurafenib, dabrafenib and encorafenib have produced impressive responses in V600X patients, however resistance usually emerges within a year, including RAS mutation, BRAFV600E amplification, and BRAFV600E intragenic deletion or splice variants. These inhibitors are also ineffective against non-V600 BRAF mutants (Class II & III). To address some of these limitations we have developed CFT1946, a bifunctional degradation activating compound (BiDAC™) degrader comprising a BRAF kinase domain targeting ligand linked to a cereblon ligand. CFT1946 is capable of degrading BRAF V600E (Class I), G469A (Class II), G466V (Class III) mutations, and the p61-BRAFV600E splice variant while maintaining exquisite selectivity against the proteome including WT BRAF and CRAF. In A375 cells, CFT1946 potently degraded BRAFV600E (Emax = 26%; DC50 = 14nM at 24hr) and, inhibited ERK phosphorylation (IC50 = 11nM at 24hr) and cell growth (GI50 = 94nM at 96hr) while having no effect in the mutant KRAS driven cell line HCT116. In A375 xenografts, oral delivery of CFT1946 resulted in deeper tumor regressions when dosed at 10 mg/kg PO BID and compared favorably to a clinically relevant dose of encorafenib. We further evaluated CFT1946 in an engineered A375-BRAFV600E/NRASQ61K double mutant model of BRAF inhibitor resistance. CFT1946 was able to degrade BRAFV600E in these cells and was much more effective than encorafenib at inhibiting viability in vitro. In this model, in vivo dosing of single agent CFT1946 caused robust tumor growth inhibition and combination with the MEK inhibitor, trametinib, resulted in tumor regressions. The combination of encorafenib and trametinib showed no activity in the same model. Next, we demonstrated that CFT1946 was able to degrade additional BRAF mutant proteins including G469A (Class II), G466V (Class III), and the p61-BRAFV600E splice variant using heterologous expression in HEK293T cells. Additionally, we also showed that CFT1946, but not encorafenib, inhibited proliferation of the BRAFG466V heterozygous lung tumor cell line H1666. Based on its activity in preclinical models, including models of BRAF inhibitor resistance, and its drug-like properties we are progressing CFT1946 as a candidate for clinical development in patients with solid tumors bearing BRAF V600X mutations. Further, given CFT1946’s activity on non-V600 BRAF mutations, we are continuing to explore CFT1946 and related BiDAC degraders as therapeutic options for patients bearing Class II or Class III BRAF mutations. Citation Format: Mathew E. Sowa, Bridget Kreger, Joelle Baddour, Yanke Liang, Jeffrey R. Simard, Laura Poling, Ping Li, Robert Yu, Ashley Hart, Roman V. Agafonov, Grace Sarkissian, Joe Sahil Patel, Richard Deibler, Kyle S. Cole, Scott Eron, David Cocozziello, Fazlur Rahman, Moses Moustakim, Christopher G. Nasveschuk, Katrina L. Jackson, Mark Fitzgerald, Victoria Garza, Morgan O’Shea, Gesine Veits, Jeremy L. Yap, Andrew J. Phillips, Elizabeth Norton, Adam S. Crystal, Stewart L. Fisher, Roy M. Pollock. Preclinical evaluation of CFT1946 as a selective degrader of mutant BRAF for the treatment of BRAF driven cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2158.