David M. Paterson, Karl L. Evans, Laura Harrison, Natalie Small, Tim Stojanovic, James McGinlay, Christopher J Short, Georgina E. Southon, Anna Jorgensen, Michael Christie, Marco Boeri, Isabelle Durance, David Fletcher, Reto Schmucki, Dario Masante, Laurence Jones, Ruth D. Waters, Jones, L [0000-0002-4379-9006], Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, BBSRC, NERC, University of St Andrews. School of Biology, University of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Institute, University of St Andrews. Coastal Resources Management Group, University of St Andrews. Sediment Ecology Research Group, University of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotland, University of St Andrews. School of Geography & Sustainable Development, and University of St Andrews. Geographies of Sustainability, Society, Inequalities and Possibilities
This work was supported by grants within the Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Sustainability (BESS) programme. BESS was a 6-year programme (2011–2017) funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) as part of the UK's Living with Environmental Change (LWEC) programme. Laurence Jones was supported by NERC grant ‘Location, Configuration, Distribution: the Role of Landscape Pattern and Diversity in Ecosystem Services' (NE/K015508/1). Other authors were supported by the following projects and grants: Fragments, Functions and Flows in Urban Ecosystem Services (F3UES) Project (NE/J015067/1), The DURESS project – Diversity of Upland Rivers for Ecosystem Service Sustainability (NE/J014818/1), Coastal Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Sustainability – CBESS (NE/J015644/1) and Wessex BESS (NE/J014680/1). 1. Cultural ecosystem services (CES), a key aspect of nature's contributions to people, remain a challenge to incorporate into decision making. One contributing factor is the difficulty of defining and describing these, due partly to: ongoing poor understanding of what drives people to interact with nature, a lack of appropriate data to quantify these interactions, and basic difficulties in measuring and modelling the complex array of social, psychological and behavioural attributes which help explain people's actions. 2. In this study we present a framework which develops the concepts of cultural capital, social capital and human capital as specific forms of human-centred capital, in the context of their contribution to understanding CES. Each form of capital encompasses separate attributes of beneficiaries. 3. Testing the framework with data from a separate trans-disciplinary study illustrated that the framework was readily applicable to specific situations. A measure of cultural capital, EcoCentrism, explained more variation than a suite of seven demographic variables. 4. Applying the framework also showed that despite using a wide range of explanatory variables, a large proportion of observed variation remained unaccounted for. This suggests that more work is needed to understand and to develop metrics which can measure additional factors which underlie peoples? motivations to engage with nature. The framework is applicable to other types of ecosystem service, and may also be useful for exploring relational values. Publisher PDF