Search

This paper presents a comparative analysis of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) structures and delivery options across different countries. OPAT, a cost-effective alternative to inpatient care for patients requiring IV antimicrobial therapy, has demonstrated multiple benefits such as patient satisfaction, economic cost savings, and reduced hospital-acquired infections. Despite these advantages, there is considerable international variation in OPAT use and implementation. By examining the OPAT structures of multiple countries, we aim to identify areas of variation and explore opportunities for expansion and improvement of OPAT services., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Competing Interests: None declared

The production of anthropomorphic phantoms generated from tissue-equivalent materials is challenging but offers an excellent copy of the typical environment encountered in typical patients. High-quality dosimetry measurements and the correlation of the measured dose with the biological effects elicited by it are a prerequisite in preparation of clinical trials with novel radiotherapy approaches. We designed and produced a partial upper arm phantom from tissue-equivalent materials for use in experimental high-dose-rate radiotherapy. The phantom was compared to original patient data using density values and Hounsfield units obtained from CT scans. Dose simulations were conducted for broad-beam irradiation and microbeam radiotherapy (MRT) and compared to values measured in a synchrotron radiation experiment. Finally, we validated the phantom in a pilot experiment with human primary melanoma cells.

Objective:  To evaluate the evidence and produce a summary and recommendations for the most common heart and lung point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS)., Methods:  We reviewed 10 clinical domains/questions related to common heart and lung applications of PoCUS. Following review of the evidence, a summary and recommendations were produced, including assigning levels of evidence (LoE) and grading of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE). 38 international experts, the expert review group (ERG), were invited to review the evidence presented for each question. A level of agreement of over 75 % was required to progress to the next section. The ERG then reviewed and indicated their level of agreement of the summary and recommendation for each question (using a 5-point Likert scale), which was approved in the case of a level of agreement of greater than 75 %. A level of agreement was defined as a summary of "strongly agree" and "agree" on the Likert scale responses., Findings and Recommendations:  One question achieved a strong consensus for an assigned LoE of 3 and a weak GRADE recommendation (question 1), the remaining 9 questions achieved broad agreement with an assigned LoE of 4 and a weak GRADE recommendation (question 2), three achieved an LoE of 3 with a weak GRADE recommendation (questions 3-5), three achieved an LoE of 3 with a strong GRADE recommendation (questions 6-8) and the remaining two were assigned an LoE of 2 with a strong GRADE recommendation (questions 9 and 10)., Conclusion:  These consensus-derived recommendations should aid clinical practice and highlight areas of further research for PoCUS in acute settings., Competing Interests: A number of authors have declared potential conflicts of interest from the past three years.Bøetker, M.T. [royalties received from e-learning platform USabcd.org];Connolly, J. [honoraria received from Sonosite FujiFilm UK, equipment loans from Canon Healthcare, Terason Ultrasound, EchoNous]; Gargani, L. [honoraria received from GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare & Caption Health]; Jarman, R.D. [honoraria received from Sonosite FujiFilm UK, equipment loans from Canon Healthcare];Kim, D. [medical advisor for Clarius Mobile Health]; Liu, R. [honoraria received from Philips Healthcare];Olusanya, O. [honoraria received from GE Healthcare & Sonosite FujiFilm UK];Peck, M. [honoraria received from GE Healthcare]., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Aims:  To evaluate the evidence and produce a summary and recommendations for the most common heart and lung applications of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS)., Methods:  We reviewed 10 clinical domains/questions related to common heart and lung applications of PoCUS. Following review of the evidence, a summary and recommendation were produced, including assignment of levels of evidence (LoE) and grading of the recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE). 38 international experts, the expert review group (ERG), were invited to review the evidence presented for each question. A level of agreement of over 75 % was required to progress to the next section. The ERG then reviewed and indicated their level of agreement regarding the summary and recommendation for each question (using a 5-point Likert scale), which was approved if a level of agreement of greater than 75 % was reached. A level of agreement was defined as a summary of "strongly agree" and "agree" on the Likert scale responses., Findings and Recommendations:  One question achieved a strong consensus for an assigned LoE of 3 and a weak GRADE recommendation (question 1). The remaining 9 questions achieved broad agreement with one assigned an LoE of 4 and weak GRADE recommendation (question 2), three achieving an LoE of 3 with a weak GRADE recommendation (questions 3-5), three achieved an LoE of 3 with a strong GRADE recommendation (questions 6-8), and the remaining two were assigned an LoE of 2 with a strong GRADE recommendation (questions 9 and 10)., Conclusion:  These consensus-derived recommendations should aid clinical practice and highlight areas of further research for PoCUS in acute settings., Competing Interests: A number of authors have declared potential conflicts of interest from the past three years:Bøetker, M.T. [royalties received from e-learning platform USabcd.org]; Connolly, J. [honoraria received from Sonosite FujiFilm UK, equipment loans from Canon Healthcare, Terason Ultrasound, EchoNous]; Gargani, L. [honoraria received from GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare & Caption Health]; Jarman, R.D. [honoraria received from Sonosite FujiFilm UK, equipment loans from Canon Healthcare]; Kim, D. [medical advisor for Clarius Mobile Health]; Liu, R. [honoraria received from Philips Healthcare]; Olusanya, O. [honoraria received from GE Healthcare & Sonosite FujiFilm UK]; Peck, M. [honoraria received from GE Healthcare]., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Pneumothorax is a common presentation to acute healthcare services in Ireland, however there is wide variation in management approaches between centres. There is robust evidence to demonstrate that ambulatory management of pneumothorax is feasible and safe. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the implementation of an integrated care pathway (ICP) for pneumothorax patients with a focus on ambulatory care would be economically beneficial for the healthcare system., Methods: This study developed, implemented and evaluated an ICP for all patients presenting with pneumothorax, with a specific focus on ambulatory management for suitable patients. The ICP was designed to be utilised in the Irish healthcare setting, and was evaluated using a prospective multi-centre observational study, with a rigorous economic analysis at the centre of study design., Main Findings: Implementation of the ICP resulted in a statistically significant reduction in inpatient length of stay of 2.84 days from 7.4 to 4.56 days (p = 0.001). The incremental per patient cost reduction of treating a patient according to the pneumothorax ICP was 2314 euro. There were no adverse events related to drain insertion at the study sites., Conclusions: This study demonstrates therefore that standardisation of care for pneumothorax patients with a focus on ambulatory management are economically beneficial for the publicly-funded healthcare service. It is envisaged that this work will be used to inform healthcare policy at a national level across Ireland., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Despite the fact that health information is now more accessible than ever, knowledge gaps remain between patients and healthcare providers (HCPs). To date, the patients' need for information following a diagnosis of oesophageal cancer has not been adequately met., Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify why knowledge gaps exist between oesophageal cancer patients and HCPs and how to address them., Methods: Purposive sampling of a group of people living with and after oesophageal cancer who had participated in a priority-setting partnership where 45% of questions from patients had existing evidence-based answers. A 7-set question series was developed for use in a patient/HCP focus group in addition to 11 individual phone interviews with survivors of oesophageal cancer. Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted to explore oesophageal cancer patients' access to information. The data was analysed thematically, which involved coding all patient transcripts before identifying and reviewing key themes., Results: The three primary themes that emerged were as follows: opportunity (HCP team factors and relationship development), ability (patient factors) and priority (pacing of information delivery)., Conclusion: Effective communication between patients and HCPs was identified as an integral component of the enhancement of patient knowledge. HCPs should continue to refine and improve methods of information delivery and encourage conversations regarding information preferences., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Rib fractures represent a substantial health burden. Chest injuries contribute to 25% of deaths after trauma and survivors can experience long-standing consequences, such as reduced functional capabilities and loss of employment. Over recent years, there has been an increase in the awareness of the importance of early identification, aggressive pain management and adequate safety netting for patients with chest injuries. Substandard management leads to increased rates of morbidity and mortality. The development of protocols in the emergency department (ED) for management of patients with chest wall injuries has demonstrated reduction of complication rates.Our aim was to develop an evidence-based, multidisciplinary chest injury pathway for the management of patients presenting with rib injury to our ED.Prior to implementation of the pathway in our department, only 39% of patients were documented as having received analgesia and only 7% of discharged patients had documented written verbal advice. There was no standardised method to perform regional anaesthetic blocks. Using quality improvement methods, we standardised imaging modality, risk stratification with a scoring system, analgesia with emphasis on regional anaesthesia blocks and disposition with information leaflets for those discharged.Implementation of the pathway increased rates of documented analgesia received from 39% to 70%. The number of regional anaesthetic blocks performed went from 0% to 60% and the number of patients receiving discharge advice went from 7% to 70%. Compliance of doctors and nurses with the pathway was 63%.Our previous audits showed substandard management of patients with chest injuries in our department. Through this quality improvement project, we were able to improve the quality of care provided to patients attending with rib fractures by increasing rate of analgesia received, regional blocks performed and discharge advice given., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Aim The fundamental concept of multidisciplinary education is a shared mental model that leads to better interdependent collaboration. The aim of this bootcamp was to create a sustainable induction curriculum for Anaesthesiology and Emergency Medicine trainees and nurses through training in a simulated multidisciplinary environment. Methods The two-day bootcamp consisted of lectures, equipment demonstration, workshops, and high-fidelity simulated scenarios. A pre- and post-course MCQ test was used for assessment of knowledge acquisition. Pre and post confidence scores were used to evaluate procedural skill confidence level. A 5-point Likert scale was used to evaluate qualitative feedback from participants. Results Seven anaesthesiology trainees, two anaesthetic nurses, six emergency medicine trainees and three emergency medicine nurses were enrolled. There was a statistically significant increase (p-value<0.01) in post-MCQ scores, portraying significant knowledge acquisition. The total procedural confidence scores increased from 375 (±9.15) to 550 (±8.43), (p < 0.01). All participants agreed that the stated educational objectives were met and relevant to their clinical practice, and strongly commended team training exercises. Conclusion Multidisciplinary simulation-based training improves team performance as well as transfer of knowledge across two or more disciplines. Overlapped training between Anaesthesiology and Emergency Medicine created an opportunity for sharing of educational resources in the current time-based speciality training system., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.