Search

An editorial is presented on the anomaly-first research methodology, which focuses on marketplace disruptions, in marketing research. The article also presents a paradigm development framework for paradigm shift. In the article, six stages of this framework are detailed which beings with seeking out the disruption-driven anomalies, developing new paradigms around these anomalies, and ultimately making these new paradigms legitimate.

This study examines how the production of news making is evidenced in published content about the complex social phenomenon of murder-suicide. Building on Reese and Shoemaker's hierarchical model (2016), this study aims to understand the impact of the individual, routines, ideological, organisational and social institution levels on news content surrounding a case of murder-suicide in the Republic of Ireland. Data was gathered from in-depth interviews with journalists and news editors who detailed the nexus of competing interests that influence their work processes. Findings reveal how organisational structures, coupled with ideological orientations, industrial routines and the professional ideology of objectivity, acted as crucial gatekeepers, encouraging a dependency on elite sources. A crime narrative supported through the operationalisation of a media template perpetuated a hierarchy of victims. These representations served to mirror the institutionalised patriarchal power. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

'Inessential Shakespeare' is largely an invented category, a consequence of a set of critical, editorial, and economic factors established when Shakespeare studies emerged as a recognisable academic discipline. Like all disciplines, Shakespeare studies required the construction of a material and conceptual apparatus consisting of the text of the plays, annotations, introductions, methods, and commentaries that would introduce students to the formal study of Shakespeare – as opposed to the more ephemeral experience of witnessing a performance. I argue that two popular and influential nineteenth-century American editors, Henry Norman Hudson and Richard Grant White, in the process of rendering Shakespeare essential to American education, also introduced a series of plays that continue to be held less essential than others. Demarcating some plays as inessential, even if unintentional, was therefore necessary due to the institutional demands of this new field of study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article announces the appointment of Shmuel Nili as Associate Editor and highlights the contributions of editorial assistants, with discussions on migration policy, public opinion, and law-politics intersections.

The article announces that Sarah Weston and James McLaughlin have been appointed as co-editors of TDPT, bringing fresh perspectives to the journal, while Diana Krasovska steps in as the new Book Reviews editor.

Bullying during the peer review process is an overlooked form of academic bullying. Measures to limit its negative impact are insufficient, necessitating new initiatives to protect individuals and the integrity of science. If unaddressed, peer review bullying will undermine diversity, equity, and inclusion, particularly harming early-career researchers and minorities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This omnibus paper brings together a number of esteemed editors and associate editors in order to share a variety of perspectives on academic publishing within the marketing discipline. Together, they provide glimpses into current thinking on some of the most pressing and current debates which we are struggling with, for example: impact, originality, bias, alienation, and the need for communities of thought. Polyvocally, this omnibus reflects on the many failures of our discipline and provides some routes forward in reframing our field's epistemic assumptions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this open science era, psychology demands researchers be transparent in their research practices. In turn, researchers might ask if journal editors are being equally transparent in their editorial practices. Editor bias is when editors fail to be fair and impartial in their handling of articles. Editor bias can arise because of identity—who authors are—or because of content—what authors write. Proposed solutions to editor bias include masking author identity and increasing editor diversity. What is needed is greater transparency. By being more transparent, editors would be in a better position to encourage others to embrace open science. Public Significance Statement: Editors play an essential role in the article review process in psychology, but how they perform that important work is not accessible. Editors are vulnerable to being biased in their judgments by the identity of authors and the content of articles. This article offers suggestions on how to reduce the threat of editor bias and how to make editors more transparent to authors and readers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The process of medical scientific journal publishing merits further explanation for authors and readers. Prospective authors need to understand the scope of the journal and the article types that are published. We give an overview of the editorial process, including selection of reviewers, peer review and decisions regarding revision, acceptance and rejection of papers for Australasian Psychiatry. We encourage authors and readers to submit papers, and volunteer as peer reviewers, working together with the journal editorial team. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of VLC Arquitectura is the property of VLC Arquitectura and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article presents information on the September 2024 issue of the periodical "Religious Studies Review," including editorial staff, annual subscription rates and table of contents.

Important in the dissemination of knowledge are the networks of editors and their editorial board members. These are crucial gatekeepers in maintaining contacts with their professional fields as well as identifying others to evaluate manuscripts submitted for possible publication. We examine the countries of editorial board members of twenty-nine major Anglophone journals and the regional sources of manuscripts and reviewers. The data reveal some journals have large numbers of board members and many submissions and others have much smaller numbers of both. North America (United States and Canada), Western Europe, and China were the major sources of English-language manuscripts submitted from 2017 to 2021. These results are useful for junior and senior scholars who seek to publish in major geographic journals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Artificial intelligence programs are constantly developing, becoming an increasingly powerful tool for solving various problems. First of all, attempts have been made to use artificial intelligence (AI) to generate new texts, but practice shows that the level of creativity exhibited by these programs is still insufficient for producing substantial articles. Of course, this will not prevent AI programs from developing text, including generation of not only dissimilar text, but capably accomplishing certain conceptual tasks. However, even today, it is possible to use AI programs to solve standard tasks in the preparation, editing, reviewing, processing, and publication of scientific texts. This article will provide an overview of the latest trends in the use of AI programs for academic publishing using examples of several scientific journals. We will look at different levels of AI and their impact on editorial work and review the potential of AI in complementing human input. Next, we will consider the following stages of working with scientific texts in the editorial offices of scientific journals: author and article registration in the journal system; initial analysis of the article; choice of reviewers; article review; communication with the author regarding received reviews; publication decision; proofreading and publication of work; its registration in database systems. In the conclusion, we summarise tips for editors on how to use AI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author reflects on his tenure and his retirement as editor in chief of the journal. He talks about his interview with the journal's Board of Trustees when he first got the role, his participation at the Council of Science Editors and its brief course for new editors, and one of the most enjoyable privileges of his tenure.

Refet S. Gurkaynak and Jonathan H. Wright, Editors: Research Handbook of Financial Markets Edward Elgar, 2023 The Research Handbook of Financial Markets is one of a large and growing list [...]