Search

Ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) is a neuromuscular disease characterized by autoantibody production against post-synaptic proteins in the neuromuscular junction. The pathophysiological auto-immune mechanisms of myasthenia are diverse, and this is governed primarily by the type of autoantibody production. The diagnosis of OMG relies mainly on clinical assessment, the use of serological antibody assays for acetylcholine receptors (AchR), muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MusK), and low-density lipoprotein 4 (LPR4). Other autoantibodies against post-synaptic proteins, such as cortactin and agrin, have been detected; however, their diagnostic value and pathogenic effect are not yet clearly defined. Clinical tests such as the ice test and electrophysiologic tests, particularly single-fiber electromyography, have a valuable role in diagnosis. The treatment of OMG is primarily through cholinesterase inhibitors (pyridostigmine), and steroids are frequently required in cases of ophthalmoplegia. Other immunosuppressive therapies include antimetabolites (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate) and biological agents such as B-cell depleting agents (Rituximab) and complement inhibitors (eculizumab). Evidence is scarce on the effect of immunosuppressive therapy on altering the natural course of OMG. Clinicians must be vigilant of a myasthenic syndrome in patients using immune-check inhibitors. Reliable and consistent biomarkers are required to assess disease severity and response to therapy to optimize the management of OMG. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current trends and the latest developments in diagnosing and treating OMG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Since the onset of the novel coronavirus pandemic, several neurological complications secondary to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection have been reported, affecting central nervous system, peripheral nervous system and neuromuscular junction. Case report: We present the case of a 77‐year‐old man who developed bulbar myasthenia gravis (MG) eight weeks after SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. The search for serum antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor and the muscle‐specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK), performed by radioimmunoassay (RIA), and the search of low‐density lipoprotein receptor‐related protein 4 antibodies, performed by immunohistochemistry, resulted negative, while anti‐MuSK antibodies were detected by cell‐based assay (CBA). The patient was treated with pyridostigmine (60 mg four times a day) with unsatisfactory clinical response, followed by immunosuppressive therapy (azathioprine 1.5 mg/kg/day) with improvement of MG symptoms after two months of treatment. Discussion: Several viral diseases have been described as associated with the onset of MG, although the underlying mechanisms are not yet fully understood. Similarly, a growing number of scientific reports suggest a correlation between SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and autoimmune diseases. The interest of our case lies in the timing of the MG onset (after 2 months from infection), together with the unusual late onset of anti‐MuSK MG. These elements suggest that coronavirus infection may act as a trigger of the disease. We confirm the importance of CBA in the serological diagnosis of RIA‐negative MG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 37-year-old man with anti-muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (MG) presented with subacute progressive dysphagia and muscle weakness of the neck and bilateral upper extremities. Conventional immune-suppressive treatments and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin were ineffective. He then displayed repeated exacerbations and remissions over the course of two years, despite two to four sessions of plasma exchange (PE) every two months. The patient was successfully treated with outpatient periodic weekly blood purification therapy with alternative PE and double-filtration plasmapheresis using an internal shunt. This case report suggests the benefits of blood purification therapy with an internal shunt against anti-MuSK antibody-positive MG.