Search

CBX8 is the core component of the PCG family protein PRC1 complex. It is overexpressed in many solid tumors and plays an important role in the prognosis and biological behaviors of tumors such as occurrence, development, invasion, and metastasis. However, exploration of the role and molecular mechanism of CBX8 in tumors is still in its infancy. Our study found that the down-regulation of CBX8 expression by RNA interference induced differential expression of several microRNAs in human colon cancer cells. The 5 most differentially expressed miRNA precursors (pre-miRNA) (hsa-miR-363-3p, hsa-miR-378a-3p, hsa-miR-371b-3p, hsa-miR-361-3p, and hsa-miR-576-3p) share a common motif sequence: ARAAAKUGCMC. We selected miR-378a-3p and further revealed that the negative regulation of miRNA expression by CBX8 mainly occurs in the processing of pre-miRNA to mature miRNA. CBX8 uses its own RNA-binding domain to interact with pre-miRNA, and is dependent on its own nuclear localization characteristics to limit nucleoplasmic transport of pre-miRNA. Changing the characteristic sequence of pre-miRNA or mutating the RNA-binding domain and nuclear localization signal of CBX8 can effectively weaken the regulation of miR-378a-3p expression by CBX8. However, our experimental results showed that miR-378a-3p inhibited the malignant expression of human colon cancer cells by targeting PDIA4, resulting in increased activity of caspases-3 and -7. In summary, our study suggests that CBX8 acts as an independent RNA-binding protein to regulate miRNA expression. Simultaneously, this study shows the correlation between the CBX8/miR-378a-3p/PDIA4 pathway and the malignant biological properties of colorectal cancer, suggesting this proposed pathway as a possible therapeutic target for human cancers.

Glioma is the most common primary tumor in the central nervous system. However, the development of glioma and effective therapeutic strategies remain elusive. Here, we identify GPR17 as a potential target to treat glioma. Data mining with human LGG and GBM samples reveals that GPR17 is negatively correlated with glioma development. Overexpressing GPR17 inhibits glioma cell proliferation and induces apoptosis by raising ROS levels. GPR17-overexpressing glioma cells are less tumorigenic in the brain than in control cells. Mechanistically, GPR17 inhibits the transcription of RNF2, a key component in the PRC1 complex, through cAMP/PKA/NF-κB signaling, leading to reduced histone H2A monoubiquitination. ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq analyses reveal KLF9 as a direct target of RNF2. KLF9 mediates the functions of GPR17 and RNF2 in glioma cells. Furthermore, activation of GPR17 by its agonist inhibits glioma formation. Our findings have thus identified GPR17 as a key regulator of glioma development and a potential therapeutic target for gliomas.

The Polycomb group (PcG) protein chromobox 8 (CBX8) is the subunit of Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) and recognizes the trimethylation of histone H3 on Lysine 27 (H3K27me3), and coordinates with PRC2 complex to function as epigenetic gene silencer. CBX8 plays a key role in cell proliferation, stem cell biology, cell senescence, and cancer development. However, our knowledge of CBX8 post-translational modifications remains elusive. Here, we report that protein kinase D1 (PKD1) interacts and phosphorylates CBX8 at Ser256 and Ser311 in an evolutionarily conserved motif. We found that PKD1 activation triggered by serum stimulation, Nocodazole treatment and oncogene Ras-induced cell senescence (Ras OIS) all promotes CBX8 S256/311 phosphorylation. PKD1-mediated CBX8 S256/311 phosphorylation impairs PRC1 complex integrity by reducing the binding of CBX8 to other PRC1 components BMI1 and RING1B, decreases the monoubiquitination of histone H2AK119, and results in CBX8 dissociation from its target INK4a/ARF locus and the de-repression of p16, and thus ultimately facilitates cellular senescence. CBX8 S256/311 phosphorylation also compromises hepatocellular cancer cells proliferation and migration. Collectively, these results suggest that PKD1-mediated CBX8 S256/311 phosphorylation is a key mechanism governing CBX8 function, including cell senescence and cancer cell proliferation.Financial supportThis work was supported by grants from Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2018YFC2000102), and from National Natural Science Foundation of China (31871382 and 81571369).

Platinum resistance is a common occurrence in high-grade serous ovarian cancer and a major cause of ovarian cancer deaths. Platinum agents form DNA cross-links, which activate nucleotide excision repair (NER), Fanconi anemia, and homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathways. Chromatin modifications occur in the vicinity of DNA damage and play an integral role in the DNA damage response (DDR). Chromatin modifiers, including polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) members, and chromatin structure are frequently dysregulated in ovarian cancer and can potentially contribute to platinum resistance. However, the role of chromatin modifiers in the repair of platinum DNA damage in ovarian cancer is not well understood. We demonstrate that the PRC1 complex member RING1A mediates monoubiquitination of lysine 119 of phosphorylated H2AX (γH2AXub1) at sites of platinum DNA damage in ovarian cancer cells. After platinum treatment, our results reveal that NER and HRR both contribute to RING1A localization and γH2AX monoubiquitination. Importantly, replication protein A, involved in both NER and HRR, mediates RING1A localization to sites of damage. Furthermore, RING1A deficiency impairs the activation of the G2–M DNA damage checkpoint, reduces the ability of ovarian cancer cells to repair platinum DNA damage, and increases sensitivity to platinum. Implications: Elucidating the role of RING1A in the DDR to platinum agents will allow for the identification of therapeutic targets to improve the response of ovarian cancer to standard chemotherapy regimens.

Polycomb group proteins are essential regulators of developmental processes across animals. Despite their importance, studies on Polycomb are often restricted to classical model systems and, as such, little is known about the evolution of these important chromatin regulators. Here we focus on Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) and trace the evolution of core components of canonical and non-canonical PRC1 complexes in animals. Previous work suggested that a major expansion in the number of PRC1 complexes occurred in the vertebrate lineage. Here we show that the expansion of the PCGF protein family, an essential step for the establishment of the large diversity of PRC1 complexes found in vertebrates, predates the bilaterian-cnidarian ancestor. This means that the genetic repertoire necessary to form all major vertebrate PRC1 complexes emerged early in animal evolution, over 550 million years ago. We further show thatPCGF5, a gene conserved in cnidarians and vertebrates but lost in all other studied groups, is expressed in the nervous system in the sea anemoneNematostella vectensis, similar to its mammalian counterpart. Together this work provides an evolutionary framework to understand PRC1 complex diversity and evolution and establishesNematostellaas a promising model system in which this can be further explored.

Summary: Mutations and deletions of polycomb repressive complex (PRC) components are increasingly recognized to affect tumor biology in a range of cancers. However, little is known about how genetic alterations of PRC-interacting molecules such as the core binding factor (CBF) complex influence polycomb activity. We report that the acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-associated CBFβ-SMMHC fusion oncoprotein physically interacts with the PRC1 complex and that these factors co-localize across the AML genome in an apparently PRC2-independent manner. Depletion of CBFβ-SMMHC caused substantial increases in genome-wide PRC1 binding and marked changes in the association between PRC1 and the CBF DNA-binding subunit RUNX1. PRC1 was more likely to be associated with actively transcribed genes in CBFβ-SMMHC-expressing cells. CBFβ-SMMHC depletion had heterogeneous effects on gene expression, including significant reductions in transcription of ribosomal loci occupied by PRC1. Our results provide evidence that CBFβ-SMMHC markedly and diversely affects polycomb recruitment and transcriptional regulation across the AML genome. : Cordonnier et al. report a physical and functional interaction between the leukemia-associated fusion protein CBFβ-SMMHC and polycomb repressive complex (PRC) 1. Their findings provide evidence that cancer-associated alterations in molecules that normally interact with epigenetic factors can lead to subversion of transcriptional regulation in malignant cells. Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia, core binding factor, oncogene, polycomb, epigenetic regulation

Summary Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) plays essential roles in cell-fate determination. Recent studies have found that the composition of mammalian PRC1 is particularly varied and complex; however, little is known about the functional consequences of these variant PRC1 complexes on cell-fate determination. Here, we show that Kdm2b promotes Oct4-induced somatic reprogramming through recruitment of a variant PRC1 complex (PRC1.1) to CpG islands (CGIs). Furthermore, we find that bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) represses Oct4/Kdm2b-induced somatic reprogramming selectively. Mechanistically, BMP-SMAD pathway attenuates PRC1.1 occupation and H2AK119 ubiquitination at genes linked to development, resulting in the expression of mesendodermal factors such as Sox17 and a consequent suppression of somatic reprogramming. These observations reveal that PRC1.1 participates in the establishment of pluripotency and identify BMP4 signaling as a modulator of PRC1.1 function.

Polycomb group proteins (PcG) are transcriptional repressors that control cell identity and development. In mammals, five different CBX proteins associate with the core Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1). In mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs), CBX6 and CBX7 are the most highly expressed CBX family members. CBX7 has been recently characterized, but little is known regarding the function of CBX6. Here, we show that CBX6 is essential for ESC identity. Its depletion destabilizes the pluripotency network and triggers differentiation. Mechanistically, we find that CBX6 is physically and functionally associated to both canonical PRC1 (cPRC1) and non-canonical PRC1 (ncPRC1) complexes. Notably, in contrast to CBX7, CBX6 is recruited to chromatin independently of H3K27me3. Taken together, our findings reveal that CBX6 is an essential component of ESC biology that contributes to the structural and functional complexity of the PRC1 complex., In mammals, five different CBX proteins can be part of Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1). Here, the authors provide evidence that CBX6 plays an essential role in regulating pluripotency in embryonic stem cells and that CBX6 functions as part of both canonical and non-canonical PRC1 complexes.

Despite much progress in the comprehension of the complex process of somatic cell reprogramming, many questions regarding the molecular mechanism of regulation remain to be answered. At present, the knowledge on the negative regulation of reprogramming process is indeed poor in contrary to the identification of positive regulators. Here we report for the first time that ubiquitin-specific protease 26 negatively regulates somatic cell-reprogramming process by stabilizing chromobox (CBX)-containing proteins CBX4 and CBX6 of polycomb-repressive complex 1 through the removal of K48-linked polyubiquitination. Thus, accumulated CBX4 and CBX6 repress the expression of pluripotency genes, such as Sox2 and Nanog, through PRC1 complexes to ubiquitinate histone H2A at their promoters. In all, our findings have revealed an essential role for ubiquitin-specific protease 26 in cellular reprogramming through polycomb-repressive complex 1., The ubiquitin-proteasome system regulates cellular reprogramming by degradation of key pluripotency factors. Here the authors report that the post-translational regulation of PRC1 components CBX4 and CBX6 by ubiquitination influences reprogramming.

Polycomb steps to inactivate X XX females silence one of their X chromosomes. This involves a process whereby a noncoding RNA known as Xist coats one of the X chromosomes and recruits chromatin silencing factors. The Polycomb complexes PRC1 and PRC2 are also known to be involved in X chromosome inactivation. Almeida et al. elucidate a key role of a specific complex, PCGF3/5-PRC1, in initiating Polycomb recruitment by Xist RNA. They further demonstrate that Polycomb recruitment is critical for Xist-mediated chromosome silencing and female embryogenesis. Science , this issue p. 1081

The compositional complexity of Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) increased dramatically during vertebrate evolution. What is considered the "canonical" PRC1 complex consists of four subunits originally identified as regulators of body segmentation in Drosophila. In mammals, each of these four canonical subunits consists of two to six paralogs that associate in a combinatorial manner to produce over a hundred possible distinct PRC1 complexes with unknown function. Genetic studies have begun to define the phenotypic roles for different PRC1 paralogs; however, relating these phenotypes to unique biochemical and transcriptional function for the different paralogs has been challenging. In this review, we attempt to address how the compositional diversity of canonical PRC1 complexes relates to unique roles for individual PRC1 paralogs in transcriptional regulation. This review focuses primarily on PRC1 complex composition, genome targeting, and biochemical function.

Maintenance of cellular identity is a critical developmental process depending on the proper transmission of epigenetic information over cell generations. H3K27me3, controlled by the Polycomb group (PcG) proteins, represents such an epigenetic mark and is correlated to long-term and heritable gene silencing. However, H3K27me3 is also found at many inducible or cell cycle regulated genes, implicating an involvement in more dynamic processes. The chromodomain of Polycomb (Pc) binds the methyl moiety of H3K27 and anchors the PRC1 complex involved in nucleosome compaction. We adapted an Auxin-based degron system to deplete Pc during Drosophila development. The fast degradation of Pc results in the rapid removal of the H3K27me3 mark by the de-methylase Utx and in consequence in the rapid upregulation of Hox genes. This result shows that the chromodomain actively protects the methyl mark, inhibiting removal by Utx, hence, allowing for a much more dynamic regulation of PcG target genes.

Ring finger protein 1 (RING1) is a RING domain characterized protein belonging to the RING finger family. It is an E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase that mediated monoubiquitination of histone H2A and the core component of PRC1 complex, which is the repressive multiprotein complex of Polycomb group (PcG). Previous studies showed the important tumorigenic role of RING1 via promoting cell proliferation and the crucial function in maintaining transcriptional program stability during development. However, its mechanism for spinal cord injury (SCI) is still unknown. In our research, we established an acute SCI model in adult rats and studied the expression and function profiles of RING1. RING1 protein level detected by western blot peaked at day 3 after trauma and then decreased gradually. Immunohistochemistry showed the increase of RING1 expression displayed in the white matter more obviously than in the gray matter. Furthermore, increased co-expression of RING1 and GFAP confirmed activated astrocytes in injured spinal cord via double immunofluorescence staining. Meanwhile, we also found the co-localization of PCNA, a famous marker of proliferative cells, with RING1 and GFAP, which indicated RING1 might play a role in astrocyte proliferation after SCI. In vitro studies, RING1 protein level in C6 cells increased after LPS challenge and RING1 was required for astrocyte proliferation and activation induced by LPS. In summary, we took a new insight into the function of RING1 in the cellular and molecular mechanism underlying the pathophysiology of SCI.

Meiosis is a unique process that allows the generation of reproductive cells. It remains largely unknown how meiosis is initiated in germ cells and why non-germline cells do not undergo meiosis. We previously demonstrated that knockdown of Max expression, a gene encoding a partner of MYC family proteins, strongly activates expression of germ cell-related genes in ESCs. Here we find that complete ablation of Max expression in ESCs results in profound cytological changes reminiscent of cells undergoing meiotic cell division. Furthermore, our analyses uncovers that Max expression is transiently attenuated in germ cells undergoing meiosis in vivo and its forced reduction induces meiosis-like cytological changes in cultured germline stem cells. Mechanistically, Max depletion alterations are, in part, due to impairment of the function of an atypical PRC1 complex (PRC1.6), in which MAX is one of the components. Our data highlight MAX as a new regulator of meiotic onset., The mechanisms that trigger meiosis in germ cells and halt this process in non-germline cells are unclear. Here, the authors show that knockout of Max in embryonic stem cells results in meiotic onset in a mechanism that involves the PRC1 complex.

Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 3C (EBNA3C) is a well-defined repressor of host gene expression in B cells transformed by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) that cooperates with various cellular factors. It is established that EBNA3C interacts with the cellular factor RBPJ (RBP-Jκ or CBF1) through two distinct motifs: the TFGC motif, also called the homology domain (HD) motif, and the VWTP motif. In this study, we investigated the role of each motif in EBNA3C transcriptional repression activity by using two novel recombinant viruses with single RBPJ interaction motifs mutated (EBNA3C HDmut and EBNA3C W227S). Infection of primary B cells with either of these recombinant EBVs led to the successful establishment of lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs). Gene expression analysis showed that full repression of EBNA3C target genes is not achieved by EBNA3C HDmut compared to that with EBNA3C W227S or the EBNA3C wild type (WT). Focusing on the well-characterized EBNA3C-repressed genes COBLL1, ADAM28, and ADAMDEC1, we investigated the mechanism of EBNA3C-mediated transcriptional repression. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis indicated that EBNA3C HDmut is still able to recruit Polycomb proteins BMI1 and SUZ12 to COBLL1 as efficiently as EBNA3C WT does, leading to the full deposition of the repressive histone mark H3K27me3. However, we found that the activation-associated chromatin mark H3K4me3 is highly enriched at EBNA3C target genes in LCLs expressing EBNA3C HDmut. We show here that EBNA3C interacts with the histone lysine demethylase KDM2B and that this interaction is important for H3K4me3 removal and for the EBNA3C-mediated repression of COBLL1 and the ADAM28-ADAMDEC1 locus. IMPORTANCE EBV is a virus associated with human cancers and is well known for its ability to transform B lymphocytes into continuously proliferating lymphoblastoid cell lines. EBNA3C is considered an oncoprotein and has been shown to be essential for B cell transformation by EBV. EBNA3C is well characterized as a viral transcription factor, but very little is known about its mechanisms of action. In the present study, we demonstrate that removal of the activating histone mark H3K4me3 and deposition of the repressive mark H3K27me3 by EBNA3C on COBLL1 are achieved by at least two distinct mechanisms. Furthermore, we discovered that EBNA3C interacts with the lysine demethylase KDM2B and that this interaction is important for its transcriptional repressive function. The findings in this study provide new insights into the mechanism used by the oncoprotein EBNA3C to repress cellular target genes.

Polycomb group proteins play essential roles in transcriptional gene repression during both animal and plant development. Polycomb repression complex 1 (PRC1) is one of the key functional modules in polycomb group silencing. It acts as both a reader of H3K27me3 (histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation) and a writer of H2Aub1 (histone H2A monoubiquitination) in establishing stable repression chromatin state. Intriguingly, a recent study showed that Arabidopsis PRC1 contains the H3K4me3-binding proteins of the ALFIN-like (AL) family, pointing to a chromatin state switch from active to repressive transcription of embryonic genes required for vegetative plant development. However, molecular and structural basis of AL–PRC1 complexes are lacking, which harmed insightful mechanistic understanding of AL–PRC1 complex function. In the present study, we report the crystal structures of the PAL domain (DUF3594 domain) of AL2 and AL7 proteins as well as their mechanistic binding to the PRC1 ring-finger proteins (RING1 and BMI1). We found that the PAL domain exists as a homodimer and represents a novel protein fold. We further determined the crystal structures of the PAL domain of AL2 (AL2-PAL) in complex with AtRING1a and AtBMI1b, the two core components of Arabidopsis PRC1. Interestingly, two PAL-binding sites were found on AtRING1a. Each of them can bind AL but with different affinities and distinct structural bases. Based on our results, we propose a mechanistic model to understand how AL proteins target PRC1 to active chromatin to undergo the transition from H3K4me3 to H2Aub1/H3K27me3 in establishing gene silencing.

UbE2E1/UbcH6 is an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme that is regulated by USP7. We identified UbE2E1 as a novel component of Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1), the E3 ligase complex responsible for histone H2A ubiquitination and gene silencing. We demonstrate that UbE2E1 is critical for the monoubiquitination of H2A at residue Lys-119 (uH2AK119) through its association with the PRC1 complex. UbE2E1 interacts with PRC1 subunits including Ring1A and Ring1B. Overexpression of UbE2E1 results in increased levels of uH2AK119, whereas overexpression of catalytically inactive UbE2E1_C131A or UbE2E1 knockdown results in decreased levels of uH2AK119. The down-regulation of H2A ubiquitination by loss of function of UbE2E1 is correlated with alleviated p16INK4a promoter repression and induced growth inhibition in HCT116 cells. These results are specific to UbE2E1 as knockdown of UbE2D E2s does not show any effect on uH2AK119. We extended the UbE2E1 regulation of uH2AK119 to USP7 and showed that USP7 is also a key regulator for monoubiquitination at H2A Lys-119 as both knockdown and deletion of USP7 results in decreased levels of uH2AK119. This study reveals that UbE2E1 is an in vivo E2 for the PRC1 ligase complex and thus plays an important role in the regulation of H2A Lys-119 monoubiquitination.

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are epigenetic repressors that are essential for cell differentiation and development. The Pc protein is a key member of the PcG family and a core component of the Polycomb repressive complex PRC1. In Drosophila, the chromodomain of Pc specifically recognizes the gene silencing mark trimethylated lysine 27 of histone H3 generated by the PRC2 complex, thus delivering the PRC1 complex to targeted chromatin sites. The mammalian Pc homologs, however, bind differentially to methylated histone H3. In addition, other mechanisms may also contribute to the chromatin targeting of Pc and its associated complexes. Here we summarize the current knowledge of the Pc chromodomain and discuss its role as a histone methylation reader from a structural point of view. The cross talk between lysine methylation and other posttranslational modifications on histones and other putative nonhistone targets of Pc protein is also discussed. Recent advancement in the chemical probe development against the chromodomain is also reviewed.

The Polycomb group (PcG) proteins have an important role in controlling the expression of key genes implicated in embryonic development, differentiation, and decision of cell fates. Emerging evidence suggests that Polycomb repressive complexes 1 (PRC1) is defined by the six Polycomb group RING finger protein (Pcgf) paralogs, and Pcgf proteins can assemble into noncanonical PRC1 complexes. However, little is known about the precise mechanisms of differently composed noncanonical PRC1 in the maintenance of the pluripotent cell state. Here we disrupt the Pcgf genes in mouse embryonic stem cells by CRISPR-Cas9 and find Pcgf6 null embryonic stem cells display severe defects in self-renewal and differentiation. Furthermore, Pcgf6 regulates genes mostly involved in differentiation and spermatogenesis by assembling a noncanonical PRC1 complex PRC1.6. Notably, Pcgf6 deletion causes a dramatic decrease in PRC1.6 binding to target genes and no loss of H2AK119ub1. Thus, Pcgf6 is essential for recruitment of PRC1.6 to chromatin. Our results reveal a previously uncharacterized, H2AK119ub1-independent chromatin assembly associated with PRC1.6 complex.

Introduction: PcG proteins form two main multiprotein complexes, Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) and PRC2. They repress the transcription of target genes. Polycomb group ring finger protein1 (PCGF1) is a component of PRC1.1, a non-canonical PRC1.1 that monoubiquitylates H2A at lysine 119 in a manner independent of H3K27me3. Several groups including ours showed that the loss of Ezh2, a component of PRC2, promotes the development of JAK2 V617F-induced Myelofibrosis (MF) in mice. However, the role of PRC1.1 in hematologic malignancies is still not fully understood. We found that the deletion of PCGF1 in mice promotes myeloid commitment of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), and eventually induces a lethal myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-like disease in mice (Nakajima-Takagi Y, unpublished data). Based on these findings, we investigated the role of PCGF1 in a mouse model of JAK2V617F-induced myelofibrosis. Methods: We transplanted BM cells from Cre-ERT2, PCGF1flox/flox;Cre-ERT2, JAK2V617F;Cre-ERT2, and JAK2V617F;PCGF1flox/flox;Cre-ERT2 mice into lethally irradiated recipient mice. We deleted PCGF1 by tamoxifen administration 4 weeks after transplantation. Results: JAK2/PCGF1 KO mice developed lethal MF significantly earlier than the other genotypes (p Conclusions: Our findings suggest that dysregulated PRC1.1 function promotes JAK2V617F-induced MF with mechanisms distinct from MF associated with PRC2 dysfunction. Disclosures Harada: Celgene: Research Funding.

PCGF1 encodes one of six human Polycomb RING finger homologs that are linked to transcriptional repression and developmental gene regulation. Individual PCGF proteins define discrete Polycomb Repressor Complex 1 (PRC1) multi-protein complexes with diverse subunit composition whose functions are incompletely understood. PCGF1 is a component of a variant PRC1 complex that also contains the BCL6 co-repressor BCOR and the histone demethylase KDM2B. To further investigate the role of PCGF1, we mapped the physical interactions of the protein under endogenous conditions in a cell model of neuronal differentiation. Using stringent statistical cut-offs, 83 highly enriched interacting proteins were identified, including all previously reported members of the variant PRC1 complex containing PCGF1, as well as proteins linked to diverse cellular pathways such as chromatin and cell cycle regulation. Notably, a sub-network of proteins associated with the establishment and maintenance of pluripotency (NANOG, OCT4, PATZ1 and the developmental regulator DPPA4) were found to independently interact with PCGF1 in a subsequent round of physical interaction mapping experiments. Furthermore, knockdown of PCGF1 results in reduced expression of DPPA4 and other subunits of the variant PRC1 complex at both mRNA and protein levels. Thus, PCGF1 represents a physical and functional link between Polycomb function and pluripotency.

Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) plays an essential role in the epigenetic repression of gene expression during development and cellular differentiation via multiple effector mechanisms, including ubiquitination of H2A and chromatin compaction. However, whether it regulates the stepwise progression of adipogenesis is unknown. Here, we show that FBXL10/KDM2B is an anti-adipogenic factor that is up-regulated during the early phase of 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation and in adipose tissue in a diet-induced model of obesity. Interestingly, inhibition of adipogenesis does not require the JmjC demethylase domain of FBXL10, but it does require the F-box and leucine-rich repeat domains, which we show recruit a noncanonical polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) containing RING1B, SKP1, PCGF1, and BCOR. Knockdown of either RING1B or SKP1 prevented FBXL10-mediated repression of 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation indicating that PRC1 formation mediates the inhibitory effect of FBXL10 on adipogenesis. Using ChIP-seq, we show that FBXL10 recruits RING1B to key specific genomic loci surrounding the key cell cycle and the adipogenic genes Cdk1, Uhrf1, Pparg1, and Pparg2 to repress adipogenesis. These results suggest that FBXL10 represses adipogenesis by targeting a noncanonical PRC1 complex to repress key genes (e.g. Pparg) that control conversion of pluripotent cells into the adipogenic lineage.

The three-dimensional organization of the genome has an important role in orchestrating gene expression, but its regulation is poorly understood. Now, a new study uncovers a major role for Polycomb components of the PRC1 complex in organizing physical networks of genes that are co-repressed to maintain pluripotency.